Abstract
The seminal reports of somatic embryogenesis in the umbellifers Oenanthe aquatica by Harry Waris in 1957 (Krikorian and Simola, Physiol Plant 105:348–355 (1999)) and carrot (Steward et al., Am J Bot 45:693–703 (1958)) paved the way for current studies on the mechanisms involved in the transition of somatic cells to the embryogenic state for many species (Fehér et al., Plant Cell Tiss Org 74:201–228, 2003; Elhiti and Stasolla, Plant embryo culture: methods and protocols, Humana Press, New York, 2011; Fehér, Biochim Biophys Acta 1849:385–402, 2015). Somatic embryogenesis has been a focal point of research in plant development. This process relies on somatic cell totipotency (i.e., the capacity to regenerate the entire plant from single somatic cells), and it has been long used in biotechnological breeding techniques as an efficient system for regenerating plants in a large-scale basis. Also, because it is a unique system which includes a large number of events—such as physiological reprogramming of explants as well as changes in the gene expression and cell division patterns, and in cell fate (Fehér, Acta Biol Szeged 52:53–56, 2008; Rose et al., Plant developmental biology-biotechnological perspectives. Springer, Heidelberg, 2010)—somatic embryogenesis has also become an appropriate method for studying the morphophysiological and molecular aspects of cell differentiation. The comprehension of the developmental events during the induction phase as well as the development of somatic embryos is essential to regulate each stage of the somatic embryogenesis developmental program efficiently. Additionally, it may be useful for the development of efficient protocols for somatic embryogenesis induction and validation in genetic transformation systems (Fehér et al., Plant Cell Tiss Org 74:201–228, 2003; Yang and Zhang, Crit Rev Plant Sci 29:36–57, 2010; Rocha and Dornelas, CAB Rev 8:1–17, 2013; Mahdavi-Darvari et al., Plant Cell Tiss Org 120:407–422, 2015). Anatomical and ultrastructural studies have contributed to the better understanding of the basic cellular mechanisms involved in the acquisition of competence and histodifferentiation of somatic embryos (Canhoto et al., Ann Bot 78:513–521, 1996; Verdeil et al., Trends Plant Sci 12:245–252, 2001; Moura et al., Plant Cell Tiss Org 95:175–184, 2008; Moura et al., Sci Agric 67:399–407, 2010 ; Almeida et al., Plant Cell Rep 31:1495–1515, 2012; Rocha et al., Protoplasma 249:747–758, 2012; Rocha et al., Plant Cell Tiss Org 120:1087–1098, 2015; Rocha et al., Protoplasma 111:69–78, 2016). In addition, histochemical methods have enabled the monitoring of the mobilization and synthesis of reserve compounds during embryogenic development. This way, the dynamic and fate of cells committed to the somatic embryogenesis can be supported by microscopy techniques. The formation of an embryogenic callus and the subsequent differentiation of somatic embryos can be analyzed over time, and the cytological changes that have occurred during these processes can also be of great value, by associating the observed cytological changes with the expression patterns of several genes from the initial explant through competence acquisition to the formation of somatic embryos. Somatic embryogenesis has been intensively studied over the past decades. A range of descriptive studies using light and electron microscopy has provided a detailed characterization of histocytological events underlying the progression from somatic cells to the formation of embryos. Here, we review recent studies that have advanced our understanding of the anatomical and ultrastructural changes that characterize the somatic embryogenesis developmental pathway.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Almeida M, Almeida CV, Graner EM et al (2012) Pre-procambial cells are niches for pluripotent and totipotent stem-like cells for organogenesis and somatic embryogenesis in the peach palm: a histological study. Plant Cell Rep 31:1495–1515. doi:10.1007/s00299-012-1264-6
Atta R, Laurens L, Boucheron-Dubuisson E et al (2009) Pluripotency of Arabidopsis xylem pericycle underlies shoot regeneration from root and hypocotyl explants grown in vitro. Plant J 57:626–644. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03715.x
Baluska F, Šamaj J, Wojtaszek P et al (2003) Cytoskeleton-plasma membrane-cell wall continuum in plants. Emerging links revisited. Plant Physiol 133:482–491. doi:10.1104/pp.103.027250
Ben Amar A, Cobanov P, Boonrod K et al (2007) Efficient procedure for grapevine embryogenic suspension establishment and plant regeneration: role of conditioned medium for cell proliferation. Plant Cell Rep 26:1439–1447. doi:10.1007/s00299-007-0341-8
Bobák M, Šamaj J, Hlinkova E et al (2003) Extracellular matrix in early stages of direct somatic embryogenesis in leaves of Drosera spathulata. Biol Plant 47:161–166. doi:10.1023/B:BIOP.0000022245.64929.8b
Cangahuala-Inocente GC, Steiner N, Santos M, Guerra MP (2004) Morphological analysis and histochemistry of Feijoa sellowiana somatic embryogenesis. Protoplasma 224:33–40. doi:10.1007/s00709-004-0055-5
Cangahuala-Inocente GC, Steiner N, Maldonado SB, Guerra MP (2009) Patterns of protein and carbohydrate accumulation during somatic embryogenesis of Acca sellowiana. Pesq Agropec Bras 44:217–224. doi:10.1590/S0100-204X2009000300001
Canhoto JM, Mesquita JF, Cruz GS (1996) Ultrastructural changes in cotyledons of pineapple guava (Myrtaceae) during somatic embryogenesis. Ann Bot 78:513–521. doi:10.1006/anbo.1996.0149
Carpita NC, Gibeaut DM (1993) Structural models of primary-cell walls in flowering plants—Consistency of molecular structure with the physical properties of the walls during growth. Plant J 3:1–30. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313X.1993.tb00007.x
Carvalho AO, Gomes VM (2007) Role of plant lipid transfer proteins in plant cell physiology—A concise review. Peptides 28:1144–1153. doi:10.1016/j.peptides.2007.03.004
Carvalho MAF, Paiva R, Alves E et al (2013) Morphogenetic potential of native passion fruit (Passiflora gibertii N. E. Brown.) calli. Braz J Bot 36:141–151. doi:10.1007/s40415-013-0015-4
Chapman A, Blervacq AS, Hendriks T et al (2000a) Cell wall differentiation during early somatic embryogenesis in plants. II. Ultrastructural study and pectin immunolocalization on chicory embryos. Can J Bot 78:824–831. doi:10.1139/b00-060
Chapman A, Blervacq AS, Tissier JP et al (2000b) Cell wall differentiation during early somatic embryogenesis in plants. I. Scanning and transmission electron microscopy study on embryos originating from direct, indirect, and adventitious pathways. Can J Bot 78:816–823. doi:10.1139/b00-059
Coimbra S, Almeida J, Junqueira V et al (2007) Arabinogalactan proteins as molecular markers in Arabidopsis thaliana sexual reproduction. J Exp Bot 58:4027–4035. doi:10.1093/jxb/erm259
Darvill A, Augur C, Bergmann C et al (1992) Oligosaccharins—oligosaccharides that regulate growth, development and defense responses in plants. Glycobiology 2:181–198. doi:10.1093/glycob/2.3.181
Smet I, Beeckman T (2011) Asymmetric cell division in land plants and algae: the driving force for differentiation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 12:177–188. doi:10.1038/nrm3064
Smet I, Vanneste S, Inzé D, Beeckman T (2006) Lateral root initiation or the birth of a new meristem. Plant Mol Biol 60:871–887. doi:10.1007/s11103-005-4547-2
Domínguez E, Heredia-Guerrero JA, Heredia A (2015) Plant cutin genesis: unanswered questions. Trends Plant Sci 20:551–555. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2015.05.009
Driouich A, Baskin TI (2008) Intercourse between cell was and cytoplasm exemplified by arabinogalactan proteins and cortical microtubules. Am J Bot 95:1491–1497. doi:10.3732/ajb.0800277
Durzan DJ (1998) Process control in somatic polyembryogenesis. In: Hällgren JE (ed) Frans Symposium Department of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, v. 8. Swedish proceedings, Swedish University of Agricultural Science, p 147
