Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Recurrence statistics of M ≥ 6 earthquakes in the Nepal Himalaya: formulation and relevance to future earthquake hazards

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recurrence statistics of large earthquakes has a long-term economic and societal importance. This study investigates the temporal distribution of large (M ≥ 6) earthquakes in the Nepal Himalaya. We compile earthquake data of more than 200 years (1800–2022) and calculate interevent times of successive main shocks. We then derive recurrence-time statistics of large earthquakes using a set of twelve reference statistical distributions. These distributions include the time-independent exponential and time-dependent gamma, lognormal, Weibull, Levy, Maxwell, Pareto, Rayleigh, inverse Gaussian, inverse Weibull, exponentiated exponential and exponentiated Rayleigh. Based on a sample of 38 interoccurrence times, we estimate model parameters via the maximum likelihood estimation and provide their respective confidence bounds through Fisher information and Cramer–Rao bound. Using three model selection approaches, namely the Akaike information criterion (AIC), Kolmogorov–Smirnov goodness-of-fit test and the Chi-square test, we rank the performance of the applied distributions. Our analysis reveals that (i) the best fit comes from the exponentiated Rayleigh (rank 1), exponentiated exponential (rank 2), Weibull (rank 3), exponential (rank 4) and the gamma distribution (rank 5), (ii) an intermediate fit comes from the lognormal (rank 6) and the inverse Weibull distribution (rank 7), whereas (iii) the distributions, namely Maxwell (rank 8), Rayleigh (rank 9), Pareto (rank 10), Levy (rank 11) and inverse Gaussian (rank 12), show poor fit to the observed interevent times. Using the best performed exponentiated Rayleigh model, we observe that the estimated cumulative and conditional occurrence of a M ≥ 6 event in the Nepal Himalaya reach 0.90–0.95 by 2028–2031 and 2034–2037, respectively. We finally present a number of conditional probability curves (hazard function curves) to examine future earthquake hazard in the study region. Overall, the findings provide an important basis for a variety of practical applications, including infrastructure planning, disaster insurance and probabilistic seismic hazard analysis in the Nepal Himalaya.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

We have compiled earthquake data (1800–2022) from public catalog (e.g., ISC, USGS) along with some published articles. These websites were last accessed in February 2023.

References

  • Abaimov SG, Turcotte DL, Shcherbakov R, Rundle JB, Yakovlev G, Goltz C, Newman WI (2008) Earthquakes: recurrence and interoccurrence times. Earthquakes: Simulations Sources and Tsunamis. Springer, Berlin, pp 777–795

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ader T, Avouac JP, Liu-Zeng J et al (2012) Convergence rate across the Nepal Himalaya and interseismic coupling on the Main Himalayan Thrust: implications for seismic hazard. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 117:B04403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambraseys N (2000) Reappraisal of North-Indian earthquakes at the turn of the 20th century. Curr Sci 79:1237–1250

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambraseys N, Douglas J (2004) Magnitude calibration of north Indian earthquakes. Geophys J Int 159:165–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bajaj S, Sharma ML (2019) Modeling earthquake recurrence in the Himalayan seismic belt using time-dependent stochastic models: implications for future seismic hazards. Pure Appl Geophys 176:5261–5278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bak P, Christensen K, Danon L, Scanlon T (2002) Unified scaling law for earthquakes. Phys Rev Let 88:178501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bantidi TM (2022) Inter-occurrence time statistics of successive large earthquakes: analyses of the global CMT dataset. Acta Geophys 70:2603–2619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilham R (2019) Himalayan earthquakes: a review of historical seismicity and early 21st century slip potential. Geol Soc Lond Mem 483:423–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilham R, Gaur VK, Molnar P (2001) Himalayan seismic hazard. Science 293:1442–1444

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chingtham P, Yadav RBS, Chopra S, Yadav AK, Gupta AK, Roy PNS (2016) Time-dependent seismicity analysis in the northwest Himalaya and its adjoining regions. Nat Haz 80:1783–1800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornell CA (1968) Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bull Seism Soc Am 58:1583–1606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corral A (2003) Local distributions and rate fluctuations in a unified scaling law for earthquakes. Phys Rev E 68:035102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corral A (2004) Long-term clustering, scaling, and universality in the temporal occurrence of earthquakes. Phys Rev Lett 92:108501

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Foss S, Korshunov D, Zachary S (2011) An introduction to heavy-tailed and subexponential distributions. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner JK, Knopoff L (1974) Is the sequence of earthquakes in Southern California, with aftershocks removed, Poissonian? Bull Seism Soc Am 64:1363–1367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta RD, Kundu D (1999) Theory & methods: generalized exponential distributions. Aust N Z J Stat 41:173–188

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta RC, Gupta PL, Gupta RD (1998) Modeling failure time data by Lehman alternatives. Commun Stat Theory Methods 27:887–904

