Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Dynamic graciloplasty for total anorectal reconstruction after abdominoperineal resection for rectal tumour

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

To review the results of dynamic graciloplasty for total anorectal reconstruction after abdominoperineal resection (APR) for rectal cancer.

Patients and methods

Chart reviews were done on 17 patients who had dynamic graciloplasty following abdominoperineal resection and details of post-operative complications, bowel functions and recurrences were obtained.

Results

Seventeen patients (12 males) had dynamic graciloplasty after APR for low rectal tumours. The median age was 58.5 years (range 33–78). Three patients from overseas were lost to follow-up, and three still have not had the defunctioning stoma closed. Only 11 patients were available for evaluation of function. The median time from graciloplasty to continence to solids and liquids is 15.7 months (range 0.4–21.9 months). Six patients had defecatory problems, requiring daily irrigation to evacuate. Nine patients were continent without need for gracilis stimulation. Only two patients needed gracilis stimulation to maintain continence. Fifty percent of rectal carcinoma patients had developed a recurrence.

Conclusion

Dynamic graciloplasty had a high morbidity and did not always bring about normal defecatory function. Gracilis stimulation was not needed to achieve continence in all cases. Conversely, dynamic graciloplasty may lead to defecatory difficulties in a large number of patients. Graciloplasty should only be considered three years after the initial APR to avoid performing the procedure in a patient who may develop recurrence as well as to select patients who are psychologically prepared for the surgery and its complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cavina E, Seccia M, Banti P, Zocco G (1998) Anorectal reconstruction after abdominoperineal resection. Experience with double-wrap graciloplasty supported by low-frequency electrostimulation. Dis Colon Rectum 41:1010–1016

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Geerdes BP, Zoetmulder FA, Heineman E, Vos EJ, Rongen MJ, Baeten CG (1997) Total anorectal reconstruction with a double dynamic graciloplasty after abdominoperineal reconstruction for low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 40:698–705

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rosen HR, Novi G, Zoech G, Feil W, Urbarz C, Schiessel R (1998) Restoration of anal sphincter function by single-stage dynamic graciloplasty with a modified (split sling) technique. Am J Surg 175:187–193

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Seccia M, Menconi C, Balestri R, Cavina E (1994) Study protocols and functional results in 86 electrostimulated graciloplasties. Dis Colon Rectum 37:897–904

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chapman AE, Geerdes B, Hewett P, Young J, Eyers T, Kiroff G et al (2002) Systematic review of dynamic graciloplasty in the treatment of faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 89:138–153

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Altomare DF, Rinaldi M, Pannarale OC, Memeo V (1997) Electrostimulated gracilis neosphincter for faecal incontinence and in total anorectal reconstruction: still an experimental procedure? Int J Colorectal Dis 12:308–312

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cavina E (1996) Outcome of restorative perineal graciloplasty with simultaneous excision of the anus and rectum for cancer. A ten-year experience with 81 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 39:182–190

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rongen MJ, Dekker FA, Geerdes BP, Heineman E, Baeten CG (1999) Secondary coloperineal pull-through and double dynamic graciloplasty after Miles resection—feasible, but with a high morbidity. Dis Colon Rectum 42:776–780; discussion 781

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rouanet P, Senesse P, Bouamrirene D, Toureille E, Veyrac M, Astre C et al (1999) Anal sphincter reconstruction by dynamic graciloplasty after abdominoperineal resection for cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 42:451–456

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rullier E, ZerbibF, Laurent C, Caudry M, Saric J (2000) Morbidity and functional outcome after double dynamic graciloplasty for anorectal reconstruction. Br J Surg 87:909–913

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Beets-Tan RG (2003) MRI in rectal cancer: the T stage and circumferential resection margin. Colorectal Dis 5:392–395

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Beets-Tan RG, Beets GL (2003) Rectal cancer: how accurate can imaging predict the T stage and the circumferential resection margin? Int J Colorectal Dis 18:385–391

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kraemer M, Wiratkapun S, Seow-Choen F, Ho YH, Eu KW, Nyam D (2001) Stratifying risk factors for follow-up: a comparison of recurrent and nonrecurrent colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 44:815–821

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Seow-Choen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ho, K.S., Seow-Choen, F. Dynamic graciloplasty for total anorectal reconstruction after abdominoperineal resection for rectal tumour. Int J Colorectal Dis 20, 38–41 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-004-0622-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-004-0622-4

Keywords

Navigation