Eccentric muscle loading encompasses several unique features compared to other types of contractions. These features include increased force, work, and performance at decreased oxygen consumption, reduced metabolic cost, improved energy efficiency, as well as decreased muscle activity. This review summarises explanatory approaches to long-standing questions in terms of muscular contraction dynamics and molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying eccentric muscle loading. Moreover, this article intends to underscore the functional link between sarcomeric components, emphasising the fundamental role of titin in skeletal muscle. The giant filament titin reveals versatile functions ranging from sarcomere organisation and maintenance, providing passive tension and elasticity, and operates as a mechanosensory and signalling platform. Structurally, titin consists of a viscoelastic spring segment that allows activation-dependent coupling to actin. This titin-actin interaction can explain linear force increases in active lengthening experiments in biological systems. A three-filament model of skeletal muscle force production (mediated by titin) is supposed to overcome significant deviations between experimental observations and predictions by the classic sliding-filament and cross-bridge theories. Taken together, this review intends to contribute to a more detailed understanding of overall muscle behaviour and force generation—from a microscopic sarcomere level to a macroscopic multi-joint muscle level—impacting muscle modelling, the understanding of muscle function, and disease.
Versatile muscle functions in eccentric loading
Skeletal muscles represent fascinating and complex machinery, enabling active force production, movement and stability of the skeleton, storage and transport of substances within the body, and generation of heat (1, 2). These multiple functions are based on the way muscles work. Muscles perform concentric, isometric, and eccentric contractions and the combinations thereof. The fundamental understanding of skeletal muscle contraction is central to muscle physiology. While the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying concentric (force generation during muscle shortening) and isometric (at constant muscle length) contractions are quite well described by the classic sliding-filament (3, 4) and cross-bridge theories (5), at least for a particular length range (6), the mechanisms underpinning eccentric contractions remain to be elucidated. Eccentric contractions refer to muscle actions that occur when the external force applied to the muscle exceeds the force produced by the muscle itself, resulting in a lengthening action (i.e. when work is done on the muscle) (7, 8). Lengthening actions are an essential part of everyday movements involving deceleration, e.g. after a jump or walking downstairs, support the weight of the body against gravity, serving as shock absorbers and struts during locomotion (9). Another important feature of eccentric contractions is their ability to absorb mechanical energy during muscle lengthening, recover that stored energy and increase the active force generated during subsequent shortening contractions compared to pure muscle shortening (10, 11). This coupling of eccentric immediately followed by concentric contractions is referred to as stretch-shortening cycles (SSCs; Fig. 1)—an important phenomenon associated with powerful and efficient movements at reduced metabolic energy expenditure (11–13).
Compared to concentric and isometric muscle actions, eccentric contractions show some further unique features responsible for the high efficiency observed. Fewer motor unit activation (14, 15), reduced cardiorespiratory and hemodynamic reactions, and less metabolic consumption for a given force (7), are associated with eccentric muscle actions (9, 16). These features yielded a growing interest over the last decades. Particularly in light of the health-related effects, an increased number of investigations focused on the beneficial outcomes of eccentric resistance training (for reviews see (9, 17, 18)). But how exactly can muscles exert high forces with little energy expenditure during lengthening actions? Two major sources have been proposed to account for unexplained observations during and after eccentric contractions, (I) the nervous system (14, 15) and (II) the muscle itself (19, 20). While recently published evidence has greatly improved our understanding of the control strategies driven by the nervous system during muscle lengthening (i.e. reduced spinal and corticospinal excitability; for reviews see (14, 15)), a substantial gap remains in our understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying eccentric loading, in particular during long stretch contractions.
There are becoming piles of literature on the mechanosensing contributions of cross-bridge activation and force-dependent cross-bridge recruitment upon muscle stretch in the past decade (21–25). Moreover, several model approaches (26–29) and ample experimental evidence (30, 31) point to a strong contribution of the giant protein titin to force generation during and after eccentric contractions.
Therefore, this review aims to discuss recent investigations—from single muscle fibre to whole muscles—to explain the mechanistic basis underlying eccentric contractions. Additionally, this article intends to underscore the functional link between sarcomeric components, emphasising the role of titin in skeletal muscle.
Physiological and mechanical phenomena associated with eccentric muscle loading
A fundamental principle of skeletal muscle physiology and a main determinant of muscle force production is the force-velocity relationship (FVR). The concentric (shortening contractions) part of the FVR has been first observed and described mathematically based on pioneering studies on isolated frog muscles by Hill (32). The FVR describes the relation between the maximum muscle force and its instantaneous rate of change in length. If a muscle shortens during contraction, the shortening velocity depends on the load, while the contraction velocity decreases with increasing load in a hyperbolic manner (23; Fig. 2 magenta line). On the contrary, the FVR upon muscle stretch does not follow the classic hyperbolic FVR for concentric contractions (Fig. 2 black line) (32, 33). The ability to exert high maximum forces during lengthening contractions is much less at slow velocities compared to fast eccentric velocities. However, there is a much greater potentiation of force (ranging from 1.0 to 1.5 F0) at very slow lengthening velocities with only marginal change in velocity (less than 0.1 v0). In this range, the eccentric part of the FVR was observed to be nearly constant (Fig. 2, almost vertical section of black line). In contrast, at forces between 1.5 and 1.8 F0, velocity changes were progressively larger, with smaller increases (and plateauing) in force (34, 35). Early studies by Katz (36) on electrically stimulated sartorius muscles from frogs found that the force produced by the muscle during rapid lengthening exceeded the isometric force (Fig. 2 blue dot) substantially by factor ×1.8 F0. Thereby, the slope in force is significantly greater (by factor ×4–6) for eccentric than for concentric contractions (36, 37). This observation is consistent with recent studies on intact and skinned muscle samples (mammalian and amphibian) over a wide range of velocities (12, 38–40). The experimental findings of these studies demonstrated an increase in peak force in eccentric muscle loading as a function of increasing stretching velocity (Fig. 3 right plot, Fig. 4A).
This muscle behaviour strongly deviates from the classic hyperbolic shape of the FVR observed for concentric contractions and depicts a distinct feature of eccentric contractions (cf. magenta and black line of Fig. 2). Classic Hill-type model approaches (32, 33) suggest cross-bridges (XBs) (formed by actomyosin interaction) as the only activation-dependent force-generating components in muscles. However, recent studies show that there is an additional parallel ‘non-cross-bridge’ (non-XB) component (e.g. titin) contributing to the total force response—particularly during eccentric muscle loading (12, 26, 31, 39). Consequently, both XB and non-XB components are involved in eccentric contractions (Fig. 3).
Anyhow, the proportion of their contributions to force production, especially the role of titin in the FVR, is not yet clear (12). Contrary to the prevailing assumption that XB-forces increase with increasing stretch velocities up to a certain level (33, 41), recent results by Tomalka et al. (12) showed decreasing XB-forces for increasing stretch velocities at the end of the lengthening contraction (Fig. 3 middle plot). They performed in vitro isovelocity ramp experiments with varying ramp velocities (30, 60, and 85% of maximum contraction velocity [vmax]) on single-skinned soleus muscle fibres from rats. The different contributions of XB (Fig. 3 middle plot) and non-XB structures (Fig. 3 left plot) to total force production (Fig. 3 right plot) were identified using the XB-inhibitor Blebbistatin. This photosensitive chemical has rather complex actions on XB function. As suggested by (42, 43), Blebbistatin inhibits the force-producing transition of the bound actomyosin complex that traps myosin heads in a weakly actin-attached state without exerting any force (44). However, long stretches applied to muscles treated with Blebbistatin are likely to result in detachment of weakly bound XBs, inferring only a marginal XB contribution to the force response upon muscle stretch. These findings suggest a central role for titin in the eccentric FVR (for a detailed review see (35)).
