Skip to main content
Log in

Continent perineal colostomy after abdominoperineal resection

Outcome after 63 cases

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: For patients with distal rectal or anal tumors, quality of life can be compromised after abdominoperineal resection and iliac colostomy. This study examines our experience with a continent perineal colostomy constructed from a colonic smooth-muscle cuff wrap. METHODS: Between 1987 and 1996, 63 patients with distal rectal or anal tumors (0–5 cm from the anal verge) underwent abdominoperineal resection and construction of a colonic smooth-muscle cuff at the site of the perineal colostomy. Postoperatively, all patients required colonic irrigations daily or every two days. The complications, continence at 6 and 12 months, and degree of satisfaction were prospectively evaluated using a standard questionnaire. RESULTS: Early complications included partial perineal dehiscence in 14 (22.5 percent) patients, pelvic abscess in 2 (3 percent) patients, and colostomy necrosis in 1 (1.6 percent) patient. Late complications were colostomy stricture in 7 (11.8 percent) patients, perineal sinus tract in 4 (6.7 percent) patients, and mucosal prolapse in 12 (20 percent) patients. Satisfactory continence (complete continence to stool and incontinence to gas) at 6 and 12 months was achieved in 30 (55.6 percent) and 27 (59 percent) patients, respectively. Patient satisfaction was noted in 85 percent. CONCLUSION: Continent perineal colostomy can serve as an alternative to conventional iliac colostomy. Most patients were satisfied. The modest complication rate can be minimized with patient selection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rothenberger DA, Wong D. Abdominoperineal resection for adenocarcinoma of the low rectum. World J Surg 1992;16:478–85.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Williams NS, Johnstone D. The quality of life after rectal excision for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1983;70:460–2.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Christiansen J, Sparso B. Treatment of anal incontinence by an implantable prosthetic anal sphincter. Ann Surg 1992;215:383–6.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Williams NS, Hallan RI, Koeze TH, Watkins ES. Construction of a neorectum and neo-anal sphincter following previous proctocolectomy. Br J Surg 1989;76:1191–4.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Williams NS, Hallan RI, Koeze TH, Phil D, Watkins ES. Restoration of gastrointestinal continuity and continence after abdominoperineal excision of the rectum using an electrically stimulated neoanal sphincter. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:561–5.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wee TK, Wong SK. Functional anal sphincter reconstruction with gracilis muscle after abdomino-perineal resection. Lancet 1984;2:1245–6.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mercanti U, Trancanelli V, Castagnoli P, Mariotti A, Ciaccarini R. Use of the gracilis muscles for sphincteric construction after abdominoperineal resection: technique and preliminary results. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:1085–9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pickrell K, Masters F, Geogiade N, Horton C. Rectal sphincter reconstruction using gracilis muscle transplant. Plastic Reconstr Surg 1954;13:46–9.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Schmidt E, Bruch HP, Greulich M, Rothhammer A, Romen W. Kontinente colostomie durch freie transplantation autologer dickdarmmusckulatur. Chirurg 1979;50:96–100.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Schmidt E, Bruch HP. Traitement chirurgical des incontinences sphincterienne intestinales par autotransplant libre de musculature lisse. J Chir 1981;118:315–20.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kirwan WO, Rupert B, Turnbull B Jr, Fazio VW, Weakley FL. Pullthrough operation with delay anastomosis for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1978;65:695–9.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lasser P, Dube P, Guillot JM, Elias D. Colostomie perineale pseudo-continente: Resultats et. technique. J Chir 1997;134:174–9.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Laucks SS II, Mazier WP, Milsom JW,et al. An assessment of colostomy irrigation. Dis Colon Rectum 1988;31:279–82.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cavina E, Seccia M, Evangelista G,et al. Perineal colostomy and electrostimulated gracilis “neosphincter” after abdomino-perineal resection of the colon and anorectum: a surgical experience and follow-up study in 47 cases. Int J Colorectal Dis 1991;6:63–4.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Baeten CG, Geerdes BP, Adang EM,et al. Anal dynamic graciloplasty in the treatment of intractable fecal incontinence. N Engl J Med 1995;332:1600–5.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, San Antonio, Texas, May 2 to 7, 1998.

About this article

Cite this article

Gamagami, R.A., Chiotasso, P. & Lazorthes, F. Continent perineal colostomy after abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 42, 626–630 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02234140

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02234140

Key words

Navigation