Skip to main content
Log in

Stapled hemorrhoidectomy—cost and effectiveness. randomized, controlled trial including incontinence scoring, anorectal manometry, and endoanal ultrasound assessments at up to three months

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: Stapled hemorrhoidectomy is performed without leaving painful perianal wounds. The aim of this study was to assess any benefits, compared with a conventional open diathermy technique. METHODS: A total of 119 consecutive patients with prolapsed irreducible hemorrhoids were randomly assigned (conventional open diathermy technique=62; stapled hemorrhoidectomy=57). Preoperative fecal incontinence scoring, anorectal manometry, and endoanal ultrasound were performed. Postoperatively, these were repeated at up to three months with pain scores, analgesic requirements, quality of life assessment, and total related medical costs. RESULTS: Conventional open diathermy technique was quicker to perform (mean, 11.4 (standard error of the mean, 0.9)vs. 17.6 (3.1) minutes). Hospitalization was similar, but conventional open diathermy technique patients felt more pain during defecation (5.1 (0.4)vs. 2.6 (0.4);P<0.005) at two weeks, and analgesic requirements were more for up to six weeks (P<0.05). Up to the latter, 85.5 percent conventional open diathermy technique wounds remained unhealed, with more bleeding (33 (53.2 percent)vs. 19 (33.3 percent);P<0.05) and pruritus (27 (43.5 percent)vs. 9 (15.8 percent);P<0.05). Total complication rates were similar (conventional open diathermy technique 16 (25.8 percent)vs. stapled hemorrhoidectomy 10 (17.5 percent)), including mild strictures and bleeding in both groups. Minor incontinence occurred postoperatively in two conventional open diathermy technique and two stapled hemorrhoidectomy patients at six weeks. Endoanal ultrasound internal anal sphincter defects were found in the incontinent conventional open diathermy technique patients, but were asymptomatic in another one conventional open diathermy technique and one stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Only one patient (conventional open diathermy technique with internal sphincter defect) remained incontinent at three months. Changes between preoperative and postoperative anorectal manometry were similar in the two groups. Patients' satisfaction scores and quality of life assessments were also similar. Conventional open diathermy technique patients resumed work later (mean 22.9 (1.8)vs. 17.1 (1.9) days;P<0.05), but the total costs incurred were less ($921.17 (16.85)vs. $1,283.09 (31.59);P<0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Stapled hemorrhoidectomy is a safe and effective option in treating irreducible prolapsed piles. It is more expensive but less painful, with less time needed off work. Nonetheless, long-term results are still awaited.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mehigan BJ, Monson JR, Hartley JE. Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2000;355:782–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rowsell M, Bello M, Hemingway DM. Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2000;355:779–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fazio VW. Early promise of stapling technique for haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 2000;355:768–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pescatori M, Favetta U, Dedola S, Orsini S. Transanal stapled excision of rectal mucosa prolapse. Tech Coloproctol 1997;1:96–8.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Longo A. Treatment of hemorrhoidal disease by reduction of mucosa and hemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device: a new procedure. In: Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery. Bologna: Monduzzi Editore, 1998:777–84.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ho YH, Seow-Choen F, Tan M, Leong AP. Randomized trial of open and closed haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 1997;84:1729–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:77–97.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ho YH, Goh HS. Computerized 3-dimensional vector volume analysis-the role of a new method for assessing anal sphincter competence. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1992;21:263–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Eypasch E, Williams JI, Wood-Dauphinee S,et al. Gastrointestinal quality of life index: development, validation and application of a new instrument. Br J Surg 1995;82:216–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nyam DC, Seow-Choen F, Ho YH. Submucosal adrenaline injection for posthemorrhoidectomy hemorrhage. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:776–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Molloy RG, Kingsmore D. Life threatening pelvic sepsis after stapled haemorrhoidectomy [letter]. Lancet 2000;355:810.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. MacRae HM, McLeod RS. Handsewnvs. stapled anastomoses in colon and rectal surgery: a meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:180–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bennett RC, Friedman MH, Goligher JC. The late results of haemorrhoidectomy by ligature and excision. BMJ 1997;84:377–9.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ho YH, Ang M, Nyam D, Tan M, Seow-Choen F. Transanal approach to rectocele repair may compromise anal sphincter pressures. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:354–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ho YH, Tsang C, Tang CL, Nyam D, Eu KW, Seow-Choen F. Anal sphincter injuries from stapling instruments introduced transanally: randomized, controlled study with endoanal ultrasound and anorectal manometry. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:169–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ho YH, Seow-Choen F, Goh HS. Haemorrhoidectomy and disordered rectal and anal physiology in patients with prolapsed haemorrhoids. Br J Surg 1995;82:596–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sun WM, Read NW, Shorthouse AJ. Hypertensive anal cushions as a cause of the high anal canal pressures in patients with haemorrhoids. Br J Surg 1990;77:458–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Ho, YH., Cheong, WK., Tsang, C. et al. Stapled hemorrhoidectomy—cost and effectiveness. randomized, controlled trial including incontinence scoring, anorectal manometry, and endoanal ultrasound assessments at up to three months. Dis Colon Rectum 43, 1666–1675 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02236847

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02236847

Key words

Navigation