Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Anastomotic leakage following low anterior resection: results of a standardized diagnostic and therapeutic approach

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aims

This study analyzed the results of a standardized approach in anastomotic leakage following low anterior resection for rectal cancer without performance of a protective ileostomy during the primary operation.

Patients and methods

The study included all 306 patients with rectal cancer electively undergoing low anterior resection with retroperitonealization of the anastomosis over 9 years. The diagnostic procedure for anastomotic leakage included serum laboratory investigations and abdominal CT together with contrast enema. Minor leakages, i.e., small leakages and pelvic abscess, were treated with rectoscopic lavage and/or CT-guided drainage of the abscess, respectively. Major leakage was defined as broad insufficiency with or without septicemia. Nonseptic patients were treated by ileostomy and rectoscopic treatment. In septic patients a revision of the anastomosis with loop ileostomy was performed.

Results

Anastomotic leakage was diagnosed in 30 patients (overall 9.8%; 12 major, 18 minor leakages). Common clinical signs were pelvic pain and fever. No patient developed a peritonitis. The most accurate diagnostic instrument was CT (96.7%).

Conclusion

Retroperitonealization appears to prevent peritonitis in patients with anastomotic leakage following low anterior resection. A differential treatment leads to good results in terms of mortality and anorectal function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vignali A, Fazio VW, Lavery IC, Milsom JW, Church JM, Hull TL, Strong SA, Oakley JR (1997) Factors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1014 patients. J Am Coll Surg 185:105–113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nesbakken A, Nygaard K, Lunde OC (2001) Outcome and late functional results after anastomotic leakage following mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 88:400–404

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Braun J, Pfingsten F, Schippers E, Schumpelick V (1992) Rectal cancer—results of continence-preserving resections. Leber Magen Darm 22:59–66

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tonus C, Keller O, Kropp R, Nier H (1996) Colorectal cancer. Which factors influence postoperative complications? Langenbecks Arch Chir 381:251–257

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kohler A, Athanasiadis S, Ommer A, Psarakis E (2000) Long-term results of low anterior resection with intersphincteric anastomosis in carcinoma of the lower one-third of the rectum: analysis of 31 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 43:843–850

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Heald RJ, Ryall RDH (1986) Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet I:1479–1482

    Google Scholar 

  7. Karanjia ND, Corder AP, Holdsworth PJ, Heald RJ (1991) Risk of peritonitis and fatal septicemia and the need to defunction the low anastomosis. Br J Surg 78:196–198

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Karanjia ND, Corder AP, Bearn P, Heald RJ (1994) Leakage from stapled low anastomosis after total mesorectal excision for carcinoma of the rectum. Br J Surg 81:1224–1226

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rullier E, Laurant C, Garrelon JL, Michel P, Saric J, Parneix M (1998) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 85:1266–1267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Debus ES, Sailer M, Geiger D, Dietz UA, Fuchs KH, Thiede A (1999) Long-term results after 75 anastomoses in the upper extraperitoneal rectum with the biofragmentable anastomosis ring. Dig Surg 16:55–59

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wullstein C, Gross E (2000) Compression anastomosis (AKA-2) in colorectal surgery: results in 442 consecutive patients. Br J Surg 87:1071–1075

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schrock TR, Deveney CW, Dunphy JE (1973) Factors contributing to leakage after colonic anastomoses. Ann Surg 177:513–518

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mileski WJ, Joehl RJ, Rege RV, Nahrwold DL (1988) Treatment of anastomotic leakage following low anterior resection. Arch Surg 123:968–971

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Testini M, Margari A, Amoruso M, Lissidini G, Bonomo GM (2000) The dehiscence of colorectal anastomoses: the risk factors. Ann Ital Chir 71:433–440

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Morgenstern L, Yamakawa T, Ben-Shoshan M, Lippman H (1972) Anastomotic leakage after low colonic anastomosis. Am J Surg 123:104–109

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pakkastie TE, Luukkonen PE, Jarvinen HJ (1994) Anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum. Eur J Surg 160:293

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Law WI, Chu KW, Ho JW, Chan CW (2000) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision. Am J Surg 179:92–96

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wheeler JM, Gilbert JM (1999) Controlled intraoperative water testing of left-sided colorectal anastomoses: are ileostomies avoidable? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 81:105–108

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ansari MZ, Collopy BT, Hart WG, Carson NJ, Chandraraj EJ (2000) In-hospital mortality and associated complications after bowel surgery in Victorian public hospitals. Aust N Z J Surg 70:6–10

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Drake DB, Pemberton JH, Beart RW, Dozois RR, Wolff BG (1987) Coloanal anastomosis in the management of benign and malignant rectal disease. Ann Surg 206:600–605

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jatzko GR, Lisborg PH, Wette VM (1996) Extraperitonealization of the anastomosis and sacral drain in restorative surgery for rectal carcinoma: a safety mechanism in the absence of a covering stoma. Surg Today 26:591–596

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Robles Campos R, Garcia Ayllon J, Parrilla Paricio P, Cifuentes Tebar J, Lujan Mompean JA, Liron Ruiz R, Torralba Martinez JA, Molina Martinez J (1992) Management of the perineal wound following abdominoperineal resection: prospective study of three methods. Br J Surg 79:29–31

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Schein M, Assalia A, Eldar S, Wittmann DH (1995) Is mechanical bowel preparation necessary before primary colonic anastomosis? An experimental study. Dis Colon Rectum 38:749–752

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Feres O, Monteiro dos Santos Jr JC, Andrade JI (2001) The role of mechanical bowel preparation for colonic resection and anastomosis: an experimental study. Int J Colorectal Dis 16:353–356

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tocchi A, Mazzoni G, Lepre L, Costa G, Liotta G, Agostini N, Miccini M (2000) Prospective evaluation of omentoplasty in preventing leakage of colorectal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 43:951–955

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Merad F, Hay JM, Fingerhut A, Flamant Y, Molkhou JM, Laborde Y (1998) Omentoplasty in the prevention of anastomotic leakage after colonic or rectal resection. Ann Surg 227:179–186

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sica GS, Spiratou C, Sileri P, Lirosi F, Gentileschi P, Rossi P, Stolfi VM, DiLorenzo N, Russo F, Forlini A, Gaspari AL (2000) Retrospective analysis of the use of prophylactic drainage of the pelvis after anterior resection of the rectum. Ann Ital Chir 71:367–372

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. DuBrow RA, David CL, Curley SA (1995) Anastomotic leaks after low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma: evaluation with CT and barium enema. AJR Am J Roentgenol 165:567–571

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sharefkin J, Joffe N, Silen W, Fromm D (1978) Anastomotic dehiscence after low anterior resection of the rectum. Am J Surg 135:519–523

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Luna-Perez P, Rodriguez-Ramirez S, Gonzalez-Macouzet J, Rodriguez-Coria DF (1999) Treatment of anastomotic leakage following low anterior resection for rectal adenocarcinoma. Rev Invest Clin 51:23–29

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Matzel KE, Stadelmeier U, Muehldorfer S, Hohenberger W (1997) Continence after colorectal reconstruction following resection: impact of level of anastomosis. Int J Colorectal Dis 12:82–87

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hallbook O, Sjodahl R (1996) Anastomotic leakage and functional outcome after anterior resection of the rectum. Br J Surg 83:60–62

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Schechter S, Eisenstat TE, Oliver GC, Rubin RJ, Salvati EP (1994) Computerized tomographic scan-guided drainage of intra-abdominal abscesses. Preoperative and postoperative modalities in colon and rectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 37:984–988

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Longo WE, Milsom JW, Lavery IC, Church JC, Oakley JR, Fazio VW (1993) Pelvic abscess after colon and rectal surgery—what is optimal management? Dis Colon Rectum 36:936–941

    Google Scholar 

  35. Longo JM, Bilbao JI, deVilla VH, Iglesias A, Pueyo J, Lecumberri FJ, Cienfuegos JA (1993) CT-guided paracoccygeal drainage of pelvic abscesses. J Comput Assist Tomogr 17:909–914

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bernini A, Spencer MP, Wong WD, Rothenberger DA, Madoff RD (1997) Computer tomography-guided percutaneous drainage in intestinal disease: factors associated with outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 40:1009–1013

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Parc Y, Frileux P, Schmitt G, Dehni N, Ollivier JM, Parc R (2000) Management of postoperative peritonitis after anterior resection: experience from a referral intensive care unit. Dis Colon Rectum 43:579–587

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Medical University Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany

    C. Eckmann, P. Kujath, T. H. K. Schiedeck, H. Shekarriz & H.-P. Bruch

Authors
  1. C. Eckmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P. Kujath
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. T. H. K. Schiedeck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. H. Shekarriz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. H.-P. Bruch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Eckmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eckmann, C., Kujath, P., Schiedeck, T.H.K. et al. Anastomotic leakage following low anterior resection: results of a standardized diagnostic and therapeutic approach. Int J Colorectal Dis 19, 128–133 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-003-0498-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-003-0498-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation