Skip to main content
Log in

Long-Term Results After Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy: High Patient Satisfaction Despite Frequent Postoperative Symptoms

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Purpose

Stapled hemorrhoidopexy has been demonstrated to be advantageous in the short term compared with the traditional techniques. We aimed to evaluate long-term results after stapled hemorrhoidopexy and to assess patient satisfaction in association with postoperative hemorrhoidal symptoms.

Methods

This prospective study included 216 patients with Grade 2 or 3 hemorrhoids, who had stapled hemorrhoidopexy using the circular stapled technique. The results were evaluated by a standardized questionnaire at least 12 months after the operation. The primary end point was patient satisfaction; secondary end points included specific hemorrhoidal symptoms.

Results

Followup data were obtained for 193 of 216 patients (89 percent) with a median follow-up of 28 (range, 12–53) months, most of whom (89 percent) were satisfied or very satisfied with the surgery. The main preoperative symptom was no longer present postoperatively in 66 percent of patients, was relieved in 28 percent, and had worsened in 2 percent. Postoperative complaints included symptoms of hemorrhoidal prolapse (24 percent of patients), anal bleeding (20 percent), anal pain (25 percent) fecal soiling/leakage (31 percent), fecal urgency (40 percent), and local discomfort (38 percent). Bivariate analysis showed significant associations between each of these symptoms and patient satisfaction. Nine patients (5 percent) were reoperated on during the follow-up period.

Conclusions

Long-term patient satisfaction was high in most of patients after stapled hemorrhoidopexy for second-degree and third-degree hemorrhoids. However, an unsatisfactory outcome was significantly related to postoperative hemorrhoidal symptoms such as prolapse, fecal soiling/leakage, and new onset of fecal urgency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Longo A. Treatment of hemorrhoidal disease by reduction of mucosa and hemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device: a new procedure. In: Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery. Bologna: Monduzzi Editore, 1998:777–84.

  2. M Pescatori (1997) ArticleTitleTransanal stapled excision of rectal mucosa prolapse Tech Coloproctol 1 96–98

    Google Scholar 

  3. J Bikhchandani PN Agarwal R Kant VS Malik (2005) ArticleTitleRandomized controlled trial to compare the early and mid-term results of stapled versus open hemorrhoidectomy Am J Surg 189 56–60 Occurrence Handle15701493 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.03.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. P Boccasanta PG Capretti M Venturi et al. (2001) ArticleTitleRandomised controlled trial between stapled circumferential mucosectomy and conventional circular hemorrhoidectomy in advanced hemorrhoids with external mucosal prolapse Am J Surg 182 64–68 Occurrence Handle11532418 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00654-7 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvovFOnuw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. SR Brown K Ballan E Ho YH Ho Fams F Seow-Choen (2001) ArticleTitleStapled mucosectomy for acute thrombosed circumferentially prolapsed piles: a prospective randomized comparison with conventional haemorrhoidectomy Colorectal Dis 3 175–178 Occurrence Handle12790985 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1463-1318.2001.00224.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s3msFShsw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. MJ Cheetham CR Cohen MA Kamm RK Phillips (2003) ArticleTitleA randomized, controlled trial of diathermy hemorrhoidectomy vs. stapled hemorrhoidectomy in an intended day-care setting with longer-term follow-up Dis Colon Rectum 46 491–497 Occurrence Handle12682543 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-6588-z Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s7msVeisg%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. JM Correa-Rovelo O Tellez L Obregon A Miranda-Gomez S Moran (2002) ArticleTitleStapled rectal mucosectomy vs. closed hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, clinical trial Dis Colon Rectum 45 1367–1375 Occurrence Handle12394436 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-6426-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. E Ganio DF Altomare F Gabrielli G Milito S Canuti (2001) ArticleTitleProspective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomy Br J Surg 88 669–674 Occurrence Handle11350437 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01772.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3mslentw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. JF Gravié P-A Lehur N Huten et al. (2005) ArticleTitleStapled hemorrhoidopexy versus Milligan-Morgen hemorrhoidectomy. A prospective, randomized, multicenter trial with 2-year postoperative follow up Ann Surg 242 29–35 Occurrence Handle15973098 Occurrence Handle10.1097/01.sla.0000169570.64579.31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. FH Hetzer N Demartines AE Handschin PA Clavien (2002) ArticleTitleStapled vs. excision hemorrhoidectomy: long-term results of a prospective randomized trial Arch Surg 137 337–340 Occurrence Handle11888463 Occurrence Handle10.1001/archsurg.137.3.337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Y-H Ho W-K Cheong C Tsang et al. (2000) ArticleTitleStapled hemorrhoidectomy – cost and effectiveness: randomized, controlled trial including incontinence scoring, anorectal manometry, and endoanal ultrasound assessments at up to three months Dis Colon Rectum 43 1666–1675 Occurrence Handle11156449 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02236847 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FpvFGrtQ%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Y-H Ho C Tsang CL Tang D Nyam KW Eu F Seow-Choen (2000) ArticleTitleAnal sphincter injuries from stapling instruments introduced transanally: randomized, controlled study with endoanal ultrasound and anorectal manometry Dis Colon Rectum 43 169–173 Occurrence Handle10696889 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02236976 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7lvF2lsA%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. M Kairaluoma K Nuorva I Kellokumpu (2003) ArticleTitleDay-case stapled (circular) vs. diathermy hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, controlled trial evaluating surgical and functional outcome Dis Colon Rectum 46 93–99 Occurrence Handle12544528 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-6502-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. KH Khalil A O’Bichere D Sellu (2000) ArticleTitleRandomized clinical trial of sutured versus stapled closed haemorrhoidectomy Br J Surg 87 1352–1355 Occurrence Handle11044160 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01624.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3crgtVGlug%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. P Lan X Wu X Zhou J Wang L Zhang (2006) ArticleTitleThe safety and efficacy of stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis of ten randomized control trials Int J Colorectal Dis 21 172–178 Occurrence Handle15971065 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00384-005-0786-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. A Maw R Concepcion K Eu et al. (2003) ArticleTitleProspective randomized study of bacteraemia in diathermy and stapled hemorrhoidectomy Br J Surg 90 222–226 Occurrence Handle12555300 Occurrence Handle10.1002/bjs.4057 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s%2FksVymtQ%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. BJ Mehigan JR Monson JE Hartley (2000) ArticleTitleStapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomized controlled trial Lancet 355 782–785 Occurrence Handle10711925 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(99)08362-2 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7nsFSruw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. PJ Nisar AG Acheson KR Neal JH Scholefield (2004) ArticleTitleStapled hemorrhoidopexy compared with conventional hemorrhoidectomy: systematic review of randomized, controlled trials Dis Colon Rectum 47 1837–1845 Occurrence Handle15622575 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-0679-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. H Ortiz J Marzo P Armendariz (2002) ArticleTitleRandomized clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomy Br J Surg 89 1376–1381 Occurrence Handle12390376 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02237.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38njt1agtA%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. D Palimento M Picchio U Attanasio A Lombardi C Bambini A Renda (2003) ArticleTitleStapled and open hemorrhoidectomy: randomized controlled trial of early results World J Surg 27 203–207 Occurrence Handle12616437

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. T Pavlidis B Papaziogas A Souparis A Patsas I Koutelidakis T Papaziogas (2002) ArticleTitleModern stapled Longo procedure vs. conventional Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized controlled trial Int J Colorectal Dis 17 50–53 Occurrence Handle12018455 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s003840100342 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD383nslGlsQ%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. BC Peng DG Jayne Y-H Ho (2003) ArticleTitleRandomized trial of rubber band ligation vs. stapled hemorrhoidectomy for prolapsed piles Dis Colon Rectum 46 291–297 Occurrence Handle12626901 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-6543-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. A Racalbuto I Aliotta G Corsaro R Lanteri A Cataldo ParticleDe A Licata (2001) ArticleTitleHemorrhoidal stapler prolapsectomy vs. Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a long-term randomized trial Int J Colorectal Dis 19 239–244 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00384-003-0547-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. M Rowsell M Bello DM Hemingway (2001) ArticleTitleCircumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomized controlled trial Lancet 355 779–781 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(99)06122-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. AJ Senagore M Singer H Abcarian et al. (2004) ArticleTitleA prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter trial comparing stapled hemorrhoidopexy and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: perioperative and one-year results Dis Colon Rectum 47 1824–1836 Occurrence Handle15622574 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-0694-9 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2cnktlKgsA%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. R Shalaby A Desoky (2001) ArticleTitleRandomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy Br J Surg 88 1049–1053 Occurrence Handle11488788 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01830.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvktlWhsQ%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. MA Singer JR Cintron JW Fleshman et al. (2002) ArticleTitleEarly experience with stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the United States Dis Colon Rectum 45 360–369 Occurrence Handle12068195 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-6183-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. EF Smyth RP Baker BJ Wilken JE Hartley TJ White JR Monson (2003) ArticleTitleStapled versus excision haemorrhoidectomy: long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial Lancet 361 1437–1438 Occurrence Handle12727401 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13106-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. LM Sutherland AK Burchard K Matsuda et al. (2002) ArticleTitleA systematic review of stapled hemorrhoidectomy Arch Surg 137 1395–1406 Occurrence Handle12470107 Occurrence Handle10.1001/archsurg.137.12.1395 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38jgvVKgug%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. MS Wilson V Pope HE Doran SJ Fearn WA Brough (2002) ArticleTitleObjective comparison of stapled anopexy and open hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, controlled trial Dis Colon Rectum 45 1437–1444 Occurrence Handle12432288 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-6446-z Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38nntFShuw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. L Brusciano SM Ayabaca M Pescatori et al. (2004) ArticleTitleReinterventions after complicated failed stapled hemorrhoidopexy Dis Colon Rectum 47 1846–1851 Occurrence Handle15622576 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-0721-x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2cnktlKgtg%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. MJ Cheetham NJ Mortensen P-O Nystrom MA Kamm RK Phillips (2000) ArticleTitlePersistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomy Lancet 356 730–733 Occurrence Handle11085693 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02632-5 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FjvVKquw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Y-H Ho F Seow-Choen C Tsang KW Eu (2001) ArticleTitleRandomized trial assessing anal sphincter injuries after stapled haemorrhoidectomy Br J Surg 88 1449–1455 Occurrence Handle11683739 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01899.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MngvF2nsQ%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. C Bönner P Prohm S Störkel (2001) ArticleTitleFournier’s gangrene following stapler hemorrhoidectomy – case report and review of literature Chirurg 72 1664–1666 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s001040170012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. S Cipriani M Pescatori (2002) ArticleTitleAcute rectal obstruction following PPH hemorrhoidectomy Colorectal Dis 4 367–370 Occurrence Handle12780584 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1463-1318.2002.00409.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. B Ravo A Amato V Bianco et al. (2002) ArticleTitleComplications after stapled hemorrhoidectomy: can they be prevented? Tech Coloproctol 6 83–88 Occurrence Handle12402051 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s101510200018 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38nktlWrtQ%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. P Meyer R Stieger (2004) ArticleTitleRetroperitoneal hematoma due to seam insufficiency after stapled hemorrhoidectomy Chirurg 75 1125–1128 Occurrence Handle15309266 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00104-004-0916-7 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2cngsFGnsA%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. RG Molloy D Kingsmore (2000) ArticleTitleLife threatening pelvic sepsis after stapled haemorrhoidectomy Lancet 355 810 Occurrence Handle10711934 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02208-X Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7nsFSqug%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. V Ripetti M Caricatto A Arullani (2002) ArticleTitleRectal perforation, retroperitoneum, and pneumomediastinum after stapling procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids Dis Colon Rectum 45 268–270 Occurrence Handle11852343 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-6159-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. LY Wong JK Jiang SC Chang JK Lin (2003) ArticleTitleRectal perforation: a life threatening complication of stapled hemorrhoidectomy Dis Colon Rectum 46 116–117 Occurrence Handle12544531 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-6505-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. MO Guenin R Rosenthal B Kern R Peterli M Flue Particlevon C Ackermann (2005) ArticleTitleFerguson hemorrhoidectomy: long-term results and patient satisfaction after Ferguson’s hemorrhoidectomy Dis Colon Rectum 48 1523–1527 Occurrence Handle15937612 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-005-0084-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Hasse C, Sitter H, Brune M, Wollenteit I, Lorenz W, Rothmund M. Haemorrhoidectomy: conventional excision versus resection with the circular stapler. Prospective, randomized study. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2004; 129:1611–7

    Google Scholar 

  43. LM Pernice B Bartalucci L Bencini A Borri S Catarzi K Kröning (2001) ArticleTitleEarly and late (ten years) experience with circular stapler hemorrhoidectomy Dis Colon Rectum 44 836–841 Occurrence Handle11391144 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02234704 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzhvFOqtA%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. P-K Koh F Seow-Choen (2005) ArticleTitleMucosal flap excision for treatment of remnant prolapsed hemorrhoids or skin tags after stapled hemorrhoidopexy Dis Colon Rectum 48 1660–1662 Occurrence Handle15981055 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-005-0089-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. H Ortiz J Marzo P Armendariz M Miguel ParticleDe (2005) ArticleTitleStapled hemorrhoidopexy vs. diathermy excision for fourth-degree hemorrhoids: a randomized, clinical trial and review of the literature Dis Colon Rectum 48 809–815 Occurrence Handle15785901 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-0861-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. MA Thaha LA Irvine RJ Steele KL Campbell (2005) ArticleTitlePostdefaecation pain syndrome after circular stapled anopexy is abolished by oral nifedipine Dis Colon Rectum 92 208–210 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M7hslyjsw%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. DF Altomare M Rinaldi PL Sallustio P Martino M Fazio ParticleDe V Memeo (2001) ArticleTitleLong-term effects of stapled haemorrhoidectomy on internal anal function and sensitivity Br J Surg 88 1487–1491 Occurrence Handle11683746 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01898.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MngvF2nug%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Fueglistaler M.D..

Appendix: Standardized Questionnaire

Appendix: Standardized Questionnaire

1.

Have the symptoms you had before the operation

disappeared

been relieved

remained unchanged

worsened?

2.

Do you have a hemorrhoidal prolapse during defecation?

not present

light

moderate

severe

3.

Do you have bleeding during defecation?

not present

light

moderate

severe

4.

Do you have anal pain?

not present

light

moderate severe

5.

Do you have loss of feces (fecal soiling/leakage)?

not present

light

moderate

severe

6a.

How long can you wait to do a bowel movement when feeling the urge?

equal to before surgery

longer than before surgery

shorter than before surgery

6b.

If shorter than before surgery: disturbing?

no

moderately

severely

7.

Do you have local discomfort (itching, discharge)?

not present

light

moderate

severe

8. Has hemorrhoidal thrombosis occurred since the operation?

Has hemorrhoidal thrombosis occurred since the operation?

yes

no

9.

Have you been reoperated for hemorrhoids or other anal diseases?

no

yes

if yes, when? _____________________________________________________

if yes, where? _____________________________________________________

Reason for reoperation?

hemorrhoids

marisc (skin tags)

fissure

fistula

abscess

anal polyp

other

I don’t know

10.

Are you satisfied with the results of the surgery?

yes, very much

yes

only fair

no

11.

Would you undergo surgery again, if necessary?

yes

no

  1. The original questionnaire was written in German.

About this article

Cite this article

Fueglistaler, P., Guenin, M.O., Montali, I. et al. Long-Term Results After Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy: High Patient Satisfaction Despite Frequent Postoperative Symptoms. Dis Colon Rectum 50, 204–212 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-006-0768-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-006-0768-y

Key words

Navigation