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hagiwara Y (1974) Probability of earthquake occurrence as obtained from a Weibull distribution analysis of crustal strain. Tectonophys 23:313–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogg RV, Mckean JW, Craig AT (2005) Introduction to Mathematical Statistics, 6th edition, PRC Press, USA pp 718

  • Johnson NL, Kotz S, Balakrishnan N (1995) Continuous univariate distributions. Interscience, 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 752–964

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan YY, Jackson DD (1991) Long-term earthquake clustering. Geophys J Int 104:117–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kagan YY, Knopoff L (1987) Statistical short-term earthquake prediction. Sci 236:1563–1567

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khattri K, Tyagi A (1983) Seismicity patterns in the Himalayan plate boundary and identification of the areas of high seismic potential. Tectonophys 96:281–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kijko A, Sellevoll MA (1981) Triple exponential distribution, a modified model for the occurrence of large earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 71:2097–2101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kourouklas C, Tsaklidis G, Papadimitriou E, Karakostas V (2022) Analyzing the correlations and the statistical distribution of moderate to large earthquakes interevent times in Greece. Appl Sci 12:7041

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey EO, Almeida R, Mallick R, Hubbard J, Bradley K, Tsang LL, Liu Y, Burgmann R, Hill EM (2018) Structural control on downdip locking extent of the Himalayan megathrust. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 123:5265–5278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoud MAW, Ghazal MGM (2017) Estimations from the exponentiated Rayleigh distribution based on generalized Type-II hybrid censored data. J Egypt Math Soc 25:71–78

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mangira O, Kourouklas C, Chorozoglou D, Iliopoulos A, Papadimitriou E (2019) Modeling the earthquake occurrence with time-dependent processes: a brief review. Acta Geophys 67:739–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews MV, Ellsworth WL, Reasenberg PA (2002) A Brownian model for recurrent earthquakes. Bull Seism Soc Am 92:2233–2250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudholkar GS, Srivastava DK (1993) Exponentiated Weibull family for analyzing bathtub failure-rate data. IEEE Trans Rel 42:299–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulargia F, Tinti S (1985) Seismic sample area defined from incomplete catalogs: an application to the Italian territory. Phys Earth Planetary Int 40:273–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishenko SP, Buland R (1987) A generic recurrence interval distribution for earthquake forecasting. Bull Seismol Soc Am 77:1382–1399

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldham T (1883) A catalogue of Indian earthquakes from the earliest times to the end of AD 1869. Mem Geol Surv India 19:163–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Pal M, Ali MM, Woo J (2006) Exponentiated Weibull distribution. Statistica (bologna) 66:139–147

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Papazachos BC, Papadimitriou EE, Kiratzi AA, Papaioannou CA, Karakaisis GF (1987) Probabilities of occurrence of large earthquakes in the Aegean and surrounding area during the period 1986–2006. Pure Appl Geophys 125:597–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papazachos BC, Papadimitriou EE, Karakaisis GF, Panagiotopoulos DG (1997) Long-term earthquake prediction in the circum-pacific convergent belt. Pure Appl Geophys 149:173–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parvez IA, Ram A (1997) Probabilistic assessment of earthquake hazards in the north-east Indian peninsula and Hindukush regions. Pure Appl Geophys 149:731–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parvez IA, Ram A (1999) Probabilistic assessment of earthquake hazards in the Indian subcontinent. Pure Appl Geophys 154:23–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasari S (2015) Understanding Himalayan tectonics from geodetic and stochastic modeling. Dissertation, Department Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, India

  • Pasari S (2018) Stochastic modelling of earthquake interoccurrence times in Northwest Himalaya and adjoining regions. Geomat Nat Haz Risk 9:568–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasari S (2019a) Nowcasting earthquakes in the Bay-of-Bengal region. Pure Appl Geophys 176:1417–1432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasari S (2019b) Inverse Gaussian versus lognormal distribution in earthquake forecasting: keys and clues. J Seismol 23:537–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasari S, Dikshit O (2014a) Impact of three-parameter Weibull models in probabilistic assessment of earthquake hazards. Pure Appl Geophys 171:1251–1281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasari S, Dikshit O (2014b) Three-parameter generalized exponential distribution in earthquake recurrence interval estimation. Nat Haz 73:639–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasari S, Dikshit O (2015a) Distribution of earthquake interevent times in northeast India and adjoining regions. Pure Appl Geophys 172:2533–2544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasari S, Dikshit O (2015b) Earthquake interevent time distribution in Kachchh, northwestern India. Earth Planets Space 67:129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasari S, Dikshit O (2018) Stochastic earthquake interevent time modeling from exponentiated Weibull distributions. Nat Haz 90:823–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasari S, Sharma Y (2020) Contemporary earthquake hazards in the West‐Northwest Himalaya: a statistical perspective through natural times. Seismol Res Lett 91(6):3358–3369. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220200104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasari S, Sharma Y, Neha N (2021) Quantifying the current state of earthquake hazards in Nepal. App Comput Geosci 10:100058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quandt RE (1966) Old and new methods of estimation and the Pareto distribution. Metrika 10:55–82

