Skip to main content

Reconstruction

  • Chapter
Rectal Cancer

Part of the book series: Updates in Surgery ((UPDATESSURG))

  • 1483 Accesses

Abstract

At present, preservation of the anal sphincter is possible in the majority of low rectal (LR) carcinomas; indeed, by associating neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (RCT) to TME, it is possible to preserve the sphincter in at least 70% of cases [1]. However, it is obvious that proctectomy, followed by straight coloanal or colorectal anastomosis (SCA), significantly modifies the mechanisms of continence and defecation. The functional results after anterior resection (AR) in low resections (LAR) with direct anastomosis (end-to-end), located less than 10 cm from the anal margin and in absence of preoperative radiotherapy, report good continence rates in just 20% of cases, against 100% of high AR (Fig. 9.1) [2].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Heald RJ, Smedh RK, Kald A et al (1997) Abdominoperineal excision of the rectum- an endangered operation. Dis Colon Rectum 40:747–751

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Batignani G, Monaci I, Ficari F, Tonelli F (1991) What affects continence after anterior resection of the rectum? Dis Colon Rectum 34:329–335

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pala C, Serventi F, Paliogiannis P (2009) Le sequel funzionali dopo chirurgia del retto basso. Ann Ital Chir 80:193–197

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lange MM, den Dulk M, Bossema ER et al (2007) Risk factors for fecal incontinence after rectal cancer treatment. Br J Surg 94:1278–1284

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hida J, Yasutomi M, Maruyama T et al (1998) Indications for colonic J-pouch recostruction after anterior resection for rectal cancer: determing the optimum level of anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 41:558–563

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Montesani C, Pronio A, Santella S et al (2004) Rectal cancer surgery with sphincter preservation: functional results related to the level of anastomosis. Clinical and instrumental study. Hepatogastroenterology 51:718–721

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Alves A (2007) Reccomendations for clinical practice. Therapeutic choices for rectal cancer. How can we reduce therapeutic sequelae and preserve quality of life? Gastroenterol Clin Biol 31:1S52–62,1S95–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lazorthes F, Fages P, Chiotasso P et al (1986) Resection of the rectum with costruction of a colonic reservoir and colo-anal anastomosis for carcinoma of the rectum. Br J Surg 73:136–138

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Parc R, Tiret E, Frileux P et al (1986) Resection and colo-anal anastomosis with colonic reservoir for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 73:139–141

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. de la Fuente SG, Mantih CR (2007) Reconstruction techniques after proctectomy: what’s the best? Clin Colon and Rectal Surg 20:221–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dehni N, Parc N (2003) Colonic J-Pouch-Anal Anastomosis for Rectal Cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 46:668–675

    Google Scholar 

  12. Harris GJC, Lavery IJ, Fazio VW (2002) Reasons for failure to construct the colonic J-pouch. What can be done to improve the size of the neorectal reservoir Should it occur? Dis Colon Rectum 45:1304–1308

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Heriot AG, Tekkis PP, Constantinides V et al (2006) Meta-analysis of colonic reservoirs versus straight coloanal anastomosis after anterior resection. Br J Surg 93:19–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hallbook O, Pahlman L, Krog M et al (1996) Randomized comparison of straight and colonic J pouch anastomosis after low anterior resection. Ann Surg 224:58–65

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dehni N, Tiret E, Singland JD et al (1998) Long-term functional outcome after low anterior resection: comparison of low colorectal anastomosis and colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 41:817–822

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Prete F, Liguori P, Nitti P et al (2000) Optimal reconstruction after resection of the rectum in cancer surgery. Chir Ital 52:323–328

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Willis S, Kasperk R, Braun J, Schumpelick V (2001) Comparison of colonic J-pouch reconstruction and straight coloanal anastomosis after intersphincteric rectal resection. Langenbecks arc Surg 386:193–199.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gotzinger P, Wamser P, Herbst F (2001) Colo-anal anastomosis: improvement of early function outcome by reconstruction with the colonic pouch. Chirurg 72:49–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mantyh CR, Hull TL, Fazio VW (2001) Coloplasty in low colorectal anastomosis: manometric and functional comparison with straight and colonic J-pouch anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 44:37–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Furst A, Burghofer K, Hutzel L, Jauch K-W (2002) Neorectal reservoir is not the functional principle of the colonic J-pouch: the volume of a short colonic J-pouch does not differ from a straight coloanal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 45:660–667

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lin J-K, Wang H-S, Yang S-H et al (2002) Comparison between straight and J-pouch coloanal anastomosis in surgery for rectal cancer. Surg Today 32:487–492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sailer M, Fuchs KH, Fein M, Thiede A (2002) Randomized clinical trial comparing quality of life after straight and pouch coloanal reconstruction. Br J Surg 89:1108–1117

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Machado M, Nygren J, Goldman S, Ljungquist O (2003) Similar outcome after colonic pouch and side-to-end anastomosis in low anterior resection for rectal cancer. A prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 238:214–220

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Machado M, Nygren J, Goldman S, Ljungquist O (2005) Functional and physiologic assessment of the colonic reservoir or side-to-end anastomosis after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a two-year follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 48:29–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jiang J-K, Yang S-H, Lin J-K (2005) Transabdominal anastomosis after low anterior resection: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing long-term results between side-to-end anastomosis and colonic J-pouch. Dis Col Rectum 48:2100–2110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ulrich AB, Seiler CM, Z’Graggen K et al (2008) Early results from a randomized clinical trial of colon J-pouch versus transverse coloplasty pouch after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Br J Surgery 95: 1257–1263

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Matsuoka H, Masaki T, Kobayashi T et al (2010) Comparison of functional and clinical outcomes: colonic J-pouch vs coloplasty in patients with low rectal cancer. Hepato-gastroenterology 57:70–72

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tsunoda H, Kamiyama G, Narita K et al (2009) Prospective randomized trial for determination of optimum size of side limb in low anterior resection with side-to-end anastomosis for rectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 52:1572–1576

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Brisinda G, Vanella S, Cadeddu F et al (2009) End-to-end vs End-to-side stapled anastomosis after anterior resection for rectal cancer. J Surg Oncol 99:75–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bozio G, Mabrut J-Y, Baulieux J (2008) Anastomose colo-anale «différéè», après exérèse totale du mèsorectum par laparoscopie, pour cancer du rectum. J chir 145:262–265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Siddiqui MRS, Sajid MS, Woods WGA (2010) A meta-analysis comparing side-to-end with colonic J-pouch formation after anterior resection for rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol 14:113–123

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Remzi FH, Gazzaz GE, Kiran RP et al (2009) Outcomes following Turnbull-Cutait ab-dominoperineal pull-through compared with coloanal anastomosis. Br J Surg 96:424–429

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Brown CJ, Fenech D, McLeod RS (2008) Reconstructive techniques after rectal resection for rectal cancer. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 16(2):CD006040

    Google Scholar 

  34. Martling AL, Holm T, Rutqvist LE (2000) Effect of a surgical training programme on outcome of rectal cancer in the Country of Stockholm. Stockholm Colorectal Cancer Study Group, Basingstoke Bowel Cancer Research Project. Lancet 356:93–96

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Rullier E, Laurent C, Bretagnol F et al (2005) Sphincter-saving resection for all rectal carcinomas: the end of the 2-cm distal rule. Ann Surg 241:465–469

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Pocard M, Sideris L, Zenasni F et al (2007) Functional results and quality of life for patients with very low rectal cancer undergoing coloanal anastomosis or perineal colostomy with colonic muscular graft. Eur J Surg Oncol 33:459–462

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Portier G, Bonhomme N, Platonoff I, Lazorthes F (2005) Use of Malone antegrade continence enema in patients with perineal colostomy after rectal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 48:499–503

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Farroni N, Van den Bosch A, Haustermamns K et al (2007) Perineal colostomy with appen-dicostomy as an alternative for an abdominal colostomy: symptoms, functional status, quality of life, and perceived health. Dis Colon Rectum 50:817–824

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Gamagami RA, Chiotasso P, Lazorthes F (1999) Continent perineal colostomy after abdominoperineal resection: out come after 63cases. Dis Colon Rectum 42:626–630

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Kirzin S, Lazorthes F, Nouaille de Gorce H et al (2010) Benefits of perineal colostomy on perineal morbidity after abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 53:1265–1271

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Abercrombie JE, Williams NS (1995) Total anorectal reconstruction. Br J Surg 82:438–442

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Schmidt E (1982) The continent colostomy. World J Surg 6:805–809

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Federov VD, Odaryuk TS, Shelygin YA, Tsarkov PV, Frolov SA (1989) Method of creation of a smooth-muscle cuff at the site of the perineal colostomy after extirpation of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 32:562–566

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Damon H, Guye O, Seigneurin A (2006) Prevalence of anal incontinence in adults and impact on quality-of-life. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 30:7–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Faucheron JL, Hannoun L, Thome C, Parc R (1994) Is fecal continence improved by non-stimulated gracilis muscle transposition? Dis Colon Rectum 37:979–983

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Christiansen J, Ronholt-Hansen C, Rasmussen O (1995) Bilateral gluteus maximus transposition for anal incontinence. Br J Surg 82:1645–1647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Williams NS, Patel J, George BD et al (1991) Development o fan electrically stimulated neoanal sphincter. Lancet 2:1166–1169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Baeten CG, Geerdes BP, Adang EM et al (1995) Anal dynamic graciloplsty in the treatment of intractable fecal incontinence. N Engl J Med 332:1600–1605

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Cavina E, Seccia M, Banti BP, Zocco G (1998) Anorectal reconstruction after abdominoperineal resection: experience with double-wrap graciloplasty supported by low-frequency electrostimulation. Dis Colon Rectum 41:1010–1016

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Cavina E (1996) Outcome of ristorative perineal graciloplasty with simultaneous excision of the anus and rectum for cancer: a ten-year experience with 81 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 39:182–190

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Rullier E, Zerbib F, Laurent C et al (2000) Morbidity and functional out come after double dynamic graciloplasty for anorectal reconstruction. Br J Surg 87:909–913

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Mander BJ, Abercrombie JF, Georg BD, Williams NS (1996) The electrically stimulated neosphincter incorporated as part of total anorectal reconstruction after abdominoperineal excision of the rectum. Ann Surg 224:702–711

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Rosen HR, Novi G, Zoech G et al (1998) Restoration of anal sphincter function by single stage dynamic graciloplasty with a modified (split-spling) technique. Am J Surg 175:187–193

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Ho KS, Seow-Chen F (2005) Dynamic graciloplasty for total anorectal reconstruction after abdominoperineal resection for rectal tumor. Int J Colorectal Dis 20:38–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Korsgen S, Keighley MR (1995) Stimulated gracilis neosphincter — not as good as previously thought: report of 4 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 38:1331–1333

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Romano G, La Torre F, Cutini G et al (2003) Total anorectal reconstruction with the artificial bowel sphincter: report of eight cases. A quality-of life assessment. Dis Colon Rectum 46:730–734

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Marchal F, Doucet C, Lechaux D et al (2005) Secondary Implantation of an artificial sphincter after abdominoperineal resection and pseudocontinent perineal colostomy for rectal cancer. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 29:425–428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Lehur PA, De Kerviler B, Maurel J et al (1997) Constipation morbide de l’adulte: intérets de l’irrigation colique antérograde. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 21:A120

    Google Scholar 

  59. Hill J, Scoott S, Maclennan I (1994) Anterograde enemas for the treatment of severe idiopathic constipation. Br J Surg 81:1490–1491

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Hughes SF, Williams NS (1995) Continent colonic conduit for the treatment of faecal incontinence associated with disordered evacuation. Br J Surg 82:1318–1320

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Malone PS, Ransley PG, Liely EM (1990) Preliminary report: the anterograde continence enema. Lancet 336:1217–1217

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Penninckx F, D’Hoore A, Vanden Bosch A (2005) Perineal colostomy with antegrade continence edema as an alternative after abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer. Ann Chir 130:327–330

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Abbes Orabi N, Vanwymersch T, Paterson M (2011) Total perineal reconstruction after abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer: long-term results of dynamic graciloplasty with Mal-one appendicostomy. Colorectal Disease 13:406–413

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paola Tarchi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tarchi, P., Moretti, E., de Manzini, N. (2013). Reconstruction. In: de Manzini, N. (eds) Rectal Cancer. Updates in Surgery. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2670-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2670-4_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-2669-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-2670-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics