Abstract
The blood–brain barrier (BBB) comprises three cell types: brain capillary endothelial cells (BECs), astrocytes, and pericytes. Abnormal interaction among these cells may induce BBB dysfunction and lead to cerebrovascular diseases. The stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHRSP) harbors a defective BBB, so we designed the present study to examine the role of these three cell types in a functional disorder of the BBB in SHRSP in order to elucidate the role of these cells in the BBB more generally. To this end, we employed a unique in vitro model of BBB, in which various combinations of the cells could be tested. The three types of cells were prepared from both SHRSPs and Wistar Kyoto rats (WKYs). They were then co-cultured in various combinations to construct in vitro BBB models. The barrier function of the models was estimated by measuring transendothelial electrical resistance and the permeability of the endothelial monolayer to sodium fluorescein. The in vitro models revealed that (1) BECs from SHRSPs had an inherent lower barrier function, (2) astrocytes of SHRSPs had an impaired ability to induce barrier function in BECs, although (3) both pericytes and astrocytes of SHRSPs and WKYs could potentiate the barrier function of BECs under co-culture conditions. Furthermore, we found that claudin-5 expression was consistently lower in models that used BECs and/or SHRSP astrocytes. These results suggested that defective interaction among BBB cells—especially BECs and astrocytes—was responsible for a functional disorder of the BBB in SHRSPs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbott NJ, Patabendige AA, Dolman DE, Yusof SR, Begley DJ (2010) Structure and function of the blood-brain barrier. Neurobiol Dis 37:13–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2009.07.030
Abbott NJ, Ronnback L, Hansson E (2006) Astrocyte-endothelial interactions at the blood-brain barrier. Nat Rev Neurosci 7:41–53. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1824
Alloubani A, Saleh A, Abdelhafiz I (2018) Hypertension and diabetes mellitus as a predictive risk factors for stroke. Diabetes Metab Syndr 12:577–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2018.03.009
Almutairi MM, Gong C, Xu YG, Chang Y, Shi H (2016) Factors controlling permeability of the blood-brain barrier. Cell Mol Life Sci 73:57–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-015-2050-8
Alvarez JI et al (2011) The Hedgehog pathway promotes blood-brain barrier integrity and CNS immune quiescence. Science 334:1727–1731. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1206936
Alvarez JI, Katayama T, Prat A (2013) Glial influence on the blood brain barrier. Glia 61:1939–1958. https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.22575
Argaw AT, Gurfein BT, Zhang Y, Zameer A, John GR (2009) VEGF-mediated disruption of endothelial CLN5- promotes blood-brain barrier breakdown. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:1977–1982. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0808698106
Bell RD et al (2012) Apolipoprotein E controls cerebrovascular integrity via cyclophilin A. Nature 485:512–516. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11087
Berger M, Bergers G, Arnold B, Hammerling GJ, Ganss R (2005) Regulator of G-protein signaling-5 induction in pericytes coincides with active vessel remodeling during neovascularization. Blood 105:1094–1101. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2004-06-2315
Bondjers C et al. (2003) Transcription profiling of platelet-derived growth factor-B-deficient mouse embryos identifies RGS5 as a novel marker for pericytes and vascular smooth muscle cells Am J Pathol 162:721–729 https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9440(10)63868-0
Brown LS, Foster CG, Courtney JM, King NE, Howells DW, Sutherland BA (2019) Pericytes and Neurovascular Function in the Healthy and Diseased Brain Front Cell Neurosci 13:282. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2019.00282
Dalkara T, Alarcon-Martinez L (2015) Cerebral microvascular pericytes and neurogliovascular signaling in health and disease. Brain Res 1623:3–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2015.03.047
Dohgu S et al (2011) Autocrine and paracrine up-regulation of blood-brain barrier function by plasminogen activator inhibitor-1. Microvasc Res 81:103–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mvr.2010.10.004
Hainsworth AH, Markus HS (2008) Do in vivo experimental models reflect human cerebral small vessel disease? A Systematic review. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 28:1877–1891. https://doi.org/10.1038/jcbfm.2008.91
Hamzah J et al (2008) Vascular normalization in Rgs5-deficient tumours promotes immune destruction. Nature 453:410–414. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06868
Haseloff RF, Blasig IE, Bauer HC, Bauer H (2005) In search of the astrocytic factor(s) modulating blood-brain barrier functions in brain capillary endothelial cells in vitro. Cell Mol Neurobiol 25:25–39
Helms HC et al (2016) vitro models of the blood-brain barrier: an overview of commonly used brain endothelial cell culture models and guidelines for their use. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 36:862–890. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678X16630991
Horai S et al (2013) Cilostazol strengthens barrier integrity in brain endothelial cells. Cell Mol Neurobiol 33:291–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10571-012-9896-1
Igarashi Y et al (1999) Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor induces barrier function of endothelial cells forming the blood-brain barrier. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 261:108–112. https://doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.1999.0992
Ikawa T et al (2019) A new approach to identifying hypertension-associated genes in the mesenteric artery of spontaneously hypertensive rats and stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Hypertens 37:1644–1656. https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000002083
Ishida H, Takemori K, Dote K, Ito H (2006) Expression of glucose transporter-1 and aquaporin-4 in the cerebral cortex of stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats in relation to the blood-brain barrier function. Am J Hypertens 19:33–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjhyper.2005.06.023
Krizbai IA et al (2015) Endothelial-mesenchymal transition of brain endothelial cells: possible role during metastatic extravasation. PLoS ONE 10:e0123845. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123845
Lee SW et al (2003) SSeCKS regulates angiogenesis and tight junction formation in blood-brain barrier. Nat Med 9:900–906. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm889
Liebner S, Dijkhuizen RM, Reiss Y, Plate KH, Agalliu D, Constantin G (2018) Functional morphology of the blood-brain barrier in health and disease. Acta Neuropathol 135:311–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-018-1815-1
Lippoldt A, Kniesel U, Liebner S, Kalbacher H, Kirsch T, Wolburg H, Haller H (2000) Structural alterations of tight junctions are associated with loss of polarity in stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rat blood-brain barrier endothelial cells. Brain Res 885:251–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-8993(00)02954-1
Manzur M, Hamzah J, Ganss R (2009) Modulation of g protein signaling normalizes tumor vessels. Cancer Res 69:396–399. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.Can-08-2842
Mencl S et al (2013) Early microvascular dysfunction in cerebral small vessel disease is not detectable on 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging: a longitudinal study in spontaneously hypertensive stroke-prone rats. Exp Transl Stroke Med 5:8. https://doi.org/10.1186/2040-7378-5-8
Morofuji Y, Nakagawa S (2020) Drug development for central nervous system diseases using in vitro blood-brain barrier models and drug repositioning. Curr Pharm Des. https://doi.org/10.2174/1381612826666200224112534
Nabika T, Cui Z, Masuda J (2004) The stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rat: how good is it as a model for cerebrovascular diseases? Cell Mol Neurobiol 24:639–646
Nabika T, Ohara H, Kato N, Isomura M (2012) The stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rat: still a useful model for post-GWAS genetic studies? Hypertens Res 35:477–484. https://doi.org/10.1038/hr.2012.30
Nakagawa S, Aruga J (2020) Sphingosine 1-phosphate signaling is involved in impaired blood-brain barrier function in ischemia-reperfusion injury. Mol Neurobiol 57:1594–1606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-019-01844-x
Nakagawa S et al (2009) A new blood-brain barrier model using primary rat brain endothelial cells, pericytes and astrocytes. Neurochem Int 54:253–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuint.2008.12.002
Nakagawa S et al (2007) Pericytes from brain microvessels strengthen the barrier integrity in primary cultures of rat brain endothelial cells. Cell Mol Neurobiol 27:687–694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10571-007-9195-4
Nitta T et al (2003) Size-selective loosening of the blood-brain barrier in claudin-5-deficient mice. J Cell Biol 161:653–660. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200302070
Ohara H, Nabika T (2016) A nonsense mutation of Stim1 identified in stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats decreased the store-operated calcium entry in astrocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 476:406–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.05.134
Ozen I, Roth M, Barbariga M, Gaceb A, Deierborg T, Genove G, Paul G (2018) Loss of regulator of g-protein signaling 5 leads to neurovascular protection in stroke. Stroke 49:2182–2190. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.020124
Rajani RM et al (2018) Reversal of endothelial dysfunction reduces white matter vulnerability in cerebral small vessel disease in rats. Sci Transl Med. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aam9507
Roth M, Gaceb A, Enstrom A, Padel T, Genove G, Ozen I, Paul G (2019) Regulator of G-protein signaling 5 regulates the shift from perivascular to parenchymal pericytes in the chronic phase after stroke. FASEB J 33:8990–8998. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.201900153R
Saitou M et al (2000) Complex phenotype of mice lacking occludin, a component of tight junction strands. Mol Biol Cell 11:4131–4142. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.11.12.4131
Schreiber S, Bueche CZ, Garz C, Braun H (2013) Blood brain barrier breakdown as the starting point of cerebral small vessel disease? New insights from a rat model. Exp Transl Stroke Med 5:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/2040-7378-5-4
Sweeney MD, Ayyadurai S, Zlokovic BV (2016) Pericytes of the neurovascular unit: key functions and signaling pathways. Nat Neurosci 19:771–783. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4288
Toyoda K et al (2013) Initial contact of glioblastoma cells with existing normal brain endothelial cells strengthen the barrier function via fibroblast growth factor 2 secretion: a new in vitro blood-brain barrier model. Cell Mol Neurobiol 33:489–501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10571-013-9913-z
Ueno M et al (2016) Blood-brain barrier damage in vascular dementia. Neuropathology 36:115–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/neup.12262
Ueno M et al (2009) The expression of P-glycoprotein is increased in vessels with blood-brain barrier impairment in a stroke-prone hypertensive model. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 35:147–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2990.2008.00966.x
Ueno M, Sakamoto H, Liao YJ, Onodera M, Huang CL, Miyanaka H, Nakagawa T (2004) Blood-brain barrier disruption in the hypothalamus of young adult spontaneously hypertensive rats. Histochem Cell Biol 122:131–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00418-004-0684-y
Wilhelm I, Krizbai IA (2014) vitro models of the blood-brain barrier for the study of drug delivery to the brain. Mol Pharm 11:1949–1963. https://doi.org/10.1021/mp500046f
Wolburg H, Lippoldt A (2002) Tight junctions of the blood-brain barrier: development, composition and regulation. Vascul Pharmacol 38:323–337
Yamagata K (2012) Pathological alterations of astrocytes in stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats under ischemic conditions. Neurochem Int 60:91–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuint.2011.11.002
Yang Y, Rosenberg GA (2011) Blood-brain barrier breakdown in acute and chronic cerebrovascular disease. Stroke 42:3323–3328. https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.110.608257
Zhao Z, Nelson AR, Betsholtz C, Zlokovic BV (2015) Establishment and dysfunction of the blood-brain barrier. Cell 163:1064–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.10.067
Funding
This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 15K08321 from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors have no competing interests.
Ethics Approval
Based on the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, Japan, all experimental procedures were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Nagasaki University (Approval Number: 1303211051).
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nakagawa, S., Ohara, H., Niwa, M. et al. Defective Function of the Blood–Brain Barrier in a Stroke-Prone Spontaneously Hypertensive Rat: Evaluation in an In Vitro Cell Culture Model. Cell Mol Neurobiol 42, 243–253 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10571-020-00917-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10571-020-00917-z