Skip to main content
Log in

Assisted Breeding in Sugar Beets

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Sugar Tech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Molecular insight and methods applied to plant breeding and germplasm enhancement is the goal of assisted breeding, also known as marker assisted breeding, marker assisted selection, molecular plant breeding, or genome-wide selection, among others. The basic idea is that most, if not all, heritable components of agronomic performance can be assayed with an unbiased, uniform, and comparatively inexpensive set of measures that are highly or completely correlated with phenotypic values. Typically such heritable components are genetically controlled, thus the panoply of DNA-based correlative methods should provide the requisite tools for assisted breeding to be successful. Whether DNA-based methods are successful in predicting agronomic performance depends on a host of considerations, many of which remain to be completely addressed for sugar beet, and thus assisted breeding remains somewhat empirical in practice, at least with respect to the specific traits of interest. Most sugar beet breeding and improvement programs have initiated assisted breeding efforts, primarily as a first step to discover marker associations with traits. These initial activities serve a number of important functions such as determining the complexity of trait inheritance, narrowing the possible range of genes and loci involved in phenotypic expression in different populations, and following the progress of sugar beet improvement following hybridization with wild and unadapted germplasm. It is unlikely that breeding will or should ever rely completely on assisted methods, however selection of the most promising germplasm can be greatly accelerated using molecular insights and knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abe, J., and C. Tsuda. 1987. Genetic analysis for isozyme variation in the section Vulgares, genus Beta. Japanese Journal of Breeding 37: 253–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amiri, R., M. Mesbah, M. Moghaddam, M. Bihamta, S. Mohammadi, and P. Norouzi. 2009. A new RAPD marker for beet necrotic yellow vein virus resistance gene in Beta vulgaris. Biologia Plantarum 53: 112–119.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barzen, E., W. Melchelke, E. Ritter, E. Schulte-Kappert, and F. Salamini. 1995. An extended map of the sugarbeet genome containing RFLP and RAPD loci. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 90: 189–193.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Behnke, H.D., and T.J. Mabry. 1994. Caryophyllales: Evolution and systematics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biancardi, E., R. Lewellen, M. De Biaggi, A. Erichsen, and P. Stevanato. 2002. The origin of rhizomania resistance in sugar beet. Euphytica 127: 383–397.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Biancardi, E., L.G. Campbell, G.N. Skaracis, and M. De Biaggi. 2005. Genetics and breeding of sugar beet, 367. Enfield, NH, USA: Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biancardi, E., J.M. McGrath, L. Panella, R.T. Lewellen, P. Stevanato. 2010. Sugar beet. In: Root and tuber crops. Handbook of plant breeding, vol. 7. ed. J.E. Bradshaw (in press).

  • Buttler, K.P. 1977. Variation in wild populations of annual beet (Beta, Chenopodiaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 128: 123–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chia, T.Y.P., A. Muller, C. Jung, and E.S. Mutasa-Gottgens. 2008. Sugar beet contains a large CONSTANS-LIKE gene family including a CO homologue that is independent of the early-bolting (B) gene locus. Journal of Experimental Botany 59: 2735–2748.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, D.A., and R.K. Scott. 1993. The sugar beet crop, 675. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coster, A., H.C.M. Heuven, R.L. Fernando, and J.C.M. Dekkers. 2009. Haplotype inference in crossbred populations without pedigree information. Genetics Selection Evolution 41: 40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David-Schwartz, R., and N. Sinha. 2007. Evolution and development in plants: Bridging the gap. International Journal of Plant Sciences 168: 49–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dohm, J.C., D. Holtgraewe, C. Lange, T. Rosleff-Soerensen, D. Borchardt, B. Schulz, H. Lehrach, B. Weisshaar, and H. Himmelbauer. 2010. Construction and analysis of a physical BAC map for sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). Unpublished from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nucgss/HN141372.1.

  • Dominguez, I., E. Graziano, C. Gebhardt, A. Barakat, S. Berry, P. Arus, M. Delseny, and S. Barnes. 2003. Plant genome archaeology: Evidence for conserved ancestral chromosome segments in dicotyledonous plant species. Plant Biotechnology Journal 1: 91–99.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Draycott, A.P. 2006. Sugar Beet. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fenárt, S., J. Arnaud, I. De Cauwer, and J. Cuguen. 2008. Nuclear and cytoplasmic genetic diversity in weed beet and sugar beet accessions compared to wild relatives: New insights into the genetic relationships within the Beta vulgaris complex species. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 116: 1063–1077.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fievet, V., P. Touzet, J.-F. Arnaud, and J. Cuguen. 2007. Spatial analysis of nuclear and cytoplasmic DNA diversity in wild sea beet (Beta vulgaris ssp maritima) populations: do marine currents shape the genetic structure? Molecular Ecology 16: 1847–1864.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, R.B., M.D. Bennet, and J.B. Smith. 1974. Genome size and the proportion of repeated nucleotide sequence DNA in plants. Biochemical Genetics 12: 257–269.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gidner, S., B. Lennefors, N. Nilsson, J. Bensefelt, E. Johansson, U. Gyllenspetz, and T. Kraft. 2005. QTL mapping of BNYVV resistance from the WB41 source in sugar beet. Genome 48: 279–285.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Geidel, H., W.E. Weber, W. Mechelke, and W. Haufe. 2000. Selection for sugar yield in sugar beet, Beta vulgaris, using different selection indices. Plant Breeding 119: 188–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giorio, G., M. Gallitelli, and F. Carriero. 1997. Molecular markers linked to rhizomania resistance in sugar beet, Beta vulgaris, from two different sources map to the same linkage group. Plant Breeding 116: 401–408.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grimmer, M.K., K.M.R. Bean, A. Qi, M. Stevens, and M.J.C. Asher. 2008. The action of three Beet yellows virus resistance QTLs depends on alleles at a novel genetic locus that controls symptom development. Plant Breeding 127: 391–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herwig, R., B. Schulz, B. Weisshaar, S. Hennig, M. Steinfath, M. Drungowski, D. Stahl, W. Wruck, A. Menze, J. O’Brien, H. Lehrach, and U. Radelof. 2002. Construction of a ‘unigene’ cDNA clone set by oligonucleotide fingerprinting allows access to 25,000 potential sugar beet genes. The Plant Journal 32: 845–857.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hjerdin-Panagopoulos, A., T. Kraft, I. Rading, S. Tuvesson, and N. Nilsson. 2002. Three QTL regions for restoration of Owen CMS in sugar beet. Crop Science 42: 540–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, C., and N. Stockfisch. 2010. Efficient use of resources in sugarbeet crop. Zuckerindustrie 135: 37–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hospital, F. 2008. Challenges for effective marker-assisted selection in plants. Genetica 136: 303–310.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hunger, S., G. Di Gaspero, S. Möhring, D. Bellin, R. Schäfer-Pregl, D.C. Borchardt, C.E. Durel, M. Werber, B. Weisshaar, F. Salamini, and K. Schneider. 2003. Isolation and linkage analysis of expressed disease-resistance gene analogues of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Genome 46: 70–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, C., K. Pillen, L. Frese, S. Fahr, and A. Melchinger. 1993. Phylogenetic-relationships between cultivated and wild species of the genus Beta revealed by DNA fingerprinting. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 86: 449–457.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuykendall, L.D., T.S. Murphy, J. Shao, and J.M. McGrath. 2007. Nucleotide sequence analyses of a sugarbeet genomic NPR1-class disease resistance gene. Journal of Sugar Beet Research 44: 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurent, V., P. Devaux, T. Thiel, F. Viard, S. Mielordt, P. Touzet, and M. Quillet. 2007. Comparative effectiveness of sugar beet microsatellite markers isolated from genomic libraries and GenBank ESTs to map the sugar beet genome. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 115: 793–805.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J.Q., B. Schulz, and B. Stich. 2010. Population structure and genetic diversity in elite sugar beet germplasm investigated with SSR markers. Euphytica 175: 35–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lein, J., K. Asbach, Y. Tian, D. Schulte, C. Li, G. Koch, C. Jung, and D.G. Cai. 2007. Resistance gene analogues are clustered on chromosome 3 of sugar beet and cosegregate with QTL for rhizomania resistance. Genome 50: 61–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, J.M., C. Derrico, and Y. Yu. 1999. Genetic diversity in selected, historical US sugarbeet germplasm and Beta vulgaris ssp maritima. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 98: 968–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, J.M., L. Panella, and L. Frese. 2010. Wild species in beet improvement. In: Wealth of wild species: Role in plant genome elucidation and improvement, ed. C. Kole. Berlin: Springer (in press).