Numerous studies have shown that fibre kinetics in eccentric muscle loading are characterised by a steep rise in force during the early phase of the stretch, immediately followed by a relatively compliant transient phase (Fig. 4A, middle and right subplot). The initial linear phase (Fig. 4B, orange lines) is biphasic with a steep force slope (P1, Fig. 4B) followed by a more gradual change in slope (P2, Fig. 4B) (39). This observation is following recent investigations of stretch-induced force responses (5% L0 stretch amplitude) in intact and skinned muscle fibres across a wide range of velocities (38–40, 45–47). Both transitions have been related to XB characteristics and are attributed to the extension of all attached myosin heads to actin (12, 37, 39, 40, 45). P1 (termed S1 by Flitney & Hirst (48)) occurs in a short time immediately after the onset of the stretch between 0.14–0.20% L0 (39). P2 is reached for extensions of 1.16–1.34% L0 (39, 48). Recent experimental findings suggest that the transition P1 is mainly due to the extension of all originally attached myosin heads, while P2 occurs when the ‘switchover from original to new heads is essentially complete’ (39). Thus, between the P1 and P2 transitions, the original myosin heads quickly detach, leaving only the newly attached heads. Recent findings demonstrate that the shape of the eccentric force response changes with increasing stretch velocity (40, 49) (Fig. 4A). The impact of stretch velocity has been observed in a series of studies for comparatively short stretch amplitudes (mainly about 2% to 5% L0). The force occurring at both transitions increased with increasing stretch velocity (37, 39, 40). Continuous stretching beyond P2 resulted in a force peak (S2, Fig. 4B; (48)) followed by a negative force slope until the force recovers by the end of the stretching phase. S2 also increased with increasing stretch velocity (12, 39, 40, 48). The phase of negative force slope after S2 was termed muscle ‘give’ (Fig. 4) (48). This term refers to the displacement of the filaments in the axial direction exceeding 11–12 nm, while the XBs are forcibly detached (50–52) and sarcomeres are no longer able to resist the rise in force upon active muscle lengthening (48).
These findings are supported by a previous study by Tomalka et al. (12). They investigated the effect of varying velocity of the length changes during SSCs on the power output in skinned fibres of rat soleus muscles. Additionally, they used the molecular myosin inhibitor Blebbistatin to differentiate between XB and non-XB contributions to the mechanical responses. They found increased power output with increased SSC-ramp velocities. Based on evidence for increased storage and release of energy in non-XB conditions, the authors conclude that energy stored in titin during eccentric contraction contributes to the increase in power output with increased velocity. For all tested velocities in the control experiments (30%, 60%, 85% vmax), fibre kinetics were characterised by muscle ‘give’ during the stretching phase of SSCs ((12), their Fig. 4). In the presence of Blebbistatin (20 µmol l−1), it has been found a quasi-linear force response during the SSCs’ stretch phase for all tested velocities ((12), their Fig. 5) with no muscle ‘give’ upon active stretching. However, it cannot be taken for granted that Blebbistatin completely eliminates XB-based force production, since Blebbistatin (and similar drugs as butanedione monoxime (BDM) (53, 54) and benzyl-toluene sulfonamide (BTS) (37)) seems to affect the contractile apparatus in a complex manner (42, 55, 56). There are indications that Blebbistatin leads, among other things, to a considerable reduction of vmax under certain conditions (42, 57). An effect that is explainable by the potential influence of an increased population of weakly bound XBs, which are suggested to contribute to an increase in stiffness and non-XB-based force while strained during muscle stretch (39, 42, 53, 56). Consequently, regardless of the effect of Blebbistatin on the contractile apparatus, a contribution of weakly bound XBs to force during the stretch (53, 56) seems to be likely for small stretch amplitudes (≈ 1.5% L0) only. For rather extensive ramp amplitudes weakly bound XBs rapidly detach (58, 59), so the strain of XBs only contributes to the initial rise in force.
Muscle ‘give’ occurred during stretch amplitudes of 1.2 to 2.1% optimal sarcomere length (32, 34–37). Therefore, ‘give’ would be expected when XBs contribute to force production during sufficiently long eccentric ramps. Continuous muscle stretching beyond the local force minimum results in a force redevelopment (Fig. 4A, force-time traces to the right of the vertical lines). This rise in force is attributed to the continuous stretch of non-XB elements (39, 60). Thus, elastic energy stored in viscoelastic structures, such as titin, increases with increasing stretching velocity (39, 61, 62)—suggesting an important role for titin, particularly in long eccentric contractions (12, 37, 39, 40, 63). Consequently, XB dynamics seem to dominate the first part of the stretch, while titin dynamics dominate the second part.
Force enhancement—muscles act like linear springs
A quasi-linear increase in force during eccentric ramp contractions (force enhancement, FE) for small to moderate changes in length (2–20% L0) has been reported by several studies (12, 37, 39, 64–66). More recently, experimental observations on rats demonstrated a spring-like behaviour of single muscle fibres from the musculus extensor digitorum longus (EDL) during long, eccentric contractions of 0.45 LO (30, 40) and 0.75 L0 (30)—nearly over the entire force-length-relation (FLR). Thereby, muscle forces up to ×2.5 of the maximum isometric force can be generated (Fig. 5). This exceeds the maximum active forces produced by XBs at these lengths, which is in strong contrast to the classic isometric FLR. This is a surprising result because the underlying non-linear FLR consists of linear segments that decrease in slope with increasing fibre length. These changes in slope are the result of variations in myofilament overlap (Fig. 5, sarcomere configuration schematics (A)–(E)). The classic sliding filament (3, 4) and XB-theories (5) cannot explain these observations. Ignoring the low passive force up to 3 µm, the classic theories predict that, aside from an initial force increase, the force during an isovelocity stretch follows the shape of the FLR scaled with a factor greater than one (due to the eccentric FVR). In particular, this means that the expected force in the plateau should be constant, and should decline on the descending limb due to a decreasing number of available XBs. In contrast, in the second half of the stretch (Fig. 5) the force is constantly increasing. In addition, the positive slopes increase with velocity instead of decreasing as the classic theories would predict. Thus, for long-stretch contractions, the active isometric FLR is no longer visible during eccentric muscle loading. Moreover, it could be demonstrated that both XBs and non-XBs contribute nonlinearly to the resulting linear total muscle force response (30). The spring-like and viscous non-XB effects observed are likely attributed to titin. This suggestion is in line with recent work (67, 68), which measured heat production and force of muscle fibres from frogs during ramp stretches. They suggested that XBs account for only ≈ 12% of the total energy storage during the active stretch. Accordingly, more than 85% of energy storage upon muscle stretch cannot be explained by XB mechanisms, particularly since attached XBs detach quickly from actin filaments (50), and their stored elastic energy is lost (12, 69, 70).
Residual force enhancement
A further distinguishing feature of eccentric muscle loading is that striated skeletal muscles generate higher active forces after stretch (residual force enhancement, RFE) if compared to the muscles’ corresponding isometric force at constant length (Fig. 6). This fact has been known for about 70 years (71) and has been investigated across all muscle structural levels, from in vitro isolated (half-) sarcomeres (72–74), myofibrils (75–79), single muscle fibres (47, 54, 80–84), muscle fibre bundles (39, 85, 86), single muscles (49, 66, 87–90) and in vivo single and multi-joint movements ((91–99); for review see (100)). RFE increases with the amplitude of stretch (61, 71, 80), and is almost independent of stretch velocity (101, 102), except for fast stretch velocities associated with muscle ‘give’ (forcibly detachment of attached XBs, see chapter II. Muscle ‘give’) (12, 40, 48, 49). (R)FE is long-lasting (minutes in skinned fibres and single myofibrils) and can be stopped immediately by deactivating the muscle (71, 103). However, RFE observed in the activated muscle often persisted following deactivation in the passive muscle, which is called passive force enhancement ((87, 92, 104–106); for a detailed review see (107)). Additionally, RFE exists at almost all muscle lengths (82, 108). Although experimental data in the literature are somewhat controversial regarding the appearance of RFE in different regions of the FLR. While some studies show that RFE exists at all muscle lengths (82, 87), other studies show little or no RFE on the ascending limb of the FLR (61, 104). However, there seems to be general agreement in the literature that the magnitude of RFE is greatest, particularly in the range of the descending limb of the FLR (26, 109, 110). Figure 7 shows an overview of the magnitude of RFE scaling with muscle size. Despite a high inter- and intraindividual variability of the data compared, there is an apparent trend for the decrease of RFE in magnitude—at least for in vitro muscle samples—from the smallest functional contractile unit of the muscle (the (half-) sarcomere) towards isolated muscle fibre bundles. Despite clear evidence of RFE across all structural muscle levels, the contraction modalities and applied methods (such as e.g. the stretch amplitude, contraction velocity, activation levels and experimental temperature, studied animal model, and titin isoform) might have important implications for experimental findings of comparable studies in the literature. These different methodological boundary conditions likely explain considerable variability in stretch-induced force responses ((R)FE). Since the structural and mechanistic complexity increases with muscle size, it is challenging to compare the findings of in vitro animal studies with multi-joint muscle actions in vivo. Therefore, when analysing RFE at different muscle levels, the superposition of multiple effects (e.g. interaction with surrounding tissues, synergistic muscle actions, three-dimensional muscle architecture [pennation angle, fascicle rotation], complex activation patterns, a mixture of muscle fibre types, neuromuscular fatigue) should be considered (111, 112).
