Abstract
PURPOSE: Injury sustained from the transanally introduced stapling technique was assessed by comparison with biofragmentable anastomotic ring anastomosis, which excluded anal manipulation. METHODS: A randomized, controlled trial was conducted on consecutive patients undergoing sigmoid colectomy (where pelvic nerve injury was avoided). A bowel function questionnaire was administered six months after surgery. Anorectal manometry and endoanal ultrasonography were performed preoperatively and at six months postoperatively. The observers were blinded to the randomization. RESULTS: There were 18 patients in the transanally introduced stapling technique group and 17 patients in the biofragmentable anastomotic ring group, with no differences in age, gender, Dukes staging, and follow-up. Three of the transanally introduced stapling technique patients had occasional liquid soiling, which was absent in biofragmentable anastomotic ring patients. Mean change in resting anal pressures was also significantly impaired when compared with patients with biofragmentable anastomotic ring (P=0.007). Endosonographic internal sphincter fragmentation was found in five transanally introduced stapling technique patients but none after biofragmentable anastomotic ring anastomosis (P=0.046). Internal sphincter fragmentation was associated with the impaired resting pressures (P=0.007). External sphincter deficiencies were found after transanally introduced stapling technique in two patients (biofragmentable anastomotic ring = 0), and these were associated with the soiling (P=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The transanally introduced stapling technique may result in anal sphincter defects and impaired anal pressures when assessed at six months of follow-up.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Griffen FD, Knight CD Sr, Whitaker JM, Knight CD Jr. The double stapling technique for low anterior resection. Results, modifications, and observations. Ann Surg 1990;211:745–51.
Laxamana A, Solomon MJ, Cohen Z, Feinberg SM, Stern HS, McLeod RS. Long-term results of anterior resection using the double-stapling technique. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:1246–50.
Jarvinen HJ, Luukkonen P. Sphincter-saving surgery for rectal carcinoma. Comparison of two five-year periods from 1980 to 1989. Ann Chir Gynaecol 1991;80:14–8.
Ho YH, Wong J, Goh HS. Level of anastomosis and anorectal manometry in predicting function following anterior resection for adenocarcinoma. Int J Colorectal Dis 1993;8:170–4.
Batignani G, Monaci I, Ficari F, Tonelli F. What affects continence after anterior resection of the rectum? Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:329–35.
Lewis WG, Holdsworth PJ, Stephenson BM, Finan PJ, Johnston D. Role of the rectum in the physiological and clinical results of coloanal anastomosis after anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 1992;79:1082–6.
Vassilakis JS, Pechlivanides G, Zoras OJ,et al. Anorectal function after low anterior resection of the rectum. Int J Colorectal Dis 1995;10:101–6.
Williamson ME, Lewis WG, Finan PJ, Miller AS, Holdsworth PJ, Johnston D. Recovery of physiologic and clinical function after low anterior resection of the rectum for carcinoma: myth or reality? Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:411–8.
Horgan PG, O'Connoll PR, Shinkwin CA, Kirwan WO. Effect of anterior resection on anal sphincter function. Br J Surg 1989;76:783–6.
Molloy RG, Moran KT, Coulter J, Waldron R, Kirwan WO. Mechanism of sphincter impairment following low anterior resection. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:462–4.
Ho YH, Tan M, Leong A, Eu KW, Nyam D, Seow-Choen F. Anal pressures impaired by stapler insertion during colorectal anastomosis: a randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 1999;42:89–95.
Farouk R, Duthie GS, Lee PW, Monson JR. Endosonographic evidence of injury to the internal anal sphincter after low anterior resection: long-term follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:888–91.
Farouk R, Drew PJ, Duthie GS, Lee PW, Monson JR. Evidence of internal anal sphincter disruption after transanal stapled anastomosis for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1996;83:1400.
McDonald PJ, Heald RJ. A survey of postoperative function after rectal anastomosis with circular stapling devices. Br J Surg 1983;70:727–9.
Ho YH, Goh HS. Computerized 3-dimensional vector volume analysis—the role of a new method for assessing anal sphincter competence. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1992;21:263–6.
Keck JO, Schoetz DJ Jr, Roberts PL, Murray JJ, Coller JA, Veidenheimer MC. Rectal mucosectomy in the treatment of giant rectal villous tumors. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:233–8.
Arnold MW, Stewart WR, Aguilar PS. Rectocele repair: four years' experience. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:684–7.
Ho YH, Ang M, Nyam D, Tan M, Seow-Choen F. Transanal approach to rectocele repair may compromise and sphincter pressures. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:354–8.
Lee JK, Maurer VM, Block GE. Anastomotic relations of pelvic autonomic nerves to pelvic operations. Arch Surg 1973;107:324–8.
Speakman CT, Burnett SJ, Kamm MA, Bartram CI. Sphincter injury after anal dilatation demonstrated by anal endosonography. Br J Surg 1991;78:1429–30.
Sentovich SM, Blatchford GJ, Rivela LJ, Lin K, Thorson AG, Christensen MA. Diagnosing anal sphincter injury with transanal ultrasound and manometry. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:1430–4.
Karanjia ND, Schache DJ, Heald RJ. Function of the distal rectum after low anterior resection for carcinoma. Br J Surg 1992;79:114–6
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Supported by National Medical Research Council (Singapore) research grant number NMRC/0106/1995.
About this article
Cite this article
Ho, YH., Tsang, C., Tang, C.L. et al. Anal sphincter injuries from stapling instruments introduced transanally. Dis Colon Rectum 43, 169–173 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02236976
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02236976