Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage After Left-Sided Colorectal Resection With Rectal Anastomosis

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify the risk factors for anastomotic leakage after left-sided colorectal resections with rectal anastomosis. METHODS: Forty-four patients with anastomotic leakage identified from a computer-generated database were compared with 44 control patients standardized for gender, age, and operative indication. RESULTS: The mean hospital stay was significantly prolonged in the leakage group, which resulted in a higher total cost of hospital treatment. The preoperative variables significantly associated with anastomotic leakage included malnutrition, weight loss, hypoalbuminemia, cardiovascular disease, two or more underlying diseases, and use of alcohol. The surgery-related factors that turned out to be significant were The American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, operation time greater than two hours, multiple blood transfusions, intraoperative contamination of the operative field, and a short distance of the anastomosis to the anal verge. Obesity, body mass index, diabetes, smoking, serum hemoglobin, serum creatinine, serum bilirubin, bowel preparation, mode of antibiotic prophylaxis, type of anastomosis, technique of stapling, size of stapler used, and use of drain were nonsignificant variables. Malnutrition, weight loss, use of alcohol, intraoperative contamination, long operation time, and multiple blood transfusions remained significant in logistic regression model. Eighty-six percent of the patients with three or more risk factors of anastomotic leakage belonged to the leakage group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with multiple risk factors have higher risk for anastomotic leakage. When patients have three or more risk factors, the creation of a protective stoma should be considered in cases with a low rectal anastomosis, and all these patients should be carefully monitored postoperatively for signs of possible leak.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. LP Fielding S Stewart-Brown L Blesovsky G Kerney (1980) ArticleTitleAnastomotic integrity after operations for large-bowel cancer BMJ 281 411–414

    Google Scholar 

  2. S Petersen M Freitag G Hellmich K Ludwig (1998) ArticleTitleAnastomotic leakage Int J Colorectal Dis 13 160–163

    Google Scholar 

  3. A Nesbakken K Nygaard OC Lunde (2001) ArticleTitleOutcome and late functional results after anastomotic leakage following mesorectal excision for rectal cancer Br J Surg 88 400–404

    Google Scholar 

  4. J Mäkelä MI Kairaluoma (1988) ArticleTitleRelaparotomy for postoperative intra-abdominal sepsis in jaundiced patients Br J Surg 75 631–639

    Google Scholar 

  5. JT Mäkelä H Kiviniemi T Juvonen S Laitinen (1995) ArticleTitleFactors influencing wound dehiscence after midline laparotomy Am J Surg 170 387–390

    Google Scholar 

  6. J Bruce ZH Krukowski G Al-Khairy EM Russell KG Park (2001) ArticleTitleSystematic review of the definition and measurement of anastomotic leak after gastrointestinal surgery Br J Surg 88 1157–1168

    Google Scholar 

  7. F Meard E Yahchouchi JM Hay A Fingerhut Y Laborde O Langlois-Zantain (1998) ArticleTitleProphylactic abdominal drainage after elective colonic resection and suprapromontory anastomosis: a multicenter study controlled by randomization. French Association for Surgical Research Arch Surg 133 309–314

    Google Scholar 

  8. S Zaheer JH Pemberton R Farouk RR Dozois BG Wolff D Ilstrup (1998) ArticleTitleSurgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the rectum Ann Surg 227 800–811

    Google Scholar 

  9. EL Bokey PH Chapuis C Fung et al. (1995) ArticleTitlePostoperative morbidity and mortality following resection of the colon and rectum for cancer Dis Colon Rectum 38 480–487

    Google Scholar 

  10. JJ Arenal C Benito MP Concejo E Ortega (1999) ArticleTitleColorectal resection and primary anastomosis in patients aged 70 and older Eur J Surg 165 716–718

    Google Scholar 

  11. JS Varma AC Chan MK Li AK Li (1990) ArticleTitleLow anterior resection using double stabling technique Br J Surg 77 888–890

    Google Scholar 

  12. RP Miettinen ST Laitinen JT Mäkelä ME Pääkkönen (2000) ArticleTitleBowel preparation with oral polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution vs. no preparation in elective open colorectal surgery Dis Colon Rectum 43 669–677

    Google Scholar 

  13. W Graf B Glimelius R Bergström L Påhlman (1991) ArticleTitleComplications after double and single stapling in rectal surgery Eur J Surg 157 543–557

    Google Scholar 

  14. ND Karanjia AP Corder P Bearn RJ Heald (1994) ArticleTitleLeakage from stapled low anastomosis after total mesorectal excision for carcinoma of the rectum Br J Surg 81 1224–1226