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rikitake T (1976) Recurrence of great earthquakes at subduction zones. Tectonophys 35(4):335–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rikitake T (1991) Assessment of earthquake hazard in the Tokyo area, Japan. Tectonophys 199:121–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rundle JB, Turcotte DL, Donnellan A, Grant-Ludwig A, Luginbuhl M, Gong G (2016) Nowcasting earthquakes. Earth Space Sci 3:480–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz CH (2019) The mechanics of earthquakes and faulting. Cambridge University, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scordilis EM (2006) Empirical global relations converting Ms and mb to moment magnitude. J Seism 10:225–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma Y, Pasari S, Ching KE, Dikshit O, Kato T, Malik JN, Chang CP, Yen JY (2020) Spatial distribution of earthquake potential along the Himalayan arc. Tectonophys 791:228556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma Y (2021) Measuring and modeling crustal deformation along the Himalayan arc. Dissertation, Department of Mathematics, Birla Institute of Technology and Science Pilani, India

  • Sharma Y, Pasari S, Ching KE, Verma H, Choudhary N (2023a) Kinematics of crustal deformation along the central Himalaya. Acta Geophys 1–12

  • Sharma Y, Pasari S, Ching KE, Verma H, Kato T, Dikshit O (2023b) Interseismic slip rate and fault geometry along the northwest Himalaya. Geophys J Int 235:2694–2706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sornette D, Knopoff L (1997) The paradox of the expected time until the next earthquake. Bull Seism Soc Am 87:789–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sreejith K, Sunil P, Agrawal R, Saji AP, Rajawat A, Ramesh D (2018) Audit of stored strain energy and extent of future earthquake rupture in central Himalaya. Sci Rep 8:1–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Uhrhammer RA (1986) Characteristics of northern and central California seismicity. Earthquake Notes 57:21

    Google Scholar 

  • Utsu T (1972) Aftershocks and earthquake statistics (IV). J Fac of Sci Hokkaido Uni, Ser 4:1–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Utsu T (1984) Estimation of parameters for recurrence models of earthquakes. Bull Earthq Res Inst Univ Tokyo 59:53–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma H, Pasari S, Sharma Y, Ching K-E (2024) High-resolution velocity and strain rate fields in the Kumaun Himalaya: an implication for seismic moment budget. J Geodyn 160:102023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2024.102023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiemer S (2001) A software package to analyze seismicity: ZMAP. Seismol Res Lett 72:373–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav RBS, Tripathi JN, Rastogi BK, Chopra S (2008) Probabilistic assessment of earthquake hazard in Gujarat and adjoining region of India. Pure Appl Geophys 165:1813–1833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav RBS, Tripathi JN, Rastogi BK, Das MC, Chopra S (2010) Probabilistic assessment of earthquake recurrence in Northeast India and adjoining region. Pure Appl Geophys 167:1331–1342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav RBS, Bayrak Y, Tripathi JN, Chopra S, Singh AP, Bayrak E (2012) A probabilistic assessment of earthquake hazard parameters in NW Himalaya and the adjoining regions. Pure Appl Geophys 169:1619–1639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yazdani A, Kowsari M (2011) Statistical prediction of the sequence of large earthquakes in Iran. IJE Trans B Appl 24:325–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin A (2006) Cenozoic tectonic evolution of the Himalayan orogen as constrained by along-strike variation of structural geometry, exhumation history, and foreland sedimentation. Earth Sci Rev 76:1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We have used MATLAB, ZMAP and generic mapping tool (GMT) for numerical computation and plotting purposes. The second author (H.V.) is grateful to UGC, New Delhi, for the research fellowship.

Funding

Partial financial support was provided by the IRDR-ICoE Taiwan (through seed grant) and DST-SERB India (through MATRICS scheme, grant no: MTR/2021/000458 and CRG scheme, grant no: CRG/2023/000809).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan, 333031, India

    Sumanta Pasari & Himanshu Verma

Authors
  1. Sumanta Pasari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Himanshu Verma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sumanta Pasari.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethical approval

All authors whose names appear on the submission made substantial contributions to the design of the work, interpreted the data, drafted the work or revised it critically for important intellectual content, approved the version to be published and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. This research does not involve human participants.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 463 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pasari, S., Verma, H. Recurrence statistics of M ≥ 6 earthquakes in the Nepal Himalaya: formulation and relevance to future earthquake hazards. Nat Hazards (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-024-06489-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-024-06489-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation