Abstract
Stripe rust, caused by Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici (Pst), is one of the most destructive diseases of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) worldwide. Xiaoyan 78829, a partial amphidiploid developed by crossing common wheat with Thinopyrum intermedium, is immune to wheat stripe rust. To transfer the resistance gene of this excellent germplasm resource to wheat, the translocation line WTT11 was produced by pollen irradiation and assessed for immunity to stripe rust races CYR32, CYR33 and CYR34. A novel stripe rust-resistance locus derived from Th. intermedium was confirmed by linkage and diagnostic marker analyses. Molecular cytogenetic analyses revealed that WTT11 carries a TTh·2DL translocation. The breakpoint of 1B was located at 95.5 MB, and the alien segments were found to be homoeologous to wheat-group chromosomes 6 and 7 according to a wheat660K single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array analysis. Ten previously developed PCR-based markers were confirmed to rapidly trace the alien segments of WTT11, and 20 kompetitive allele-specific PCR (KASP) markers were developed to enable genotyping of Th. intermedium and common wheat. Evaluation of agronomic traits in two consecutive crop seasons uncovered some favorable agronomic traits in WTT11, such as lower plant height and longer main panicles, that may be applicable to wheat improvement. As a novel genetic resource, the new resistance locus may be useful for wheat disease-resistance breeding.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Wheat stripe rust, caused by Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici (Pst), is one of the factors limiting wheat production in most wheat-growing regions subject to cool and moist weather conditions (Chen et al. 2014). Historically, the breeding of resistant varieties has been considered to be an economical and environmentally friendly method to control stripe rust. Although more than 80 stripe rust-resistance genes have been identified and cataloged to date, only a few have been researched in depth (Zhang et al. 2019a). For example, Yr5, Yr7 and YrSP are located on wheat chromosome 2B and encode nucleotide-binding and leucine-rich repeat proteins (NLRs) possessing a non-canonical N-terminal zinc-finger BED domain (Marchal et al. 2018). Yr15, mapped onto chromosome 1B, encodes a putative kinase-pseudokinase protein (Klymiuk et al. 2018). Yr36, discovered in wild emmer wheat, includes kinase and putative START lipid-binding domains (Fu et al. 2009). Yr18/Lr34 on wheat chromosome 7D encodes adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette (ABC) transporters (Krattinger et al. 2009). Yr46/Lr67, which has been mapped onto wheat chromosome 4D, encodes a predicted hexose transporter, and YrAS2388, derived from Aegilops tauschii, encodes a typical nucleotide oligomerization domain-like receptor (NLR) (Moore et al. 2015; Zhang et al. 2019a). YrU1 is derived from the diploid wheat Triticum urartu and encodes a coiled-coil-NBS-leucine-rich repeat protein with N-terminal ankyrin-repeat and C-terminal WRKY domains (Wang et al. 2020a). Despite current research progress, the stripe rust pathogen mutates faster than the breeding of disease-resistant varieties and is thus a threat to future world food security (Li 2010). As an example, CYR34 (V26), a new pathogenic race of Pst virulent to Yr24/Yr26 and Yr36, was first documented in 2008 (Zeng et al. 2015; McIntosh et al. 2018). The percentage of wheat stripe rust infections attributed to CYR34 increased sharply, from 0 to 34.85%, during 2009–2016, and CYR34 is now a predominant strain in Gansu Province, China (Huang et al. 2018). Therefore, the exploration of new resistant germplasm resources and the application of their resistance genes in wheat genetic improvement is thus crucial.
Secondary and tertiary gene pools of common wheat constitute a large reservoir of potentially valuable genes for enriching wheat genetic diversity (Bommineni and Jauhar 1997). A total of 18 stripe rust-resistance genes have been currently documented in these two gene pools: Yr8, Yr17, Yr19, Yr28, Yr37, Yr38, Yr40, Yr42 and Yr70 from Aegilops (Riley et al. 1968; Bariana and McIntosh 1993; Chen et al. 1995; Singh et al. 2000; Marais et al. 2005a, 2006, 2009; Kuraparthy et al. 2007; Bansal et al. 2016); Yr7, Yr24 and Yr53 from Triticum durum (Macer 1963; McIntosh and Lagudah 2000; Xu et al. 2013); Yr15, Yr35 and Yr36 from Triticum dicoccoides (McIntosh et al. 1996; Marais et al. 2005b; Chicaiza et al. 2006); Yr9 and Yr83 from Secale cereal (Zeller 1973; Li et al. 2020); and Yr50 putatively derived from Thinopyrum intermedium (Host) Barkworth and D. R. Dewey [syn. = Agropyron intermedium (Host) Beauvoir = Elytrigia intermedia (Host) Nevski] (Liu et al. 2013). Th. intermedium (2n = 6x = 42) possesses many favorable features, including genes conferring resistance against wheat streak mosaic virus, rust, powdery mildew and scab (Friebe et al. 1996; Han et al. 2003; Fedak and Han, 2005; Qi et al. 2007; He et al. 2009; Luo et al. 2009). Since Th. intermedium is immune to stripe rust, it can be widely applied for wheat-resistance improvement (Bao et al. 2014).
As important intermediates produced by the backcrossing of common wheat with wheat–relative hybrids, partial amphiploids generally carry the complete wheat genome in addition to a set of alien chromosomes (Fedak et al. 2000). The wheat–Th. intermedium partial amphiploids Zhong 1–7, TAF46, TAI7047, TAI8335, TE253-I, TE257, TE346 and Xiaoyan 78829 have been successively created (Qi et al. 1979; Banks et al. 1993; Zhang et al. 1996; Fedak et al. 2000; Chang et al. 2010; Bao et al. 2014). Among them, Zhong 2, Zhong 4, Zhong 5, TAI7047, TAI8335, Xiaoyan 78829, TAF46, TE253-I, TE257 and TE346 are immune or highly resistant to stripe rust. Using partial amphiploids as intermediate parents is of both theoretical and practical significance in wheat chromosome engineering breeding. The wheat–Th. intermedium substitution line W44 and translocation lines such as Z4, CH13-21, CH4131 and CH4132 with good stripe rust resistance have been developed by crossing wheat–Th. intermedium partial amphiploids with common wheat. The resistance of all these new materials is believed to be derived from Th. intermedium (Friebe et al. 1992; Larkin et al. 1995; Zhan et al. 2015; Zheng et al. 2020). Among these lines, W44 has been determined to be a 7Ai-2(7D) substitution line by C-banding and is nearly immune to stripe rust. Z4, which has a stable chromosome number of 44 and has displayed effective stripe rust resistance for over 40 years, contains two pairs of non-Robertsonian translocations—TrI and TrII—and lacks wheat chromosome 3A. Evaluation of the stripe rust resistance of Z4 and its derived progenies confirmed adult plant resistance (APR) to stripe rust comes from TrII (Lang et al. 2018). CH13-21 is derived from a cross between the wheat–Th. intermedium partial amphiploid TAI7047 and the common wheat line Mianyang 11. Genomic in situ hybridization (GISH), multi-color fluorescence in situ hybridization (mc-FISH) and multi-color GISH (mc-GISH) have demonstrated that CH13-21 contains 40 wheat chromosomes and a pair of T6BS.6Ai#1L compensating Robertsonian translocation chromosomes. At adult plant stage, CH13-21 is highly resistant to Pst races CYR30, CYR32 and CYR33. Two wheat–Th. intermedium translocation lines CH4131 and CH4132 were screened with highly resistance to Pst races at adult plant stage, whose translocated chromosome configuration was T3Ai-1BS.1BL. Its alien chromosome segments belonged to group 3 chromatin using sequence characterized amplified region (SCAR) and intron targeting (IT) markers’ analyses.
In a previous, unpublished study, we found that Xiaoyan 78829 is nearly immune to Pst races. Our research group has since been focused on the development of more wheat–Th. intermedium translocation lines with good agronomic traits as well as disease resistance. In the present study, we developed a novel translocation line, WTT11, with excellent stripe rust resistance and agronomic traits. The aims of this study were to (1) characterize the translocation line WTT11 using cytogenetic methods and a wheat660K single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array; (2) validate the resistance of alien segments to Pst race CYR34 by linkage and diagnostic marker analyses; (3) develop PCR-based markers located on the alien chromosome fragments; (4) develop kompetitive allele-specific PCR (KASP) markers enable genotyping of Th. intermedium and common wheat and (5) evaluate the agronomic performance of WTT11 during two consecutive growing seasons. WTT11 broadens the wheat-resistance gene pool and can be used as a novel germplasm resource for wheat-resistance breeding.
Materials and methods
Plant materials and Pst race
WTT11 is a wheat–Th. intermedium BC4F6 translocation line with the pedigree Xiaoyan 81*5/3/Lumai 21//Xiaoyan 343/Xiaoyan 78829 (Fig. 1). First, Xiaoyan 343 (AABBDD, 2n = 6x = 42) was hand pollinated with pollen of Xiaoyan 78829 (AABBDDEE, 2n = 8x = 56) to produce F1 interspecific hybrids. The 60Co γ-ray-irradiated pollens of F1 interspecific hybrids were pollinated to elite common wheat cultivar Lumai 21. Selected translocation lines were then backcrossed five times with the recurrent parent Xiaoyan 81. Finally, homozygous translocation lines were selected from self-bred seeds. Seedling disease assessment was carried out on BC4F4 plants. Totally, 121 BC2F1 individuals from population Y11 (2) (Yannong 19*3/WTT11) were used for linkage analysis. Nineteen Th. intermedium accessions provided by the USDA-ARS Western Regional Plant Introduction Station, Pullman, WA, USA, were used for wheat660K SNP array analysis and KASP marker development and are detailed in Table S1. All materials are preserved in the laboratory of Zhensheng Li, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology (IGDB), Innovative Academy of Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing, China. The Pst race CYR32, CYR33 and CYR34 was provided by the stripe rust assessment platform of the IGDB, CAS.
Chromosome preparation
Chromosome spreads were prepared according to Han et al. (2006) with minor modifications. In brief, three seeds of each line were germinated on moist filter paper in a 23 °C incubator for 2 days. Root tips with a length of 1–2 cm were collected, pretreated with N2O under 10 atm pressure for 2 h, fixed in 90% acetic acid for 8 min and then immediately digested with cellulase and pectinase. The meristem of root tips was mashed and diluted with 100% acetic acid. Finally, 10 μL of this mixture was dropped onto the center of a slide. Slides with good mitotic phases were used in subsequent analyses. Chromosome spreads were prepared according to the above procedure from each BC2F1 individual from Y11 (2) population.
GISH, mc-FISH and mc-GISH analyses
GISH, mc-FISH and mc-GISH were performed following the procedures of Han et al. (2009) with some modification. For the GISH analysis, Th. intermedium genomic DNA (gDNA) labeled with fluorescein-12-dUTP (green) served as a probe, while Chinese Spring gDNA was used as a block. The ratio of probe to block was 1:200. The two probes used for mc-FISH, pAs1 and pSc119.2, were labeled with Texas-red-5-dCTP (red) and fluorescein-12-dUTP (green), respectively. For mc-GISH, fluorescein-12-dUTP (green)-labeled Th. intermedium and T. urartu gDNAs and Texas-red-5-dCTP (red)-labeled Ae. tauschii gDNA were used as probes, and Ae. speltoides gDNA was used as a block. The mc-GISH analysis was used to identify A-, B-, D- and Th. intermedium genomes. After hybridization, slides were washed in 2 × Saline Sodium Citrate and then counterstained with 4, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole. Cells with clear hybridization signals were photographed with a DP80 CCD camera attached to an Olympus BX53 microscope and analyzed using the program CellSens Standard 1.12 (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
Stripe rust-resistance evaluation
When first leaves were fully expanded, 10 individuals of WTT11 and its parents were inoculated with a mix of urediniospores and talc. The inoculated seedlings were subsequently kept in a dew and darkness chamber at 10 °C for 24 h and then transferred to a greenhouse under 70% relative humidity and 14 h of light at 16 °C and 10 h of darkness at 14 °C. When the susceptible controls were heavily infected, 2 weeks after inoculation, plant infection types (ITs) were recorded on a 0–4 scale, where 0 and 0; represent immunity and near immunity, respectively, and 1–4 represent progressively higher susceptibility, as evidenced by increasing sporulation and decreasing necrosis or chlorosis. Plants with IT scores of 0–2 were regarded as resistant, whereas those with scores of 3–4 were considered susceptible (Kang et al. 2017). The recurrent parents Xiaoyan 81 and Yannong 19 were used as susceptible control cultivars, and 121 individuals from the Y11 (2) population were also tested for seedling resistance.
Molecular marker analysis
To confirm whether WTT11 contained any known resistance genes in Th. intermedium, two simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers including Xbarc1096 for detecting Yr50 (Liu et al. 2013), Xbarc187-1B-1 for YrL693 (Huang et al. 2014) and one SCAR marker D05-A4-1 for YrCH-1BS (Zheng et al. 2020) were amplified in WTT11 and its parents. The sequence information and annealing temperatures of these markers are listed in Table S2. The PCR amplification volume contained of 12.5-μL 2 × Taq PCR Master Mix (CoWin Biosciences, Beijing, China), 1 μL of DNA template (100 ng/μL), 1 μL of each primer (10 μM) and 9.5 μL of ddH2O. The PCR cycling protocols were as follows: one cycle at 94 °C for 3 min for denaturation; 30 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 48–54 °C (depending on annealing temperature for each primer) for 30 s, 72 °C for 30 s; one cycle at 72 °C for 5 min for final extension. The PCR amplification products were separated in a 2% agarose gel and photographed with the Tanon 1600 Gel Image System (Tanon, Shanghai, China).
Wheat660K SNP array analysis
To explore deletion events and homoeology between alien segments and wheat chromosomes, extracted gDNAs of WTT11 and three replicates of Xiaoyan 81 and Th. intermedium (PI401208) were genotyped using the 660 K wheat Affymetrix Axiom SNP array following the standard procedure of the CapitalBio Technology Company (Beijing, China). SNPs were classified according to performance metrics, such as call rate and number of minor alleles, into six categories: Poly High Resolution, No Minor Homozygote, Mono High Resolution, Call Rate Below Threshold, Off-Target Variant and Other. All SNPs with unique physical positions on the WTT11 genome were collected to analyze deletion events. The deletion rate for each chromosome of WTT11 was calculated in 3-MB sliding windows, with 1-MB steps. Except for marker-deficient regions, those regions in which the deletion ratio was statistically higher than the average value for a given chromosome were considered to have experienced deletion events. Genotypes of wheat chromosomes of WTT11 should theoretically have been similar to those of Xiaoyan 81, as WTT11 was backcrossed to Xiaoyan 81 five times and then selfed six times, whereas alien DNA sequences of WTT11, being derived from the wheatgrass chromosomes in Xiaoyan 78829, was expected to be consistent with Th. intermedium genomic sequences. SNPs showing homozygosity and pleomorphism between Xiaoyan 81 and Th. intermedium, especially those belonging to Poly High Resolution and No Minor Homozygote categories, were used to analyze the homoeology of alien segments and wheat chromosomes. The ratio of heterozygous SNPs of WTT11 originating from Th. intermedium and Xiaoyan 81 were counted in 50-MB sliding windows, with 1-MB steps. The alien segments of WTT11 were homoeologous to the proportion of wheat chromosomes with highest heterozygosity.
Verification of specific markers
Using specific-locus amplified fragment (SLAF) sequencing technology, 10 previously developed PCR-based markers (M-XNXY68-4, M-XNXY68-33, M-XNXY68-41, M-XNXY68-50, M-XNXY68-86, M-XNXY68-100, M-XNXY68-151, M-XNXY68-353, M-XNXY68-361, and M-XNXY68-390) were confirmed to be specifically amplified in DT11 (denominated as WTT11) and Th. intermedium (Yang et al. 2019). Total gDNA of 121 individuals of BC2F1 population Y11 (2) were extracted using the sodium N-dodecanoylsalcosinate method. The 10 markers were PCR amplified in the Y11 (2) population in reaction volumes consisting of 17-μL Green Mix (Tsingke Biological Technology, Beijing, China), 1 μL of template DNA (100 ng/μL) and 1 μL of each primer (10 μM). The PCR cycling protocol was as follows: an initial step of 98 °C for 2 min, followed by 35 cycles of 98° C for 10 s, 50–60 °C (i.e., the appropriate annealing temperature for each marker) for 15 s, and 72 °C for 10 s, with a final extension of 72 °C for 5 min.
Development and validation of KASP markers
Some SNPs on the Axiom Wheat-Relative Genotyping Array were recently converted to KASP markers (Grewal et al. 2020a). To develop KASP markers in this study, a slightly modified method was used. All flanking sequences of specific SNPs on the 660 K wheat Affymetrix Axiom SNP array from WTT11 alien segments were used in a BLASTN search against the wheat reference sequence (IWGSC RefSeq v1.0; IWGSC et al. 2018). Only sequences with a single BLAST hit to a contig were retained. KASP markers based on the 120-bp sequence surrounding the target SNP were then designed using online software (https://galaxy.triticeaetoolbox.org/).
To validate the specificity and stability of the developed KASP markers, we genotyped 19 accessions of Th. intermedium and 6 wheat cultivars (Xiaoyan 343, Lumai 21, Xiaoyan 81, Yannong 19, Jimai 22 and Chinese Spring). KASP marker amplifications were performed in 10-μL reaction volumes consisting of 5 μL of 2 × KASP master mix, 0.14-μL primer assay mix, 1-μL template DNA (50 ng/μL) and 3.86-μL ddH2O on an ABI StepOnePlus instrument. PCR cycling conditions were as follows: an initial step of 94 °C for 15 min and 94 °C for 20 s, followed by 10 touchdown cycles of 61–55 °C (decreasing 0.6 °C per cycle) and then 26 cycles of 94 °C for 20 s and 55 °C for 1 min. Additional cycling, which consisted of 94 °C for 20 s and 57 °C for 1 min (three cycles per step), was performed until tight genotyping clusters were obtained. The genotyping data were analyzed using StepOne v2.3.
Agronomic trait evaluation
During consecutive growing seasons in 2017–2019, WTT11 and its recurrent parent Xiaoyan 81 were grown in triplicate in plots at the Xinxiang Experiment Station, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (113.5° E, 35.2° N). In each plot, 20 seeds were sown per 2.0-m row, with an inter-row spacing of 0.2 m. At physiological maturity, five whole plants from the center of the middle row were investigated for the following agronomic traits: plant height, effective tiller number, main panicle length, kernel number per main spike, thousand-kernel weight, and yield per plant. Excel and SPSS (v19.0) were used for statistical analyses.
Results
WTT11 carried a TTh·2DL translocation
GISH analysis revealed that WTT11 carries 42 wheat chromosomes and two wheat–Th. intermedium whole-arm translocation chromosomes (Fig. 2A). In the mc-FISH analysis of translocation chromosomes, faint pAs1 signals were detected on the alien segments, and three pairs of strong punctate pAs1 signals were observed on the wheat fragments. One pair of strong punctate pAs1 signals appeared in the terminal regions of chromosome 2D. These results indicate that the long arm of chromosome 2D had broken and that the smaller segment had combined with the alien segment. The presence of the pAs1 and pSc119.2 signals demonstrate that WTT11 underwent a TTh·2DL translocation event (Fig. 2B). A mc-GISH analysis, which allowed A-, B-, D- and Th. intermedium genomes to be labeled with yellow, blown, red and green fluorescence, respectively, was performed to explore the genomic constitution of WTT11. This analysis revealed that WTT11 had 40 wheat chromosomes including 12, 14 and 14 from A, B and D genomes, respectively, plus one pair of interspecific translocation chromosomes and A–B translocation chromosomes. Similar to the Chinese Spring signal pattern, two small B-genome segments were found to be translocated in the terminals of 4AL (Fig. 2C).
WTT11 was immune to stripe rust at seedling stage
Wheat cultivar Xiaoyan 81 was used as susceptible control and WTT11 was identified to immune to Pst races CYR32, CYR33 and CYR34 (Fig. 3A). Then, Pst race CYR34 was used to evaluate ITs of seedlings of the WTT11 translocation line and its parents. As shown in Fig. 3B, Xiaoyan 81 was susceptible to Pst race CYR34 (IT = 3). In contrast, WTT11 and its parents Xiaoyan 78829 and Xiaoyan 343 were nearly immune (IT = 0;), and Lumai 21 was highly resistant to CYR34 (IT = 1). To shed light on the origin of the stripe rust-resistance gene, we, therefore, performed backcrossing to transfer the alien segment from WTT11 into the CYR34-susceptible cultivar Yannong 19. A total of 121 individuals from the Y11 (2) population were screened by cytogenetic analyses and evaluation of strip rust resistance. A single alien segment signal was detected in 42 plants but was absent in the remaining 79. Analysis of resistance revealed that the 42 translocation individuals were immune (IT = 0), just like the resistant control WTT11, whereas the plants without the alien signal were as susceptible to infection (ITs = 3 or 4) (Fig. 3C; Table 1).
WTT11 might contain a novel stripe rust-resistance gene
Three reported diagnostic markers of Th. intermedium were used to amplify the genome of WTT11 and its parents. The amplification results are shown in Fig. S1. For Xbarc1096, the same DNA bands in WTT11 and its wheat parents were amplified, while no DNA bands in Th. intermedium were amplified, indicating WTT11 lacks Yr50. For Xbarc187-1B-1, linked with YrL693, the amplified products of WTT11 were different from those of Th. intermedium, implying WTT11 lacks YrL693 as well. In addition, the SCAR marker D05-A4-1 could amplify specific DNA band in Th. intermedium, but not in WTT11, indicating WTT11 does not contain YrCH-1BS.
Deletion and homoeologous relationship were revealed
Wheat660K SNP array analyses of WTT11, Xiaoyan 81 and Th. intermedium were carried out following a standard procedure. Out of 660,009 markers on the SNP array, 645,395 located at unique physical positions were selected to reveal deletion events in WTT11. Among them, 9,724 SNPs, excluding those undetected in three replicates of Xiaoyan 81, were absent in WTT11. As indicated by the distribution of SNP deletion ratios, the terminal region of chromosome arm 1BS was involved in a deletion event, and the breakpoint was detected at 95.5 MB (Fig. 4A). A count of missing SNPs on chromosome arm 1BS revealed that 1,489 SNPs were absent from chromosome arm 1BS, including 1,286 (86.37%) formerly present within the 0–95.5-MB region (Fig. 4B).
To explore the homoeologous relationships of alien chromosomes in WTT11, we examined heterozygous genotypes while taking into account the results of the cytogenetic analyses. A total of 299 SNPs that were not only heterozygous but also consistent with the genotypes of both Th. intermedium and Xiaoyan 81 were selected and counted in 50-MB sliding windows at 1-MB intervals. As shown in Fig. 5, heterozygous SNPs were mainly distributed on chromosomes 6B, 6D, 7A, 7B and 7D, thus indicating that the alien segments were homoeologous to wheat-group chromosomes 6 and 7.
Ten specific markers could trace alien chromosome segments of WTT11 effectively
Ten specific markers for WTT11 were amplified in the 121 individuals from Y11 (2) population and its parents. The primer sequences and annealing temperatures are listed in Table S3. Agarose gel electrophoresis showed that markers M-XNXY68-4, M-XNXY68-33, M-XNXY68-41, M-XNXY68-50, M-XNXY68-86, M-XNXY68-100, M-XNXY68-151, M-XNXY68-353, M-XNXY68-361 and M-XNXY68-390 were able to amplify specific bands in WTT11, Th. intermedium, Xiaoyan 78829 and individuals harboring a single alien segment from Y11 (2) population, but did not amplify other individuals of the Y11 (2) population nor Xiaoyan 343, Lumai 21, Xiaoyan 81, Yannong 19 or Chinese Spring (Fig. 6). These amplification results were consistent with the results of the cytogenetic analyses and the resistance evaluation. These 10 markers were thus regarded as specific markers for the alien chromosomal segments of WTT11.
KASP markers were developed to distinguish Th. intermedium and wheat genotypes
Drawing on the results of the SNP microarray analysis, flanking sequences of 299 SNP markers were compared against the wheat reference sequence (IWGSC RefSeq v1.0) in a BLASTN search. A total of 60 (20.07%) SNP flanking sequences were present in only one copy in the wheat genome, and corresponding primer pairs were designed using the KASP primer design platform. The results of amplifications using these primers suggested that 20 KASP markers could differentiate Th. intermedium and common wheat genotypes (Table S4). For example, amplification with Kasp-AX-109538133 revealed that 19 Th. intermedium accessions and Chinese Spring had C/C alleles, while Xiaoyan 343, Lumai 21, Xiaoyan 81 and Yannong 19 possessed T/T alleles, and Jimai 22 carried C/T alleles (Fig. 7).
WTT11 possessed excellent agronomic performance
The phenotypic characteristics of WTT11 and its recurrent parent Xiaoyan 81 were investigated during two consecutive seasons (Table 2). Compared with Xiaoyan 81, WTT11 plants had significantly lighter thousand-kernel weights (P < 0.01), but longer main panicles and more kernel number per main spike. It was remarkable that yield per plant of WTT11 and Xiaoyan 81 was similar and did not show any significant difference in both growing seasons. Besides, WTT11 plants had significantly lower (P < 0.01) plant height than Xiaoyan 81 in 2018–2019 years.
Discussion
A linkage analysis was conducted to explore the origin of disease resistance in WTT11
Pedigree derivation has frequently been used to confirm the origin of resistance genes in wheat–alien introgressions. For instance, the wheat–rye 4R chromosome disomic addition line WR35 was developed by crossing Xiaoyan 6 with the rye cultivar German White. At the seedling stage, evaluation of stripe rust reactions revealed that German White is immune or nearly immune to Pst races CYR31, CYR32, CYR33 and CYR34 (IT = 0 or 0;), whereas WR35 is highly resistant (IT = 1) and Xiaoyan 6 is susceptible (IT = 4) to all four races. These results suggest that WR35 possesses a new stripe rust-resistance gene that differs from resistance genes known from rye (An et al. 2019). As another example, the partial amphiploid TAI7047 was derived from hybrids of Th. intermedium and common wheat Jinchun 5 and Taiyuan 768. The wheat introgression line CH223 was then developed by crossing TAI7047 with common wheat Jing 411 and Jinmai 33. Evaluation of stripe rust resistance revealed that CH223 and TAI7047 are both immune and nearly immune to races CYR32, CYR33 and CYR34, while Jinchun 5, Taiyuan 768, Jing 411 and Jinmai 33 are all susceptible to CYR30, CYR31, CYR32 and CYR33. The stripe rust resistance of CH223 is thus presumably derived from Th. intermedium (Chang et al., 2010). For germplasm resources with known family trees, pedigree analysis is a convenient, feasible method for tracing disease-resistance inheritance.
Different from the above studies, some wheat parents of wheat–alien progeny are immune or highly resistant, or some are difficult to obtain for resistance evaluation. In this study, Xiaoyan 343, one of the parents of WTT11, was immune to stripe rust race CYR34. Lumai 21 was highly resistant to CYR34. Besides, NPFP, the wheat parent of partial amphiploid Xiaoyan 78829, was so antique that we could not retain it for resistance screening. Therefore, we used variety Yannong 19 that was susceptible to CYR34 as recurrent parent and constructed BC2F1 population to transfer the alien segments in its background. GISH and stripe rust evaluation results verified each other and determined obviously that the resistance gene was derived from Th. intermedium. Furthermore, three markers linked to Yr50, YrL693 and YrCH-1BS did not amplify specific bands in WTT11. The wheat660K SNP array data indicated that alien chromosomal segments of WTT11 belong to the homoeologous group 6 and 7. Our studies suggested that the resistance of WTT11 originates from a novel gene derived from Th. intermedium.
The wheat660K SNP array may be a more precise tool for physical mapping
Since homoeologous pairing and recombination have not taken place between alien and common wheat chromosomes, physical mapping is potentially an alternative way to map important genes on alien chromosomes. For example, Li et al. (2016) identified rye 6R and 6RL deletion lines and then localized a powdery mildew resistance gene by combining mc-FISH analysis with resistance assessment. Unfortunately, only a few FISH probes have been developed from alien genomes. In addition, exactly defining alien segment sizes, particularly those related to intercalary translocations and introgressions, is difficult to accomplish solely by cytogenetic methods. Many recent studies have, therefore, resorted to known genome sequences, such as those of T. urartu, Ae. tauschii and Triticum aestivum, to map alien genes more precisely. Dai et al. (2020) constructed a fine cytological map of 4VS by cytogenetic and 4VS-specific marker analysis. They carried out a BLASTN search of 199 marker sequences against the Ae. tauschii 4DS reference genome sequence and further assigned 39 bins to corresponding genome regions of chromosome arm 4DS; they then narrowed down the WYMV resistance gene Wss1 locus to the corresponding physical region, i.e., a 0–14.3-MB physical distance on 4DS of Ae. tauschii. Many studies have revealed the existence of homoeology between the Thinopyrum genome and the wheat genome (Grewal et al. 2018; Cseh et al. 2019; Baker et al. 2020; Wang et al. 2020b). At the same time, several researchers have started to develop useful markers by comparative genomic analysis. For example, Guo et al. (2015) used sequences in the distal region of Ae. tauschii 7DL and a bread wheat array to develop SSR and DArT markers for 7el, an accomplishment that greatly contributed to the successful cloning of Fhb7. In addition, Zhang et al. (2019b) developed a series of closely linked PCR-based markers for Sr26 based on comparative genomic analysis of NLR genes. In view of the high degree of homoeology between wheat and Thinopyrum genomes, future studies should rely more heavily on the wheat reference genome.
Using the wheat660K SNP array, 299 specific SNPs were located on alien segments in this study. Our analysis indicated that the alien segments are homoeologous with wheat-group chromosomes 6 and 7. Since cloned stripe rust-resistance genes are mostly NLR genes, resistance gene analogs (RGA) family annotation indicated that 286 and 354 RGA candidates were predicted in Th. elongatum chromosome 6E and 7E by the RGAugury pipeline (Wang et al. 2020b). To map the resistance gene in WTT11 and reduce deleterious linkage drag, many translocation lines with smaller alien segments need to be produced by 60Co γ-ray irradiation of WTT11. Depending on the physical positions of the specific SNPs, a fine physical map for alien segments of WTT11 can then be constructed.
All detection methods are equally important in wheat chromosome engineering
Cytogenetic analyses, such as GISH, mc-FISH and mc-GISH, mainly explore aspects such as types of chromosome structural variation, numbers and sizes of alien chromosomes or chromosome fragments, and genomic constitution. Since their results are clearly visible, GISH and FISH are the first methods of choice when analyzing germplasm developed by chromosome engineering. Many partial amphiploids and wheat–alien addition, substitution and translocation lines have been successfully analyzed by these molecular cytogenetic techniques (Zhang et al. 1996; Benavente et al. 1996; Friebe et al. 2000; Nagy et al. 2002; Malysheva et al. 2003; Han et al. 2004).
Since GISH and FISH are costly, labor intensive and time consuming, however, many markers specific for alien chromosomes, such as random amplified polymorphic DNAs markers (King et al. 1993), sequence-tagged markers (Luan et al. 2010), PCR-based landmark unique gene markers (Ardalani et al. 2016), IT markers (Wang et al. 2017), and SNP markers (Tiwari et al. 2014), have been developed to easily identify alien chromosomes in a wheat background. The SLAF-seq technique enables the efficient and convenient development of specific PCR-based markers for plant species with uncharacterized genomes. An increasing number of SLAF markers are, therefore, being applied in wheat chromosome engineering to rapidly trace alien segments. For example, 67 Th. ponticum-specific SLAF markers were developed from the tiny wheat–Th. ponticum translocation line EA and subsequently verified in the F2 population of a cross between wheat cultivar Xiaoyan 60 and EA (Liu et al. 2018).
Stable homozygous introgressions are easily analyzed and can, therefore, obviously be applied to some characters in wheat breeding. Most PCR-based molecular markers are dominant, however, which limits their ability to distinguish between heterozygous and stable homozygous introgressions. KASP markers, which constitute a novel type of co-dominant molecular markers, have fortunately been developed and can rapidly detect alien segments and provide information on their homozygosity (Grewal et al. 2020a). Many putative SNPs based on SNP array, RNA-seq and SLAF-seq analyses have been converted into KASP markers to allow discrimination of alien chromosomes from the wheat genome (Zhou et al. 2017; Grewal et al. 2020b; Han et al. 2020). In our studies, we have, therefore, developed specific KASP markers to distinguish Th. intermedium and wheat for subsequent application in homozygous germplasm screening.
In summary, a new wheat–Th. intermedium translocation line, WTT11, was produced by distant hybridization and assessed for immunity to Pst races CYR32, CYR33 and CYR34. Cytogenetic analyses revealed that the alien segments were translocated into the long arm of chromosome 2D. A wheat660K SNP array analysis also suggested that a deletion occurred in the 0–95.5-MB region of chromosome 1B. At the same time, the alien segments were homoeologous to wheat-group chromosomes 6 and 7. Furthermore, 10 specific PCR-based markers for alien segments and 20 KASP markers distinguishing Th. intermedium and wheat were developed. These new markers can be used in wheat breeding programs to effectively trace alien segments conferring stripe rust resistance.