    Google Scholar 

  15. O Hallböök RJ Sjödahl (1996) ArticleTitleAnastomotic leakage and functional outcome after anterior resection of the rectum Br J Surg 83 60–62

    Google Scholar 

  16. R Tang HH Chen YL Wang et al. (1996) ArticleTitleRisk factors for surgical site infection after elective resection of the colon and rectum Ann Surg 234 181–189

    Google Scholar 

  17. JA Windsor GL Hill (1988) ArticleTitleWeight loss with physiologic impairment. A basic indicator of surgical risk Ann Surg 207 290–296

    Google Scholar 

  18. E Rullier C Laurent JL Garrelon P Michel J Saric M Parneix (1998) ArticleTitleRisk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer Br J Surg 85 355–358

    Google Scholar 

  19. TH Blee GE Belzer PJ Lambert (2002) ArticleTitleObesity Am Surg 68 163–166

    Google Scholar 

  20. LT Sörensen T Jörgensen LT Kirkeby J Skovdal B Vennits P Wille-Jörgensen (1999) ArticleTitleSmoking and alcohol abuse are major risk factors for anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery Br J Surg 86 927–931

    Google Scholar 

  21. H Tönnesen H Kehlet (1999) ArticleTitlePreoperative alcoholism and postoperative morbidity Br J Surg 86 969–974

    Google Scholar 

  22. S Biondo E Ramos M Deiros et al. (2000) ArticleTitlePrognostic factors for mortality in left colonic peritonitis J Am Coll Surg 191 635–642

    Google Scholar 

  23. ML Baum DS Anish TC Chalmers HS Sacks H Smith SuffixJr RM Fagerström (1981) ArticleTitleA survey of clinical trials of antibiotic prophylaxis in colon surgery N Engl J Med 205 795–799

    Google Scholar 

  24. M McDonald E Crabsch C Marshall A Forbes (1999) ArticleTitleSingle- versus multiple-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis for major surgery Aust N Z J Surg 69 68–69

    Google Scholar 

  25. KS Scher (1997) ArticleTitleStudies on the duration of antibiotic administration for surgical prophylaxis Am Surg 63 59–62

    Google Scholar 

  26. JG Docherty JR McGregor AM Akyol CD Murray DJ Galloway (1995) ArticleTitleComparison of manually constructed and stapled anastomoses in colorectal surgery. West of Scotland and Highland Anastomosis Study Group Ann Surg 221 176–184

    Google Scholar 

  27. CJ Hirsch BS Gingold MK Wallack (1997) ArticleTitleAvoidance of anastomotic complications in low anterior resection of the rectum Dis Colon Rectum 40 42–46

    Google Scholar 

  28. PM Sagar MN Hartley J Macfie B Mancey-Jones P Sedman J May (1995) ArticleTitleRandomized trial of pelvic drainage after rectal resection Dis Colon Rectum 38 254–258

    Google Scholar 

  29. DR Urbach ED Kennedy MM Cohen (1999) ArticleTitleColon and rectal anastomoses do not require routine drainage. A systematic review and meta-analysis Ann Surg 229 174–180

    Google Scholar 

  30. A Vignali VW Fazio IC Lavery et al. (1997) ArticleTitleFactors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses J Am Coll Surg 185 105–113

    Google Scholar 

  31. PI Tartter (1988) ArticleTitleBlood transfusion and infectious complications following colorectal cancer surgery Br J Surg 75 789–792

    Google Scholar 

  32. MM Heiss W Mempel KW Jauch et al. (1993) ArticleTitleBeneficial effect of autologous blood transfusion on infectious complications after colorectal cancer surgery Lancet 342 1328–1333

    Google Scholar 

  33. TE Pakkastie PE Lukkonen HE Järvinen (1994) ArticleTitleAnastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum Eur J Surg 160 293–297

    Google Scholar 

  34. WI Law KW Chu JW Ho CW Chan (2000) ArticleTitleRisk factors for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision Am J Surg 179 92–96

    Google Scholar 

  35. N Dehni RD Schlegel C Cunningham M Guiguet E Tiret R Parc (1998) ArticleTitleInfluence of a defunctioning stoma on leakage rates after low colorectal anastomosis and colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis Br J Surg 85 1114–1117

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

    Authors
    1. Jyrki T. Mäkelä M.D.
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    2. Heikki Kiviniemi M.D.
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    3. Seppo Laitinen M.D.
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    About this article

    Cite this article

    Mäkelä, J.T., Kiviniemi, H. & Laitinen, S. Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage After Left-Sided Colorectal Resection With Rectal Anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 46, 653–660 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6627-9

    Download citation

    • Issue Date:

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6627-9

    Keywords

    Search

    Navigation