Skip to main content
Log in

What affects continence after anterior resection of the rectum?

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Functional results after anterior rectal resections are commonly considered satisfactory but variable percentages of postoperative incontinence are often reported. Continence was evaluated after 20 low anterior resections (LAR) and 13 high anterior resections (HAR) by means of clinical assessment, anorectal manometry, and evacuation proctography. Whereas all HAR patients had perfect continence, 10 patients (50 percent of the LAR group had occasional episodes of soiling from liquid feces, 5 patients (25 percent had frequent soiling or occasional incontinence for solid feces, and 1 patient (5 percent had frequent solid stool loss requiring surgical treatment. Anal canal resting pressure at 3 and 4 cm from the anal verge was significantly lower in the LAR group (P<0.02 and P<0.05, respectively) than in the HAR group. However, the maximum voluntary contraction did not differ between the two groups. Rectoanal inhibitory reflex was found to be present in 17 of the 20 patients with LAR and in all patients with HAR. The volume at which the anal sphincter is continuously inhibited was significantly reduced in the LAR group (P<0.001). Also, the conscious rectal sensibility volumes were found to be significantly reduced for threshold, constant, and maximum tolerated volume. Threshold volume for internal sphincter relaxation was lower than the threshold volume for rectal sensation in some patients with LAR. This could allow postoperative fecal soiling. Rectal compliance was decreased (P<0.001) in the LAR group. Evacuation proctography, performed in six LAR patients affected by major soiling or solid stool loss, revealed an abnormal obtuse anorectal angle and pathologic lowering of the perineum at rest and during defecation. The concomitance of internal anal sphincter impairment, reduction in rectal compliance, and previous pelvic floor muscle damage are postulated as cause affecting continence in patients who underwent LAR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Keighley MR, Matheson D. Functional results of rectal excision and endo-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 1980;67:757–61.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rosen L, Khubchandani IT, Sheets JA, Stasik JJ, Riether RD. Clinical and manometric evaluation of continence after the Bacon two-stage pull-through procedure. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:232–4.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Iwai N, Hashimoto K, Yamane T,et al. Physiologic status of the anorectum following sphincter-saving resection for carcinoma of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 1982;25:652–9.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Goligher JC. The functional results after sphincter saving resection of the rectum. Hunterian Lecture, R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 13 March 1951.

  5. McDonald PJ, Heald RJ. A survey of postoperative function after rectal anastomosis with circular stapling devices. Br J Surg 1983;70:727–9.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Duthie HL. The rectum and the anal canal. Clin Gastroenterol 1979;8:443–54.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Catchpole BM. Motor pattern of the left colon before and after surgery for rectal cancer: possible implications in other disorders. Gut 1988;29:624–30.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Williams NS, Price R, Johnston D. The long-term effect of sphincter preserving operations for rectal carcinoma on function of the anal sphincter in man. Br J Surg 1980;67:203–8.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nakahara S, Itoh H, Mibu R,et al. Clinical and manometric evaluation of anorectal function following low anterior resection with low anastomotic line using an EEA stapler for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1988;31:762–6.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Horgan PG, O'Connell PR, Shinkwin CA, Kirwan WO. Effect of anterior resection on anal sphincter function. Br J Surg 1989;76:783–6.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pedersen D, Hint K, Olsen J, Christiansen J, Jensen P, Mortensen P. Anorectal function after low anterior resection for carcinoma. Ann Surg 1986;204:133–5.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tonelli F, Indinnimeo M, Felli F. La funzione anorettale dopo interventi di resezione del retto: valutazione clinica e manometrica. Il Policlinico 1979;86:1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Suzuki H, Matsumoto K, Amano S, Fujioka M, Honzumi M. Anorectal pressure and compliance after low anterior resection. Br J Surg 1980;67:655–7.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bartolo DC, Read NW, Tarrah JA, Read MG, Donnelly TC, Johnson AG. Differences in anal sphincter function and clinical presentation in patients with pelvic floor descent. Gastroenterology 1983;85:68–75.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kirwan WO, O'Riordain MG, Waldron R. Declining indications for abdominoperineal resection. Br J Surg 1989;76:1061–3.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Read at the Congress on Colo-Rectal Disease Milan, Italy, June 29–30, 1989.

About this article

Cite this article

Batignani, G., Monaci, I., Ficari, F. et al. What affects continence after anterior resection of the rectum?. Dis Colon Rectum 34, 329–335 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02050593

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02050593

Key words

Navigation