References
An DG, Ma PT, Zheng Q, Fu SL, Li LH, Han FP, Han GH, Wang J, Xu YF, Jin YL, Luo QL, Zhang XT (2019) Development and molecular cytogenetic identification of a new wheat–rye 4R chromosome disomic addition line with resistances to powdery mildew, stripe rust and sharp eyespot. Theor Appl Genet 132:257–272
Ardalani S, Mirzaghaderi G, Badakhshan H (2016) A Robertsonian translocation from Thinopyrum bessarabicum into bread wheat confers high iron and zinc contents. Plant Breed 135:286–290
Baker L, Grewal S, Yang CY, Hubbart-Edwards S, Scholefield D, Ashling S, Burridge AJ, Przewieslik-Allen AM, Wilkinson PA, King IP, King J (2020) Exploiting the genome of Thinopyrum elongatum to expand the gene pool of hexaploid wheat. Theor Appl Genet 133:2213–2226
Banks PM, Xu SJ, Wang RRC, Larkin PJ (1993) Varying chromosome composition of 56-chromosome wheat × Thinopyrum intermedium partial amphiploids. Genome 36:207–215
Bansal M, Kaur S, Dhaliwal HS, Bains NS, Bariana HS, Chhuneja P, Bansal UK (2016) Mapping of Aegilops umbellulata-derived leaf rust and stripe loci in wheat. Plant Pathol 66:38–44
Bao YG, Wu X, Zhang C, Li XF, He F, Qi XL, Wang HG (2014) Chromosomal constitutions and reactions to powdery mildew and stripe rust of four novel wheat–Thinopyrum intermedium partial amphiploids. J Genet Genom 41:663–666
Bariana HS, McIntosh RA (1993) Cytogenetic studies in wheat. XV. Location of rust resistance genes in VPM1 and their genetic linkage with other disease resistance genes in chromosome 2A. Genome 36:476–482
Benavente E, Fernández-Calvín B, Orellana J (1996) Relationship between the levels of wheat–rye metaphase I chromosomal pairing and recombination revealed by GISH. Chromosoma 105:92–96
Bommineni VR, Jauhar PP (1997) Wide hybridization and genome relationships in cereals: an assessment of molecular approaches. Maydica 42:81–105
Chang ZJ, Zhang XJ, Yang ZJ, Zhan HX, Li X, Liu C, Zhang CZ (2010) Characterization of a partial wheat–Thinopyrum intermedium amphiploid and its reaction to fungal diseases of wheat. Hereditas 147:304–312
Chen XM, Jones SS, Line RF (1995) Chromosomal location of genes for stripe rust in spring wheat cultivars Compare, Fielder, Lee and Lemhi and interactions of aneuploid wheats with races of Puccinia striiforms. Phytopathology 85:375–381
Chen WQ, Wellings C, Chen XM, Kang ZS, Liu TG (2014) Wheat stripe (yellow) rust caused by Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici. Mol Plant Pathol 15:433–446
Chicaiza O, Khan IA, Zhang X, Brevis CJ, Jackson L, Chen XM, Dubcovsky J (2006) Registration of five wheat isogenic lines for leaf rust and stripe rust resistance genes. Crop Sci 46:485–487
Cseh A, Yang CY, Hubbart-Edwards S, Scholefield D, Ashling SS, Burridge AJ, Wilkinson PA, King IP, King J, Grewal S (2019) Development and validation of an exome-based SNP marker set for identification of the St, Jr and Jvs genomes of Thinopyrym intermedium in a wheat background. Theor Appl Genet 132:1555–1570
Dai KL, Zhao RH, Shi MM, Xiao J, Yu ZY, Jia Q, Wang ZK, Yuan CX, Sun HJ, Cao AZ, Zhang RQ, Chen PD, Li YB, Wang HY, Wang XE (2020) Dissection and cytological mapping of chromosome arm 4VS by the development of wheat–Haynaldia villosa structural aberration library. Theor Appl Genet 133:217–226
Fedak G, Han FP (2005) Characterization of derivatives from wheat–Thinopyrum wide crosses. Cytogenet Genome Res 109:350–359
Fedak G, Chen Q, Conner RL, Laroche A, Armstrong KW (2000) Characterization of wheat–Thinopyrum partial amphiploids by meiotic analysis and genomic in situ hybridization. Genome 43:712–719
Friebe B, Zeller FJ, Mukai Y, Forster BP, Bartos P, McIntosh RA (1992) Characterization of rust-resistant wheat–Agropyron intermedium derivatives by C-banding, in situ hybridization and isozyme analysis. Theor Appl Genet 83:775–782
Friebe B, Jiang JM, Raupp WJ, McIntosh RA, Gill BS (1996) Characterization of wheat-alien translocations conferring resistance to diseases and pests: current status. Euphytica 91:59–87
Friebe B, Kynast RG, Gill BS (2000) Gametocidal factor-induced structural rearrangements in rye chromosomes added to common wheat. Chromosome Res 8:501–511
Fu DL, Uauy C, Distelfeld A, Blechl A, Epstein L, Chen XM, Sela H, Fahima T, Dubcovsky J (2009) A kinase-START gene confers temperature-dependent resistance to wheat stripe rust. Science 323:1357–1360
Grewal S, Yang CY, Edwards SH, Scholefield D, Ashling S, Burridge AJ, King IP, King J (2018) Characterisation of Thinopyrum bessarabicum chromosomes through genome-wide introgressions into wheat. Theor Appl Genet 131:389–406
Grewal S, Hubbart-Edwards S, Yang CY, Devi U, Baker L, Heath J, Ashling S, Scholefield D, Howells C, Yarde J, Isaac P, King IP, King J (2020a) Rapid identification of homozygosity and site of wild relative introgressions in wheat through chromosome-specific KASP genotyping assays. Plant Biotechnol J 18:743–755
Grewal S, Othmeni M, Walker J, Hubbart-Edwards S, Yang CY, Scholefield D, Ashling S, Isaac P, King IP, King J (2020b) Development of wheat–Aegilops caudata introgression lines and their characterization using genome-specific KASP markers. Front Plant Sci 11:606
Guo J, Zhang XL, Hou YL, Cai JJ, Shen XR, Zhou TT, Xu HH, Ohm HW, Wang HW, Li AF, Han FP, Wang HG, Kong LR (2015) High-density mapping of the major FHB resistance gene Fhb7 derived from Thinopyrum ponticum and its pyramiding with Fhb1 by marker-assisted selection. Theor Appl Genet 128:2301–2316
Han FP, Fedak G, Benabdelmouna A, Armstrong K, Ouellet T (2003) Characterization of six wheat-Thinopyrum intermedium derivatives by GISH, RFLP and multicolor GISH. Genome 46:490–495
Han FP, Liu B, Fedak G, Liu ZH (2004) Genomic constitution and variation in five partial amphiploids of wheat–Thinopyrum intermedium as revealed by GISH, multicolor GISH and seed storage protein analysis. Theor Appl Genet 109:1070–1076
Han FP, Lamb JC, Birchler JA (2006) High frequency of centromere inactivation resulting in stable dicentric chromosomes of maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:3238–3243
Han FP, Gao Z, Birchler JA (2009) Centromere inactivation and reactivation reveal both genetic and epigenetic components for centromere specification. Plant Cell 21:1929–1939
Han GH, Liu SY, Jin YL, Jia MS, Ma PT, Liu H, Wang J, An DG (2020) Scale development and utilization of universal PCR-based and high-throughput KASP markers specific for chromosome arms of rye (Secale cereale L.). BMC Genom 21:206
He RL, Chang ZJ, Yang ZJ, Yuan ZY, Zhan HX, Zhang XJ, Liu JX (2009) Inheritance and mapping of powdery mildew resistance gene Pm43 introgressed from Thinopyrum intermedium into wheat. Theor Appl Genet 118:1173–1180
Huang Q, Li X, Chen WQ, Xiang ZP, Zhong SF, Chang ZJ, Zhang M, Zhang HY, Tian FQ, Ren ZL, Luo PG (2014) Genetic mapping of a putative Thinopyrum intermedium-derived stripe rust resistance gene on wheat chromosome 1B. Theor Appl Genet 127:843–853
Huang J, Jia QZ, Zhang B, Sun ZY, Huang MM, Jin SL (2018) Epidemic forecasting of the new strains G22–9 (CYR34) and G22–14 of Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici in wheat in Gansu province. J Plant Prot 45:101–108
IWGSC, Appels R, Eversole K, Feuillet C, Keller B, Rogers J, Stein N et al (2018) Shifting the limits in wheat research and breeding using a fully annotated reference genome. Science 361(6403):eaar7191
Kang HY, Tang L, Li DY, Diao CD, Zhu W, Tang Y, Wang Y, Fan X, Xu LL, Zeng J, Sha LN, Yu XF, Zhang HQ, Zhou YH (2017) Cytogenetic study and stripe rust response of the derivatives from a wheat–Thinopyrum intermedium–Psathyrostachys huashanica trigeneric hybrid. Genome 60:393–401
King IP, Purdie KA, Rezanoor HN, Koebner RMD, Miller TE, Reader SM, Nicholson P (1993) Characterization of Thinopyrum bessarabicum chromosome segments in wheat using random amplified polymorphic DNAs (RAPDs) and genomic in situ hybridization. Theor Appl Genet 86:895–900
Klymiuk V, Yaniv E, Huang L, Raats D, Fatiukha A et al (2018) Cloning of the wheat Yr15 resistance gene sheds light on the plant tandem kinase-pseudokinase family. Nat Commun 9:3735
Krattinger SG, Lagudah ES, Spielmeyer W et al (2009) A putative ABC transporter confers durable resistance to multiple fungal pathogens in wheat. Science 323:1360–1363
Kuraparthy V, Chhuneja P, Dhaliwal HS, Kaur S, Bowden RL, Gill BS (2007) Characterization and mapping of cryptic alien introgression from Aegilops geniculata with new leaf rust and stripe rust resistance genes Lr57 and Yr40 in wheat. Theor Appl Genet 114:1379–1389
Lang T, La SX, Li B, Yu ZH, Chen QH, Li JB, Yang EN, Li GR, Yang ZJ (2018) Precise identification of wheat–Thinopyrum intermedium translocation chromosomes carrying resistance to wheat stripe rust in line Z4 and its derived progenies. Genome 61:177–185
Larkin PJ, Banks PM, Lagudah ES, Appels R, Chen X, Xin ZY, Ohm HW, McIntosh RA (1995) Disomic Thinopyrum intermedium addition lines in wheat with barley yellow dwarf virus resistance and with rust resistances. Genome 38:385–394
Li ZS (2010) Retrospect and prospect of wheat breeding in China. J Agric Sci Technol China 12:1–4
Li M, Tang ZX, Qiu L, Wang YY, Tang SY, Fu SL (2016) Identification and physical mapping of new PCR-based markers specific for the long arm of rye (Secale cereale L.) chromosome 6. J Genet Genom 43:209–216
Li JB, Li J, Dundas I, Dong CM, Li GR, Trethowan R, Yang ZJ, Hoxha S, Zhang P (2020) Identification and characterization of a new stripe rust resistance gene Yr83 on rye chromosome 6R in wheat. Theor Appl Genet 133:1095–1107
Liu J, Chang ZJ, Zhang XJ, Yang ZJ, Li X, Jia JQ, Zhan HX, Guo HJ, Wang JM (2013) Putative Thinopyrum intermedium-derived stripe rust resistance gene Yr50 maps on wheat chromosome arm 4BL. Theor Appl Genet 126:265–274
Liu LQ, Luo QL, Teng W, Li B, Li HW, Li YW, Li ZS, Zheng Q (2018) Development of Thinopyrum ponticum-specific molecular markers and FISH probes based on SLAF-seq technology. Planta 247:1099–1108
Luan Y, Wang XG, Liu WH, Li CY, Zhang JP, Gao AN, Wang YD, Yang XM, Li LH (2010) Production and identification of wheat–Agropyron cristatum 6P translocation lines. Planta 232:501–510
Luo PG, Luo HY, Chang ZJ, Zhang HY, Zhang M, Ren ZL (2009) Characterization and chromosomal location of Pm40 in common wheat: a new gene for resistance to powdery mildew derived from Elytrigia intermedium. Theor Appl Genet 118:1059–1064
Macer RCF (1963) The forma and monosomic genetic analysis of stripe rust (Puccinia stritiformis) resistance in wheat. In: Mackey J (ed) Proceedings of the 2nd international wheat genetics symposium. Lund University, Lund, pp 127–142 ((Hereditas Suppl 2))
Malysheva L, Sjakste T, Matzk F, Roder M, Ganal M (2003) Molecular cytogenetic analysis of wheat–barley hybrids using genomic in situ hybridization and barley microsatellite markers. Genome 46:314–322
Marais GF, Mccallum B, Snyman JE, Pretorius ZA, Marais AS (2005a) Leaf rust and stripe rust resistance genes Lr54 and Yr37 transferred to wheat from Aegilops kotschyi. Plant Breed 124:538–541
Marais GF, Pretorius ZA, Wellings CR, Mccallum B, Marais AS (2005b) Leaf rust and stripe rust resistance genes transferred to common wheat from Triticum dicoccoides. Euphytica 143:115–123
Marais GF, Mccallum B, Marais AS (2006) Leaf rust and stripe rust resistance genes derived from Aegilops sharonensis. Euphytica 149:373–380
Marais GF, Marais AS, Mccallum B, Pretorius ZA (2009) Transfer of leaf rust and stripe rust resistance genes Lr62 and Yr42 from Aegilops neglecta Req. ex Bertol. to common wheat. Crop Sci 49:871–879
Marchal C, Zhang JP, Zhang P, Fenwick P, Steuernagel B, Adamski NM, Boyd L, McIntosh R, Wulff BBH, Berry S, Lagudah E, Uauy C (2018) BED-domain-containing immune receptors confer diverse resistance spectra to yellow rust. Nat Plants 4:662–668