Although a substantial gap remains in our understanding of mechanisms underlying eccentric contractions (113, 114), (R)FE is a well-acknowledged and fundamental property of muscle behaviour (26, 74, 113, 115, 116).
V. Ultrastructural changes
Besides the well-known benefits, eccentric muscle contractions have been associated with potentially inducing various damage on the muscle fibre contractile and cytoskeletal structures. High mechanical loading of involved tissue structures can lead to microlesions and partial necrosis, disruption of the excitation-contraction coupling or the extracellular matrix, Z-disc streaming, sarcolemma damage, swelling of mitochondria, dilatation of the T-tubule system, and delayed onset muscle soreness [DOMS]. These degenerative changes have several functional consequences for health and disease and were suggested to contribute to muscle weakness in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (117), or after eccentric exercise (118). These topics have been thoroughly reviewed recently (8, 9, 119) and will not be further discussed here.
Cellular and molecular mechanisms
The role of mechanosensitive properties of cross-bridges
A potential mechanism to explain eccentric muscle behaviour within the sarcomere might be explained with force-dependent or stress-dependent XB recruitment upon stretch. The thick filament operates as a regulatory mechanosensory for the regulation of force generation in skeletal muscles (22, 120, 121). Recent X-ray diffraction studies on actively contracting fibres from striated skeletal muscle (21, 22, 25, 122) suggest that the myosin filament can exist in one of two possible states: a relaxed state (OFF) and an activated state (ON). In the ‘OFF’ (22) or ‘super relaxed’ state (123), seen in resting muscle, the great majority of myosin motors is made unavailable for actin binding or ATP hydrolysis (22). However, a small fraction of ON motors ‘allows the muscle to respond immediately to calcium activation when the external load is low (22)’. At high loads, the myosin filaments are switched ON by mechanical stress due to stretch-dependent activation accompanied by the mobilization of more myosin motors that generate more force (21, 22). These results suggested that this regulatory mechanism of thick filament mechanosensing in striated muscles acts independently of the well-known thin filament-mediated calcium-signalling pathway (21) and might have broad implications on the force generation in lengthening contractions (21). However, for long magnitudes of stretch, the majority of XBs are likely to detach (see chapters II and III), while only a fraction of bound XBs is capable to contribute to enhanced forces observed during long eccentric contractions (12, 30, 40, 67, 68). There are several hints that these enhanced forces are due to increased non-XB forces. A series of experiments, in which XB formation is hampered by actomyosin inhibitors, enabled the estimation of non-XB contributions to FE (30, 78, 124, 125).
To date, there is no single accepted mechanism that explains the high force generation upon muscle stretch. A recent study by Fusi et al. (21) suggests a possible role of titin in the regulation of muscle contractility due to thick filament activation mediated by the mechanosensory pathway in the myosin filament (22, 126).
The role of titin
Albeit extensive experimental research has been done on isolated muscles for over 100 years (127), underlying force-generating mechanisms are not fully understood at this time. Even the generally accepted and groundbreaking Hill (32) and Huxley-type models (3–5) are not capable to describe muscle force during and after eccentric contractions.
Despite several explanatory approaches for the unique properties of eccentric muscle loading, no generally accepted model exists. Mechanisms discussed include modified XB kinetics (128, 129), the contribution of sarcomere length dynamics (80, 115, 116, 130, 131), and non-XB contributions to muscle force (103). Some of these mechanisms or explanations can be partially ruled out based on the following criteria. The proposed modifications of the XB cycle have not yet been confirmed experimentally (132). Moreover, only a fraction (0.05 F0) of the experimentally observed dynamics can be described by sarcomere length inhomogeneities (104, 115). Other authors prefer explanatory approaches in which non-XB structures play a crucial role in eccentric muscle loading (113, 133). In addition to the XB components (containing contractile [actin and myosin] and regulatory proteins [i.a. troponin, tropomyosin]), muscle fibres consist of several non-XB components (containing structural proteins [i.a. titin, nebulin, desmin]). These structural proteins have versatile and complex functions in muscle contraction. They contribute to stability, elasticity, alignment, and even active force production—although in a supportive manner (133). Titin is known to play a key role in eccentric muscle loading and has an integral function as a modulator of muscle contraction (133). Functionally, this protein has been reported to serve as a scaffold for the biogenesis of sarcomeres (134), alignment of the myosin filament (133), maintenance of sarcomere length (135), and preservation of passive force and (visco-)elastic recoil in the sarcomere (12, 134). Titin also modulates the actin-myosin-based force production via non-XB formation (26, 30, 136).
Structurally, skeletal muscle titin is referred to as the third myofilament and is the most abundant protein in skeletal muscles with a molecular mass between 3800 and 4200 kDa (137, 138). Titin spans half a sarcomere from the Z-disc to the M-line. It firmly anchors to myosin in the A-band region and then runs freely across the I-band region of the sarcomere until it attaches to actin (approx. 50–100 nm away from the Z-disc) before finally entering the Z-disc. Thereby, this giant protein forms a ‘permanent’ interconnection between the thin and thick filaments of muscle sarcomeres (133, 136, 139). This filamentous protein consists of two segments, a free spring segment located in the sarcomeric I-band with highly variable elastic properties (133, 140) and a less compliant part of titin in the A-band (141). Titin at the Z-disc, A-band, and M-band has primarily structural roles by binding to other main components of the sarcomere (i.a. α-actinin and actin at the Z-disc, myosin heavy chain protein and myosin-binding protein C in the A-band, and myomesin within the M-band) (133, 142). It effectively interacts with more than 30 muscle proteins. Titin’s I-band consists of a proximal and distal immunoglobulin domain, a PEVK region (abundant in the amino acids proline (P), glutamate (E), valine (V), and lysine (K)), and an N2A region (141). Different skeletal muscles express different isoforms of titin, with large variations in length observed in the N2A and PEVK regions (139, 143). These different expressions correlate with the mechanical properties of different muscle types (133, 139, 140). Fast skeletal muscles (containing predominately high proportions of fast myosin heavy chains [MHCs]) express short titin N2A isoforms. In contrast, slow skeletal muscles express longer N2A isoforms. Considering this, a functional implication might be that fast muscles are more prone to show an increase in titin-induced force generation during and after stretch contractions compared to slow muscles (Fig. 8, cf. black vs grey trace) (79, 113, 139). Titin in skeletal muscle is known to become stiffer upon muscle activation in the presence of Ca2+ (≈ 20%) (59, 144–146). More important, however, seems to be the property to contribute to spring-like force generation during an active stretch from any resting length, likely by attaching to actin during Ca2+ activation. This filamentous spring protein titin is known to significantly reduce its persistence length upon activation (147–150). Novel three-filament model approaches have been proposed that explain mechanisms underlying eccentric loading in skeletal muscle based on an adjustable titin spring (26–29). These approaches are backed up by a large number of experimental evidence for titin-actin interactions upon muscle activation (148, 151–154). In particular, a recent study by Dutta et al. (148) demonstrated titin-N2A interaction with actin upon Ca2+ activation. This interaction was likely impaired in muscles from muscular dystrophy with myositis (mdm) mice exhibiting an 83 amino acid deletion at the N2A-PEVK intersection, resulting in no increase in titin stiffness and reduced RFE (148).
Posttranslational modifications of titin
It is widely known that titin stiffness plays a fundamental role in regulating muscle performance in cardiac and skeletal muscle (133). Alterations in titin stiffness affect the contractile properties of the muscle—particularly during eccentric muscle actions. Several posttranslational modifications of titin mediate the rapid modulation of titin stiffness. The stiffness of titin can be acutely modulated by Ca2+ (144) and chaperone binding (155), titin-actin interaction (148, 151–154), and oxidation (156, 157). Another mechanism that contributes to the modulation of titin stiffness is regulated by phosphorylation (158, 159). The modulation depends on the location where protein kinases phosphorylate the elastic titin regions. At both ends of the titin molecule, the phosphorylation status regulates the binding of titin to many Z-disc and M-band proteins (159). The majority of the phosphorylation studies has been done on the cardiac N2B and PEVK elements (160, 161). There is general agreement that phosphorylation of the cardiac N2B region increases the persistence length of the elastic titin spring, which results in reduced overall titin-based stiffness and force. Whereas phosphorylation of the cardiac PEVK domain reduces the effective free spring length yielding increased stretch-dependent stiffness and force. Only a few studies have investigated the phosphorylation of the two titin domains N2A and PEVK in skeletal muscle (162–165). The findings reveal a titin modification detected in eccentrically exercised skeletal muscles of adult rats, resulting in an overall increase in titin-based stiffness (164, 165).
These results suggest that titin’s posttranslational modifications in cardiac and skeletal muscles may act differently upon exercise-induced mechanical stress. The observed changes in titin-based stiffness are thought to play an important role in adjusting the passive and active properties of cardiac and skeletal muscle in health and disease. For detailed reviews on posttranslational modifications of titin see (133, 158–160).
Future challenges in muscle modelling
A precise knowledge of molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying eccentric contractions is also required for the improvement of muscle models. Muscle models—designed to facilitate realistic predictions of muscle force production during dynamic contractions over the entire working range of the muscle—are used to answer a variety of questions in biology, medicine, biomechanics and physiology (166–168). A precise prediction of muscular forces is needed to gain detailed knowledge of (i) the structure and functioning of the muscle, (ii) neuromuscular relationships in locomotor systems, (iii) the optimization of medical diagnostic and/or treatment methods, but also (iv) to address unresolved issues related to mechanical/metabolic movement principles or physiological processes. By modelling titin as a viscoelastic spring segment with an activation-dependent coupling to actin, computational models will be able to mimic active lengthening experiments in biological muscle. A three-filament model of skeletal muscle force production (mediated by titin) is supposed to overcome significant deviations between experimental observations and predictions by the classic sliding-filament (3, 4) and cross-bridge theories (5) (two-filament models). This will improve the accuracy of muscle models (27) as well as multi-body models (169) concerning the control of movements and efficiency of locomotion.
Hence, the development of data-driven numerical methods for the simulation of biological systems (hollow organs [stomach (170, 171), urinary bladder (172, 173)], and skeletal muscles (174)) are of great importance. Due to novel research approaches together with computer simulations, possible binding mechanisms (e.g. actin-titin, titin-tropomyosin) can be tested. The predictive power of complex 3D muscle models is only as good as the physical accuracy comprising each of its components, generally the properties of certain muscle structures, boundary conditions, and/or underlying geometries (169). Such predictions also depend on the correct characterisation of their smallest unit—the (half-) sarcomere. Errors in their description inevitably lead to deviations of the muscular force and thus to issues and misinterpretations of all model-based research. Consequently, the prediction of realistic muscle forces in dynamic contractions allows a better understanding of e.g. overall muscular force production, functional morphology, mechanical principles of locomotion, prosthetics, and robotics or provides a detailed insight into the functionality and motility of hollow organs.
Conclusion and future perspectives
The long-standing problem in muscle physiology of how muscles operate in eccentric contractions has been intensely studied for the past 70 years—with remarkable progress. Skeletal muscle behaviour during and following active stretches is associated with increased performance at decreased oxygen consumption, reduced metabolic cost (ATP), improved energy efficiency, as well as decreased muscle activity (175–178). Stretch-induced force potentiation exists during voluntary contractions and is relevant for movement generation in daily activities (179). The versatile and unique characteristics driven by eccentric muscle loading represent important determinants of active force production. The progressive force development and linear spring-like muscle behaviour during stretch contractions are not accounted for in existing Hill- or Huxley-type muscle models so far, and might significantly reduce the control effort. Additionally, this distinct manner might offer high-impact shock absorption strategies during eccentric movements such as landing after jumps or downhill running (30). The features discussed above could be demonstrated at the small microscopic scale up to the gross macroscopic scale. Ample evidence supports the idea of a cumulative mechanism that combines non-linear XB and non-XBs contributions to result in a linear force response during muscle-lengthening contractions. Findings suggest that titin is a fundamental regulator in eccentric loading in striated muscle, although its role is still evolving. The mechanical properties of titin continually adapt to cover prevailing conditions of skeletal muscle performance. For all mechanisms noted above, modulation in titin-based stiffness plays an essential role. Titin stiffness alters as a function of titin-isoforms (139), other sarcomeric proteins (such as molecular chaperones) targeting the titin springs (155), the interaction of titin-spring elements with the thin filament actin (26), phosphorylation-mediated regulation (158, 160), and mechanosignalling (120). Current and future findings are likely to improve the understanding of overall muscle behaviour and force generation on different scales touching health, rehabilitation, physical and applied sciences, robotics, and foundations of muscle contraction.
This is a review paper. The results reported here have been published previously (see references for specifics).
Dickinson MH, Farley CT, Full RJ, Koehl MA, Kram R, Lehman S (2000) How animals move: an integrative view. Science 288:100–106. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.288.5463.100
Roberts TJ, Azizi E (2011) Flexible mechanisms: the diverse roles of biological springs in vertebrate movement. J Exp Biol 214:353–361. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.038588
Huxley AF, Niedergerke R (1954) Structural changes in muscle during contraction; interference microscopy of living muscle fibres. Nature 173:971–973. https://doi.org/10.1038/173971a0
Huxley HE, Hanson J (1954) Changes in the cross-striations of muscle during contraction and stretch and their structural interpretation. Nature 173:973–976
Huxley AF (1957) Muscle structure and theories of contraction. Prog Biophys Biophys Chem 7:255–318
Edman KAP (1979) The velocity of unloaded shortening and its relation to sarcomere length and isometric force in vertebrate muscle fibres. J Physiol 291:143–159
Abbott B, Bigland B, Ritchie J (1952) The physiological cost of negative work. J Physiol 117:380–390
Douglas J, Pearson S, Ross A, McGuigan M (2017) Eccentric exercise: physiological characteristics and acute responses. Sport Med 47:663–675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-016-0624-8
Hody S, Croisier JL, Bury T, Rogister B, Leprince P (2019) Eccentric muscle contractions: risks and benefits. Front Physiol 10:1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00536
Lindstedt SL, LaStayo PC, Reich TE (2001) When active muscles lengthen: properties and consequences of eccentric contractions. News Physiol Sci 16:256–261. https://doi.org/10.1152/physiologyonline.2001.16.6.256
Komi PV (2000) Stretch-shorting cycle:a powerful model to study normal and fatigued muscle. J Biomech 33:1197–206
Tomalka A, Weidner S, Hahn D, Seiberl W, Siebert T (2021) Power amplification increases with contraction velocity during stretch-shortening cycles of skinned muscle fibers. Front Physiol 12:1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.644981
Seiberl W, Hahn D, Power GA, Fletcher JR, Siebert T (2021) Editorial: the stretch-shortening cycle of active muscle and muscle-tendon complex: what, why and how it increases muscle performance? Front Physiol 12:10–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.693141
Duchateau J, Enoka RM (2016) Neural control of lengthening contractions. J Exp Biol 219:197–204. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.123158
Duchateau J, Baudry S (2014) Insights into the neural control of eccentric contractions. J Appl Physiol 116:1418–1425. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00002.2013
Meyer K, Steiner R, Lastayo P, Lippuner K, Allemann Y, Eberli F, Schmid J, Saner H, Hoppeler H. Eccentric exercise in coronary patients : central hemodynamic and metabolic responses. Med Sci Sport Exerc 35, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1249/01.MSS.0000074580.79648.9D.
Hoppeler H. Moderate load eccentric exercise; a distinct novel training modality. Front Physiol 7, 2016. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2016.00483.
LaStayo P, Marcus R, Dibble L, Frajacomo F, Lindstedt S (2014) Eccentric exercise in rehabilitation: safety feasibility, and application. J Appl Physiol 116:1426–1434. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00008.2013
Nishikawa K (2016) Eccentric contraction : unraveling mechanisms of force enhancement and energy conservation. J Exp Biol 219:189–196. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.124057
Herzog W (2014) Mechanisms of enhanced force production in lengthening (eccentric) muscle contractions. J Appl Physiol 116:1407–17. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00069.2013
Fusi L, Brunello E, Yan Z, Irving M (2016) Thick filament mechano-sensing is a calcium-independent regulatory mechanism in skeletal muscle. Nat Commun 7:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13281
Linari M, Brunello E, Reconditi M, Fusi L, Caremani M, Narayanan T, Piazzesi G, Lombardi V, Irving M (2015) Force generation by skeletal muscle is controlled by mechanosensing in myosin filaments. Nature 528:276–279. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15727
Brunello E, Fusi L, Ghisleni A, Park-Holohan SJ, Ovejero JG, Narayanan T, Irving M (2020) Myosin filament-based regulation of the dynamics of contraction in heart muscle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 117:8177–8186. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1920632117
Ait-Mou Y, Hsu K, Farman GP, Kumar M, Greaser ML, Irving TC, de Tombe pp. (2016) Titin strain contributes to the Frank-Starling law of the heart by structural rearrangements of both thin- and thick-filament proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113:2306–2311. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516732113
Piazzesi G, Caremani M, Linari M, Reconditi M (2018) Thick filament mechano-sensing in skeletal and cardiac muscles : a common mechanism able to adapt the energetic cost of the contraction to the task. Front Physiol 9:1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.00736
Rode C, Siebert T, Blickhan R (2009) Titin-induced force enhancement and force depression: a “sticky-spring” mechanism in muscle contractions? J Theor Biol 259:350–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.03.015
Heidlauf T, Klotz T, Rode C, Siebert T, Röhrle O (2017) A continuum-mechanical skeletal muscle model including actin-titin interaction predicts stable contractions on the descending limb of the force-length relation. PLoS Comput Biol 13:1–25
Schappacher-Tilp G, Leonard T, Desch G, Herzog W (2015) A novel three-filament model of force generation in eccentric contraction of skeletal muscles. PLoS One 10:0117634. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117634
Nishikawa KC, Monroy JA, Uyeno TE, Yeo SH, Pai DK, Lindstedt SL (2012) Is titin a “winding filament”? A new twist on muscle contraction. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 279:981–990. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2011.1304
Tomalka A, Rode C, Schumacher J, Siebert T (2017) The active force – length relationship is invisible during extensive eccentric contractions in skinned skeletal muscle fibres. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 284:20162497. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.2497
Li Y, Hessel AL, Unger A, Ing D, Recker J, Koser F, Freundt JK, Linke WA (2020) Graded titin cleavage progressively reduces tension and uncovers the source of A-band stability in contracting muscle. Elife 9:1–23. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64107
Hill AV (1938) The heat of shortening and the dynamic constants of muscle. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 126:136–195. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1938.0050
Haeufle DFB, Günther M, Bayer A, Schmitt S (2014) Hill-type muscle model with serial damping and eccentric force-velocity relation. J Biomech 47:1531–1536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.02.009
Edman KAP (1988) Double-hyperbolic force-velocity relation in frog muscle fibres. J Physiol 404:301–321. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp017291
Alcazar J, Csapo R, Ara I, Alegre LM (2019) On the shape of the force-velocity relationship in skeletal muscles: the linear, the hyperbolic, and the double-hyperbolic. Front Physiol 10:1–21. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00769
Katz B (1939) The relation between force and speed in muscular contraction. J Physiol 96:45–64. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1939.sp003756
Roots H, Offer GW, Ranatunga KW (2007) Comparison of the tension responses to ramp shortening and lengthening in intact mammalian muscle fibres: crossbridge and non-crossbridge contributions. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 28:123–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10974-007-9110-0
Lombardi V, Piazzesi G (1990) The contractile response during steady lengthening of stimulated frog muscle fibres. J Physiol 431:141–171
Pinniger GJ, Ranatunga KW, Offer GW (2006) Crossbridge and non-crossbridge contributions to tension in lengthening rat muscle: force-induced reversal of the power stroke. J Physiol 573:627–643. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2005.095448
Weidner S, Tomalka A, Rode C, Siebert T. 2022 How velocity impacts eccentric force generation of fully activated skinned skeletal muscle fibers in long stretches. J Appl Physiol : 223–233 https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00735.2021.
Joyce GC, Rack PM (1969) Isotonic lengthening and shortening movements of cat soleus muscle. J Physiol 204:475–491
Rahman MA, Ušaj M, Rassier DE, Månsson A (2018) Blebbistatin effects expose hidden secrets in the force-generating cycle of actin and myosin. Biophys J 115:386–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2018.05.037
Iwamoto H (2018) Effects of myosin inhibitors on the X-ray diffraction patterns of relaxed and calcium-activated rabbit skeletal muscle fibers. Biophys Physicobiology 15:111–120. https://doi.org/10.2142/biophysico.15.0_111
Kovács M, Tóth J, Hetényi C, Málnási-Csizmadia A, Seller JR (2004) Mechanism of blebbistatin inhibition of myosin II. J Biol Chem 279:35557–35563. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M405319200
Burmeister Getz E, Cooke R, Lehman SL (1998) Phase transition in force during ramp stretches of skeletal muscle. Biophys J 75:2971–2983. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77738-0
Linari M, Bottinelli R, Pellegrino MA, Reconditi M, Reggiani C, Lombardi V (2004) The mechanism of the force response to stretch in human skinned muscle fibres with different myosin isoforms. J Physiol 554:335–352. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2003.051748
Tomalka A, Weidner S, Hahn D, Seiberl W, Siebert T (2020) Cross-bridges and sarcomeric non-cross-bridge structures contribute to increased work in stretch-shortening cycles. Front Physiol 11:1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.00921
Flitney F, Hirst D (1978) Cross-bridge detachment and sarcomere ’give’ during stretch of active frog’s muscle. J Physiol 276:449–465. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012246
Fukutani A, Leonard T, Herzog W (2019) Does stretching velocity affect residual force enhancement? J Biomech 89:143–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.04.033
Huxley AF, Simmons RM (1971) Proposed mechanism of force generation in striated muscle. Nature 233:533–538. https://doi.org/10.1038/233533a0
Sugi H (1972) Tension changes during and after stretch in frog muscle fibres. J Physiol 225:237–253
Huxley HE (1969) The mechanism of muscular contraction. Science 164:1356–1366
Rassier DE (2008) Pre-power stroke cross bridges contribute to force during stretch of skeletal muscle myofibrils. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 275:2577–2586. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.0719
Rassier D, Herzog W (2004) Active force inhibition and stretch-induced force enhancement in frog muscle treated with BDM. J Appl Physiol 97:1395–1400. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00377.2004
Månsson A, Rassier D, Tsiavaliaris G. 2015 Poorly understood aspects of striated muscle contraction. Biomed Res Int 2015 https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/245154.
Minozzo FC, Rassier DE (2010) Effects of blebbistatin and Ca2+ concentration on force produced during stretch of skeletal muscle fibers. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 299:C1127-35. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00073.2010
Stewart M, Franks-Skiba K, Cooke R (2009) Myosin regulatory light chain phosphorylation inhibits shortening velocities of skeletal muscle fibers in the presence of the myosin inhibitor blebbistatin. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 30:17–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10974-008-9162-9
Schoenberg M (1985) Equilibrium muscle cross-bridge behavior. Theoretical considerations. Biophys J 48:467–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(85)83802-9
Bagni MA, Cecchi G, Colombini B, Colomo F (2002) A non-cross-bridge stiffness in activated frog muscle fibers. Biophys J 82:3118–3127. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75653-1
Edman KAP, Tsuchiya T (1996) Strain of passive elements during force enhancement by stretch in frog muscle fibres. J Physiol 490:191–205. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1996.sp021135
Edman KAP, Elzinga G, Noble M (1978) Enhancement of mechanical performance by stretch during tetanic contractions of vertebrate skeletal muscle fibres. J Physiol 281:139–155. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012413
Sugi H, Tsuchiya T (1988) Stiffness changes during enhancement and deficit of isometric force by slow length changes in frog skeletal muscle fibres. J Physiol 407:215–229. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp017411
Herzog W, Leonard TR. The history dependence of force production in mammalian skeletal muscle following stretch-shortening and shortening-stretch cycles. [Online]. J Biomech 33: 531–42, 2000. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10708773.
Colombini B, Nocella M, Benelli G, Cecchi G, Bagni MA (2007) Crossbridge properties during force enhancement by slow stretching in single intact frog muscle fibres. J Physiol 585:607–615. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2007.141440
Till O, Siebert T, Rode C, Blickhan R (2008) Characterization of isovelocity extension of activated muscle: a Hill-type model for eccentric contractions and a method for parameter determination. J Theor Biol 255:176–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.08.009
Siebert T, Leichsenring K, Rode C, Wick C, Stutzig N, Schubert H, Blickhan R, Böl M (2015) Three-dimensional muscle architecture and comprehensive dynamic properties of rabbit gastrocnemius, plantaris and soleus: input for simulation studies. PLoS One 10:0130985. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130985
Linari M, Lucii L, Reconditi M, Casoni ME, Amenitsch H, Bernstorff S, Piazzesi G, Lombardi V (2000) A combined mechanical and X-ray diffraction study of stretch potentiation in single frog muscle fibres. J Physiol 526:589–596. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.00589.x
Linari M, Woledge RC, Curtin NA (2003) Energy storage during stretch of active single fibres from frog skeletal muscle. J Physiol 548:461–474. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2002.032185
Bosco C, Ito A, Komi PV, Luhtanen P, Rahkila P, Rusko H, Viitasalo JT (1982) Neuromuscular function and mechanical efficiency of human leg extensor muscles during jumping exercises. Acta Physiol Scand 114:543–550
Wilson G, Elliott B, Wood G (1991) The effect on performance of imposing a delay during an SSC movement. Med Sci Sport Exerc 23:364–370
Abbott BC, Aubert XM (1952) The force exerted by active striated muscle during and after change of length. J Physiol 117:77–86. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1952.sp004733
Minozzo FC, Baroni BM, Correa JA, Vaz MA, Rassier DE (2013) Force produced after stretch in sarcomeres and half-sarcomeres isolated from skeletal muscles. Sci Rep 3:2320. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep02320
Leonard TR, DuVall M, Herzog W (2010) Force enhancement following stretch in a single sarcomere. Am J Physiol - Cell Physiol 299:C1398–C1401. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00222.2010
Herzog W, Schappacher G, DuVall M, Leonard TR, Herzog JA (2016) Residual force enhancement following eccentric contractions: a new mechanism involving titin. Physiology 31:300–312. https://doi.org/10.1152/physiol.00049.2014
Haeger RM, Rassier DE (2020) Force enhancement after stretch of isolated myofibrils is increased by sarcomere length non - uniformities. Sci Rep 10(1):21590. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78457-1
Rassier DE, Herzog W, Pollack GH. 2003 Stretch-induced force enhancement and stability of skeletal muscle myofibrils. Adv Exp Med Biol 538: 501–15; discussion 515 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9029-7_45.
Rassier DE, Pavlov I (2012) Force produced by isolated sarcomeres and half-sarcomeres after an imposed stretch. AJP Cell Physiol Cell Physiol 302:C240–C248. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00208.2011
Shalabi N, Cornachione A, Leite F, Vengallatore S, Rassier DE (2017) Residual force enhancement is regulated by titin in skeletal and cardiac myofibrils. J Physiol 595:2085–2098. https://doi.org/10.1113/JP272983
Cornachione AS, Leite FS, Bagni MA, Rassier DE (2016) The increase in non-crossbridge forces after stretch of activated striated muscle is related to titin isoforms. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 310:C19–C26. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00156.2015
Edman KAP, Elzinga G, Noble M (1982) Residual force enhancement after stretch of contracting frog single muscle fibers. J Gen Physiol 80:769–784. https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.80.5.769
Cornachione AS, Rassier DE (2012) A non-cross-bridge, static tension is present in permeabilized skeletal muscle fibers after active force inhibition or actin extraction. AJP Cell Physiol 302:C566–C574. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00355.2011
Peterson D, Rassier D, Herzog W (2004) Force enhancement in single skeletal muscle fibres on the ascending limb of the force-length relationship. J Exp Biol 207:2787–2791. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.01095
Rassier DE, Herzog W (2005) Force enhancement and relaxation rates after stretch of activated muscle fibres. Proc Biol Sci 272:475–480. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2004.2967
Fukutani A, Herzog W (2018) Residual force enhancement is preserved for conditions of reduced contractile force. Med Sci Sport Exerc 50:1186–1191. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000001563
Julian FJ, Morgan DL (1979) Intersarcomere dynamics during fixed-end tetanic contractions of frog muscle fibres. J Physiol 293:365–378
Nocella M, Cecchi G, Bagni MA, Colombini B (2014) Force enhancement after stretch in mammalian muscle fiber: no evidence of cross-bridge involvement. AJP Cell Physiol 307:C1123–C1129. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00290.2014
Herzog W, Leonard TR (2002) Force enhancement following stretching of skeletal muscle: a new mechanism. J Exp Biol 205:1275–1283
Ettema GJ, Huijing PA, de Haan A (1992) The potentiating effect of prestretch on the contractile performance of rat gastrocnemius medialis muscle during subsequent shortening and isometric contractions. J Exp Biol 165:121–36
van Atteveldt H, Crowe A (1980) Active tension changes in frog skeletal muscle during and after mechanical extension. J Biomech 13:323–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(80)90011-1
Brown IE, Loeb GE (2000) Measured and modeled properties of mammalian skeletal muscle: III. The effects of stimulus frequency on stretch-induced force enhancement and shortening-induced force depression. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 21:21–31. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005619014170
Cook CS, Mcdonagh MJN (1995) Force responses to controlled stretches of electrically stimulated human muscle-tendon complex. Exp Physiol 80:477–490
Lee HD, Herzog W (2002) Force enhancement following muscle stretch of electrically stimulated and voluntarily activated human adductor pollicis. J Physiol 545:321–330. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2002.018010
Fukutani A, Misaki J, Isaka T. Influence of joint angle on residual force enhancement in human plantar flexors. Front Physiol 8, 2017. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00234.
Fukutani A, Shimoho K, Isaka T. Isometric preactivation before active lengthening increases residual force enhancement. Scand J Med Sci Sports : 1–8, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.13454.
