Skip to main content
Log in

In vitro regeneration and morphogenesis studies in common bean

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An efficient protocol for high frequency in vitro regeneration of multiple shoots and somatic embryos from the embryonic axis of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) was developed. Ten common bean cultivars representing a wide range of diversity among current commercial market classes were used for in vitro regeneration evaluation in our study. These cultivars were tested on 63 different media formulations consisting of combinations of cytokinins, namely benzyladenine (BA) and thidiazuron (TDZ) at concentration levels of 0.0, 1.0, 2.5, 5.0 and 10.0 mg l−1 and auxin, namely naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) at concentration levels of 0.0, 0.05, 0.1 and 1.0 mg l−1. P. vulgaris cv. Olathe pinto bean performed the best producing over 20 multiple shoots per explant while cv. Condor black bean was the poorest with nine multiple shoots per explant. The optimum media for regeneration of multiple shoots was 4.4 mg l−1 Murashige and Skoog (MS) containing 2.5 mg l−1 BA and 0.1 mg l−1 IAA supplemented with 30 mg l−1 silver nitrate. Adventitious shoots and somatic embryos were regenerated on 4.4 mg l−1 MS medium containing 1 mg l−1 TDZ and 0.05 mg l−1 NAA supplemented with 30 mg l−1 silver nitrate or activated charcoal. Efficient and effective rooting of plantlets was achieved by dipping the cut end base of in vitro regenerated shoots in 1.0 mg l−1 indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) solution and culturing on media containing 4.4 mg l−1 MS supplemented by 0.1 mg l−1 IAA, NAA or IBA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdelwahd R, Hakam N, Labhilili M, Udupa SM (2008) Use of an absorbent and antioxidants to reduce the effect of leached phenolics in in vitro plantlet regeneration of faba bean. Afr J Biotechnol 7(8):997–1002

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed E, Ahmed EE, Bisztray GYD, Velich I (2002) Plant regeneration from seedling explants of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Acta Biologica Szegediensis 46(3–4):27–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Aragao FJL, Barros LMG, Brasileiro ACM, Ribeiro SG, Smith FD, Faria JC, Rech EL (1996) Inheritance of foreign genes in transgenic bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) co transformed via particle bombardment. Theor Appl Genet 93:142–150

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aragao FJL, Ribeiro SG, Barros LMG, Brasileiro ACM, Maxwell DP, Rech EL, Faria JC (1998) Transgenic beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) engineered to express viral antisense RNAs showed delayed and attenuated symptoms to bean golden mosaic geminivirus. Mol Breeding 4:491–499

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aragao FJL, Viana GR, Albino MMC, Rech EL (2001) Transgenic dry bean tolerant to the herbicide glufosinate ammonium. Crop Sci 42:1298–1302

    Google Scholar 

  • Arellano J, Fuentes SI, Castillo-Espanã P, Hernández G (2009) Regeneration of different cultivars of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) via indirect organogenesis. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 96:1–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arnaldos TL, Munoz R, Ferrer MA, Calderon AA (2001) Changes in phenol content during strawberry (Fragaria × ananasa, cv. Chandler) callus culture. Physiol Plant 113:315–322

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blair MW, Caldas GV, Avila P, Lascano C (2006) Tannin content of commercial classes of common bean. Annu Rep Bean Improv Coop 49:151–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonfim K, Faria JC, Nogueira EOPL, Mendes EA, Aragao FJL (2007) RNAi-mediated resistance to Bean golden mosaic virus in genetically engineered common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 20:717–726

    Google Scholar 

  • Brasileiro ACM, Aragao FJL, Rossi S, Dusi DMA, Barros LMG, Rech EL (1996) Susceptibility of common and tepary beans to Agrobacterium spp. strains and improvement of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation using microprojectile bombardment. J Am Soc Hort Sci 121:810–815

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado-Sanchez P, Saucedo-Ruiz M, Guzman-Maldonado SH, Villordo-Pineda E, Gonzalez-Chavira M, Faire-VelAzquez S, Acosta-Gallegos JA, Mora-Aviles A (2006) An organogenic plant regeneration system for common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Plant Sci 170:822–827

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dillen W, De Clercq J, Goosens A, Van Montagu M, Angenon G (1997) Agrobacterium mediated transformation of Phaseolus acutifolius A. Gray. Theor Appl Genet 94:15–158

  • Dillen W, Zambre M, De Clercq J, Goossens A, Kapila J, Vranova E, Van Montagu M, Angenon G (2000) In vitro regeneration and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Phaseolus vulgaris L. (common bean) and P. acutifolius A. Gray (Tepary Bean). Acta Hort 521:ISHS

    Google Scholar 

  • Klomparens KS, Flegler S, Hooper GR (1986) Procedures for transmission and scanning electron microscopy for biological and medical sciences—a laboratory manual. Ladd Research Industries, Burlington

  • Liu Z, Park B-J, Kanno A, Kameya T (2005) The novel use of combination of sonication and vacuum infiltration in Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of kidney beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) with lea gene. Mol Breeding 16:189–197

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Malik KA, Saxena PK (1992) Regeneration in Phaseolus vulgaris L.: high-frequency induction of direct shoot formation in intact seedlings by benzyladenine and thidiazuron. Planta 186:384–389 84-389; 1.nta 2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mohamed MF, Read PE, Coyne DP (1991) Plant regeneration in vitro from the embryonic axes of common and tepary beans. Annu Rep Bean Improv Coop 34:150–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ozyigit II (2008) Phenolic changes during in vitro organogenesis of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) shoot tips. Afr J Biotechnol 7(8):1145–1150

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Santalla M, Power JB, Davey MR (1998) Efficient in vitro shoot regeneration responses of Phaseolus vulgaris and P. coccineus. Euphytica 102:195–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh SP (2001) Broadening the genetic base of common bean cultivars: a review. Crop Sci 41:1659–1675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sticklen MB, Oraby HF (2005) Shoot apical meristem: a sustainable explant for genetic transformation of cereal crops. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 41:187–200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Veltcheva M, Svetleva D, Petkova SP, Pearl A (2005) In vitro regeneration and genetic transformation of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)—problems and progress. Sci Hortic 107:2–10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zambre MA, De Clercq J, Vranova E, Van Montagu M, Angenon G, Dillen W (1998) Plant regeneration from embryo-derived callus in Phaseolus vulgaris L. (common bean) and P. acutifolius A. Gray (tepary bean). Plant Cell Rep 17:626–630

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zambre MA, Geerts P, Maqeut A, Van Montagu M, Dillen W, Angenon G (2001) Regeneration of fertile plants from callus in Phaseolus polyanthus Greenman (Year Bean). Ann Bot 88:371–377

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Kingdom Kwapata’s Ph.D. research has been supported by funding from the W. Fulbright fellowship, the W. Leo and Rae Phelps Mericle Memorial Scholarship and the MSU College of Agriculture and Natural Sciences. The authors would like to thank Dr. Sasha Kravchenko for providing advice on the statistical design, and Halima Awale for her assistance on maintaining plants in greenhouses. Scanning microscopy presented in this article was performed through services of the MSU Center for Advanced Microscopy.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mariam B. Sticklen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kwapata, K., Sabzikar, R., Sticklen, M.B. et al. In vitro regeneration and morphogenesis studies in common bean. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 100, 97–105 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-009-9624-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-009-9624-9

Keywords

Navigation