McIntosh RA, Lagudah ES (2000) Cytogenetical studies in wheat. XVIII. Gene Yr24 for resistance to stripe rust. Plant Breed 119:81–93
McIntosh RA, Silk J, The TT (1996) Cytogenetic studies in wheat XVII. Monosomic analysis and linkage relationships of gene Yr15, for resistance to stripe rust. Euphytica 89:395–399
McIntosh RA, Mu JM, Han DJ, Kang ZS (2018) Wheat stripe rust resistance gene Yr24/Yr26: A retrospective review. Crop J 6:321–329
Moore JW, Herrera-Foessel S, Lan C, Schnippenkoetter W, Ayliffe M, Huerta-Espino J, Lillemo M, Viccars L, Milne R, Periyannan S, Kong X, Spielmeyer W, Talbot M, Bariana H, Patrick JW, Dodds P, Singh R, Lagudah E (2015) A recently evolved hexose transporter variant confers resistance to multiple pathogens in wheat. Nat Genet 47:1494–1498
Nagy ED, Molnar-Lang M, Linc G, Lang L (2002) Identification of wheat–barley translocations by sequential GISH and two-colour FISH in combination with the use of genetically mapped barley SSR markers. Genome 45:1238–1247
Qi SY, Yu SX, Zhang YH, Yu GH, Song FY (1979) Studies on wheat breeding by distant hybridization between wheat and Agropyron Glaucum. Sci Agric Sin 2:1–11
Qi LL, Friebe B, Zhang P, Gill BS (2007) Homoeologous recombination, chromosome engineering and crop improvement. Chromosome Res 15:3–19
Riley R, Chapman V, Johnson R (1968) Introduction of yellow rust resistance of Aegilops comosa into wheat by genetically induced homoeologous recombination. Nature 217:383–384
Singh RP, Nelson JC, Sorrells ME (2000) Mapping Yr28 and other genes for resistance to stripe rust in wheat. Crop Sci 40:1148–1155
Tiwari VK, Wang SC, Sehgal S et al (2014) SNP discovery for mapping alien introgressions in wheat. BMC Genom 15:273
Wang HY, Dai KL, Xiao J, Yuan CX, Zhao RH et al (2017) Development of intron targeting (IT) markers specific for chromosome arm 4VS of Haynaldia villosa by chromosome sorting and next-generation sequencing. BMC Genom 18:167
Wang H, Zou SH, Li YW, Lin FY, Tang DZ (2020a) An ankyrin-repeat and WRKY-domain-containing immune receptor confers stripe rust resistance in wheat. Nat Commun 11:1353
Wang HW, Sun SL, Ge WY et al (2020b) Horizontal gene transfer of Fhb7 from fungus underlies Fusarium head blight resistance in wheat. Science 368(6493):eaba5435
Xu LS, Wang MN, Cheng P, Kang ZS, Hulbert SH, Chen XM (2013) Molecular mapping of Yr53, a new gene for stripe rust resistance in durum wheat accession PI 480148 and its transfer to common wheat. Theor Appl Genet 126:523–533
Yang GT, Luo QL, Liu LQ et al (2019) Development of Thinopyrum ponticum specific molecular markers by using SLAF-seq technology. J China Agric Univ 24:1–5
Zeller FJ (1973) 1B/1R wheat–rye chromosome substitutions and translocations. In: Sears ER, Sears LMS (eds) Proceedings 4th international wheat genetics symposium. University of Missouri Press, Columbia, pp 209–222
Zeng QD, Shen C, Yuan FP, Wang QL, Wu JH, Xue WB, Zhan GM, Yao S, Chen W, Huang LL, Han DJ, Kang ZS (2015) The resistance evaluation of the Yr genes to the main prevalent pathotypes of Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici in China. Acta Phytopathol Sin 45:641–650
Zhan HX, Zhang XJ, Li GR, Pan ZH, Hu J, Li X, Qiao LY, Jia JQ, Guo HJ, Chang ZJ, Yang ZJ (2015) Molecular characterization of a new wheat–Thinopyrum intermedium translocation line with resistance to powdery mildew and stripe rust. Int J Mol Sci 16:2162–2173
Zhang XY, Dong YS, Wang RRC (1996) Characterization of genomes and chromosomes in partial amphiploids of the hybrid Triticum aestivum × Thinopyrum ponticum by in situ hybridization, isozyme analysis, and RAPD. Genome 39:1062–1071
Zhang CZ, Huang L, Zhang HF, Hao QQ, Lyu B, Wang MN, Epstein L, Liu M, Kou CL, Qi J, Chen FJ, Li MK, Gao G, Ni F, Zhang LQ, Hao M, Wang JR, Chen XM, Luo MC, Zheng YL, Wu JJ, Liu DC, Fu DL (2019a) An ancestral NB-LRR with duplicated 3’UTRs confers stripe rust resistance in wheat and barley. Nat Commun 10:4023
Zhang JP, Zhang P, Hewitt T, Li JB, Dundas I, Schnippenkoetter W, Hoxha S, Chen CH, Park R, Lagudah E (2019b) A strategy for identifying markers linked with stem rust resistance in wheat harbouring an alien chromosome introgression from a non-sequenced genome. Theor Appl Genet 132:125–135
Zheng XW, Tang CG, Han R, Zhao JJ, Qiao L, Zhang SW, Qiao LY, Ge C, Zheng J, Liu C (2020) Identification, characterization, and evaluation of novel stripe rust-resistant wheat–Thinopyrum intermedium chromosome translocation lines. Plant Dis 104:875–881
Zhou SH, Yan BQ, Li F, Zhang JP, Zhang J, Ma HH, Liu WH, Lu YQ, Yang XM, Li XQ, Liu X, Li LH (2017) RNA-seq analysis provides the first insights into the phylogenetic relationship and interspecific variation between Agropyron cristatum and wheat. Front Plant Sci 8:1644
Acknowledgements
We sincerely thank Prof. Xueyong Zhang and Chenyang Hao at Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, for providing trial field. This project was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFD0102000) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 31971875).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
ZSL and QZ conceived the research; GTY performed the experiments; PH performed stripe rust resistance evaluation; GTY and QZ drafted the manuscript; HWL, QLL and BL provided substantial help in preparing materials and performing experiments. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical standards
The authors declare that the experiments comply with the current laws of the country in which they were performed.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, G., Zheng, Q., Hu, P. et al. Cytogenetic identification and molecular marker development for the novel stripe rust-resistant wheat–Thinopyrum intermedium translocation line WTT11. aBIOTECH 2, 343–356 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42994-021-00060-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42994-021-00060-3