Abstract
Recently, there has been a worldwide call to explore nature-friendly compounds, which could enhance plant growth and substitute for chemically synthesized products. Endophytes are a group of microorganisms that lives in the plants and algae symbiotically. In this research, endophytes were isolated from leaves of the halophyte, Limonium axillare. A total of 280 bacterial isolates were obtained from the leaves of L. axillare. Strains displaying similarities in terms of morphology and biochemical reactions were categorized into 48 groups. One representative from each group was identified and subjected to enzymatic and plant growth-promoting tests. Forty-eight isolates were identified using a sequence similarity-based method based on the 16S rDNA gene. The identified strains were categorized into two genera: Bacillus and Staphylococcus. Our investigation uncovered 44 isolates from the Bacillus genus, representing 10 different species, including Bacillus sp., B. pseudomycoides, B. cereus, B. paramycoides, B. velezensis, B. subtilis, B. thuringiensis, B. wiedmannii, B. anthracis, and B. bacterium. Furthermore, we observed that only 4 isolates belonged to the Staphylococcus genus, encompassing 3 distinct species: S. bacterium, S. succinus, and S. saprophyticus. The isolated bacteria were screened for extracellular enzymes, plant growth promoting traits, antifungal activity, and salinity tolerance. From the previous screening, diverse responses were obtained. Most of the isolates were secreted at least one of the hydrolysis enzymes (protease, lipase and amylase). (93.8%) of the strains showed phosphate solubilization activity. (33.3%) produce (IAA). Siderophore production potential was present in 91.7% of isolates, while ACC deaminase and HCN production activities were identified in 52.1 and 41.7% of strains, respectively. Additionally, DNase activity was evident in 27.1%, and ammonia production was observed in 31.3% of the isolates. The isolates Bacillus velezensis (AL4QUA) strain showed positive effect in the greenhouse experiment in terms of plant growth promoter agent and biocontrol agent against Fusarium oxysporum pathogen of tomato seedling. Thus, endophytes have the potential to reduce chemical inputs in conventional agricultural practices, increase nutrient uptake and improve plant stress resilience.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Halophytes are plants uniquely adapted to thrive in environments with elevated salt concentrations, showing a remarkable ability to tolerate high levels of salt. They have adapted to thrive in these conditions by developing specialized survival strategies (Flowers and Colmer 2008). One intriguing aspect of their adaptation is their association with endophytic microorganisms (Rodríguez-Llorente et al. 2019). Endophytes are microorganisms, including bacteria and fungi that reside within the internal tissues of plants without causing harm (Hallmann et al. 1997). These endophytes play a crucial role in enhancing the growth, stress tolerance, and overall fitness of halophytes to saline environments (Komaresofla et al. 2019). The study of halophyte-endophyte interactions, as well as its potential application in the field of sustainable agriculture, has received significant attention in recent years.
Endophytes play a key role in halophytes, but research has recently shed light on the diversity and functions of these organisms. The production of osmoprotectants, the promotion of nutrient uptake, or the modulation of plant hormone levels have been documented as mechanisms by which endophytic bacteria contribute to salt tolerance (Saberi Riseh et al. 2021; Mahgoub et al. 2021; Afridi et al. 2019). Additionally, fungal endophytes have been shown to enhance the production of secondary metabolites in halophytes, including antioxidants and antimicrobial compounds (Calado et al. 2021; Andhale 2021), which could have valuable applications in pharmaceuticals and biotechnological industries.
The interaction between halophytes and endophytes is not limited to salt tolerance alone. Endophytes have also been shown to confer resistance against various biotic stresses, including pathogen attacks and herbivory, thereby improving plant health and survival (Christakis et al. 2021; Singh et al. 2021; Ajijah et al. 2023). Furthermore, the presence of endophytes in halophytes has been linked to improved nutrient acquisition, water use efficiency, and overall plant growth (Ajijah et al. 2023; Choudhury et al. 2021).
A plant growth promotion (PGP) strategy involves the interaction of plants with certain microorganisms, such as bacteria, fungi, and archaea, that contribute to the health or development of plants (Compant et al. 2010). The PGP microorganisms establish symbiotic or associative relationships with plants and provide them with a range of benefits, such as nutrient acquisition, hormone production, disease suppression, and stress tolerance (Glick 2012). Over the past decade, PGP microorganisms have gained considerable attention as a promising approach to improving agricultural productivity and sustainability (Mishra et al. 2017; Omomowo and Babalola 2019). Among the primary mechanisms by which PGP microorganisms promote plant growth is by increasing nutrient availability and uptake (Glick 2012). Some rhizobacteria, such as Azospirillum and Pseudomonas, have been shown to solubilize phosphorus and increase its availability for plants (Robin et al. 2008). Leguminous plants benefit from symbiotic relationships with nitrogen-fixing bacteria such as Rhizobium and Bradyrhizobium (Giraud et al. 2007). In addition, PGP microorganisms produce hormones, particularly phytohormones that contribute to plant growth and development (Kurepin et al. 2014). The production of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) by certain bacteria promotes root development and nutrient uptake (Chhun et al. 2004). Other microorganisms, such as mycorrhizal fungi, produce gibberellins and cytokinins, which stimulate plant growth and flowering (Bona et al. 2015).
Plants possess diverse strategies to be protected from pathogens, including antagonistic interactions and the activation of mechanisms such as induced systemic resistance (Bae et al. 2011). Among the microorganisms capable of protection, plants against pathogens are endophytes (Afzal et al. 2019). Due to their location within the plant cell, these microorganisms are more protected from environmental stresses than Rhizobacteria are (Rana et al. 2020; Kuklinsky‐Sobral et al. 2004). This unique characteristic has prompted extensive research into their potential as biocontrol agents. Notably, recent findings have also highlighted their ability to enhance plant growth and overall health (Ji et al. 2014).
The endophytes hold promise as a potential biological control agent for bacterial and fungal pathogens, specific genera such as Bacillus, Streptomyces, Pseudomonas, Burkholderia, and Agrobacterium have received predominant attention in both research and commercial applications (Fravel 2005; Arguelles-Arias et al. 2009; Cawoy et al. 2015; Cao et al. 2018). In addition to proteins, peptides, lipopeptides, bacteriocins, and secondary metabolites, these microorganisms produce various compounds that have antibacterial activity against phytopathogens (Montesinos 2007; Zhao et al. 2014). Purification and characterization of each of these bioactive compounds can be accomplished by specific procedures.
Research has indicated that endophytic bacteria (EB) associated with halophytes can serve as valuable and environmentally friendly supplements to enhance the growth of plants, both halophytic and non-halophytic, in saline soils (Etesami and Beattie 2018). Consequently, there is a growing interest in exploring and harnessing the potential of endophytic resources linked to halophytes (Sofy et al. 2021; Kearl et al. 2019).
Fusarium oxysporum, a soil-borne pathogen, is responsible for causing extensive damage in multiple crop types. It is noteworthy that F. oxysporum is listed among the top ten economically harmful fungi, leading to substantial agricultural losses in crops such as banana, cotton, canola, and tomato, as documented by Dean et al. (2012). Employing broad-spectrum fungicides to control this fungus has led to environmental pollution and the development of resistance. As a more environmentally friendly alternative, the exploration of safe bio-control agents is highly recommended in the management of phytopathogene infections (Zheng et al. 2016).
