Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fibrin glue in the endoscopic treatment of fistulae and anastomotic leakages of the gastrointestinal tract

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Fistulae or leakages of anastomotic junctions of the gastrointestinal tract used to be an indication for surgery. However, patients often are severely ill and endoscopic therapeutic options have been suggested to avoid surgical intervention.

Purpose

This is a retrospective analysis of fibrin glue application in the treatment of gastrointestinal fistulae or anastomotic leakages.

Aim

The aim of this study was to investigate the value of fibrin glue in the treatment of gastrointestinal fistulae and leakages.

Methods

From September 1996 to November 2002, 52 patients with gastrointestinal fistulae or insufficiencies have been treated endoscopically including the use of fibrin glue (Tissucol Duo S®, Baxter, Unterschleissheim, Germany). Clinical data comprising concomitant therapies and results were analysed by chart review.

Results

Twenty-six lesions were located in the oesophagus or gastroesophageal junction, 4 in the stomach, 7 in the small intestine, 13 colorectal and 2 in the pancreas. The duration of treatment ranged from 12 to 1,765 days. Two to 81 ml fibrin glue (median 8.5) was used in 1–40 sessions (median 4). All patients received antibiotics; additional endoscopic options were frequently applied. Endoscopic therapy cured 55.7% patients (n = 29); 36.5% (n = 19) were cured with fibrin glue as sole endoscopic option. In 23.1% (n = 12), surgical intervention became necessary. Patients without major infectious complications tended to have a higher cure rate without surgery (87.5% vs. 50%). Eleven patients died (21.1%).

Conclusion

Endoscopic therapy is a valuable option in the treatment of fistulae and anastomotic insufficiencies of the gastrointestinal tract. It usually is applied repeatedly. Fibrin glue is a mainstay of this procedure. Major infectious complications seem to define a subgroup of patients with poorer outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eberl T, Jagoditsch M, Klingler A, Tschmelitsch J (2008) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection for rectal cancer. Am J Surg 196(4):592–598

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schmidt O, Merkel S, Hohenberger W (2003) Anastomotic leakage after low rectal stapler anastomosis: significance of intraoperative anastomotic testing. Eur J Surg Oncol 29(3):239–243

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bertelsen CA, Andreasen AH, Jorgensen T, Harling H (2010) Anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer: risk factors. Colorectal Dis 12(1):37–43

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rullier E, Laurent C, Garrelon JL et al (1998) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 85(3):355–358

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee WS, Yun SH, Roh YN et al (2008) Risk factors and clinical outcome for anastomotic leakage after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. World J Surg 32(6):1124–1129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Golub R, Golub RW, Cantu R Jr, Stein HD (1997) A multivariate analysis of factors contributing to leakage of intestinal anastomoses. J Am Coll Surg 184(4):364–372

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Matthiessen P, Hansson L, Sjodahl R, Rutegard J (2010) Anastomotic-vaginal fistula (AVF) after anterior resection of the rectum for cancer—occurrence and risk factors. Colorectal Dis 12:351–357

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. den Dulk M, Noter SL, Hendriks ER et al (2009) Improved diagnosis and treatment of anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 35(4):420–426

    Google Scholar 

  9. Alves A, Panis Y, Trancart D et al (2002) Factors associated with clinically significant anastomotic leakage after large bowel resection: multivariate analysis of 707 patients. World J Surg 26(4):499–502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Branagan G, Finnis D (2005) Prognosis after anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 48(5):1021–1026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Graf W, Glimelius B, Bergstrom R, Pahlman L (1991) Complications after double and single stapling in rectal surgery. Eur J Surg 157(9):543–547

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Buchanan GN, Bartram CI, Phillips RK et al (2003) Efficacy of fibrin sealant in the management of complex anal fistula: a prospective trial. Dis Colon Rectum 46(9):1167–1174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sentovich SM (2003) Fibrin glue for anal fistulas: long-term results. Dis Colon Rectum 46(4):498–502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Makela JT, Kiviniemi H, Laitinen S (2003) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after left-sided colorectal resection with rectal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 46(5):653–660

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Frye J, Bokey EL, Chapuis PH, Sinclair G, Dent OF (2009) Anastomotic leakage after resection of colorectal cancer generates prodigious use of hospital resources. Colorectal Dis 11(9):917–920

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zmora O, Mizrahi N, Rotholtz N et al (2003) Fibrin glue sealing in the treatment of perineal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 46(5):584–589

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cintron JR, Park JJ, Orsay CP et al (2000) Repair of fistulas-in-ano using fibrin adhesive: long-term follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 43(7):944–949

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rabago LR, Ventosa N, Castro JL et al (2002) Endoscopic treatment of postoperative fistulas resistant to conservative management using biological fibrin glue. Endoscopy 34(8):632–638

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Papavramidis ST, Eleftheriadis EE, Apostolidis DN, Kotzampassi KE (2001) Endoscopic fibrin sealing of high-output non-healing gastrocutaneous fistulas after vertical gastroplasty in morbidly obese patients. Obes Surg 11(6):766–769

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Konishi T, Watanabe T, Kishimoto J, Nagawa H (2006) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after surgery for colorectal cancer: results of prospective surveillance. J Am Coll Surg 202(3):439–444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Eckmann C, Kujath P, Schiedeck TH, Shekarriz H, Bruch HP (2004) Anastomotic leakage following low anterior resection: results of a standardized diagnostic and therapeutic approach. Int J Colorectal Dis 19(2):128–133

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Choy PY, Bissett IP, Docherty JG, Parry BR, Merrie AE (2007) Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3):CD004320.

  23. Lustosa SA, Matos D, Atallah AN, Castro AA (2001) Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3):CD003144

  24. Jung SH, Yu CS, Choi PW et al (2008) Risk factors and oncologic impact of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 51(6):902–908

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu CD, Glantz GJ, Livingston EH (2003) Fibrin glue as a sealant for high-risk anastomosis in surgery for morbid obesity. Obes Surg 13(1):45–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tirindelli MC, Greco R, Marchesi F, Gabbrielli A, Avvisati G (2008) Fibrin glue for endoscopic gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with impaired haemostasis. Transfus Med 18(3):207–208

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lillemoe KD, Cameron JL, Kim MP et al (2004) Does fibrin glue sealant decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized trial. J Gastrointest Surg 8(7):766–772

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yeung JM, Alistair J, Simpson D et al (2010) Fibrin glue for the treatment of Fistulae in Ano—a method worth sticking to? Colorectal Dis 12:363–366

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. de Parades V, Far HS, Etienney I et al (2010) Seton drainage and fibrin glue injection for complex anal fistulas. Colorectal Dis 12:459–463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kowalski C, Kastuar S, Mehta V, Brolin RE (2007) Endoscopic injection of fibrin sealant in repair of gastrojejunostomy leak after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis 3(4):438–442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Schwaitzberg SD, Kochman ML, Hawes RH, Rattner DW (2009) Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): is it time for introduction to clinical practice? Surgery 146(5):841–842

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Loungnarath R, Dietz DW, Mutch MG et al (2004) Fibrin glue treatment of complex anal fistulas has low success rate. Dis Colon Rectum 47(4):432–436

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Johnson EK, Gaw JU, Armstrong DN (2006) Efficacy of anal fistula plug vs. fibrin glue in closure of anorectal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 49(3):371–376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Maralcan G, Baskonus I, Aybasti N, Gokalp A (2006) The use of fibrin glue in the treatment of fistula-in-ano: a prospective study. Surg Today 36(2):166–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Vitton V, Gasmi M, Barthet M et al (2005) Long-term healing of Crohn’s anal fistulas with fibrin glue injection. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 21(12):1453–1457

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Gisbertz SS, Sosef MN, Festen S, Gerhards MF (2005) Treatment of fistulas in ano with fibrin glue. Dig Surg 22(1–2):91–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Patrlj L, Kocman B, Martinac M et al (2000) Fibrin glue–antibiotic mixture in the treatment of anal fistulae: experience with 69 cases. Dig Surg 17(1):77–80

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Sentovich SM (2001) Fibrin glue for all anal fistulas. J Gastrointest Surg 5(2):158–161

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Patil PK, Patel SG, Mistry RC, Deshpande RK, Desai PB (1992) Cancer of the esophagus: esophagogastric anastomotic leak—a retrospective study of predisposing factors. J Surg Oncol 49(3):163–167

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Urschel JD (1995) Esophagogastrostomy anastomotic leaks complicating esophagectomy: a review. Am J Surg 169(6):634–640

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Pross M, Manger T, Reinheckel T et al (2000) Endoscopic treatment of clinically symptomatic leaks of thoracic esophageal anastomoses. Gastrointest Endosc 51(1):73–76

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Truong S, Bohm G, Klinge U, Stumpf M, Schumpelick V (2004) Results after endoscopic treatment of postoperative upper gastrointestinal fistulas and leaks using combined Vicryl plug and fibrin glue. Surg Endosc 18(7):1105–1108

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elisabeth Lippert.

Additional information

Elisabeth Lippert and Frank H. Klebl have contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lippert, E., Klebl, F.H., Schweller, F. et al. Fibrin glue in the endoscopic treatment of fistulae and anastomotic leakages of the gastrointestinal tract. Int J Colorectal Dis 26, 303–311 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-010-1104-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-010-1104-5

Keywords

Navigation