Abstract
PURPOSE: Stapled hemorrhoidectomy may be associated with less pain and faster recovery than conventional hemorrhoidectomy for prolapsing hemorrhoids. Therefore, the outcome of stapled hemorrhoidectomy was compared with that of diathermy hemorrhoidectomy in a randomized, controlled trial. METHODS: Sixty patients with third-degree hemorrhoids were randomly assigned to stapled hemorrhoidectomy (n = 30) or to diathermy hemorrhoidectomy in a day-case setting. Visual analog scale was used for postoperative pain scoring. Surgical and functional outcome was assessed at six weeks and one year after surgery. RESULTS: Operation time was a median of 21 (range, 11–59) minutes in the stapled group vs. 22 (range, 14–40) minutes in the diathermy group. Day-case surgery was successful in 24 patients (80 percent) in the stapled group vs. 29 patients (97 percent) in the diathermy group. Average pain in the stapled group was significantly lower than in the diathermy group (median, 1.8 (0.1–4.8) vs. 4.3 (1.4–6.2), 95 percent confidence interval difference medians, 1.15–3.85, P = 0.0002, Mann-Whitney U test) as was the average pain expected by the patients (median −2.7 (−0.15–0.8) vs. 0.006 (−4.05–0.5) respectively, 95 percent confidence interval difference medians, 0.5–3.55, P = 0.0018, Mann-Whitney U test). Postoperative morbidity and time off work were not significantly different between the diathermy and stapled groups. Seven treatment failures in the stapled group and one in the diathermy group necessitated other treatments at a later date. Patient satisfaction scores in the stapled and diathermy group were similar. Symptoms attributed to difficult rectal evacuation decreased significantly after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Stapled hemorrhoidectomy is a significantly less painful operation than diathermy hemorrhoidectomy, but does not seem to offer significant advantages in terms of hospital stay or symptom control in the long term. Hemorrhoidectomy may improve symptoms of difficult rectal evacuation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
WH Thompson (1975) ArticleTitleThe nature of haemorrhoids Br J Surg 62 542–552
EA Carapeti MA Kamm PJ McDonald SJ Chadwick RK Phillips (1999) ArticleTitleRandomized trial of open versus day-case haemorrhoidectomy Br J Surg 62 612–613
F Seow-Choen YH Ho HG Ang HS Goh (1992) ArticleTitleProspective, randomized trial comparing pain and clinical function after conventional scissors excision/ligation vs. diathermy excision without ligation for symptomatic prolapsed hemorrhoids Dis Colon Rectum 35 1165–1169
S Ibrahim C Tsang YL Lee KW Eu F Seow-Choen (1998) ArticleTitleProspective, randomized trial comparing pain and complications between diathermy and scissors for closed hemorrhoidectomy Dis Colon Rectum 41 1418–1420
E Carapeti M Kamm P McDonald R Phillips (1998) ArticleTitleDouble-blind randomized controlled trial of effect of metronidazole on pain after day-case haemorrhoidectomy Lancet 351 169–172
DF Altomare M Rinaldi C Chiumarulo N Palasciano (1999) ArticleTitleTreatment of external anorectal mucosal prolapse with circular stapler Dis Colon Rectum 42 1102–1105
M Rowsell M Bello DM Hemingway (2000) ArticleTitleCircumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy Lancet 355 779–781
BJ Mehigan JR Monson JE Hartley (2000) ArticleTitleStapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy Lancet 355 782–785
YH Ho WK Cheong C Tsang et al. (2000) ArticleTitleStapled hemorrhoidectomy – cost and effectiveness. Randomized, controlled trial including incontinence scoring, anorectal manometry, and endoanal ultrasound assessments at up to three months Dis Colon Rectum 43 1666–1667
R Shalaby A Desoky (2001) ArticleTitleRandomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy Br J Surg 88 1049–1053
L Hunt AJ Luck G Rudkin PJ Hewett (1999) ArticleTitleDay-case haemorrhoidectomy Br J Surg 86 255–258
RJ Place M Coloma PF White PJ Huber J Van Vlymen CL Simmang (2000) ArticleTitleKetorolac improves recovery after outpatient anorectal surgery Dis Colon Rectum 43 804–808
M Scaglia S Fasth T Hallgren S Nordgren T Oresland L Hultén (1994) ArticleTitleAbdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse Dis Colon Rectum 37 805–813
DA Drossman RS Sandler DC McKee AJ Lovitz (1982) ArticleTitleBowel patterns among subjects not seeking health care. Use of a questionnaire to identify a population with bowel dysfunction Gastroenterology 83 529–534
JM Jorge SP Wexner (1993) ArticleTitleEtiology and management of fecal incontinence Dis Colon Rectum 36 77–97
M Pescatori G Anastasio C Bottini A Mentasi (1992) ArticleTitleNew grading and scoring for anal incontinence Dis Colon Rectum 35 482–487
J Matthews D Altman M Campbell P Royston (1990) ArticleTitleAnalysis of serial measurements in medical research BMJ 300 230–235
E Ganio DF Altomore F Gabrielli G Milito S Canuti (2001) ArticleTitleProspective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomy Br J Surg 88 669–674
AM Roe DC Bartolo KD Vellacott J Locke-Edmunds NJ Mortensen (1987) ArticleTitleSubmucosal versus ligation excision haemorrhoidectomy Br J Surg 74 948–951
R Bleday JP Pena DA Rothenberger SM Goldberg JG Buls (1992) ArticleTitleSymptomatic hemorrhoids Dis Colon Rectum 35 477–481
YH Ho C Tsang CL Tang D Nyam KW Eu F Seow-Choen (2000) ArticleTitleAnal sphincter injuries from stapling instruments introduced transanally Dis Colon Rectum 43 169–173
MJ Cheetham NJ Mortensen PO Nystrom MA Kamm RK Phillips (2000) ArticleTitlePersistent pain and faecal urgency after haemorrhoidectomy Lancet 356 730–733
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Kairaluoma, M., Nuorva, K. & Kellokumpu, I. Day-Case Stapled (Circular) vs. Diathermy Hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 46, 93–99 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6502-8
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6502-8