Skip to main content
Log in

Risk Factors and Oncologic Impact of Anastomotic Leakage after Rectal Cancer Surgery

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Purpose

The impact of anastomotic leakage on the long-term oncologic outcome is not clear. This retrospective study evaluated risk factors and oncologic impacts of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery.

Methods

Data were analyzed from 1,391 patients who underwent sphincter preservation for rectal cancer between January 1997 and August 2003. Operations were classified as anterior resection (n = 164), low anterior resection (n = 898), or ultralow anterior resection (n = 329).

Results

The anastomotic leakage rate was 2.5 percent. Multivariate analysis identified male (hazard ratio, 3.03), old age (hazard ratio, 2.42), and lower anastomosis level (hazard ratio, 2.68) as risk factors for leakage. The local recurrence rates were 9.6 and 2.2 percent for the leakage and nonleakage groups, respectively but were not significant (P = 0.14). The overall five-year survival rates were 55.1 and 74.1 percent in the leakage and nonleakage groups, respectively (P < 0.05), and the cancer-specific survival rates were 63 and 78.3 percent in the leakage and nonleakage groups, respectively (P = 0.05). However, in subgroup analysis, significant differences were identified only in Stage III patients.

Conclusions

Age, sex, and ultralow anterior resection were found to be risk factors for anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. In addition, leakage was associated with poor survival.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rullier E, Laurent C, Garrelon JL, Michel P, Saric J, Parneix M. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1998;85:355–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pakkastie TE, Luukkonen PE, Jarvinen HJ. Anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum. Eur J Surg 1994;160:293–300.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Paty PB, Enker WE, Cohen AM, Lauwers GY. Treatment of rectal cancer by low anterior resection with coloanal anastomosis. Ann Surg 1994;219:365–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen Z, Myers E, Langer B, Taylor B, Railton RH, Jamieson C. Double-stapling technique for low anterior resection. Dis Colon Rectum 1983;26:231–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Heald RJ, Moran BJ, Ryall RD, Sexton R, MacFarlane JK. Rectal cancer: the Basingstoke experience of total mesorectal excision, 1978–1997. Arch Surg 1998;133:894–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Carlsen E, Schlichting E, Guldvog I, Johnson E, Heald RJ. Effect of the introduction of total mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1998;85:526–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Yeh CY, Changchien CR, Wang JY, et al. Pelvic drainage and other risk factors for leakage after elective anterior resection in rectal cancer patients: a prospective study of 978 patients. Ann Surg 2005;241:9–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Karanjia ND, Corder AP, Bearn P, Heald RJ. Leakage from stapled low anastomosis after total mesorectal excision for carcinoma of the rectum. Br J Surg 1994;81:1224–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Law WL, Chu KW. Anterior resection for rectal cancer with mesorectal excision: a prospective evaluation of 622 patients. Ann Surg 2004;240:260–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Vignali A, Fazio VW, Lavery IC, et al. Factors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1,014 patients. J Am Coll Surg 1997;185:105–13.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Law WI, Chu KW, Ho JW, Chan CW. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision. Am J Surg 2000;179:92–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pakkastie TE, Ovaska JT, Pekkala ES, Luukkonen PE, Jarvinen HJ. A randomised study of colostomies in low colorectal anastomoses. Eur J Surg 1997;163:929–33.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Allen-Mersh TG, Sprague DB, Mann CV, Turner MJ. Pelvic drainage after anterior resection of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:223–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Beard JD, Nicholson ML, Sayers RD, Lloyd D, Everson NW. Intraoperative air testing of colorectal anastomoses: a prospective, randomized trial. Br J Surg 1990;77:1095–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Schmidt O, Merkel S, Hohenberger W. Anastomotic leakage after low rectal stapler anastomosis: significance of intraoperative anastomotic testing. Eur J Surg Oncol 2003;29:239–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Yalin R, Aktan AO, Yegen C, Dosluoglu H, Okboy N. Importance of testing stapled rectal anastomoses with air. Eur J Surg 1993;159:49–51.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Irvin TT, Goligher JC. Aetiology of disruption of intestinal anastomoses. Br J Surg 1973;60:461–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fielding LP, Stewart-Brown S, Blesovsky L, Kearney G. Anastomotic integrity after operations for large-bowel cancer: a multicentre study. BMJ 1980;281:411–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Peeters KC, Tollenaar RA, Marijnen CA, et al. Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2005;92:211–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Abulafi AM, Williams NS. Local recurrence of colorectal cancer: the problem, mechanisms, management and adjuvant therapy. Br J Surg 1994;81:7–19.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Fujita S, Teramoto T, Watanabe M, Kodaira S, Kitajima M. Anastomotic leakage after colorectal cancer surgery: a risk factor for recurrence and poor prognosis. Jpn J Clin Oncol 1993;23:299–302.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bell SW, Walker KG, Rickard MJ, et al. Anastomotic leakage after curative anterior resection results in a higher prevalence of local recurrence. Br J Surg 2003;90:1261–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Petersen S, Freitag M, Hellmich G, Ludwig K. Anastomotic leakage: impact on local recurrence and survival in surgery of colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 1998;13:160–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Walker KG, Bell SW, Rickard MJ, et al. Anastomotic leakage is predictive of diminished survival after potentially curative resection for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 2004;240:255–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Graffner H, Fredlund P, Olsson SA, Oscarson J, Petersson BG. Protective colostomy in low anterior resection of the rectum using the EEA stapling instrument. A randomized study. Dis Colon Rectum 1983;26:87–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Phillips RK, Hittinger R, Blesovsky L, Fry JS, Fielding LP. Local recurrence following “curative” surgery for large bowel cancer: II. The rectum and rectosigmoid. Br J Surg 1984;71:17–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Chang SC, Lin JK, Yang SH, Jiang JK, Chen WC, Lin TC. Long-term outcome of anastomosis leakage after curative resection for mid and low rectal cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 2003;50:1898–902.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Branagan G, Finnis D. Prognosis after anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:1021–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. McArdle CS, McMillan DC, Hole DJ. Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival of patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 2005;92:1150–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Balkwill F, Mantovani A. Inflammation and cancer: back to Virchow? Lancet 2001;357:539–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Fermor B, Umpleby HC, Lever JV, Symes MO, Williamson RC. Proliferative and metastatic potential of exfoliated colorectal cancer cells. J Natl Cancer Inst 1986;76:347–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Law WL, Choi HK, Lee YM, Ho JW, Seto CL. Anastomotic leakage is associated with poor long-term outcome in patients after curative colorectal resection for malignancy. J Gastrointest Surg 2007;11:8–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hotta T, Takifuji K, Arii K, et al. Clinical impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on patients with Stage III colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res 2006;26:1425–32.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chang Sik Yu M.D..

Additional information

Poster presentation at the meeting of The American Society Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Seattle Washington, June 3 to 7, 2006.

About this article

Cite this article

Jung, S.H., Yu, C.S., Choi, P.W. et al. Risk Factors and Oncologic Impact of Anastomotic Leakage after Rectal Cancer Surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 51, 902–908 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-008-9272-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-008-9272-x

Key words

Navigation