Limonium axillare, (Forssk.) Kuntze, commonly known as the Mediterranean Sea lavender, is a halophytic plant species that belongs to the family Plumbaginaceae. It is native to coastal regions of the Mediterranean and exhibits remarkable adaptations to high salinity and arid conditions (Fig. 1). In recent years, there has been increasing interest in studying L. axillare due to its ecological significance, unique physiological adaptations, and potential applications in various fields. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first in its kind to isolate the bacterial endophytes from the halophyte L. axillare. Thus, the present study focuses on the isolation, purification, identification and biochemical characterization of any bacterial endophytes associated with the leaves of the halophyte L. axillare.
Our current study focused on four primary objectives: The first objective was to isolate bacterial endophytes from halophytic plants, aiming to uncover unique microbial strains thriving in these specific ecological niches. is the second objective was to conduct biochemical tests to evaluate the plant growth-promoting (PGP) potential of the isolated bacterial endophytes by subjecting the isolates to various assays, we aim to identify and characterize strains that exhibit significant capabilities in promoting plant growth. The third objective was to investigate the antagonistic properties of the isolated bacterial endophytes against fungal pathogens. Understanding how these microbes interact with and potentially control fungal pathogens is essential for exploring their role in biocontrol strategies. The fourth objective was to assess the specific impact of selected isolates on Fusarium oxysporum, a notable fungal pathogen. Moreover, preliminary observations indicate the growth-promoting effects of a highly efficient isolate on tomato plants exposed to the fungal pathogen F. oxysporum infection.
Materials and Methods
Study Sites and Sample Collection
The state of Qatar is located in the Arabian Gulf region (50° 45′–51° 40′ E longitude and 24° 40ʹ–26° 10ʹ N latitude) with an area of approximately 11,400 square kilometers. This region is characterized by warm and hyper-arid desert ecosystem. Qatar is hot and has dry weather; therefore, the temperature could exceed 45 °C during the summer months from July to August. Limonium axillare (Forssk.) Kuntze is native to Qatar and not endangered or threaten species. In the present study, the plant L. axillare was collected from two locations Al Thakhira coastal area (25° 42′ 4″ N, 51° 33′ 16″ E) and Qatar University protected field (25° 22′ 6″ N; 51° 29′ 35″ E). L. axillare was collected after proper authorizations and all methods were carried out in following relevant regulations. To isolate endophytes, 35 healthy plants were selected for sampling. Ten leaves from the middle of eachplant sample were collected (Total 350 leaves), stored properly in labeled plastic bags in an icebox, transferred to the lab, and stored in a refrigerator at 4 °C. The isolation process conducted within 0–24 h after collection.
Isolation of Endophytes
The collected leaf samples were cleaned by tap water to remove dust and any debris present followed by washing for several times with autoclaved distilled water. After that the leaves were surface-sterilized using methods as follows: leaf samples were immersed in sodium hypochlorite (5%) for 2 min, then immersed in sodium ethanol (70%) for 5 min, followed by washing in sterile distilled water for several times to eliminate agents of the sterilization process. The samples were then cut into pieces under aseptic conditions and the leaf pieces were placed into Petri dishes containing Nutrient Agar media. The plates then incubated at 30 °C for 24–48 h. The emerging endophytes were transferred onto new Petri plates for the purpose of purification and storage. The purified strains were preserved in 30% (v/v) glycerol and kept at − 20 °C for further use and long-term storage. To confirm the efficiency of the sterilization process in killing all epiphytic bacteria, an aliquot of sterile distilled water from the final rinse was plated on nutrient agar plates and incubated under similar conditions. If there is no microbial growth, then the leaf samples were considered surface sterilized. The endophyte colonization rate was calculated according to the following equation (Petrini and Carroll 1981).
Molecular Identification of Endophytes
The endophytic microbes were identified molecularly by genomic DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) extraction, PCR techniques, nucleotide sequencing, and phylogenetic analysis. Isolates were grown overnight on nutrient agar medium to obtain pure cultures. DNA was extracted from cells by thermal lysis (0.5 mL water suspension, boiling for 15 min, centrifugation for 4 min at 14 000 rpm). The supernatant from this reaction was used to amplify the PCR product. Amplification of the 16S rRNA fragment was done using primers (27F: 5′-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′ and 1492R: 5′- GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′). Amplicons were purified after amplification and sequenced by a sanger sequencer (3130/3130xl DNA Analyzers). The BLAST algorithm was used to find identical or related sequences in the NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information) Gene Bank database.
In Vitro Analysis of Hydrolytic Enzymes
All the endophytic bacterial isolates were screened for 3 enzymes (protease, lipase, and amylase). Skim milk agar medium was used to assess protease activity (van den Berg et al. 1993). For screening of amylase activity, the isolates were inoculated on starch agar plates (Dunican and Seeley 1962). In the case of lipid hydrolysis, tributyrin agar were used to detect the activity of lipase (Smeltzer et al. 1992). The assessments of the above enzymes were performed in triplicate for each assay.
Assessment of Characteristics of Plant Growth Promotion
An assessment of the growth-promoting traits of bacterial isolates was conducted based on the production of ammonia, the solubilization of inorganic phosphate, the production of siderophore, the production of IAA, the nitrogen fixation and the activity of ACC deaminases. The assessment of each activity was performed in triplicate for all assays.
Analysis of ammonia production was performed using a qualitative method. Bacterial isolates were tested for their ability to produce ammonia in peptone water. Each tube was inoculated with 10 mL peptone water using fresh-grown cultures and incubated for 48–72 h at 28 °C. In each tube, Nessler’s reagent (0.5 mL) was added. In a positive test for ammonia production, brown to yellow coloration was observed.
In order to determine the solubilization capacity of inorganic phosphate, bacteria isolates were spot-inoculated on modified Pikovskayas agar plates (mended with bromophenol blue dye) using tricalcium phosphate. After 7 days of incubation at 28 °C, phosphate solubilization was determined by the appearance of transparent halo zones around bacterial colonies.
For siderophores production assay. CAS blue agar plates were inoculated with 24 h old bacteria cultures to determine the production of siderophores. Incubation has been carried out for 7 days at 28 °C on CAS blue agar plates. The formation of orange zones around the growing colonies was indicative of the production of siderophores.
The screening of indole acetic acid (IAA) was carried out by inoculating one loop of 24 h old culture into 5 mL Tryptone water and incubating at 30 °C with shaking at 125 rpm for 2 days. After incubation, 1 mL of Kovac’s Indole reagent was added to the tube and mixed gently. The formation of bright pink color in the top layer indicates the positive result for indole.
ACC deaminase activity was determined by inoculating fresh bacterial isolates on the minimal agar plates amended with 3 mM ACC instead of (NH4)2SO4 as the sole nitrogen source. The inoculated plates were incubated at 30 °C for 3 days and growth was monitored daily. Colonies growing on the plates were considered ACC deaminase producers.
To investigate the potential of the bacterial isolate to be capable of nitrogen fixation, the fresh bacterial isolates were streaked on Norris glucose nitrogen free media and kept at 30 °C for 2 days to observe the growth. The colonies formed after incubation were transferred twice to the same medium plates in the same conditions to reconfirm their nitrogen fixation.