Hahn D, Riedel TN (2018) Residual force enhancement contributes to increased performance during stretch-shortening cycles of human plantar flexor muscles in vivo. J Biomech 77:190–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.06.003
Siebert T, Kurch D, Blickhan R, Stutzig N (2016) Does weightlifting increase residual force enhancement? J Biomech 49:2047–2052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.05.017
Fortuna R, Power GA, Mende E, Seiberl W, Herzog W (2016) Residual force enhancement following shortening is speed-dependent. Sci Rep 5:21513. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep21513
Pinniger GJ, Cresswell AG (2007) Residual force enhancement after lengthening is present during submaximal plantar flexion and dorsiflexion actions in humans. J Appl Physiol 102:18–25. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00565.2006
Contento VS, Dalton BH, Power GA (2019) The inhibitory tendon-evoked reflex is increased in the torque-enhanced state following active lengthening compared to a purely isometric contraction. Brain Sci 10:1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10010013
de Campos D, Orssatto LBR, Trajano GS, Herzog W, de Fontana H, B. (2022) Residual force enhancement in human skeletal muscles: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sport Heal Sci 11:94–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2021.05.006
Herzog W (2004) History dependence of skeletal muscle force production: implications for movement control. Hum Mov Sci 23:591–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2004.10.003
Rassier DE, Herzog W, Wakeling J, Syme DA (2003) Stretch-induced, steady-state force enhancement in single skeletal muscle fibers exceeds the isometric force at optimum fiber length. J Biomech 36:1309–1316. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00155-6
Schachar R, Herzog W, Leonard TR (2002) Force enhancement above the initial isometric force on the descending limb of the force-length relationship. J Biomech 35:1299–1306. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00188-4
Morgan DL, Whitehead NP, Wise AK, Gregory JE, Proske U (2000) Tension changes in the cat soleus muscle following slow stretch or shortening of the contracting muscle. J Physiol 522:503–513. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-2-00503.x
Joumaa V, Rassier DE, Leonard TR, Herzog W (2007) Passive force enhancement in single myofibrils. Pflugers Arch Eur J Physiol 455:367–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00424-007-0287-2
Lee EJ, Joumaa V, Herzog W (2007) New insights into the passive force enhancement in skeletal muscles. J Biomech 40:719–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.10.009
Herzog W (2019) Passive force enhancement in striated muscle. J Appl Physiol 126:1782–1789. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00676.2018
Rassier DE, Herzog W, Pollack GH (2003) Dynamics of individual sarcomeres during and after stretch in activated single myofibrils. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 270:1735–1740. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2003.2418
Leonard TR, Herzog W (2010) Regulation of muscle force in the absence of actin-myosin-based cross-bridge interaction. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 299:C14-20. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00049.2010
Edman KAP (2012) Residual force enhancement after stretch in striated muscle. A consequence of increased myofilament overlap? J Physiol 590:1339–45. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2011.222729
Ward SR, Winters TM, O’Connor SM, Lieber RL (2020) Non-linear scaling of passive mechanical properties in fibers, bundles, fascicles and whole rabbit muscles. Front Physiol 11:1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.00211
Herzog W (2017) Skeletal muscle mechanics: questions, problems and possible solutions. J Neuroeng Rehabil 14:17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-017-0310-6
Rassier DE (2017) Sarcomere mechanics in striated muscles: from molecules to sarcomeres to cells. Am J Physiol - Cell Physiol 313:C134–C145. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00050.2017
Fukutani A, Herzog W. 2019 Current understanding of residual force enhancement: cross-bridge component and non-cross-bridge component. Int J Mol Sci 20 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20215479.
Campbell SG, Campbell KS (2011) Mechanisms of residual force enhancement in skeletal muscle: Insights from experiments and mathematical models. Biophys Rev 3:199–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12551-011-0059-2
Edman KAP (2010) Contractile performance of striated muscle. Adv Exp Med Biol 682:7–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6366-6_2
Carpenter S, Karpati G (1979) Duchenne muscular dystrophy: plasma membrane loss initiates muscle cell necrosis unless it is repaired. Brain 102:147–161
Lieber RL, Fridén J (2002) Mechanisms of muscle injury gleaned from animal models. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 81:S70-579. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PHM.0000029771.92757.2F
Lieber RL (2018) Biomechanical response of skeletal muscle to eccentric contractions. J Sport Heal Sci 7:294–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2018.06.005
Gautel M (2011) The sarcomeric cytoskeleton: who picks up the strain? Curr Opin Cell Biol 23:39–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2010.12.001
Reconditi M, Brunello E, Fusi L, Linari M, Martinez MF, Lombardi V, Irving M, Piazzesi G (2014) Sarcomere-length dependence of myosin filament structure in skeletal muscle fibres of the frog. J Physiol 592:1119–37. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2013.267849
Haselgrove JC (1975) X-ray evidence for conformational changes in the myosin filaments of vertebrate striated muscle. J Mol Biol 92:113–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2836(75)90094-7
Stewart MA, Franks-Skiba K, Chen S, Cooke R (2010) Myosin ATP turnover rate is a mechanism involved in thermogenesis in resting skeletal muscle fibers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:430–435. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0909468107
Colombini B, Nocella M, Bagni MA (2016) Non-crossbridge stiffness in active muscle fibres. J Exp Biol 219:153–160. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.124370
Rassier DE, Leite FS, Nocella M, Cornachione AS, Colombini B, Bagni MA (2015) Non-crossbridge forces in activated striated muscles: a titin dependent mechanism of regulation? J Muscle Res Cell Motil 36:37–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10974-014-9397-6
Brunello E, Fusi L (2020) A new spring for titin. J Physiol 598:213–214. https://doi.org/10.1113/JP279314
Blix M (1891) Die Länge und die spannung des muskels. Skand Arch Physiol 3:295–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-1716.1892.tb00660.x
Maréchal G, Plaghki L (1979) The deficit of the isometric tetanic tension redeveloped after a release of frog muscle at a constant velocity. J Gen Physiol 73:453–67. https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.73.4.453
Walcott S, Herzog W (2008) Modeling residual force enhancement with generic cross-bridge models. Math Biosci 216:172–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2008.10.005
Morgan DL, Mochon S, Julian FJ (1982) A quantitative model of intersarcomere dynamics during fixed-end contractions of single frog muscle fibers. Biophys J 39:189–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(82)84507-4
Telley IA, Denoth J, Stüssi E, Pfitzer G, Stehle R (2006) Half-sarcomere dynamics in myofibrils during activation and relaxation studied by tracking fluorescent markers. Biophys J 90:514–30. https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.105.070334
Mehta A, Herzog W (2008) Cross-bridge induced force enhancement? J Biomech 41:1611–1615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.02.010
Linke WA (2018) Titin gene and protein functions in passive and active muscle. Annu Rev Physiol 80:389–411. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physiol-021317-121234
Krüger M, Kötter S (2016) Titin, a central mediator for hypertrophic signaling, exercise-induced mechanosignaling and skeletal muscle remodeling. Front Physiol 7:1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2016.00076
Eckels EC, Tapia-rojo R, Andr J, Fern JM (2018) The work of titin protein folding as a major driver in muscle contraction. Annu Rev Physiol 80:327–351
Tomalka A, Roehrle O, Han J-C, Pham T, Taberner AJ, Siebert T (2019) Extensive eccentric contractions in intact cardiac trabeculae : revealing compelling differences in contractile behaviour compared to skeletal muscles. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 286:20190719. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.0719
Bang M-L, Centner T, Fornoff F, Geach AJ, Gotthardt M, McNabb M, Witt CC, Labeit D, Gregorio CC, Granzier H, Labeit S (2001) The complete gene sequence of titin, expression of an unusual 700-kDa titin isoform, and its interaction with obscurin identify a novel Z-line to I-band linking system. Circ Res 89:1065–1072. https://doi.org/10.1161/hh2301.100981
Wang K, McClure J, Tu A (1979) Titin: major myofibrillar components of striated muscle. Proc Natl Acad Sci 76:3698–3702. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.76.8.3698
Prado LG, Makarenko I, Andresen C, Krüger M, Opitz CA, Linke WA (2005) Isoform diversity of giant proteins in relation to passive and active contractile properties of rabbit skeletal muscles. J Gen Physiol 126:461–480. https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.200509364
Freiburg A, Beckmann JS, Cazorla O, Trombitas K, Kolmerer B, Hell W, Gregorio CC, Centner T, Granzier H, Labeit S, Fougerousse F, Witt C (2000) Series of exon-skipping events in the elastic spring region of titin as the structural basis for myofibrillar elastic diversity. Circ Res 86:1114–1121. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.86.11.1114
Labeit S, Kolmerer B (1995) Titins: giant proteins in charge of muscle ultrastructure and elasticity. Science 80(270):293–296. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.270.5234.293
Wang Z, Grange M, Wagner T, Kho AL, Gautel M, Raunser S, Wang Z, Grange M, Wagner T, Kho AL, Gautel M, Raunser S. Article the molecular basis for sarcomere organization in vertebrate skeletal muscle The molecular basis for sarcomere organization in vertebrate skeletal muscle. .
Fukuda N, Granzier HL, Ishiwata S, Kurihara S (2008) Physiological functions of the giant elastic protein titin in mammalian striated muscle. J Physiol 58:151–159. https://doi.org/10.2170/physiolsci.RV005408
Labeit D, Watanabe K, Witt C, Fujita H, Wu Y, Lahmers S, Funck T, Labeit S, Granzier HL (2003) Calcium-dependent molecular spring elements in the giant protein titin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:13716–13721. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2235652100
Joumaa V, Rassier DE, Leonard TR, Herzog W (2008) The origin of passive force enhancement in skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 294:C74–C78. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00218.2007
Bagni MA, Colombini B, Geiger P, P.R. B, Cecchi G. (2004) Non-cross-bridge calcium-dependent stiffness in frog muscle fibers. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 286:1353–1357. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00493.2003
Tahir U, Monroy JA, Rice NA, Nishikawa KC. 2020 Effects of a titin mutation on force enhancement and force depression in mouse soleus muscles. J Exp Biol 223 https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.197038.
Dutta S, Tsiros C, Sundar SL, Athar H, Moore J, Nelson B, Gage MJ, Nishikawa K (2018) Calcium increases titin N2A binding to F-actin and regulated thin filaments. Sci Rep 8:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32952-8
Joumaa V, Leonard TR, Herzog W (2008) Residual force enhancement in myofibrils and sarcomeres. Proc Biol Sci 275:1411–9. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.0142
Kellermayer M, Granzier HL (1996) Calcium-dependent inhibition of in vitro thin-filament motility by native titin. FEBS Lett 380:281–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-5793(96)00055-5
Astier C, Raynaud F, Lebart MC, Roustan C, Benyamin Y (1998) Binding of a native titin fragment to actin is regulated by PIP2. FEBS Lett 429:95–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-5793(98)00572-9
Bianco P, Nagy A, Kengyel A, Szatmári D, Mártonfalvi Z, Huber T, Kellermayer MSZ (2007) Interaction forces between F-actin and titin PEVK domain measured with optical tweezers. Biophys J 93:2102–2109. https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.107.106153
Li Y, Unger A, von Frieling-Salewsky M, Rivas Pardo JA, Fernandez JM, Linke WA (2018) Quantifying the titin contribution to muscle force generation using a novel method to specifically cleave the titin springs in situ. Biophys J 114:645a. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2017.11.3480
Nagy A (2004) Differential actin binding along the PEVK domain of skeletal muscle titin. J Cell Sci 117:5781–5789. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.01501
Unger A, Beckendorf L, Böhme P, Kley R, von Frieling-Salewsky M, Lochmüller H, Schröder R, Fürst DO, Vorgerd M, Linke WA (2017) Translocation of molecular chaperones to the titin springs is common in skeletal myopathy patients and affects sarcomere function. Acta Neuropathol Commun 5:72. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-017-0474-0
Grützner A, Garcia-Manyes S, Kötter S, Badilla CL, Fernandez JM, Linke WA (2009) Modulation of titin-based stiffness by disulfide bonding in the cardiac titin N2-B unique sequence. Biophys J 97:825–834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2009.05.037
Alegre-Cebollada J, Kosuri P, Giganti D, Eckels E, Rivas-pardo A, Hamdani N, Warren CM, Solaro RJ, Wolfgang A, Fernández JM (2014) S-glutathionylation of cryptic cysteines enhances titin elasticity by blocking protein folding. Cell 156:1235–1246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.01.056.S-glutathionylation
Freundt JK, Linke WA (2019) Passive Properties of Muscle Titin as a force-generating muscle protein under regulatory control. J Appl Physiol 126:1474–1482. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00865.2018
Hidalgo C, Granzier H (2013) Tuning the molecular giant titin through phosphorylation: Role in health and disease. Trends Cardiovasc Med 23:165–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcm.2012.10.005
Hamdani N, Herwig M, Linke WA (2017) Tampering with springs: phosphorylation of titin affecting the mechanical function of cardiomyocytes. Biophys Rev 9:225–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12551-017-0263-9
Krüger M, Kötter S, Grützner A, Lang P, Andresen C, Redfield MM, Butt E, Dos Remedios CG, Linke WA (2009) Protein kinase G modulates human myocardial passive stiffness by phosphorylation of the titin springs. Circ Res 104:87–94. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.184408
Lanzicher T, Zhou T, Saripalli C, Keschrumrus V, Smith JE III, Mayans O, Sbaizero O, Granzier H (2020) Single-molecule force spectroscopy on the N2A element of titin: effects of phosphorylation and CARP. Front Physiol 11:1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.00173
Ibata N, Terentjev EM (2021) Why exercise builds muscles: titin mechanosensing controls skeletal muscle growth under load. Biophys J 120(17):3649–3663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2021.07.023
Müller AE, Kreiner M, Kötter S, Lassak P, Bloch W, Suhr F, Krüger M. Acute exercise modifies titin phosphorylation and increases cardiac myofilament stiffness. .
Hidalgo C, Saripalli C, Granzier HL (2014) Effect of exercise training on post-translational and post-transcriptional regulation of titin stiffness in striated muscle of wild type and IG KO mice. Arch Biochem Biophys 552–553:100–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2014.02.010
Haeufle DFB, Wochner I, Holzmüller D, Driess D, Günther M, Schmitt S (2020) Muscles reduce neuronal information load: quantification of control effort in biological vs robotic pointing and walking. Front Robot AI 7:1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2020.00077
Siebert T, Screen HRC, Rode C. Computational modelling of muscle, tendon, and ligaments biomechanics. In: Computational Modelling of Biomechanics and Biotribology in the Musculoskeletal System. Elsevier, 2021, p. 155–186.
Seth A, Hicks J, Uchida T, Habib A, Dembia C, Dunne J, Ong C, DeMers M, Rajagopal A, Millard M, Hamner S, Arnold E, Yong J, Lakshmikanth S, Sherman M, Ku J, Delp S (2018) OpenSim: simulating musculoskeletal dynamics and neuromuscular control to study human and animal movement. PLoS Comput Biol 14:1006223. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006223
Röhrle O, Sprenger M, Schmitt S (2017) A two-muscle, continuum-mechanical forward simulation of the upper limb. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 16:743–762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-016-0850-x
Tomalka A, Borsdorf M, Böl M, Siebert T (2017) Porcine stomach smooth muscle force depends on history-effects. Front Physiol 8:1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00802
Klemm L, Seydewitz R, Borsdorf M, Siebert T, Böl M (2020) On a coupled electro-chemomechanical model of gastric smooth muscle contraction. Acta Biomater 109:163–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2020.04.007
Borsdorf M, Tomalka A, Stutzig N, Morales-Orcajo E, Böl M, Siebert T (2019) Locational and directional dependencies of smooth muscle properties in pig urinary bladder. Front Physiol 10:1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00063
Seydewitz R, Menzel R, Siebert T, Böl M (2017) Three-dimensional mechano-electrochemical model for smooth muscle contraction of the urinary bladder. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 75:128–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.03.034
Papenkort S, Böl M, Siebert T (2021) Architectural model for muscle growth during maturation. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-021-01492-y
Powers K, Nishikawa K, Joumaa V, Herzog W (2016) Decreased force enhancement in skeletal muscle sarcomeres with a deletion in titin. J Exp Biol 219:1311–1316. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.132027
Joumaa V, Herzog W (2013) Energy cost of force production is reduced after active stretch in skinned muscle fibres. J Biomech 46:1135–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.01.008
Cavagna GA, Dusman B, Margaria R (1968) Positive work done by a previously stretched muscle. J. Appl. Physiol 24:21–32
Nishikawaa K, Lindstedt S, LaStayo P (2018) Basic science and clinical use of eccentric contractions: history and uncertainties. J Sport Heal Sci Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2018.06.002
Seiberl W, Power GA, Hahn D (2015) Residual force enhancement in humans: current evidence and unresolved issues. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 25:571–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2015.04.011
Rack P, Westbury D (1974) The short range stiffness of active mammalian muscle and its effect on mechanical properties. J Physiol 240:331–350. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010613
I would like to thank Tobias Siebert for continuously supporting my research through fruitful discussions, which greatly contributed to this review presented here. Thanks goes to Sven Weidner for support in performing many of the muscle fibre experiments cited here.
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) – project number 405834662 – under grant SI841/17-1, and partially funded by the DFG as part of the German Excellence Strategy – EXC 2075–390 740 016.
The author declares no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Tomalka, A. Eccentric muscle contractions: from single muscle fibre to whole muscle mechanics. Pflugers Arch - Eur J Physiol 475, 421–435 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00424-023-02794-z