  • McGrath, J., D. Trebbi, A. Fenwick, L. Panella, B. Schulz, V. Laurent, S. Barnes, and S. Murray. 2007. An open-source first-generation molecular genetic map from a sugarbeet × table beet cross and its extension to physical mapping. Crop Science 47: S27–S44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mita, G., M. Dani, P. Casciari, A. Pasquali, E. Selva, C. Minganti, and P. Piccardi. 1991. Assessment of the degree of genetic variation in beet based on RFLP analysis and the taxonomy of Beta. Euphytica 55: 1–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Möhring, S., F. Salamini, and K. Schneider. 2004. Multiplexed, linkage group-specific SNP marker sets for rapid genetic mapping and fingerprinting of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Molecular Breeding 14: 475–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moose, S.P., and R.H. Mumm. 2008. Molecular plant breeding as the foundation for 21st century crop improvement. Plant Physiology 147: 969–977.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, N.O., C. Halldén, M. Hansen, A. Hjerdin, and T. Säll. 1997. Comparing the distribution of RAPD and RFLP markers in a high density linkage map of sugar beet. Genome 40: 644–651.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, N., M. Hansen, A. Panagopoulos, S. Tuvesson, M. Ehlde, M. Christiansson, I. Rading, M. Rissler, and T. Kraft. 1999. QTL analysis of Cercospora leaf spot resistance in sugar beet. Plant Breeding 118: 327–334.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Panella, L., and R. Lewellen. 2007. Broadening the genetic base of sugar beet: Introgression from wild relatives. Euphytica 154: 383–400.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Panella, L., R.T. Lewellen, and L.E. Hanson. 2008. Breeding for multiple disease resistance in sugarbeet: Registration of FC220 and FC221. Journal of Plant Registrations 2: 146–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pestsova, E., J. Meinhard, A. Menze, U. Fischer, A. Windhovel, and P. Westhoff. 2008. Transcript profiles uncover temporal and stress-induced changes of metabolic pathways in germinating sugar beet seeds. BMC Plant Biology 8: 122.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, F.J. 1916. Correlation between morphological characters and the saccharine content of sugar beets. American Journal of Botany 3: 361–376.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, P., Y. He, R. Schmitz, R. Amasino, L. Panella, and C. Richards. 2007. Evolutionary conservation of the FLOWERING LOCUS C-mediated vernalization response: Evidence from the sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). Genetics 176: 295–307.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rush, C.M., H.-Y. Liu, R.T. Lewellen, and R. Acosta-Leal. 2006. The continuing saga of rhizomania of sugar beets in the United States. Plant Disease 90: 4–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saccomani, M., P. Stevanato, D. Trebbi, J.M. McGrath, and E. Biancardi. 2009. Molecular and morpho-physiological characterization of sea, ruderal and cultivated beets. Euphytica 169: 19–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schafer-Pregl, R., D. Borchardt, E. Barzen, C. Glass, W. Mechelke, J. Seitzer, and F. Salamini. 1999. Localization of QTLs for tolerance to Cercospora beticola on sugar beet linkage groups. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 99: 829–836.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, T., and J.S. Heslop-Harrison. 1998. Genomes, genes and junk: The large-scale organization of plant chromosomes. Trends in Plant Science 3: 195–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, K., B. Weisshaar, D. Borchardt, and F. Salamini. 2001. SNP frequency and allelic haplotype structure of Beta vulgaris expressed genes. Molecular Breeding 8: 63–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, K., R. Schafer-Pregl, D.C. Borchardt, and F. Salamini. 2002. Mapping QTLs for sucrose content, yield and quality in a sugar beet population fingerprinted by EST-related markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 104: 1107–1113.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, K., D. Kulosa, T. Soerensen, S. Mohring, M. Heine, G. Durstewitz, A. Polley, E. Weber, J.L. Jamsari, U. Hohmann, E. Tahiro, B. Weisshaar, B. Schulz, G. Koch, C. Jung, and M. Ganal. 2007. Analysis of DNA polymorphisms in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) and development of an SNP-based map of expressed genes. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 115: 601–615.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scholten, O., and W. Lange. 2000. Breeding for resistance to rhizomania in sugar beet: A review. Euphytica 112: 219–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Setiawan, A., G. Koch, S. Barnes, and C. Jung. 2000. Mapping quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for resistance to Cercospora leaf spot disease (Cercospora beticola Sacc.) in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 100: 1176–1182.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shendure, J., R.D. Mitra, C. Varma, and G.M. Church. 2004. Advanced sequencing technologies: Methods and goals. Nature Reviews Genetics 5: 335–344.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smigocki, A.C., S.D. Ivic-Haymes, O.P. Puthoff, and S. Zuzga. 2008. Recent advances in functional genomics for sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) improvement: progress in determining the role of BvSTI in pest resistance in roots. Sugar Tech 10: 91–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stevanato, P., D. Trebbi, and M. Saccomani. 2010. Root traits and yield in sugar beet: Identification of AFLP markers associated with root elongation rate. Euphytica 173: 289–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stich, B., A. Melchinger, M. Heckenberger, J. Mohring, A. Schechert, and H. Piepho. 2008. Association mapping in multiple segregating populations of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 117: 1167–1179.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taguchi, K., K. Okazaki, H. Takahashi, T. Kubo, and T. Mikami. 2010. Molecular mapping of a gene conferring resistance to Aphanomyces root rot (black root) in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Euphytica 173: 409–418.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trebbi, D., and J.M. McGrath. 2009. Functional differentiation of the sugar beet root system as indicator of developmental phase change. Physiologia Plantarum 135: 84–97.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, M.H., L.M. Pakish, and H. Zhou. 2001. An isozyme marker for resistance to root-knot nematode in sugarbeet. Crop Science 41: 1051–1053.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Mitchell McGrath.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mitchell McGrath, J. Assisted Breeding in Sugar Beets. Sugar Tech 12, 187–193 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-010-0051-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-010-0051-3

Keywords

Navigation