In Vitro Antagonism Assessment
Twenty-four bacterial isolates, which shows at least four positive results of plant growth promoting characteristics the antagonistic activity was evaluated using the dual culture method (Ganesan and Gnanamanickam 1987). Individual bacterial strains and fungi were co-cultured on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) medium. A mycelial plug with a diameter of 5 mm was obtained from the periphery of a 3-day-old fungal culture on PDA. This plug was positioned at the center of a 90 mm Petri dish. On two opposing sides of the plug, 24-h-old cultures of each bacterial strain were streaked in a straight line, maintaining a distance of 2.5 cm from the plug, ensuring that the bacterial streaks ran parallel to each other. Petri dishes without bacterial streaks were used as controls. The Petri dishes were then incubated at 25 °C. Each treatment was replicated 3 times. After 10 days of incubation, the fungal growth diameter was measured, and the percentage of mycelium inhibition over the control was calculated using the following formula.
here, ‘C’ represents the fungal mycelium’s maximum growth under control conditions, and ‘T’ represents the fungal mycelium growth in the treatment.
Tomato Plant Bioassay
Tomato Seeds Growth Conditions
Seeds of tomato Solanum lycopersicum L. (Alta, Pomodoro marglobe, Italy) were purchased from the local market. To promote seed germination and eliminate pathogens, the seeds were surface-sterilized by immersing them in sodium hypochlorite solution (5%) for 2 min and then ethanol (70%) for 3 min followed by rinsing with sterilized distilled water for about 3–5 min. Tomato seeds were planted in a tray filled with a 50% peat moss and 50% soil mixture that had been autoclaved. The tray received regular irrigation with tap water and was placed in a greenhouse environment (at 20 ± 2 °C with and a minimum photon flux density of 350 ± 50 µ moL m−2 s−1). After approximately 2 weeks from the initial sowing, the germinated seedlings were individually moved to 10 cm diameter plastic pots. These pots contained a sterile blend of peat moss and soil in a 1:1 ratio.
Bacterial Endophytic and Pathogenic Fungi Inoculum Preparation
The antagonistic bacterial strain (AL4QUA) was cultured on NA plates for 48 h. Subsequently, two loopful of a fresh bacterial culture were added to 5 mL of sterile distilled water and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min before application. In the pot experiment, each pot requiring bacterial treatment received 10 mL of a bacterial suspension (AL4QUA) in sterile distilled water with an optical density (OD600) of approximately 0.4. This treatment was carried out 1 week prior to inoculating the phytopathogenic fungi. The Fusarium oxysporum strain, which was supplied by Qatar University’s Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences. Cultivation of the F. oxysporum fungus was carried out on (PDA) medium for 1 week at 25 °C. The pathogen inoculum concentration, adjusted to roughly 108 spore/mL, was determined with the aid of a hemocytometer.
Greenhouse Experiment
2-week-old seedlings of tomato were transplanted in 10 cm diameter pots. Then, the plantlets were inoculated with bacterial endophyte (AL4QUA) and kept under greenhouse conditions. The experiment was one factor with four treatment levels in a completely randomized design and four replications. The treatments were as follows: (1) Untreated seedlings, (2) seedlings inoculated with bacterial endophyte (AL4QUA), (3) seedlings inoculated with the pathogen Fusarium oxisporum spore suspension and (4) seedlings that have been inoculated first (1 week earlier) with bacterial endophyte (AL4QUA) and then inoculated with the plant pathogen F. oxisporum. The last treatment mainly used to detect possible antagonism between the endopyte activity and the plant pathogen. No fertilizer or pesticide was used. The plant growth was observed daily up to 6 weeks for any disease symptoms. Weekly, leaf chlorophyll contents (using SPAD 502 Plus Chlorophyll Meter) and plant heights were measured. 6-weeks post treatment (harvesting time) all plants were separated from the soil and their roots were softly washed from soil deposits, and each plant were separated into two portions, the belowground (root) and the aboveground (shoot). Plant parts were placed separately in paper bags, oven dried at 80 °C for 72 h and then the dry weight (biomass) were measured.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the data, and statistical significance was attributed to P-values of ≤ 0.05. To make mean comparisons, Tukey’s test at a significance level of P ≤ 0.05 was performed, either between control and treated groups or among all treatment categories. Furthermore, Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was employed in order to assess the correlation between the microorganisms and the parameters measured in the tests. All data analyses were performed using OriginPro (Version 2023; OriginLab Corporation, USA).
Results
Isolation of Bacterial Endophytes
In this study, bacterial endophytes were isolated from fresh leaves of the halophytic plant Limonium axillare. Sterilization of the surface of sample explants was crucial for removing epiphytic microbes. Due to the absence of growth on the control plate, this step was satisfactory in our study. An adequate number of endophytes were observed on the edges of explants (leaf) on LB agar. As no growth was observed on control plates, these isolates were considered endophytes of plants. Several bacterial species were isolated based on the distinct characteristics of growth. A sum of 280 bacterial isolates were derived from L. axillare leaves. Strains with similar morphology and biochemical reactions were grouped into 48 categories. One representative from each category underwent enzymatic and plant growth-promoting (PGP) tests. Identification of these isolates relied on a sequence similarity-based method utilizing the 16S rDNA gene, leading to the identification of forty-eight isolates. The most predominant and diverse genus identified was Bacillus constituting 92% of the isolates with 10 different species. The rest of the bacterial isolates belong to Staphylococcus. The overall colonization rate of endophytic bacteria that colonize leaf segments was 78.7%.
Morphological and Molecular Characterization
The 16S rDNA region was subjected to PCR amplification employing the forward primer (27 F) and the reverse primer (1492 R), resulting in the generation of an amplicon with an approximate size of 1500 base pairs. These PCR products were subsequently subjected to bidirectional sequencing, utilizing both the forward (27 F) and reverse (1492 R) primers. The resulting nucleotide sequences were aligned to yield fragments ranging from about 1400 to 1500 base pairs in length. These aligned 16S rDNA nucleotide sequences were then deposited into the GenBank database and assigned unique accession numbers. Following BLASTn analysis of the 16S rRNA gene sequences, the endophytic bacterial isolates were identified, and a comprehensive account of these isolates and their closest genetic relatives, based on sequence similarity, is presented in (Table 1). The identified strains were classified into two genera, Bacillus and Staphylococcus. Our study revealed the presence of 44 isolates from the Bacillus genus, encompassing 10 different species (including Bacillus sp., B. pseudomycoides, B. cereus, B. paramycoides, B. velezensis, B. subtilis, B. thuringiensis, B. wiedmannii, B. anthracis, and B. bacterium). Additionally, we found that only 4 isolates belong to the Staphylococcus genus, covering 3 distinct species (S. bacterium, S. succinus, and S. saprophyticus) (Table 1).
A diverse array of biochemical, physiological, and morphological traits were examined in the initial stages to identify bacterial endophytes. The findings revealed distinctions among the bacterial species isolated from the leaves. The examination of bacterial colonies’ morphology revealed a diverse range of colony colors, which included shades of cream, yellow, off-white, and white colors. Subsequent Gram staining analysis revealed that 46 isolates, constituting 95.8% of the total, were characterized as Gram-positive endophytes, whereas 2 isolates, comprising 4.2%, were categorized as Gram-negative.
