Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Long-term functional outcome after low anterior resection

Comparison of low colorectal anastomosis and colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare long-term functional results of two methods of reconstruction after anterior rectal resection for cancer: low colorectal anastomosis and colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: After anterior resection for mid or low rectal cancer, the decision to perform low colorectal or coloanal anastomosis is made intraoperatively, depending on the distance of the tumor from the anal verge. Functional results of these operations are considered to be similar one to two years after surgery. No study to date has compared long-term functional results after rectal excision followed by either low colorectal anastomosis or colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis. METHODS: From 1987 to 1992, 173 patients underwent anterior resection for cancer located between 2 to 12 cm from the anal verge. All patients alive without recurrence were contacted by telephone interview for assessment of functional results. There were 47 patients with colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis and 34 patients with low colorectal anastomosis. Minimum follow-up was three years for all patients (mean, 5 years). RESULTS: The two groups were well matched for gender, age, histologic stage, and use of adjuvant therapies. Patients with colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis displayed significantly better function in terms of frequency of defecation (1.57±1vs. 2.79±1;P=0.001) and presence of irregular transit or stool “clustering” (30vs. 71 percent;P=0.003). Patients who underwent colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis were significantly less likely to require constipating agents (4vs. 21 percent;P=0.03) or need to follow a estricted diet (14vs. 41 percent;P=0.01). Results concerning the need to defecate again within one hour and disruption of social or professional life as a consequence of surgery showed a tendency in favor of colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis. CONCLUSION: Colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis offers superior long-term function compared with low colorectal anastomosis after radical treatment of rectal cancer. Preservation of a short rectal segment followed by a straight colorectal anastomosis does not offer any clinical advantage over colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Williams NS. The rationale for preservation of the anal sphincter in patients with low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1984;71:575–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Parks AG. Transanal technique in low rectal anastomosis. J R Soc Med 1972;65:975–6.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Paty PB, Enker WE, Cohen AM, Lauwers GY. Treatment of rectal cancer by low anterior resection with coloanal anastomosis. Ann Surg 1994;219:365–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McAnena OJ, Heald RJ, Lockhart-Mummery HE. Operative and functional results of total mesorectal exision with ultra-low anterior resection in the management of carcinoma of the lower one-third of the rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1990;170:517–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. McDonald PJ, Heald RJ. A survey of postoperative function after rectal anastomosis with circular stapling devices. Br J Surg 1983;70:727–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Williams NS, Price R, Johnston D. The long term effect of sphincter preserving operations for rectal carcinoma on function of anal sphincter in man. Br J Surg 1980;67:203–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pedersen IK, Hint K, Olsen J,et al. Anorectal function after low anterior resection for carcinoma. Ann Surg 1986;204:133–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Parc R, Tiret E, Frileux P, Moszkowski E, Loygue J. Resection and colo-anal anastomosis with colonic reservoir for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 1986;73:139–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lazorthes F, Fages P, Chiotasso P, Lemozy J, Bloom E. Resection of the rectum with construction of a colonic reservoir and colo-anal anastomosis for carcinoma of the rectum. Br J Surg 1986;73:136–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hallböök O, Pâhlman L, Krog M, Wexner SD, Sjödahl R. Randomized comparison of straight and colonic J pouch anatomosis after low anterior resection. Ann Surg 1996;224:58–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Berger A, Tiret E, Parc R,et al. Excision of the rectum with colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis for adenocarcinoma of the low and mid rectum. World J Surg 1992;16:470–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cohen AM. Colon J-pouch rectal reconstruction after total or subtotal proctectomy. World J Surg 1993;17:267–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Karanjia ND, Corder AP, Bearn P, Heald RJ. Leakage from stapled low anastomosis after total mesorectal excision for carcinoma of the rectum. Br J Surg 1994;81:1224–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Seow-Choen F, Goh HS. Prospective randomized trial comparing J colonic pouch-anal anastomosis and straight coloanal reconstruction. Br J Surg 1995;82:608–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nakahara S, Itoh H, Mibu R,et al. Clinical and manometric evaluation of anorectal function following low anterior resection with low anastomotic line using an EEA™ stapler for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1988;31:762–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Paty PB, Enker WE, Cohen AM, Minsky BD, Friedlander-Klar H. Long-term functional results of coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancer. Am J Surg 1994;167:90–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. O'Riordain MG, Molloy RG, Gillen P, Horgan A, Kirwan WO. Rectoanal inhibitory reflex following low stapled anterior resection of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:874–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sweeney JL, Ritchie JK, Hawley PR. Resection and sutured peranal anastomosis for carcinoma of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:103–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kusunoki M, Shoji Y, Yanagi H,et al. Function after anoabdominal rectal resection and colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 1991;78:1434–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mortensen NJ, Ramirez JM, Takeuchi N, Humphreys MM. Colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis after rectal excision for carcinoma: functional outcome. Br J Surg 1995;82:611–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lewis WG, Holdsworth PJ, Stephenson BM, Finan PJ, Johnston D. Role of the rectum in the physiological and clinical results of coloanal and colorectal anastomosis after anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 1992;79:1082–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Karanjia ND, Schache DJ, Heald RJ. Function of the distal rectum after low anterior resection for carcinoma. Br J Surg 1992;79:114–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pélissier EP, Blum D, Bachour A, Bosset JF. Functional results of coloanal anastomosis with reservoir. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:843–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kollmorgen CF, Meagher AP, Wolff BG, Pemberton JH, Martenson JA, Illstrup DM. The long-term effect of adjuvant postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal carcinoma on bowel function. Ann Surg 1994;220:676–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lewis WG, Martin IG, Williamson ME,et al. Why do some patients experience poor functional results after anterior resection of the rectum for carcinoma? Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:259–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ortiz H, De Miguel M, Armendariz P, Rodriguez J, Choccaro C. Coloanal anastomosis: are functional results better with a pouch? Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:375–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. From the Centre de Chirurgie Digestive, University of Pierre and Marie Curie, Paris, France

    Nidal Dehni M.D., Emmanuel Tiret M.D., Jean Dominique Singland M.D., Christopher Cunningham M.D. (F.R.C.S.), Rodolfo Daniel Schlegel M.D. &  Rolland Parc M.D. (Hon. F.R.C.S.E.)

  2. INSERM 444, Saint Antoine Hospital AP-HP and Faculty of Medicine, University of Pierre and Marie Curie, Paris, France

    Marguerite Guiguet M.D.

Authors
  1. Nidal Dehni M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Emmanuel Tiret M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jean Dominique Singland M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Christopher Cunningham M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Rodolfo Daniel Schlegel M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Marguerite Guiguet M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Rolland Parc M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

About this article

Cite this article

Dehni, N., Tiret, E., Singland, J.D. et al. Long-term functional outcome after low anterior resection. Dis Colon Rectum 41, 817–822 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02235358

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02235358

Key words

Search

Navigation