Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reinterventions After Complicated or Failed Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

BACKGROUND

Stapled hemorrhoidopexy has become increasingly popular over the past five years, mainly because of the assumption that it is associated with less pain. However, persistent tags and recurrence might represent a problem, because piles are not excised and severe complications requiring surgery have been occasionally reported. The aim of the present study is to analyze the causes for and the outcome of reintervention following either severely complicated or failed stapled hemorrhoidopexy.

METHODS

A total of 232 primary stapled hemorrhoidopexies and 65 reinterventions after stapled hemorrhoidopexy were performed by the authors in five centers devoted to colorectal surgery. Twelve patients of the latter group had the stapled hemorrhoidopexy performed in one of these centers. Thirty-five were males and 30 were females. The mean age was 50 (range, 29–81) years. In all cases the primary indication for stapled hemorrhoidopexy was either third-degree or fourth-degree symptomatic hemorrhoids. In all patients submitted to reoperation the diagnosis of either severely complicated or failed stapled hemorrhoidopexy was made. The clinical history of all of these patients was carefully studied and all underwent inspection, digital exploration, and proctoscopy. After the reintervention, proctoscopy was performed in 61 patients (92 percent) after a median follow-up of 5.5 (range, 1–36) months.

RESULTS

Our reoperation rate after stapled hemorrhoidopexy was 11 percent. The most frequent indications for reintervention were persistent, severe anal pain (visual analog pain score higher than 7) in 29 patients (45 percent), severe postoperative bleeding in 20 (31 percent), anal fissure in 16 (21 percent), prolapsing piles in 12 (18 percent), rectal polyp in 11 (16 percent), anorectal sepsis in 11 (16 percent), and fecal incontinence in 7 (11 percent). Thirteen different types of reintervention were needed. Excisional hemorrhoidectomy, removal of staples, and fissurectomy and/or internal sphincterotomy were the most frequent operation (n = 41). A decrease in anal pain, as measured by visual analog pain score, was observed one month after reintervention, compared with that measured preoperatively (from 5.6 ± 3.6 to 3.0 ± 2.9) (P < 0.001). Bleeding requiring treatment occurred in six cases (10 percent), anal stricture requiring dilation occurred in three (5 percent), and fecal incontinence in three (5 percent). Proctoscopy showed no recurrences in 52 cases (80 percent) after the reintervention.

CONCLUSION

Pain and bleeding mostly caused by piles, fissures, and retained staples were the most frequent causes for reoperation after stapled hemorrhoidopexy . Reintervention was associated with a high bleeding and soiling rate, but was effective in treating pain and other symptoms in the majority of patients. Because of the wide spectrum of different interventions required, a failed or complicated stapled hemorrhoidopexy might be better treated by an experienced colorectal surgeon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. B Ravo A Amato V Bianco et al. (2002) ArticleTitleComplications after stapled hemorrhoidectomy: can they be prevented? Tech Coloproctol 6 83–8 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s101510200018 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38nktlWrtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12402051

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. M Rowsell M Bello DM Hemingway (2000) ArticleTitleCircumferential mucosectomy (stapled hemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional hemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial Lancet 355 779–81 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(99)06122-X Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7nsFSrug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10711924

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. E Ganio DF Altomare F Gabrielli G Milito S Canuti (2001) ArticleTitleProspective randomised multicentre trial comparino stapled with open hemorrhoidectomy Br J Surg 88 669–74 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01772.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3mslentw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11350437

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. MJ Cheetham CR Cohen MA Kamm RK Phillips (2003) ArticleTitleA randomized, controlled trial of diathermy hemorrrhoidectomy vs. stapled hemorrhoidectomy in an intended day-care setting with longer-term follow-up Dis Colon Rectum 46 491–7 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-6588-z Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s7msVeisg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12682543

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. RG Molloy D Kingsmore (2000) ArticleTitleLife threatening pelvic sepsis after stapled haemorrhoidectomy Lancet 355 810 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02208-X Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7nsFSqug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10711934

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. M Pescatori G Anastasio C Bottini A Mentasti (1992) ArticleTitleNew grading and scoring for anal incontinence: evaluation of 335 patients Dis Colon Rectum 35 482–7 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2B3szns1M%3D Occurrence Handle1568401

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. AM Hussein (2001) ArticleTitleLigation anopexy for treatment of advanced hemorrhoidal disease Dis Colon Rectum 44 1887–90 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MjgtV2hsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11742181

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. M Pescatori A Interisano D Mascagni C Bottini (1995) ArticleTitleDouble flap technique to reconstruct the anal canal after concurrent surgery for fistulae abscess and haemorrhoids Int J Colorectal Dis 10 19–21 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqB28vgsVI%3D Occurrence Handle7745317

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. MJ Cheetham NJ Mortensen PO Nystron MA Kamm RK Phillips (2000) ArticleTitlePersistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled hemorrhoidectomy Lancet 356 730–3 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02632-5 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FjvVKquw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11085693

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. GC Beattie JP Lam MA London (2000) ArticleTitleA prospective evaluation of the introduction of circular stapled anoplasty in the management of hemorrhoids and mucosal prolapse Colorect Dis 2 137–42 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1463-1318.2000.00125.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. H Ortiz J Marzo P Armendariz (2002) ArticleTitleRandomised clinical trial of stapled haemorrrhoidopexy versus conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomy Br J Surg 89 1376–81 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02237.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38njt1agtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12390376

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. JC McConnell IT Khubchandani (1983) ArticleTitleLong-term follow-up of closed hemorrhoidectomy Dis Colon Rectum 26 797–9 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiuD2MjhtFQ%3D Occurrence Handle6641462

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. R Shalaby A Desoky (2000) ArticleTitleRandomised clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy Br J Surg 88 1352–5

    Google Scholar 

  14. AJ Watson CM Laren ParticleMc AD Chapman NR Binnil MA Loudon (2003) ArticleTitleFurther cautionary tales from histopathology of stapled haemorrhoidopexy specimens Colorect Dis 5 270–2 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1463-1318.2003.00456.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. HM Quah HI Hadi DJ Hay A Mari (2003) ArticleTitleResidual staples as a possibile cause of recurrent rectal bleeding after stapled haemorrhoidectomy Colorect Dis 5 193–6

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ho YH, Cheong WK, Tsang C, et al. Stapled hemorrhoidectomy-cost and effectiveness. Randomized, controlled trial including incontinence scoring, anorectal manometry, and endoanal ultrasound assessments at up to three months Dis Colon Rectum 2000;12:1666–75.

    Google Scholar 

  17. G Arbman H Krook S Haaspaniemi (2000) ArticleTitleClosed vs. open hemorrhoidectomy—is there any difference? Dis Colon Rectum 43 31–4 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3ntFahug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10813120

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Thaha MA, Kazmi SA, Irvine LA, et al. New onset fecal urgency and its impact on recovery following circular stapled anopexy: preliminary results of a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Br J Surg 2003;90:Suppl 1.

  19. A Maw R Concepcion KW Eu et al. (2003) ArticleTitleProspective randomized study of bacteraemia in diathermy and stapled hemorrhoidectomy Br J Surg 90 222–6 Occurrence Handle10.1002/bjs.4057 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s%2FksVymtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12555300

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. A Maw KW Eu F Seow-Choen (2002) ArticleTitleRetroperitoneal sepsis complicating stapled hemorrhoidectomy: report of a case and review of the literature Dis Colon Rectum 45 826–8 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-6304-z Occurrence Handle12072637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. A Herold JJ Kirsch (2000) ArticleTitlePain after stapled hemorrhoidectomy(letter) Lancet 356 2187 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03510-8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FpsVCrug%3D%3D

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. M Pescatori U Favetta A Amato (2000) ArticleTitleAnorectal function and clinical outcome after open and closed haemorrhoidectomy, with and without internal sphincterotomy. A prospective study Tech Coloproctol 4 17–23 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s101510050049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. LM Sutherland AK Burchard K Matsuda et al. (2002) ArticleTitleA systematic review of stapled haemorrhoidectomy Arch Surg 137 1395–406 Occurrence Handle10.1001/archsurg.137.12.1395 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38jgvVKgug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12470107

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. R Cuelemans U Creve R Hee ParticleVan C Martens FL Wuyts (2000) ArticleTitleBenefit of emergency hemorrhoidectomy. A comparison with result after elective operations Eur J Surg 166 808–12 Occurrence Handle10.1080/110241500447452 Occurrence Handle11071169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The authors thank Dr. B. Wolff, who kindly revised the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Coloproctology Unit, Villa Flaminia Hospital, Rome, Italy

    L. Brusciano M.D., S. M. Ayabaca M.D. & M. Pescatori M.D., F.R.C.S., E.B.S.Q.

  2. Department of Colorectal Surgery, Villa Scassi Hospital, Genua, Italy

    G. M. Accarpio M.D.

  3. Coloproctology Unit, University Hospital, Padua, Italy

    G. Dodi M.D. & F. Cavallari M.D.

  4. Department of Surgery, American Hospital, Rome, Italy

    B. Ravo M.D.

  5. Coloproctology Unit, S. Pio 10th Hospital, Milan, Italy

    R. Annibali M.D.

Authors
  1. L. Brusciano M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. M. Ayabaca M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Pescatori M.D., F.R.C.S., E.B.S.Q.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. G. M. Accarpio M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. G. Dodi M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. F. Cavallari M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. B. Ravo M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. R. Annibali M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Pescatori M.D., F.R.C.S., E.B.S.Q. .

About this article

Cite this article

Brusciano, L., Ayabaca, S., Pescatori, M. et al. Reinterventions After Complicated or Failed Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy. Dis Colon Rectum 47, 1846–1851 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0721-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0721-x

Key words

Search

Navigation