Abstract
Glycerol is a by-product of biodiesel production and may become an environmental problem. This paper investigates the utilization of glycerol as alternative feedstock for methanol production. A mathematical model of the methanol plant encompassing the steam reforming and methanol synthesis units is employed to generate data for an economic analysis involving two comparative cases: the conventional operation of the plant using only natural gas and the operation with partial substitution of the natural gas by glycerol. The results indicate that the glycerol injection can reduce the total natural gas consumption by about 11% for a given fixed methanol production. A breakeven analysis procedure is applied to determine the limit price of glycerol that makes this operation economically feasible. Based on a natural gas price of 10.13 US$/MMbtu, this analysis demonstrates that glycerol injection is feasible if its price is lower than 78.5 US$/t. Additionally, a sensitivity analysis indicates that a variation of 10% on the natural gas price causes a 26% variation on the glycerol breakeven point. The complete set of data indicates that it is possible to explore periods of glycerol low prices to reduce the operational costs of methanol plants that suffer from high natural gas prices.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- i :
-
Component
- j :
-
Reaction
- ã :
-
Catalyst activity
- Ac :
-
Tube cross-sectional area (m2)
- Cpm :
-
Specific heat capacity (J/kg K)
- C NG :
-
Natural gas cost (US$/t MeOH)
- C Gly :
-
Glycerol cost (US$/t MeOH)
- C tot :
-
Total operating cost (US$/t MeOH)
- d e :
-
Outer tube diameter (m)
- F i :
-
Molar flow rate of the component i (kmol/s)
- F Gly,purif :
-
Purified glycerol consumption (t/t MeOH)
- F NG,feed :
-
Natural gas consumption related to raw material (m3/t MeOH)
- F NG,ref :
-
Natural gas consumption related to fuel (m3/t MeOH)
- F NG,vap :
-
Natural gas consumption related to the glycerol vaporization (m3/t MeOH)
- F PG,ref :
-
Fuel purge gas consumption (m3/t MeOH)
- G :
-
Mass flux (kg/s m2)
- K :
-
Equilibrium constant
- K eq1 :
-
Equilibrium constant for Eq. (16)
- K eq2 :
-
Equilibrium constant for Eq. (17)
- kd :
-
Reaction rate constant
- ke :
-
Reaction rate constant
- K f :
-
Flash K value
- l :
-
Axial position along the reactor tube (m)
- LHV:
-
Lower heating value (J/m3)
- n :
-
Number of moles (mol)
- N :
-
Stoichiometric number
- P :
-
Pressure (bar)
- P o :
-
Reference pressure (bar)
- P NG :
-
Natural gas price (US$/m3)
- P Gly,raw :
-
Raw glycerol price (US$/t purified glycerol)
- P Gly,purif :
-
Glycerol purification price (US$/t purified glycerol)
- PROD:
-
Methanol production (t/s)
- Q absorbed :
-
Absorbed heat load (W)
- Q fired :
-
Fired heat load (W)
- R :
-
Universal gas constant (J/mol K)
- r :
-
Reaction rate (kmol/s kgcat)
- T :
-
Temperature (K)
- Tw :
-
Pipe external wall temperature (K)
- U :
-
Overall heat transfer coefficient (W/m2K)
- V :
-
Molar volume (m3)
- v:
-
Vapor fraction
- x :
-
Liquid phase composition
- y :
-
Vapor molar fraction
- z :
-
Global feed composition
- ΔCp°:
-
Molar heat capacity difference (J/mol K)
- ΔG°:
-
Standard Gibbs energy variation at temperature T (J/mol)
- ΔG 0°:
-
Standard Gibbs energy variation at temperature T 0 (J/mol)
- ΔH°:
-
Standard enthalpy variation at temperature T (J/mol)
- ΔH r :
-
Molar heat of reaction at temperature T (J/mol)
- ΔH 0°:
-
Standard enthalpy variation at temperature T 0 (J/mol)
- ε:
-
Extent of reaction
- η :
-
Steam reformer radiation zone efficiency
- ν:
-
Stoichiometric number
- ρB :
-
Bed density (kg/m3)
- φ:
-
Fugacity coefficient
- φL :
-
Liquid phase fugacity coefficient
- φV :
-
Vapor phase fugacity coefficient
References
Appl M (1997) Ammonia, methanol, hydrogen, carbon monoxide—modern production technologies. Nitrogen, British Sulfur Publishing, London
Ayoub M, Abdullah AZ (2012) Critical review on the current scenario and significance of crude glycerol resulting from biodiesel industry towards more sustainable renewable energy industry. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16:2671–2686. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.01.054
Campbell SL, Chancelier J, Nikoukhah R (2010) Modeling and simulation in Scilab/Scicos with ScicosLab 44, 2nd edn. Springer, New York
Ciriminna R, Pina CD, Rossi M, Pagliaro M (2014) Understanding the glycerol market. Eur J Lipid Sci Technol 116:1432–1439. doi:10.1002/ejlt.201400229
Costa ALH, Lima ERA, Souza PA (2016) Investigation of glycerol utilization for methanol production. Chem Eng Trans. Accepted for publication
Froment GF, Wagner ES (1994) Reforming, steam, analyzed. In: McKetta JJ, executive editor. Encyclopedia of chemical processing and design, Volume 47, Marcel Dekker Inc., New York
Knothe G (2005) Introduction. In: Knothe G, Gerpen JV, Krahl J (eds) The biodiesel handbook. AOCS Press, Urbana
Lange JP (2001) Methanol synthesis: a short review of technology improvements. Catal Today 64:3–8. doi:10.1016/S0920-5861(00)00503-4
Lim H, Jun HJ, Park M, Kim H, Bae JW, Ha K, Chae H, Jun K (2010) Optimization of methanol synthesis reaction on Cu/ZnO/Al2O3/ZrO2 catalyst using genetic algorithm: maximization of the synergetic effect by the optimal CO2 fraction. Korean J Chem Eng 27:1760–1767. doi:10.1007/s11814-010-0311-7
Lung Y, Tan CH, Show PL, Ling TC, Lan JC, Lam HL, Chang J (2016) Docosahexaenoic acid production from crude glycerol by Schizochytriumlimacinum SR21. Clean Technol Environ Policy 18:2209–2216. doi:10.1007/s10098-016-1126-y
Methanol Institute (2017) The methanol industry. http://www.methanol.org/the-methanol-industry/. Accessed 05 January 2017
Posada JA, Rincón LE, Cardona CA (2012) Design and analysis of biorefineries based on raw glycerol: addressing the glycerol problem. Biores Technol 111:282–293. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2012.01.151
Quispe CAG, Coronado CJR, Carvalho JA Jr (2013) Glycerol: production, consumption, prices, characterization and new trends in combustion. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 27:475–493. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.06.017
Rahimpour MR, Ghader S, Baniadam M, Kalajahi JF (2003) Incorporating of flexibility in the design of a methanol synthesis loop in the presence of catalyst deactivation. Chem Eng Technol 26:672–678. doi:10.1002/ceat.200700209
Ramachandran R, Oudenhoven S, Kersten S, Van Rossum G, Van der Ham A (2013) Techno-economic analysis of biomethanol production via hybrid steam reforming of glycerol with natural gas. Energy Fuels 27:5962–5974. doi:10.1021/ef401323w
REN21 (2016) Renewables 2016: Global status report. http://www.ren21.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/GSR_2016_Full_Report.pdf. Accessed 14 December 2016
Rostrup-Nielsen JR (2002) Syngas in perspective. Catal Today 71:243–247. doi:10.1016/S0920-5861(01)00454-0
Silva GP, Mack M, Contiero J (2009) Glycerol: a promising and abundant carbon source for industrial microbiology. Biotechnol Adv 27:30–39. doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.07.006
Smith JM, Van Ness HC, Abbot MM (2005) Introduction to chemical engineering thermodynamics. McGraw-Hill, Boston
Tan HW, Abdul Aziz AR, Aroua MK (2013) Glycerol production and its applications as a raw material: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 27:118–127. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.06.035
Ulber D (2015) A guide to: methane reforming. Chem Eng. January, pp 40–46
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2008) Environmental laws applicable to construction and operation of biodiesel production facilities. http://biodiesel.org/docs/ffs-production/epa-guidance-for-biodiesel-producers.pdf?sfvrsn=4. Accessed 30 May 2017
Van den Bussche KM, Froment GF (1996) A steady-state kinetic model for methanol synthesis and the water gas shift reaction on a commercial Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 catalyst. J Catal 161:1–10
Wang X, Li S, Wang H, Liu B, Ma X (2008) Thermodynamic analysis of glycerin steam reforming. Energy Fuels 22:4285–4291. doi:10.1021/ef800487r
Yergin D (2012) The quest: energy, security, and the remaking of the modern world. Penguin Books, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
França, R.G.D., Souza, P.A., Lima, E.R.A. et al. An extended techno-economic analysis of the utilization of glycerol as an alternative feedstock for methanol production. Clean Techn Environ Policy 19, 1855–1865 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-017-1391-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-017-1391-4