Eberhard S, Doubrava N, Marfa V et al (1989) Pectic cell wall fragments regulate tobacco thin cell layer explant morphogenesis. Plant Cell 1:747–755. doi:10.1105/tpc.1.8.747
Elhiti M, Stasolla C (2011) The use of zygotic embryos as explants for in vitro propagation: an overview. In: Thorpe TA, Yeung EC (eds) Plant embryo culture: methods and protocols, vol. 710. Humana Press, New York, pp 229–255. doi:10.1007/978-1-61737-988-8_17
Fehér A (2005) Why somatic plant cells start to form embryos? In: Mujib A, Šamaj J (eds) Somatic embryogenesis. Springer, Berlin, pp 85–101. doi:10.1007/7089_019
Fehér A (2008) The initiation phase of somatic embryogenesis: what we know and what we don’t. Acta Biol Szeged 52:53–56
Fehér A (2015) Somatic embryogenesis—stress-induced remodeling of plant cell fate. Biochim Biophys Acta 1849:385–402. doi:10.1016/j.bbagrm.2014.07.005
Fehér A, Pasternak TP, Dudits D (2003) Transition of somatic plant cells to an embryogenic state. Plant Cell Tiss Org 74:201–228. doi:10.1023/A:1024033216561
Fowler JE, Quatrano RS (1997) Plant cell morphogenesis: plasma membrane interactions with the cytoskeleton and cell wall. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 13:697–743. doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.13.1.697
Gaj MD (2001) Direct somatic embryogenesis as a rapid and efficient system for in vitro regeneration of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Tiss Org 64:39–46. doi:10.1023/A:1010679614721
Germana MA (2003) Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from anther culture of Citrus aurantium and C. reticulata. Biologia 58:843–850
Heidstra R (2007) Asymmetric cell division in plant development. Prog Mol Subcell Biol 45:1–37. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-69161-7_1
Hu Y, Qin Y, Zhao J (2006) Localization of an arabinogalactan protein epitope and the effects of Yariv phenylglycoside during zygotic embryo development of Arabidopsis thaliana. Protoplasma 229:21–31. doi:10.1007/s00709-006-0185-z
Immerzeel P, Eppink MM, de Vries SC et al (2006) Carrot arabinogalactan proteins are interlinked with pectins. Physiol Plant 128:18–28. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.2006.00712.x
Jariteh M, Ebrahimzadeh H, Niknam V et al (2015) Developmental changes of protein, proline and some antioxidant enzymes activities in somatic and zygotic embryos of Persian walnut (Juglans regia L.). Plant Cell Tiss Org 122:101–115. doi:10.1007/s11240-015-0753-z
Jiménez VM, Bangerth F (2001) Endogenous hormone concentrations and embryogenic callus development in wheat. Plant Cell Tiss Org 67:37–46. doi:10.1023/A:1011671310451
Jin S, Zhang X, Liang S et al (2005) Factors affecting transformation efficiency of embryogenic callus of upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) with Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Cell Tiss Org 81:229–237. doi:10.1007/s11240-004-5209-9
Kader J-C (1975) Proteins and the intracellular exchange of lipids: stimulation of phospholipid exchange between mitochondria and microsomal fractions by proteins isolated from potato tuber. Biochim Biophys Acta 380:31–44. doi:10.1016/0005-2760(75)90042-9
Kader J-C (1996) Lipid-transfer proteins in plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 47:627–654. doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.47.1.627
Karami O, Aghavaisi B, Pour AM (2009) Molecular aspects of somatic-to-embryogenic transition in plants. J Chem Biol 2:177–190. doi:10.1007/s12154-009-0028-4
Knox JP (2008) Revealing the structural and functional diversity of plant cell walls. Curr Opin Plant Biol 11:308–313. doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2008.03.001
Kohron BD (2000) Plasma membrane-cell wall contacts. Plant Physiol 124:31–38. doi:10.1104/pp.124.1.31
Konieczny R, Bohdanowicz J, Czaplicki AZ, Przywara L (2005) Extracellular matrix surface network during plant regeneration in wheat anther culture. Plant Cell Tiss Org 83:201–208. doi:10.1007/s11240-005-5771-9
Konieczny R, Swierczynska J, Czaplicki AZ, Bohdanowicz J (2007) Distribution of pectin and arabinogalactan protein epitopes during organogenesis from androgenic callus of wheat. Plant Cell Rep 26:355–363. doi:10.1007/s00299-006-0222-6
Kouakou TH, Waffo TP, Kouadio YJ et al (2007) Phenolic compounds and somatic embryogenesis in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Plant Cell Tiss Org 90:25–29. doi:10.1007/s11240-007-9243-2
Kreuger M, van Holst GJ (1993) Arabinogalactan proteins are essential in somatic embryogenesis of Daucus carota L. Planta 189:243–248. doi:10.1007/BF00195083
Krikorian AD, Simola LK (1999) Totipotency, somatic embryogenesis, and Harry Waris (1893-1973). Physiol Plant 105:348–355. doi:10.1034/j.1399-3054.1999.105221.x
Kurczyńska EU, Gaj MD, Ujczak A, Mazur E (2007) Histological analysis of direct somatic embryogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Planta 226:619–628. doi:10.1007/s00425-007-0510-6
Kurczyńska EU, Potocka I, Dobrowolska I et al (2012) Cellular markers for somatic embryogenesis. In: Sato K-I (ed) Embryogenesis. InTech, Rijeka, pp 307–332
Li ZT, Dhekeny S, Dutt M et al (2006) Optimizing Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of grapevine. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 42:220–227. doi:10.1079/IVP2006770
Liu F, Zhang X, Lu C et al (2015) Non-specific lipid transfer proteins in plants: presenting new advances and an integrated functional analysis. J Exp Bot 66:5663–5681. doi:10.1093/jxb/erv313
Mahdavi-Darvari F, Noor NM, Ismanizan I (2015) Epigenetic regulation and gene markers as signals of early somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell Tiss Org 120:407–422. doi:10.1007/s11240-014-0615-0
Maldonado AM, Doerner P, Dixonk RA et al (2002) A putative lipid transfer protein involved in systemic resistance signaling in Arabidopsis. Nature 419:399–403. doi:10.1038/nature00962
Malik MR, Wang F, Dirpaul JM et al (2007) Transcript profiling and identification of molecular markers for early microspore embryogenesis in Brassica napus. Plant Physiol 144:134–154. doi:10.1104/pp.106.092932
Mashiguchi K, Urakami E, Hasegawa M et al (2008) Defense-related signaling by interaction of arabinogalactan proteins and beta-glucosyl Yariv reagent inhibits gibberellin signaling in barley aleurone cells. Plant Cell Physiol 49:178–190. doi:10.1093/pcp/pcm175
McCabe PF, Valentine TA, Forsberg LS, Pennell RI (1997) Soluble signals from cells identified at the cell wall establish a developmental pathway in carrot. Plant Cell 9:2225–2241. doi:10.1105/tpc.9.12.2225
Motose H, Sugiyama M, Fukuda H (2004) A proteoglycan mediates inductive interaction during plant vascular development. Nature 429:873–878. doi:10.1038/nature02613
Moura EF, Ventrella MC, Motoike SY (2010) Anatomy, histochemistry and ultrastructure of seed and somatic embryo of Acrocomia aculeata (Arecaceae). Sci Agric 67:399–407. doi:10.1590/S0103-90162010000400004
Moura EF, Ventrella MC, Motoike SY et al (2008) Histological study of somatic embryogenesis induction on zygotic embryos of macaw palm (Acrocomia aculeata (Jacq.) Lodd. ex Martius). Plant Cell Tiss Org 95:175–184. doi:10.1007/s11240-008-9430-9
Namasivayam P (2007) Acquisition of embryogenic competence during somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell Tiss Org 90:1–8. doi:10.1007/s11240-007-9249-9
Namasivayam P, Skepper J, Hanke D (2006) Identification of a potential structural marker for embryogenic competency in the Brassica napus spp. Oleifera embryogenic tissue. Plant Cell Rep 25:887–895. doi:10.1007/s00299-006-0122-9
Nothnagel EA (1997) Proteoglycans and related components in plant cells. Int Rev Cytol 174:195–291. doi:10.1016/S0074-7696(08)62118-X
Nomura K, Komamine A (1985) Identification and isolation of single cells that produce somatic embryos at a high frequency in a carrot suspension culture. Plant Physiol 79:988–991. doi:10.1104/pp.79.4.988
Paiva Neto VB, Botelho MN, Aguiar R et al (2003) Somatic embryogenesis from immature zygotic embryos of annatto (Bixa orellana L.). In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 39:629–634. doi:10.1079/IVP2003465
Park SY, Jauh GY, Mollet JC et al (2000) A lipid transfer-like protein is necessary for lily pollen tube adhesion to an in vitro stylar matrix. Plant Cell 12:151–164. doi:10.1105/tpc.12.1.151
Pilarska M, Knox JP, Konieczny R (2013) Arabinogalactan-protein and pectin epitopes in relation to an extracellular matrix surface network and somatic embryogenesis and callogenesis in Trifolium nigrescens Viv. Plant Cell Tiss Org 115:35–44. doi:10.1007/s11240-013-0337-8
Pinto G, Silva S, Araújo C, Neves L, Santos C (2010) Histocytological changes and reserves accumulation during somatic embryogenesis in Eucalyptus globulus. Trees 24:763–769. doi:10.1007/s00468-010-0446-5
Pinto DLP, Almeida AMR, Rêgo MM et al (2011) Somatic embryogenesis from mature zygotic embryos of commercial passionfruit (Passiflora edulis Sims) genotypes. Plant Cell Tiss Org 107:521–530. doi:10.1007/s11240-011-0003-y
Poon S, Heath RL, Clarke AE (2012) A chimeric arabinogalactan protein promotes somatic embryogenesis in cotton cell culture. Plant Physiol 160:684–695. doi:10.1104/pp.112.203075
Popielarska-Konieczna M, Kozieradzka-Kiszkurno M, Swierczynska J, Goralski G, Slesak H, Bohdanowicz J (2008a) Ultrastructure and histochemical analysis of extracellular matrix surface network in kiwifruit endosperm-derived callus culture. Plant Cell Rep 27:1137–1145. doi:10.1007/s00299-008-0534-9
Popielarska-Konieczna M, Kozieradzka-Kiszkurno M, Swierczyńska J, Góralski G, Slesak H, Bohdanowicz J (2008b) Are extracellular matrix surface network components involved in signaling and protective function? Plant Signal Behav 3:707–709. doi:10.4161/psb.3.9.6433
Potocka I, Timothy C, Baldwin TC, Kurczyńska EU (2012) Distribution of lipid transfer protein 1 (LTP1) epitopes associated with morphogenic events during somatic embryogenesis of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Rep 31:2031–2045. doi:10.1007/s00299-012-1314-0
Puigderrajols P, Mir G, Molinas M (2001) Ultrastructure of early secondary embryogenesis by multicellular and unicellular pathways in cork oak (Quercus suber L.). Ann Bot 87:179–189. doi:10.1006/anbo.2000.1317
Qin Y, Zhao J (2006) Localization of arabinogalactan proteins in egg cells, zygotes, and two-celled proembryos and effects of beta-D-glucosyl Yariv reagent on egg cell fertilization and zygote division in Nicotiana tabacum L. J Exp Bot 57:2061–2074. doi:10.1093/jxb/erj159
Quiroz-Figueroa FR, Fuentes-Cerda CFJ, Rojas-Herrera R, Loyola-Vargas VM (2002) Histological studies on the developmental stages and differentiation of two different somatic embryogenesis systems of Coffea arabica. Plant Cell Rep 20:1141–1149. doi:10.1007/s00299-002-0464-x
Quiroz-Figueroa FR, Rojas-Herrera R, Galaz-Avalos RM, Loyola-Vargas VM (2006) Embryo production through somatic embryogenesis can be used to study cell differentiation in plants. Plant Cell Tiss Org 86:285–301. doi:10.1007/s11240-006-9139-6
Rocha DI, Dornelas MC (2013) Molecular overview on plant somatic embryogenesis. CAB Rev 8:1–17. doi:10.1079/PAVSNNR20138022
Rocha DI, Monte-Bello CC, Dornelas MC (2015) Alternative induction of de novo shoot organogenesis or somatic embryogenesis from in vitro cultures of mature zygotic embryos of passion fruit (Passiflora edulis Sims) is modulated by the ratio between auxin and cytokinin in the medium. Plant Cell Tiss Org 120:1087–1098. doi:10.1007/s11240-014-0663-5
Rocha DI, Pinto DLP, Vieira LM et al (2016) Cellular and molecular changes associated with competence acquisition during passion fruit somatic embryogenesis: ultrastructural characterization and analysis of SERK gene expression. Protoplasma 253:595–609. doi:10.1007/s00709-015-0837-y
Rocha DI, Vieira LM, Tanaka FA et al (2012) Somatic embryogenesis of a wild passion fruit species Passiflora cincinnata Masters: histocytological and histochemical evidences. Protoplasma 249:747–758. doi:10.1007/s00709-011-0318-x
Rodriguez APM, Wetzstein HY (1998) A morphological and histological comparison of the initiation and development of pecan (Carya illionensis) somatic embryogenesis cultures induced with naphthaleneacetic acid or 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid. Protoplasma 204:71–83. doi:10.1007/BF01282295
Rojas-Herrera R, Quiroz-Figueroa FR, Monforte-González M et al (2002) Differential gene expression during somatic embryogenesis in Coffea arabica L., revealed by RT-PCR differential display. Mol Biotechnol 21:43–50. doi:10.1385/MB:21:1:043
Rose RJ, Mantiri FR, Kurdyukov S et al (2010) Developmental biology of somatic embryogenesis. In: Pua E-C, Davey MR (eds) Plant developmental biology-biotechnological perspectives, vol 2. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 3–26. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-04670-4_1
Saare-Surminski K, Preil W, Knox JP, Lieberei R (2000) Arabinogalactan proteins in embryogenic and non-embryogenic callus cultures of Euphorbia pulcherrima. Physiol Plant 108:180–187. doi:10.1034/j.1399-3054.2000.108002180.x
Safi H, Saibi W, Alaoui MM et al (2015) A wheat lipid transfer protein (TdLTP4) promotes tolerance to abiotic and biotic stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol Biochem 89:64e75. doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2015.02.008
Šamaj J, Baluska F, Bobak M, Volkmann D (1999) Extracellular matrix surface network of embryogenic units of friable maize callus contains arabinogalactan-proteins recognized by monoclonal antibody JIM4. Plant Cell Rep 18:369–374. doi:10.1007/s002990050588
Šamaj J, Bobák M, Blehová A, Pretová A (2006) Importance of cytoskeleton and cell wall in somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell Monographs (Somatic Embryogenesis), pp 35–50. doi:10.1007/7089_024
Šamaj J, Salaj T, Matusova R et al (2008) Arabinogalactan-protein epitope Gal4 is differentially regulated and localized in cell lines of hybrid fir (Abies alba × Abies cephalonica) with different embryogenic and regeneration potential. Plant Cell Rep 27:221–229. doi:10.1007/s00299-007-0429-1
Šamaj J, Samajova O, Peters M et al (2000) Immunolocalization of LM2 arabinogalactan protein epitope associated with endomembranes of plant cells. Protoplasma 212:186–196. doi:10.1007/BF01282919
San-José MC, Corredoira E, Martínez MTAM et al (2010) Shoot apex explants for induction of somatic embryogenesis in mature Quercus robur L. trees. Plant Cell Rep 29:661–671. doi:10.1007/s00299-010-0852-6
Sardar HS, Yang J, Showalter AM (2006) Molecular interactions of arabinogalactan proteins with cortical microtubules and F-actin in bright yellow-2 tobacco cultured cells. Plant Physiol 142:1469–1479. doi:10.1104/pp.106.088716
Schmidt EDL, Guzzo F, Toonen MAJ, de Vries SC (1997) A leucine-rich repeat containing receptor-like kinase marks somatic plant cells competent to form embryos. Development 124:2049–2062
Seifert GJ, Roberts K (2007) The biology of arabinogalactan proteins. Annu Rev Plant Biol 58:137–161. doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.58.032806.103801
Serpe MD, Nothnagel EA (1994) Effects of Yariv phenylglycosides on rosa cell suspensions: evidence for the involvement of arabinogalactan proteins in cell proliferation. Planta 193:542–550. doi:10.1007/BF02411560
Showalter AM (2001) Arabinogalactan proteins: structure, expression and function. Cell Mol Life Sci 58:1399–1417. doi:10.1007/PL00000784
Silva ML, Pinto DLP, Guerra MP et al (2009) A novel regeneration system for a wild passion fruit species (Passiflora cincinnata Mast.) based on somatic embryogenesis from mature zygotic embryos. Plant Cell Tiss Org 99:47–54. doi:10.1007/s11240-009-9574-2
Silva GM, Cruz ACF, Otoni WC et al (2015) Histochemical evaluation of induction of somatic embryogenesis in Passiflora edulis Sims (Passifloraceae). In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant. DOI: 10.1007/s11627-015-9699-4. doi: 10.1007/s11627-015-9699-4
Smertenko A, Bozhkov PV (2014) Somatic embryogenesis: life and death processes during apical–basal patterning. J Exp Bot 65:1343–1360. doi:10.1093/jxb/eru005
Somleva MN, Schmidt EDL, de Vries SC (2000) Embryogenic cells in Dactylis glomerata L. (Poaceae) explants identified by cell tracking and by SERK expression. Plant Cell Rep 19:718–726. doi:10.1007/s002999900169
Stacey NJ, Roberts K, Knox JP (1990) Patterns of expression of the JIM4 arabinogalactan protein epitope in cell cultures and during somatic embryogenesis in Daucus carota L. Planta 180:285–292. doi:10.1007/BF00194009
Stein VC, Paiva R, Vargas DP et al (2010) Ultrastructural calli analysis of Inga vera Willd subsp. Affinis (DC.) T.D. Penn. Rev Árvore 34:789–796. doi:10.1590/S0100-67622010000500004
Steiner N, Farias-Soares FL, Schmidt EC et al (2016) Toward establishing a morphological and ultrastructural characterization of proembryogenic masses and early somatic embryos of Araucaria angustifolia (Bert.) O. Kuntze. Protoplasma 253:487–501. doi:10.1007/s00709-015-0827-0
Steinmacher DA, Saare-Surminski K, Lieberei R (2012) Arabinogalactan proteins and the extracellular matrix surface network during peach palm somatic embryogenesis. Physiol Plant 146:336–349. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.2012.01642.x
Sterk P, Booij H, Schellekens GA et al (1991) Cell-specific expression of the carrot EP2 lipid transfer protein gene. Plant Cell 3:907–921. doi:10.1105/tpc.3.9.907
Steward FC, Mapes MO, Mears K (1958) Growth and organized development of cultured cells. I. Growth and division of freely suspended cells. Am J Bot 45:693–703
Sugimoto K, Gordon SP, Meyerowitz EM (2011) Regeneration in plants and animals: dedifferentiation, transdifferentiation, or just differentiation? Trends Cell Biol 21:212–218. doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2010.12.004
Sugimoto K, Jiao Y, Meyerowitz EM (2010) Arabidopsis regeneration from multiple tissues occurs via a root development pathway. Dev Cell 18:463–471. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2010.02.004
Sussex IM, Kerk NM (2001) The evolution of plant architecture. Curr Opin Plant Biol 4:33–37. doi:10.1016/S1369-5266(00)00132-1
Suzuki Y, Kitagawa M, Knox JP, Yamaguchi I (2002) A role for arabinogalactan proteins in gibberellin-induced alpha-amylase production in barley aleurone cells. Plant J 29:733–741. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01259.x
Tang XC, He YQ, Wang Y, Sun MX (2006) The role of arabinogalactan proteins binding to Yariv reagents in the initiation, cell developmental fate, and maintenance of microspore embryogenesis in Brassica napus L. cv. Topas. J Exp Bot 57:2639–2650. doi:10.1093/jxb/erl027
ten Hove CA, Heidstra R (2008) Who begets whom? Plant cell fate determination by asymmetric cell division. Curr Opin Plant Biol 11:34–41. doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2007.11.001
Thoma S, Kaneko Y, Somerville C (1993) A non-specific lipid transfer protein from Arabidopsis is a cell wall protein. Plant J 3:427–436. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313X.1993.t01-25-00999.x
Thompson HJM, Knox JP (1998) Stage-specific responses of embryogenic carrot cell suspension cultures to arabinogalactan protein-binding beta-glucosyl Yariv reagent. Planta 205:32–38. doi:10.1007/s004250050293
Toonen MAJ, Schmidt EDL, van Kammen A, de Vries SC (1997) Promotive and inhibitory effects of diverse arabinogalactan proteins on Daucus carota L. somatic embryogenesis. Planta 203:188–195. doi:10.1007/s004250050181
Tsuwamoto R, Fukuoka H, Takahata Y (2007) Identification and characterization of genes expressed in early embryogenesis from microspores of Brassica napus. Planta 225:641–652. doi:10.1007/s00425-006-0388-8
