Skip to main content
Log in

A two-stage pretreatment of seedlings improves adventitious shoot regeneration in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of a two-stage pretreatment of seedlings on the subsequent shoot regeneration capacity were investigated. Pretreated seedlings were obtained by germinating seeds on three different germination media and then further culturing on six different growth media. Lamina and petiole explants of two sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) breeding lines were then excised from the pretreated seedlings and cultured on five different shoot regeneration media. In both breeding lines, petiole explants produced significantly more shoots than lamina explants with higher frequencies of organogenic capacities; petiole explants of the lines M1195 and ELK345 produced a mean of 2.1 and 2.7 shoots per explant while their lamina explants produced 1.5 and 2.2 shoots per explant, respectively. A genotypic variation was evident as the line ELK345 was more productive for shoot development from both types of explants. In overall comparisons of different germination, growth and regeneration media, germination medium was most effective when supplemented with 0.5 mg/l 6-benzyladenine (BA) while both growth and regeneration media were most productive when contained a combination of 0.25 mg/l BA and 0.10 mg/l indole-3-butyric acid (IBA). Of all the treatments tested, the highest mean number of shoots per explant (8.3 shoots) and frequency of organogenic explants (75.6%) were obtained on regeneration medium supplemented with 0.25 mg/l BA and 0.10 mg/l IBA when petiole explants of the line ELK345 were excised from the seedlings that had been germinated on medium containing 0.5 mg/l BA followed by further growth on medium containing 0.25 mg/l BA and 0.10 mg/l IBA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abogadallah GA, Quick WP (2010) Fast versatile regeneration of Trifolium alexandrinum L. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 100:39–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arellano J, Fuentes SI, Castillo-Espana P, Hernandez G (2009) Regeneration of different cultivars of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) via indirect organogenesis. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 96:11–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Christianson ML, Warnick DA (1983) Competence and determination in the process of in vitro shoot organogenesis. Dev Biol 95:288–293

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cogbill S, Faulcon T, Jones G, McDaniel M, Harmon G, Blackmon R, Young M (2010) Adventitious shoot regeneration from cotyledonary explants of rapid-cycling fast plants of Brassica rapa L. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 101:127–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Onofrio C, Morini S (2006) Somatic embryo, adventitious root and shoot regeneration in in vitro grown quince leaves as influenced by treatments of different length with growth regulators. Sci Hort-Amsterdam 107:194–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Detrez C, Tetu T, Sangwan RS, Sangman-Norrel BS (1988) Direct organogenesis from petiole and thin cell layer explants in sugar beet cultured in vitro. J Exp Bot 39:917–926

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Detrez C, Sangwan RS, Sangwan-Norrel BS (1989) Phenotypic and karyotypic status of Beta vulgaris plant regenerated from direct organogenesis in petiole culture. Theor Appl Genet 77:462–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doley WP, Saunders JW (1989) Hormone-free medium will support callus production and subsequent shoot regeneration from whole plant leaf explants in some sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) populations. Plant Cell Rep 8:222–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grieve TM, Gartland KMA, Elliot MC (1997) Micropropagation of commercially important sugar beet cultivars. Plant Growth Regul 21:15–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gurel E (1997) Callus and root development from leaf explants of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.): Variability at variety, plant and organ level. Turk J Bot 21:131–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurel E, Wren MJ (1995a) In vitro development from leaf explants of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.): Rhizogenesis and the effect of sequential exposure to auxin and cytokinin. Ann Bot-London 75:31–38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gurel E, Wren MJ (1995b) Measuring polyphenol oxidase activity in small leaf discs of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Turk J Bot 19:497–502

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurel S, Gurel E, Kaya Z (2001) Callus development and indirect shoot regeneration from seedling explants of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) cultured in vitro. Turk J Bot 25:25–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurel E, Topal E, Gurel S (2003a) The effect of pretreating seedlings with BA on direct shoot regeneration from petiole explants of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Biotechnol Biotech Eq 17:89–96

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gurel S, Topal E, Gurel E (2003b) The effect of pretreating seedlings with TDZ on direct shoot regeneration from petiole explants of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Asia-Pac J Mol Biol 11:57–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurel E, Gurel S, Lemaux PG (2008) Biotechnology applications for sugar beet. Crit Rev Plant Sci 27:108–140

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hisano H, Kimoto Y, Hayakawa H, Takeichi J, Domae T, Hashimoto R, Abe J, Asano S, Kanazawa A, Shimamoto Y (2004) High frequency Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and plant regeneration via direct shoot formation from leaf explants in Beta vulgaris and Beta maritima. Plant Cell Rep 22:910–918

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ivic-Haymes SD, Smigocki AC (2005) Identification of highly regenerative plants within sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) breeding lines for molecular breeding. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 41:483–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacq B, Tetu T, Sangwan RS, De Laat A, Sangwan-Norreel BS (1993) Efficient production of uniform plants from cotyledon explants of sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L). Plant Breed 110:185–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krens FA, Trifonova A, Keizer LCP, Hall RD (1996) The effect of exogenously applied phytohormones on gene transfer efficiency in sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.). Plant Sci 116:97–106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kwapata K, Sabzikar R, Sticklen MB, Kelly JD (2010) In vitro regeneration and morphogenesis studies in common bean. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 100:97–105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Mize K, Campbell F (2010) Regeneration of daylily (Hemerocallis) from young leaf segments. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 102:199–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu CM, Xu ZH, Chua NH (1993) Auxin polar transport is essential for the establishment of bilateral symmetry during early plant embryogenesis. Plant Cell 5:621–630

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu C, Callow P, Rowland LJ, Hancock JF, Song G (2010) Adventitious shoot regeneration from leaf explants of southern highbush blueberry cultivars. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 103:137–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishutkina YV, Gaponenko AK (2006) Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) morphogenesis in vitro: effect of phytohormone type and concentration in the culture medium, type of explants, and plant genotype on shoot regeneration frequency. Russ J Genet 42:150–157

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moghaddam BE, Mesbah M, Yavari N (2000) The effect of in planta TIBA and proline treatment on somatic embryogenesis of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Euphytica 112:151–156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T, Skoog FA (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ninkovic S, Djordjevic T, Vinterhalter B, Uzelac B, Cingel A, Savic J, Radovic S (2010) Embryogenic responses of Beta vulgaris L. callus induced from transgenic hairy roots. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 103:81–91

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie GA, Shoort KC, Davey MR (1989) In vitro shoot regeneration from callus, leaf axils and petioles of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). J Exp Bot 40:277–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders JW, Tsai CJ (1999) Production of somatic embryos and shoots from sugarbeet callus: Effects of abscisic acid, other growth regulators, nitrogen source, sucrose concentration and genotype. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 35:18–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tetu T, Sangwan RS, Sangwan-Norreel BS (1987) Hormonal control of organogenesis and somatic embryogenesis in Beta vulgaris callus. J Exp Bot 38:506–517

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas TD (2007) Pretreatment in thidiazuron improves the in vitro shoot induction from leaves in Curculigo orchioides Gaertn., an endangered medicinal plant. Acta Physiol Plant 29:455–461

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Toldi O, Gyulai G, Kiss J, Tarns I, Balazs E (1996) Antiauxin enhanced microshoot initiation and plant regeneration from epicotyl-originated thin layer explants of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L). Plant Cell Rep 15:851–854

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Turkish Sugar Co (2010) Sector report 2009, TSFAS, Ankara. http://www.turkseker.gov.tr

  • Watt MP, Banasiak M, Reddy D, Albertse EH, Snyman SJ (2009) In vitro minimal growth storage of Saccharum spp. hybrid (genotype 88H0019) at two stages of direct somatic embryogenic regeneration. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 96:263–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zakharchenko NS, Kalyaeva MA, Bur’yanov YI (2000) The method for genetic transformation of different sugar beet varieties. Russ J Plant Physiol 47:70–75

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang CL, Chen DF, Elliott MC, Slater A (2001) Thidiazuron-induced organogenesis and somatic embryogenesis in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L). In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 37:305–310

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang CL, Chen DF, Kubalakova M, Zhang J, Scott NW, Elliott MC, Slater A (2008) Efficient somatic embryogenesis in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) breeding lines. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 93:209–221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong Z, Smith HG, Thomas TH (1993a) Micropropagation of wild beet (Beta maritima) from inflorescence pieces. Plant Growth Regul 12:53–57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong Z, Smith HG, Thomas TH (1993b) In vitro culture of petioles and intact leaves of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). Plant Growth Regul 12:59–66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are deeply grateful to the Turkish Sugar Factories Co. for the financial support of this work. Special thanks are also due to Dr. Mustafa Erdal and Dr. Esat Guler (Sugar Institute, Ankara, Turkey) for providing breeding lines.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Songul Gurel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gurel, S., Baloglu, M.C., Gurel, E. et al. A two-stage pretreatment of seedlings improves adventitious shoot regeneration in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 106, 261–268 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-011-9916-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-011-9916-8

Keywords

Navigation