Purpose
Long-term closure rates of anorectal fistulas using fibrin glue have been disappointing, possibly because of the liquid consistency of the glue. A suturable bioprosthetic plug (Surgisis®, Cook Surgical, Inc.) was fashioned to close the primary opening of fistula tracts. A prospective cohort study was performed to compare fibrin glue vs. the anal fistula plug.
Methods
Patients with high transsphincteric fistulas, or deeper, were prospectively enrolled. Patients with Crohn's disease or superficial fistulas were excluded. Age, gender, number and type of fistula tracts, and previous fistula surgeries were compared between groups. Under general anesthesia and in prone jackknife position, the tract was irrigated with hydrogen peroxide. Fistula tracts were occluded by fibrin glue vs. closure of the primary opening using a Surgisis® anal fistula plug.
Results
Twenty-five patients were prospectively enrolled. Ten patients underwent fibrin glue closure, and 15 used a fistula plug. Patient's age, gender, fistula tract characteristics, and number of previous closure attempts was similar in both groups. In the fibrin glue group, six patients (60 percent) had persistence of one or more fistulas at three months, compared with two patients (13 percent) in the plug group (P < 0.05, Fisher exact test).
Conclusions
Closure of the primary opening of a fistula tract using a suturable biologic anal fistula plug is an effective method of treating anorectal fistulas. The method seems to be more reliable than fibrin glue closure. The greater efficacy of the fistula plug may be the result of the ability to suture the plug in the primary opening, therefore, closing the primary opening more effectively. Further prospective, long-term studies are warranted.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
GN Buchanan CI Bartram RK Phillips et al. (2003) ArticleTitleEfficacy of fibrin sealant in the management of complex anal fistulas Dis Colon Rectum 46 1167–1174 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-6708-9 Occurrence Handle12972959
J Garcia-Aguilar CS Davey CT Le AC Lowry DA Rothenberger (2000) ArticleTitlePatient satisfaction after surgical treatment for fistula-in-ano Dis Colon Rectum 43 1206–1212 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvltVGjsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11005484
S Athanasiadis C Helmes R Yazigi A Kohler (2004) ArticleTitleThe direct closure of the internal fistula opening without advancement flap for transsphincteric fistula-in-ano Dis Colon Rectum 47 1174–1180 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-0551-x Occurrence Handle15148648
UM Gustafsson W Graf (2002) ArticleTitleExcision of anal fistula with closure of the primary opening Dis Colon Rectum 43 1672–1678
DD Zimmermann JW Briel MP Gosselink WR Schouten (2001) ArticleTitleAnocutaneous advancement flap repair of transsphincteric fistulas Dis Colon Rectum 44 1474–1480
WR Schouten DD Zimmermann JW Briel (1999) ArticleTitleTransanal advancement flap repair of transsphincteric fistula Dis Colon Rectum 42 1419–1423 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02235039 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FjtVyjtw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10566529
T Sonoda T Hull MR Piedmonte VR Fazio (2002) ArticleTitleOutcomes of primary repair of anorectal and rectovaginal fistulas using the endorectal advancement flap Dis Colon Rectum 45 1622–1628 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-7249-y Occurrence Handle12473885
N Mizrahi SD Wexner O Zmora (2002) ArticleTitleEndoanal advancement flap: are there predictors of failure? Dis Colon Rectum 45 1616–1621 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-7248-z Occurrence Handle12473884
SM Sentovich (2003) ArticleTitleFibrin glue for anal fistulas Dis Colon Rectum 46 498–502 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-6589-y Occurrence Handle12682544
I Lindsey MM Smilgin-Humphreys C Cunningham NJ Mortensen B George (2002) ArticleTitleA randomized, controlled trial of fibrin glue vs. conventional treatment for anal fistula Dis Colon Rectum 45 1608–1615 Occurrence Handle12473883
M Singer J Cintron R Nelson et al. (2005) ArticleTitleTreatment of fistulas-in-ano with fibrin sealant in combination with intra-adhesive antibiotics and/or closure of the internal fistula opening Dis Colon Rectum 48 799–808 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-0898-z Occurrence Handle15785883
J Cintron JJ Park CP Orsay et al. (2000) ArticleTitleRepair of fistulas-in-ano using fibrin adhesive: long-term follow-up Dis Colon Rectum 43 944–949 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02237355 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czmsFKisg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10910240
T Ueno LC Pickett SG Feunte Particlede la DC Lawson TN Pappas (2004) ArticleTitleClinical applications of porcine small intestinal submucosa in the management of infected or potentially contaminated abdominal defects J Gastrointest Surg 8 109–112 Occurrence Handle14746842
ME Franklin JJ Gonzalez JL Glass (2004) ArticleTitleUse of porcine small intestinal submucosa as a prosthetic device for laparoscopic repair of hernias in contaminated fields: 2 year follow-up Hernia 8 186–189 Occurrence Handle14991410
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Dr. David Armstrong has a patent-licensing agreement with the manufacturers of Surgisis® (Cook Surgical, Bloomington, IN).
About this article
Cite this article
Johnson, E.K., Gaw, J.U. & Armstrong, D.N. Efficacy of Anal Fistula Plug vs. Fibrin Glue in Closure of Anorectal Fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 49, 371–376 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-005-0288-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-005-0288-1