Uzelac B, Ninković S, Smigocki A, Budimir S (2007) Origin and development of secondary somatic embryos in transformed embryogenic cultures of Medicago sativa. Biol Plant 51:1–6. doi:10.1007/s10535-007-0001-4
van Hengel AJ, Barber C, Roberts K (2004) The expression patterns of arabinogalactan-protein AtAGP30 and GLABRA2 reveal a role for abscisic acid in the early stages of root epidermal patterning. Plant J 39:70–83. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02104.x
van Hengel AJ, Tadesse Z, Immerzeel P et al (2001) N-acetylglucosamine and glucosamine-containing arabinogalactan proteins control somatic embryogenesis. Plant Physiol 125:1880–1890. doi:10.1104/pp.125.4.1880
van Holst GJ, Clarke AE (1985) Quantification of arabinogalactan protein in plant extracts by single radial gel diffusion. Anal Biochem 148:446–450. doi:10.1016/0003-2697(85)90251-9
Verdeil JL, Hocher V, Huet C et al (2001) Ultrastructural changes in coconut calli associated with the acquisition of embryogenic competence. Ann Bot 88:9–18. doi:10.1006/anbo.2001.1408
Verdeil JL, Alemanno L, Niemenak N, Trambarger TJ (2007) Pluripotent versus totipotent plant stem cells: dependence versus autonomy? Trends Plant Sci 12:245–252. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2007.04.002
von Arnold S, Sabala I, Bozhkov P et al (2002) Developmental pathways of somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell Tiss Org 69:233–249. doi:10.1023/A:1015673200621
Vrinten PL, Nakamura T, Kasha KJ (1999) Characterization of cDNAs expressed in the early stages of microspore embryogenesis in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Plant Mol Biol 41:455–463. doi:10.1023/A:1006383724443
Vroemen CW, Langeveld S, Mayer U et al (1996) Pattern formation in the Arabidopsis embryo revealed by position-specific Lipid Transfer Protein gene expression. Plant Cell 8:783–791. doi:10.1105/tpc.8.5.783
Wang X, Nolan KE, Irwanto RR et al (2011) Ontogeny of embryogenic callus in Medicago truncatula: the fate of the pluripotent and totipotent stem cells. Ann Bot 107:599–609. doi:10.1093/aob/mcq269
Willats WGT, Knox JP (1996) A role for arabinogalactan-proteins in plant cell expansion: evidence from studies on the interaction of beta-glucosyl Yariv reagent with seedlings of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 9:919–925. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313X.1996.9060919.x
Yang X, Zhang X (2010) Regulation of somatic embryogenesis in higher plants. Crit Rev Plant Sci 29:36–57. doi:10.1080/07352680903436291
Yang X-Y, Zhang X-L, Jin S-X et al (2007) Production and characterization of asymmetric hybrids between upland cotton Coker 201 (Gossypium hirsutum) and wild cotton (G. klozschianum Anderss). Plant Cell Tiss Org 89:225–235. doi:10.1007/s11240-007-9245-0
Yeung EC (1999) The use of histology in the stud of plant tissue culture systems -some practical comments. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 35:137–143. doi:10.1007/s11627-999-0023-z
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) (Brazil), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) (Brazil), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG) (Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) (São Paulo, SP, Brazil), and Ministry of Science and Higher Education (Poland; Grant Number 1S-0115-001-1-01-01-05).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rocha, D.I., Kurczyńska, E., Potocka, I., Steinmacher, D.A., Otoni, W.C. (2016). Histology and Histochemistry of Somatic Embryogenesis. In: Loyola-Vargas, V., Ochoa-Alejo, N. (eds) Somatic Embryogenesis: Fundamental Aspects and Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33705-0_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33705-0_26
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33704-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33705-0
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)