Abstract
PURPOSE: The artificial bowel sphincter has been proposed to treat patients with fecal incontinence. The good results achieved with this procedure encouraged us to use this device for reconversion of patients who previously underwent an abdominoperineal resection. METHODS: Between 1999 and 2001, we selected eight patients for the total anorectal reconstruction, five for a synchronous reconstruction, and three cases for a delayed procedure. One patient was male and seven were female. The mean age was 52.6 years. All the patients underwent a postoperative manometry and defecography. Continence and quality of life scores were also evaluated in the follow-up. RESULTS: The follow-up length ranged from 6 to 28 months. Manometry assessed a basal pressure with the ABS cuff inflated between 58 and 62.2 mmHg. All but one patient achieved a good grade of continence with a Wexner score range between 3 and 9. A certain degree of impaired evacuation occurred in three patients, but with adequate training this improved and did not affect patient’s satisfaction. The administered questionnaires demonstrated a significant improvement in quality of life scores for stoma patients and an elevated quality of life in patients synchronously treated with artificial bowel sphincter implant. CONCLUSION: The artificial bowel sphincter is a good option for reconstruction of patients previously treated with an abdominoperineal resection. The procedure is feasible and safe, without serious postoperative complications. The quality of life is improved when the procedure is performed in stabilized stoma patients and is acceptable for motivated patients synchronously implanted. As compared with electrostimulated graciloplasty, the artificial bowel sphincter technique seems to be easier to perform and more acceptable for the patients, although the cost of the device is still high.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
KP Nugent P Daniels B Stewart R Patankar CD Johnson (1999) ArticleTitleQuality of life in stoma patients Dis Colon Rectum 42 1569–1574
NS Williams RI Hallan TH Koeze ES Watkins (1989) ArticleTitleConstruction of a neorectum and neo-anal sphincter following previous proctocolectomy Br J Surg 76 1191–1194
E Cavina M Seccia G Evangelista et al. (1990) ArticleTitlePerineal colostomy and electrostimulated gracilis “neosphincter” after abdominoperineal resection of the colon and anorectum Int J Colorectal Dis 5 6–11
NS Williams RI Hallan TH Koeze ES Watkins (1990) ArticleTitleRestoration of gastrointestinal continuity and continence after abdominoperineal excision of the rectum using an electrically stimulated neoanal sphincter Dis Colon Rectum 33 561–565
PA Lehur F Michot P Denis et al. (1996) ArticleTitleResults of artificial sphincter in severe anal incontinence Dis Colon Rectum 39 1352–1355
PA Lehur JV Roig M Duinslaeger (2000) ArticleTitleArtificial anal sphincter Dis Colon Rectum 43 1100–1106
DF Altomare G Dodi F La Torre G Romano E Melega M Rinaldi (2001) ArticleTitleArtificial anal sphincter (Acticon Neosphincter) for severe faecal incontinence. A multicenter retrospective analysis of 28 cases Br J Surg 88 1481–1486
JM Jorge SD Wexner (1993) ArticleTitleEtiology and management of fecal incontinence Dis Colon Rectum 36 77–97
NK Aaranson S Ahmedzai B Bergman (1993) ArticleTitleThe European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 J Nat Cancer Inst 85 365–373
A Coates F Porzsolt D Osoba (1997) ArticleTitleQuality of life in oncology practice Eur J Cancer 33 1025–1030
F Agachan T Chen J Pfeifer P Reissman SD Wexner (1996) ArticleTitleA constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients Dis Colon Rectum 39 681–685
G Romano F Bianco P Esposito (2001) ArticleTitleThe artificial bowel sphincter Ospedali d’Italia Chirurgia 7 554–562
E Cavina M Seccia P Banti G Zocco (1998) ArticleTitleAnorectal reconstruction after abdominoperineal resection Dis Colon Rectum 41 1010–1016
BP Geerdes FA Zoetmulder E Heineman EJ Vos MJ Rongen CG Baeten (1997) ArticleTitleTotal anorectal reconstruction with a double dynamic graciloplasty after abdominoperineal reconstruction for low rectal cancer Dis Colon Rectum 40 698–705
BJ Mander JF Abercrombie BD George NS Williams (1996) ArticleTitleThe electrically stimulated gracilis neosphincter incorporated as part of total anorectal reconstruction after abdominoperineal excision of the rectum Ann Surg 224 702–711
AJ Malouf CJ Vaizey MA Kamm RJ Nicholls (2000) ArticleTitleReassessing artificial bowel sphincters Lancet 355 2219–2220
SF Hughes NS Williams (1995) ArticleTitleContinent colonic conduit for the treatment of fecal incontinence associated with disordered evacuation Br J Surg 82 1318–1320
H Ortiz P Armendariz M De Miguel MD Ruiz R Alos JV Roig (2002) ArticleTitleComplications and functional outcome following artificial anal sphincter implantation Br J Surg 89 877–881
PA Lehur F Zerbib M Neunlist P Glemain S Bruley des Varannes (2002) ArticleTitleComparison of quality of life and anorectal function after artificial sphincter implantation Dis Colon Rectum 45 508–513
E Kapiteijn CA Marijnen ID Nagtegaal H Putter (2001) ArticleTitlePreoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer N Engl J Med 345 638–646
M Dahlberg B Glimelius W Graf L Pahlman (1998) ArticleTitlePreoperative irradiation affects functional results after surgery for rectal cancer Dis Colon Rectum 41 543–551
BJ Mander SD Wexner NS Williams (1999) ArticleTitlePreliminary results of a multicentre trial of the electrically stimulated gracilis neoanal sphincter Br J Surg 86 1543–1548
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Romano, G., La Torre, F., Cutini, G. et al. Total Anorectal Reconstruction With the Artificial Bowel Sphincter: Report of Eight Cases. Dis Colon Rectum 46, 730–734 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6649-3
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6649-3