Skip to main content
Log in

Total Anorectal Reconstruction With the Artificial Bowel Sphincter: Report of Eight Cases

A Quality-of-Life Assessment

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: The artificial bowel sphincter has been proposed to treat patients with fecal incontinence. The good results achieved with this procedure encouraged us to use this device for reconversion of patients who previously underwent an abdominoperineal resection. METHODS: Between 1999 and 2001, we selected eight patients for the total anorectal reconstruction, five for a synchronous reconstruction, and three cases for a delayed procedure. One patient was male and seven were female. The mean age was 52.6 years. All the patients underwent a postoperative manometry and defecography. Continence and quality of life scores were also evaluated in the follow-up. RESULTS: The follow-up length ranged from 6 to 28 months. Manometry assessed a basal pressure with the ABS cuff inflated between 58 and 62.2 mmHg. All but one patient achieved a good grade of continence with a Wexner score range between 3 and 9. A certain degree of impaired evacuation occurred in three patients, but with adequate training this improved and did not affect patient’s satisfaction. The administered questionnaires demonstrated a significant improvement in quality of life scores for stoma patients and an elevated quality of life in patients synchronously treated with artificial bowel sphincter implant. CONCLUSION: The artificial bowel sphincter is a good option for reconstruction of patients previously treated with an abdominoperineal resection. The procedure is feasible and safe, without serious postoperative complications. The quality of life is improved when the procedure is performed in stabilized stoma patients and is acceptable for motivated patients synchronously implanted. As compared with electrostimulated graciloplasty, the artificial bowel sphincter technique seems to be easier to perform and more acceptable for the patients, although the cost of the device is still high.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. KP Nugent P Daniels B Stewart R Patankar CD Johnson (1999) ArticleTitleQuality of life in stoma patients Dis Colon Rectum 42 1569–1574

    Google Scholar 

  2. NS Williams RI Hallan TH Koeze ES Watkins (1989) ArticleTitleConstruction of a neorectum and neo-anal sphincter following previous proctocolectomy Br J Surg 76 1191–1194

    Google Scholar 

  3. E Cavina M Seccia G Evangelista et al. (1990) ArticleTitlePerineal colostomy and electrostimulated gracilis “neosphincter” after abdominoperineal resection of the colon and anorectum Int J Colorectal Dis 5 6–11

    Google Scholar 

  4. NS Williams RI Hallan TH Koeze ES Watkins (1990) ArticleTitleRestoration of gastrointestinal continuity and continence after abdominoperineal excision of the rectum using an electrically stimulated neoanal sphincter Dis Colon Rectum 33 561–565

    Google Scholar 

  5. PA Lehur F Michot P Denis et al. (1996) ArticleTitleResults of artificial sphincter in severe anal incontinence Dis Colon Rectum 39 1352–1355

    Google Scholar 

  6. PA Lehur JV Roig M Duinslaeger (2000) ArticleTitleArtificial anal sphincter Dis Colon Rectum 43 1100–1106

    Google Scholar 

  7. DF Altomare G Dodi F La Torre G Romano E Melega M Rinaldi (2001) ArticleTitleArtificial anal sphincter (Acticon Neosphincter) for severe faecal incontinence. A multicenter retrospective analysis of 28 cases Br J Surg 88 1481–1486

    Google Scholar 

  8. JM Jorge SD Wexner (1993) ArticleTitleEtiology and management of fecal incontinence Dis Colon Rectum 36 77–97

    Google Scholar 

  9. NK Aaranson S Ahmedzai B Bergman (1993) ArticleTitleThe European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 J Nat Cancer Inst 85 365–373

    Google Scholar 

  10. A Coates F Porzsolt D Osoba (1997) ArticleTitleQuality of life in oncology practice Eur J Cancer 33 1025–1030

    Google Scholar 

  11. F Agachan T Chen J Pfeifer P Reissman SD Wexner (1996) ArticleTitleA constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients Dis Colon Rectum 39 681–685

    Google Scholar 

  12. G Romano F Bianco P Esposito (2001) ArticleTitleThe artificial bowel sphincter Ospedali d’Italia Chirurgia 7 554–562

    Google Scholar 

  13. E Cavina M Seccia P Banti G Zocco (1998) ArticleTitleAnorectal reconstruction after abdominoperineal resection Dis Colon Rectum 41 1010–1016

    Google Scholar 

  14. BP Geerdes FA Zoetmulder E Heineman EJ Vos MJ Rongen CG Baeten (1997) ArticleTitleTotal anorectal reconstruction with a double dynamic graciloplasty after abdominoperineal reconstruction for low rectal cancer Dis Colon Rectum 40 698–705

    Google Scholar 

  15. BJ Mander JF Abercrombie BD George NS Williams (1996) ArticleTitleThe electrically stimulated gracilis neosphincter incorporated as part of total anorectal reconstruction after abdominoperineal excision of the rectum Ann Surg 224 702–711

    Google Scholar 

  16. AJ Malouf CJ Vaizey MA Kamm RJ Nicholls (2000) ArticleTitleReassessing artificial bowel sphincters Lancet 355 2219–2220

    Google Scholar 

  17. SF Hughes NS Williams (1995) ArticleTitleContinent colonic conduit for the treatment of fecal incontinence associated with disordered evacuation Br J Surg 82 1318–1320

    Google Scholar 

  18. H Ortiz P Armendariz M De Miguel MD Ruiz R Alos JV Roig (2002) ArticleTitleComplications and functional outcome following artificial anal sphincter implantation Br J Surg 89 877–881

    Google Scholar 

  19. PA Lehur F Zerbib M Neunlist P Glemain S Bruley des Varannes (2002) ArticleTitleComparison of quality of life and anorectal function after artificial sphincter implantation Dis Colon Rectum 45 508–513

    Google Scholar 

  20. E Kapiteijn CA Marijnen ID Nagtegaal H Putter (2001) ArticleTitlePreoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer N Engl J Med 345 638–646

    Google Scholar 

  21. M Dahlberg B Glimelius W Graf L Pahlman (1998) ArticleTitlePreoperative irradiation affects functional results after surgery for rectal cancer Dis Colon Rectum 41 543–551

    Google Scholar 

  22. BJ Mander SD Wexner NS Williams (1999) ArticleTitlePreliminary results of a multicentre trial of the electrically stimulated gracilis neoanal sphincter Br J Surg 86 1543–1548

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Romano, G., La Torre, F., Cutini, G. et al. Total Anorectal Reconstruction With the Artificial Bowel Sphincter: Report of Eight Cases. Dis Colon Rectum 46, 730–734 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6649-3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6649-3

Keywords

Navigation