Biochemical Analysis of the Bacterial Endophytic Isolates
Biochemical tests for bacterial enzymes like protease, lipase, and amylase vary among different bacterial isolates. Out of the entire set of isolates, 42 (87.5%) exhibited lipase activity, with an equal number of 42 (87.5%) demonstrating protease activity. In contrast, only 16 isolates (33.3%) displayed amylase activity (Table 2) (Fig. 2).
Assessment of the Plant Growth-Promoting Features and Halotolerance Capability of the Isolates
All the 48 strains go through in vitro testing to assess seven distinct plant growth-promoting characteristics (Table 3, Fig. 2). Among the 48 isolates, diverse responses were observed in the plant growth-promoting tests, with 47 strains displaying a positive response to at least two of the PGP tests. Forty-five strains (93.8%) exhibited the formation of clearly visible and well-defined clearing zones on Pikovskaya media confirming the potential phosphate solubilization activity. Variations were observed in the biosynthesis of IAA (Indole-3-Acetic Acid) among the strains. A total of 16 strains (33.3%) demonstrated the capability to produce IAA. The CAS agar assay was used to assess the siderophore-producing potential of endophytes. Among the isolates, 44 isolates (91.7%) exhibited the capacity for siderophore production. Twenty-five strains (52.1%) verified the ability to thrive on a DF salt minimal agar medium supplemented with ACC, indicating their possession of ACC deaminase activity. HCN production ability was detected in 20 isolates (41.7%) of the isolates. DNase activity potential was evident in thirteen isolates, accounting for 27.1% of the total. Fifteen isolates (31.3%) were capable of producing ammonia. The salt tolerance of all 48 isolates was evaluated, and the findings revealed that each of them exhibited the ability to withstand of up to (6%) NaCl, while seventeen strains thrived in a medium with a salt concentration of up to (10%) NaCl (Table 3).
Principal Component Analysis (PCA) enabled the identification of potential relationships between variables and the assessed treatments. The primary component (PC1) accounted for the most significant portion of variability in the data, followed by subsequent components (PC2, PC3, etc.) representing the remaining variability. The correlation between the examined bacteria and their plant growth-promoting (PGP) capabilities, which included the production of IAA, siderophore, hydrogen cyanide, NH3, ACC deaminase activity, nitrogen fixation and phosphate solubilization, was analyzed using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) as depicted in (Fig. 3). PC1 explained 31.51% of the total variability, while PC2 accounted for 22.09%. Together, PC1 and PC2 represented 53.6% of the total variability. The graphical biplot demonstrated that the first component (PC1) strongly influenced siderophore production, phosphate solubilization, ammonia production, nitrogen fixation and the ACC deaminase enzyme, whereas PC2 exhibited an influence on the other evaluated characteristics (Fig. 3).
In Vitro Antagonistic Activities Against Fungal Pathogens
The potential antagonistic impact of bacterial endophytic isolates was assessed against various fungal phytopathogens, including Alternaria alternata, Botrytis cinerea, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, and Fusarium oxysporum. Antagonistic effectiveness was evaluated in strains that demonstrated a minimum of four positive results in PGP (Plant Growth-Promoting) tests. Consequently, a dual culture assay was conducted for 24 strains only (Table 4).
The bacterial endophytic isolates exhibited distinct responses when confronted with these fungal pathogens. Among them, 13 (54.2%), 15 (62.5%), 16 (66.7%), and 12 (50%) bacterial isolates demonstrated antagonistic behavior against Botrytis cinerea, Alternaria alternata, Fusarium oxysporum, and Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, respectively, as observed through the dual culture assay.
Table 4 reveals that only one endophyte out of the 24 isolates obtained from Limonium axillare exhibited inhibitory effects against all four types of pathogens. Specifically, Al4QU displayed remarkable inhibitory activity, with fungistatic effects of 78.0% ± 1.2% against B. cinerea, 75.2% ± 0.4 against A. alternata, 82.2% ± 0.2 against F. oxysporum, and 76.7% ± 0.3 against C. gloeosporioides.
Evaluating the Biocontrol and Growth Promotion Effects of Selected Endophyte AL4QUA (B. velezensis) on Tomato Seedlings
The strain AL4QUA showed strong in-vitro antagonistic activity against F. oxysporum (Fig. 4). Under greenhouse conditions, the strain AL4QUA [(B. velezensis) OQ254800.1] demonstrated strong efficacy in controlling tomato seedling growth. The outcomes of the plant growth promotion treatment revealed that strain AL4QUA significantly enhanced the growth of tomato plants within the greenhouse.
Seedlings exposed to the pathogen F. oxysporum exhibited adverse effects across all assessed parameters in comparison to other treatment groups. The biomass of these seedlings decreased by nearly 50% (as illustrated in Figs. 5, 6, 7, 8). Based on the figures, the growth and response of the tomato seedlings indicated significant differences (P ≤ 0.05) in fresh weight, dry weight, shoot length, and chlorophyll content. Conversely, seedlings exposed to both endophytes and the fungus displayed growth patterns comparable to or, in certain parameters, exceeding those of the untreated control group. These results suggest that the endophytes may have a potential positive impact on seedling growth and/or antagonistic properties against the pathogen.
Discussion
The influence of salinity stress, a significant abiotic factor impacting crop growth and yield, particularly in crops like tomato, emphasizes the importance of implementing sustainable agricultural practices (Chebotar et al. 2022; Akram et al. 2019; Verma et al. 2021; Vaishnav et al. 2019). Numerous rhizosphere bacteria known for their plant growth-promoting abilities have the capacity to alleviate the adverse impacts of abiotic stressors, such as salinity and heavy metals, through a range of direct and indirect mechanisms (Gkorezis et al. 2016; Albureikan 2023). These beneficial bacteria ultimately contribute to improved crop development and increased yields (Albureikan 2023). Isolating, identifying, and examination of endophytes derived from halophytes are as important as the examination of rhizosphere bacteria that inhibit the halophytes. In the current study, we have undertaken an investigation into the diverse bacterial endophytes present within the leaf tissues of the intriguing halophyte Limonium axillare, which thrives in arid and semi-arid environments. Our research explores these endophytes’ potential for promoting plant growth and their capacity for exhibiting antagonistic properties. To the best of our knowledge, this marks the initial isolation and examination of endophytes from Limonium axillare. Out of the 48 bacterial endophytes identified in this study, it was evident that Gram-positive bacteria, specifically, those belonging to the genus Bacillus, were the most prevalent. Our findings are consistent with prior research on the isolation of bacterial endophytes from Suaeda heteroptera, where Bacillus was similarly identified as the predominant genus of endophytic bacteria, accounting for 30.4% of the total isolates (Niu et al. 2011). Earlier research has consistently highlighted the prevalence of Bacillus spp. in diverse agro-climatic regions and environments subject to natural challenges (Misra and Chauhan 2020; Mokrani et al. 2020; Semwal et al. 2023; Misra et al. 2017). Furthermore, the outcomes of the 16S rRNA gene sequencing are consistent with recent reports that underscore the prominent role of Bacillus spp. as a crucial element in the plant endosphere (Cochard et al. 2022; Semwal et al. 2023; Christakis et al. 2021). The dominance of the Bacillus genus can be attributed to its greater adaptability to saline environments, as supported by studies (Sgroy et al. 2009; Yaish et al. 2015; Singh et al. 2021; Glick 2014).
In our research, all 48 isolates exhibited growth in the presence of 6% NaCl, while only 17 strains demonstrated growth in the presence of 10% NaCl. These strains hold great potential as candidates for the creation of bioinoculants, which could play a pivotal role in supporting salt soil phytoremediation efforts and alleviating salt-induced stress. Our findings align with earlier research focused on the isolation of endophytic bacteria from three halophytic plants, namely Cakile maritima, Matthiola tricuspidata, and Crithmum maritimum (Christakis et al. 2021). That study revealed that a substantial portion of their isolates exhibited growth tolerance at elevated salt concentrations ranging from 5 to 17% NaCl (Christakis et al. 2021). Furthermore, the results from both endophytic and rhizospheric bacteria isolated from Arthrocnemum macrostachyum demonstrated remarkable tolerance to salt levels of up to 10% NaCl (Khan et al. 2022).
Plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) have a crucial role in governing soil fertility, facilitating nutrient cycling, and enhancing plant growth. PGPB are well-known for their significant capability in secreting phytohormones such as indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), hydrolytic enzymes like (protease, lipase and amylase), production of various metabolites [siderophore, hydrogen cyanide (HCN), 1 aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid deaminase (ACC deaminase)], ammonia production and fixation of nitrogen (Lahlali et al. 2022; Tiwari et al. 2019; Ajijah et al. 2023). These compounds play a crucial role in enhancing plant growth and bolstering resistance to stress. Increasing nutrient availability in the soil by nitrogen fixation, phosphate solubilization and chelating iron by siderophore production. In this current study, the bacterial isolates exhibited significant potential in the production of various plant growth-promoting substances as reported in Table 3. Approximately (33.3%) of the bacterial isolates were capable of producing IAA, (52.1%) exhibited ACC deaminase activity, and a substantial (91.75%) demonstrated the ability to produce siderophores. These findings align with recent research that isolated multiple endophytic bacterial strains associated with halophytes, many of which exhibited unique plant growth-promoting traits; these findings demonstrate comprehensive enhancements in plant growth under saline stress (Sahu et al. 2023; Barcia-Piedras et al. 2023; Zhang et al. 2019; Kang et al. 2019). One of the primary plant growth-promoting (PGP) mechanisms involves ACC deaminase, which mitigates the impact of salt stress by reducing ethylene levels in plants (Dragojević et al. 2023; Madhaiyan et al. 2006; Glick 2014). While salt stress typically inhibits the synthesis of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) in plants, endophytic bacteria can compensate by producing their own IAA, promoting the growth of plant roots, stems, and leaves(Selvakumar et al. 2016; Choudhury et al. 2021). Another mechanism entails the production of siderophores, which not only dissolve soil iron for plant uptake but also deter plant pathogens (Christakis et al. 2021; Sorty et al. 2016; Zhou et al. 2017).
Furthermore, Limonium axillare harbored a wealth of endophytic bacteria possessing N2-fixation (27.1%) and phosphate-solubilization (93.8%) capabilities. The presence of such bacteria likely contributes to the ability of Limonium axillare to thrive in nutrient-poor soil, particularly in conditions with limited nitrogen and phosphorus availability.
The adverse impacts associated with chemical pesticides, such as phytotoxicity, pathogen resistance, and chemical residues, have ignited significant interest in the development of novel antimicrobial agents (Sorty et al. 2016; Shahzad et al. 2017). Endophytic bacteria have emerged as promising biocontrol alternatives due to their capacity to produce antimicrobial compounds, the presence of siderophores, and their ability to induce systemic resistance against plant diseases(Khan et al. 2018; Shahzad et al. 2017; Chen et al. 2021).
In the present study, the antimicrobial potential of a selected group of bacterial isolates (24 isolates) displaying at least four plant growth-promoting (PGP) traits was evaluated against four plant pathogens. Impressively, nearly all 24 strains exhibited substantial antimicrobial activity against two or more of the tested pathogens (as depicted in Table 4).
Bacillus species have been extensively researched for their potential as microbial biocontrol agents (Tian et al. 2020; Das et al. 2014; Beneduzi et al. 2012). These beneficial microorganisms, when applied in agriculture, can influence plant development and fruit production by enhancing nutrient uptake and engaging in a range of enzyme activities that counteract pathogenic bacteria and fungi (Fonseca et al. 2022; Beneduzi et al. 2012). The dual culture assay has proven to be an effective and valued qualitative method for the assessment of microorganisms’ antagonistic activities against fungal phytopathogens. We conducted a search for indigenous bacteria found in L.axillare that exhibited the potential to exert antagonistic effects on the four primary fungi responsible for crop losses, A. alternate, B. cinerea, C. gloeosporioides and F. oxysporum. Notably, recent reports have expanded our understanding of the disease-controlling capabilities of B. velezensis, underscoring their significance as biocontrol agents. For instance, Kim et al. (2021) highlighted the effectiveness of B. velezensis (AK-0) against C. gloeosporoides, the causal agent of apple bitter rot. Additionally, Palazzini et al. (2016) demonstrated, through greenhouse and field trials, that B. velezensis (RC 218) could reduce the severity of Fusarium head blight and the associated mycotoxin deoxynivalenol. Furthermore, B. velezensis (NKG2) exhibited in vitro antagonistic effects against several major fungal plant pathogens, including B. cinerea, A. alternata, Fusarium graminareum, Fusarium oxysporum, Fulvia fulva, and Ustilaginosa virens (Myo et al. 2019). Moreover, Chacón et al. (2022) isolated epiphytic bacteria Bacillus velezensis (BA3 and BA4) from blueberry and showed their antifungal activity against B. cinerea and A. alternate. The isolation of B. velezensis (TSA32-1) from the soil revealed its ability to exert antimicrobial activity against phytopathogenic fungi, manifested as the inhibition of Fusarium graminearum, F. fujikuroi, Alternatia alternate, and Diaporthe actinidiae growth (Kim et al. 2022).
Diseases pose a significant constraint on tomato cultivation, with fungal diseases being particularly troublesome. Fusarium oxysporum, a soil-borne hemibiotrophic fungal pathogen, significantly hampers tomato crop yields in both greenhouse and open-field environments. In the advanced stages of infection, this fungal pathogen infiltrates the xylem vessels, leading to a gradual wilting and, ultimately, the demise of the plant (Agrios 2005). F. oxysporum is a widely recognized plant ailment that inflicts substantial damage on a range of crops, both in the field and during postharvest storage global tomato production varies from year to year but consistently ranks among the top vegetables produced worldwide. In 2020, the global production of tomatoes was approximately 182 million metric tons, making it one of the most widely grown and consumed vegetables. Biocides have traditionally been employed as chemical means to manage soil-borne pathogens. Nevertheless, this approach poses environmental risks, and certain chemicals are no longer in use. Host resistance and the utilization of biocontrol agents are now supplanting these conventional methods of pest control (Herrera-Téllez et al. 2019). The results indicated that the endophytes might enhanced the growth of the seedlings and/or antagonize the pathogen. There are two mechanisms for endophyte to promote plant growth either directly or indirectly. Direct mechanism involves in the promoting of the plant growth by facilitating the gaining of required nutrients and by modulating the level of hormones within the plant. Such essential nutrients include phosphorus, iron and nitrogen (Santoyo et al. 2016). Endophytes either can involve in synthesizing several phytohormones such as cytokinin, gibberellin and auxin, or may involve in lowering the level of ethylene by synthesizing (ACC) enzyme that responsible for cleaves of the immediate precursor of ethylene (ACC) compounds (Hardoim et al. 2015). For the indirect promotion of the growth of plant, endophytes involve in inhibition of pathogens and parasites that caused plant diseases such as fungi, bacteria (Saini et al. 2015), insects and nematodes (Santoyo et al. 2016).
Conclusion
In summary, the B. velezensis (AL4QUA) strain, isolated from the halophyte Limonium axillare, exhibits promising potential for the effective management of phytopathogenic fungi. This positions it as a strong candidate for use as a biological control agent in the cultivation of local crops. Our findings not only corroborate previous reports on the in vitro bioactivities of this species but also mark a significant achievement in isolating antifungal B. velezensis strains from L. axillare and evaluating their effectiveness against fungal pathogens in both in vitro and in vivo settings. Future research will prioritize uncovering the mechanisms that underlie biological control, including the exploration of bioactive compounds. Additionally, complete genome sequencing of these potential agents will contribute to a better understanding of the genetic and physiological mechanisms driving their control over phytopathogenic fungi.
Data Availability
All data sets produced or examined in the current study are incorporated within this manuscript.
References
Afridi MS, Mahmood T, Salam A, Mukhtar T, Mehmood S, Ali J, Khatoon Z, Bibi M, Javed MT, Sultan T (2019) Induction of tolerance to salinity in wheat genotypes by plant growth promoting endophytes: involvement of ACC deaminase and antioxidant enzymes. Plant Physiol Biochem 139:569–577
Afzal I, Shinwari ZK, Sikandar S, Shahzad S (2019) Plant beneficial endophytic bacteria: Mechanisms, diversity, host range and genetic determinants. Microbiol Res 221:36–49
Agrios GN (2005) Plant pathology. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Ajijah N, Fiodor A, Pandey AK, Rana A, Pranaw K (2023) Plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) with biofilm-forming ability: a multifaceted agent for sustainable agriculture. Diversity 15:112
Akram W, Aslam H, Ahmad SR, Anjum T, Yasin NA, Khan WU, Ahmad A, Guo J, Tingquan Wu, Luo W (2019) Bacillus megaterium strain A12 ameliorates salinity stress in tomato plants through multiple mechanisms. J Plant Interact 14:506–518
Albureikan MOI (2023) Rhizosphere microorganisms with different strategies and mechanisms to enhance plant growth in the occurrence of different environmental stress factors. J Pure Appl Microbiol 17:1341
Andhale NB (2021) Endophytic fungi associated with Plumbago zeylanica L. and their effect on secondary metabolite production
Arguelles-Arias A, Ongena M, Halimi B, Lara Y, Brans A, Joris B, Fickers P (2009) Bacillus amyloliquefaciens GA1 as a source of potent antibiotics and other secondary metabolites for biocontrol of plant pathogens. Microb Cell Fact 8:1–12
Bae H, Roberts DP, Lim H-S, Strem MD, Park S-C, Ryu C-M, Melnick RL, Bailey BA (2011) Endophytic trichoderma isolates from tropical environments delay disease onset and induce resistance against Phytophthora capsici in hot pepper using multiple mechanisms. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 24:336–351
Barcia-Piedras JM, Pérez-Romero JA, Mateos-Naranjo E, Parra R, Rodríguez-Llorente ID, Camacho M, Redondo-Gómez S (2023) Stimulation of PGP bacteria on the development of seeds, plants and cuttings of the obligate halophyte arthrocaulon (Arthrocnemum) macrostachyum (Moric.) Piirainen & G. Kadereit. Plants 12:1436
Beneduzi A, Ambrosini A, Passaglia LMP (2012) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): their potential as antagonists and biocontrol agents. Genet Mol Biol 35:1044–1051
Bona E, Lingua G, Manassero P, Cantamessa S, Marsano F, Todeschini V, Copetta A, D’Agostino G, Massa N, Avidano L (2015) AM fungi and PGP pseudomonads increase flowering, fruit production, and vitamin content in strawberry grown at low nitrogen and phosphorus levels. Mycorrhiza 25:181–193
Calado M, da Luz J, Silva CA, Susano P, Santos D, Alves J, Martins A, Gaspar H, Pedrosa R, Campos MJ (2021) Marine endophytic fungi associated with Halopteris scoparia (Linnaeus) Sauvageau as producers of bioactive secondary metabolites with potential dermocosmetic application. PLoS ONE 16:e0250954
Cao Yu, Pi H, Chandrangsu P, Li Y, Wang Y, Zhou H, Xiong H, Helmann JD, Cai Y (2018) Antagonism of two plant-growth promoting Bacillus velezensis isolates against Ralstonia solanacearum and Fusarium oxysporum. Sci Rep 8:4360
Cawoy H, Debois D, Franzil L, De Pauw E, Thonart P, Ongena M (2015) Lipopeptides as main ingredients for inhibition of fungal phytopathogens by Bacillus subtilis/amyloliquefaciens. Microb Biotechnol 8:281–295
Chacón FI, Sineli PE, Mansilla FI, Pereyra MM, Diaz MA, Volentini SI, Poehlein A, Meinhardt F, Daniel R, Dib JR (2022) Native cultivable bacteria from the blueberry microbiome as novel potential biocontrol agents. Microorganisms 10:969
Chebotar VK, Chizhevskaya EP, Baganova ME, Keleinikova OV, Yuzikhin OS, Zaplatkin AN, Khonina OV, Kostitsin RD, Lapenko NG (2022) Endophytes from halotolerant plants aimed to overcome salinity and draught. Plants 11:2992
Chen Z, Zhao Lu, Dong Y, Chen W, Li C, Gao X, Chen R, Li L, Zhengjun Xu (2021) The antagonistic mechanism of Bacillus velezensis ZW10 against rice blast disease: evaluation of ZW10 as a potential biopesticide. PLoS ONE 16:e0256807
Chhun T, Taketa S, Tsurumi S, Ichii M (2004) Different behaviour of indole-3-acetic acid and indole-3-butyric acid in stimulating lateral root development in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Growth Regul 43:135–143
Choudhury AR, Choi J, Walitang DI, Trivedi P, Lee Y, Sa T (2021) ACC deaminase and indole acetic acid producing endophytic bacterial co-inoculation improves physiological traits of red pepper (Capsicum annum L.) under salt stress. J Plant Physiol 267:153544
Christakis CA, Daskalogiannis G, Chatzaki A, Markakis EA, Mermigka G, Sagia A, Sarris PF (2021) Endophytic bacterial isolates from halophytes demonstrate phytopathogen biocontrol and plant growth promotion under high salinity. Front Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.681567
Cochard B, Giroud B, Crovadore J, Chablais R, Arminjon L, Lefort F (2022) Endophytic PGPR from tomato roots: isolation, in vitro characterization and in vivo evaluation of treated tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Microorganisms 10:765
Compant S, Clément C, Sessitsch A (2010) Plant growth-promoting bacteria in the rhizo-and endosphere of plants: their role, colonization, mechanisms involved and prospects for utilization. Soil Biol Biochem 42:669–678
Das R, Mondal B, Mondal P, Khatua DC, Mukherjee N (2014) Biological management of citrus canker on acid lime through Bacillus subtilis (S-12) in West Bengal, India. J Biopest 7:38
Dean R, Van Kan JAL, Pretorius ZA, Hammond-Kosack KE, Di Pietro A, Spanu PD, Rudd JJ, Dickman M, Kahmann R, Ellis J (2012) The Top 10 fungal pathogens in molecular plant pathology. Mol Plant Pathol 13:414–430
Dragojević M, Stankovic N, Djokic L, Raičević V, Jovičić-Petrović J (2023) Endorhizosphere of indigenous succulent halophytes: a valuable resource of plant growth promoting bacteria. Environ Microb 18:1–16
Dunican LK, Seeley HW (1962) Starch hydrolysis by Streptococcus equinus. J Bacteriol 83:264–269
Etesami H, Beattie GA (2018) Mining halophytes for plant growth-promoting halotolerant bacteria to enhance the salinity tolerance of non-halophytic crops. Front Microbiol 9:148
Flowers TJ, Colmer TD (2008) Salinity tolerance in halophytes. New Phytol 179:945
Fonseca MDCD, Bossolani JW, de Oliveira SL, Moretti LG, Portugal JR, Scudeletti D, Crusciol CAC (2022) Bacillus subtilis inoculation improves nutrient uptake and physiological activity in sugarcane under drought stress. Microorganisms 10:809
Fravel DR (2005) Commercialization and implementation of biocontrol. Annu Rev Phytopathol 43:337–359
Ganesan P, Gnanamanickam SS (1987) Biological control of Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc. in peanut by inoculation with Pseudomonas fluorescens. Soil Biol Biochem 19:35–38
Giraud E, Moulin L, Vallenet D, Barbe V, Cytryn E, Avarre J-C, Jaubert M, Simon D, Cartieaux F, Prin Y (2007) Legumes symbioses: absence of Nod genes in photosynthetic bradyrhizobia. Science 316:1307–1312
Gkorezis P, Daghio M, Franzetti A, Van Hamme JD, Sillen W, Vangronsveld J (2016) The interaction between plants and bacteria in the remediation of petroleum hydrocarbons: an environmental perspective. Front Microbiol 7:1836
Glick BR (2012) Plant growth-promoting bacteria: mechanisms and applications. Scientifica 2012:1–15
Glick BR (2014) Bacteria with ACC deaminase can promote plant growth and help to feed the world. Microbiol Res 169:30–39
Hallmann J, Quadt-Hallmann A, Mahaffee WF, Kloepper JW (1997) Bacterial endophytes in agricultural crops. Can J Microbiol 43:895–914
Hardoim PR, Van Overbeek LS, Berg G, Pirttilä AM, Compant S, Campisano A, Döring M, Sessitsch A (2015) The hidden world within plants: ecological and evolutionary considerations for defining functioning of microbial endophytes. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 79:293–320
Herrera-Téllez VI, Cruz-Olmedo AK, Plasencia J, Gavilanes-Ruíz M, Arce-Cervantes O, Hernández-León S, Saucedo-García M (2019) The protective effect of Trichoderma asperellum on tomato plants against Fusarium oxysporum and Botrytis cinerea diseases involves inhibition of reactive oxygen species production. Int J Mol Sci 20:2007
Ji SH, Gururani MA, Chun S-C (2014) Isolation and characterization of plant growth promoting endophytic diazotrophic bacteria from Korean rice cultivars. Microbiol Res 169:83–98
Kang S-M, Shahzad R, Bilal S, Khan AL, Park Y-G, Lee K-E, Asaf S, Khan MA, Lee I-J (2019) Indole-3-acetic-acid and ACC deaminase producing Leclercia adecarboxylata MO1 improves Solanum lycopersicum L. growth and salinity stress tolerance by endogenous secondary metabolites regulation. BMC Microbiol 19:1–14
Kearl J, Caitlyn McNary J, Lowman S, Mei C, Aanderud ZT, Smith ST, West J, Colton E, Hamson M, Nielsen BL (2019) Salt-tolerant halophyte rhizosphere bacteria stimulate growth of alfalfa in salty soil. Front Microbiol 10:1849
Khan N, Martínez-Hidalgo P, Ice TA, Maymon M, Humm EA, Nejat N, Sanders ER, Kaplan D, Hirsch AM (2018) Antifungal activity of Bacillus species against Fusarium and analysis of the potential mechanisms used in biocontrol. Front Microbiol 9:2363
Khan T, Alzahrani OM, Sohail M, Hasan KA, Gulzar S, Rehman AU, Mahmoud SF, Alswat AS, Abdel-Gawad SA (2022) Enzyme profiling and identification of endophytic and rhizospheric bacteria isolated from Arthrocnemum macrostachyum. Microorganisms 10:2112
Kim YS, Lee Y, Cheon W, Park J, Kwon H-T, Balaraju K, Kim J, Yoon YJ, Jeon Y (2021) Characterization of Bacillus velezensis AK-0 as a biocontrol agent against apple bitter rot caused by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. Sci Rep 11:626
Kim J-A, Song J-S, Kim PI, Kim D-H, Kim Y (2022) Bacillus velezensis TSA32-1 as a promising agent for biocontrol of plant pathogenic fungi. J Fungi 8:1053
Komaresofla BR, Alikhani HA, Etesami H, Khoshkholgh-Sima NA (2019) Improved growth and salinity tolerance of the halophyte Salicornia sp. by co–inoculation with endophytic and rhizosphere bacteria. Appl Soil Ecol 138:160–170
Kuklinsky-Sobral J, Araújo WL, Mendes R, Geraldi IO, Pizzirani-Kleiner AA, Azevedo JL (2004) Isolation and characterization of soybean-associated bacteria and their potential for plant growth promotion. Environ Microbiol 6:1244–1251
Kurepin LV, Zaman M, Pharis RP (2014) Phytohormonal basis for the plant growth promoting action of naturally occurring biostimulators. J Sci Food Agric 94:1715–1722
Lahlali R, Ezrari S, Radouane N, Kenfaoui J, Esmaeel Q, El Hamss H, Belabess Z, Barka EA (2022) Biological control of plant pathogens: a global perspective. Microorganisms 10:596
Madhaiyan M, Poonguzhali S, Ryu J, Sa T (2006) Regulation of ethylene levels in canola (Brassica campestris) by 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase-containing Methylobacterium fujisawaense. Planta 224:268–278
Mahgoub HAM, Fouda A, Eid AM, Ewais E-D, Hassan S-D (2021) Biotechnological application of plant growth-promoting endophytic bacteria isolated from halophytic plants to ameliorate salinity tolerance of Vicia faba L. Plant Biotechnol Rep 15:819–843
Mishra J, Singh R, Arora NK (2017) Plant growth-promoting microbes: diverse roles in agriculture and environmental sustainability. Probiotics and plant health. Springer, Singapore, pp 71–111
Misra S, Chauhan PS (2020) ACC deaminase-producing rhizosphere competent Bacillus spp. mitigate salt stress and promote Zea mays growth by modulating ethylene metabolism. Biotech 10:119
Misra S, Dixit VK, Khan MH, Mishra SK, Dviwedi G, Yadav S, Lehri A, Chauhan PS (2017) Exploitation of agro-climatic environment for selection of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) deaminase producing salt tolerant indigenous plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Microbiol Res 205:25–34
Mokrani S, Nabti E-H, Cruz C (2020) Current advances in plant growth promoting bacteria alleviating salt stress for sustainable agriculture. Appl Sci 10:7025
Montesinos E (2007) Antimicrobial peptides and plant disease control. FEMS Microbiol Lett 270:1–11
Myo EM, Liu B, Ma J, Shi L, Jiang M, Zhang K, Ge B (2019) Evaluation of Bacillus velezensis NKG-2 for bio-control activities against fungal diseases and potential plant growth promotion. Biol Control 134:23–31
Niu XG, Han M, Song LC, Xiao YN (2011) Identification of endophytic bacteria and preliminary research on their growth-promoting effect under salt stress in Suaeda heteroptera Kitag. J Shenyang Agric Univ 42:698–702
Omomowo OI, Babalola OO (2019) Bacterial and fungal endophytes: tiny giants with immense beneficial potential for plant growth and sustainable agricultural productivity. Microorganisms 7:481
Palazzini JM, Dunlap CA, Bowman MJ, Chulze SN (2016) Bacillus velezensis RC 218 as a biocontrol agent to reduce Fusarium head blight and deoxynivalenol accumulation: genome sequencing and secondary metabolite cluster profiles. Microbiol Res 192:30–36
Petrini O, Carroll G (1981) Endophytic fungi in foliage of some Cupressaceae in Oregon. Can J Bot 59:629–636
Rana KL, Kour D, Kaur T, Devi R, Yadav AN, Yadav N, Dhaliwal HS, Saxena AK (2020) Endophytic microbes: biodiversity, plant growth-promoting mechanisms and potential applications for agricultural sustainability. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 113:1075–1107
Riseh S, Roohallah M-Z, Tamanadar E, Pour MM, Thakur VK (2021) Salinity stress: toward sustainable plant strategies and using plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria encapsulation for reducing it. Sustainability 13:12758
Robin A, Vansuyt G, Hinsinger P, Meyer JM, Briat J-F, Lemanceau P (2008) Iron dynamics in the rhizosphere: consequences for plant health and nutrition. Adv Agron 99:183–225
Rodríguez-Llorente ID, Pajuelo E, Navarro-Torre S, Mesa-Marín J, Caviedes MA (2019) ’Bacterial endophytes from halophytes: how do they help plants to alleviate salt stress? Saline soil-based agriculture by halotolerant microorganisms. Springer, Singapore, pp 147–60
Sahu PK, Shafi Z, Singh S, Khushboo Ojha K, Jayalakshmi JT, Manzar N, Sharma PK, Srivastava AK (2023) Colonization potential of endophytes from halophytic plants growing in the “Runn of Kutch” salt marshes and their contribution to mitigating salt stress in tomato cultivation. Front Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1226149
Saini R, Dudeja SS, Giri R, Kumar V (2015) Isolation, characterization, and evaluation of bacterial root and nodule endophytes from chickpea cultivated in Northern India. J Basic Microbiol 55:74–81
Santoyo G, Moreno-Hagelsieb G, CarmenOrozco-Mosqueda Ma, Glick BR (2016) Plant growth-promoting bacterial endophytes. Microbiol Res 183:92–99
Selvakumar G, Krishnamoorthy R, Kim K, Sa T-M (2016) Genetic diversity and association characters of bacteria isolated from arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal spore walls. PLoS ONE 11:e0160356
Semwal P, Misra S, Misra A, Kar S, Majhi B, Mishra SK, Srivastava S, Chauhan PS (2023) Endophytic Bacillus strains enhance biomass and bioactive metabolites of Gloriosa superba. Ind Crops Prod 204:117296
Sgroy V, Cassán F, Masciarelli O, Papa MFD, Lagares A, Luna V (2009) Isolation and characterization of endophytic plant growth-promoting (PGPB) or stress homeostasis-regulating (PSHB) bacteria associated to the halophyte Prosopis strombulifera. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 85:371–381
Shahzad R, Khan AL, Bilal S, Asaf S, Lee I-J (2017) Plant growth-promoting endophytic bacteria versus pathogenic infections: an example of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens RWL-1 and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici in tomato. PeerJ 5:e3107
Singh S, Ghadge VA, Kumar P, Mathew DE, Dhimmar A, Sahastrabudhe H, Nalli Y, Rathod MR, Shinde PB (2021) Biodiversity and antimicrobial potential of bacterial endophytes from halophyte Salicornia brachiata. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 114:591–608
Smeltzer MS, Hart ME, Iandolo JJ (1992) Quantitative spectrophotometric assay for Staphylococcal lipase. Appl Environ Microbiol 58:2815–2819
Sofy MR, Aboseidah AA, Heneidak SA, Ahmed HR (2021) ACC deaminase containing endophytic bacteria ameliorate salt stress in Pisum sativum through reduced oxidative damage and induction of antioxidative defense systems. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:40971–40991
Sorty AM, Meena KK, Choudhary K, Bitla UM, Minhas PS, Krishnani KK (2016) Effect of plant growth promoting bacteria associated with halophytic weed (Psoralea corylifolia L.) on germination and seedling growth of wheat under saline conditions. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 180:872–882
Tian Z, Chen C, Chen K, Liu P, Fan Q, Zhao J, Long C-A (2020) Biocontrol and the mechanisms of Bacillus sp. w176 against postharvest green mold in citrus. Postharvest Biol Technol 159:111022
Tiwari S, Prasad V, Lata C (2019) Bacillus: Plant growth promoting bacteria for sustainable agriculture and environment. New and future developments in microbial biotechnology and bioengineering. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Vaishnav A, Shukla AK, Sharma A, Kumar R, Choudhary DK (2019) Endophytic bacteria in plant salt stress tolerance: current and future prospects. J Plant Growth Regul 38:650–668
van den Berg DJC, Smits A, Pot B, Ledeboer AM, Kersters K, Verbake JMA, Theo Verrips C (1993) Isolation, screening and identification of lactic acid bacteria from traditional food fermentation processes and culture collections. Food Biotechnol 7:189–205
Verma H, Kumar D, Kumar V, Kumari M, Singh SK, Sharma VK, Droby S, Santoyo G, White JF, Kumar A (2021) The potential application of endophytes in management of stress from drought and salinity in crop plants. Microorganisms 9:1729
Yaish MW, Antony I, Glick BR (2015) Isolation and characterization of endophytic plant growth-promoting bacteria from date palm tree (Phoenix dactylifera L.) and their potential role in salinity tolerance. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 107:1519–1532
Zhang C, Tian XY, Zhang C-S (2019) Diversity and probiotic activities of endophytic bacteria associated with the coastal halophyte Messerschmidia sibirica. Appl Soil Ecol 143:35–44
Zhao Y, Selvaraj JN, Fuguo Xing Lu, Zhou YW, Song H, Tan X, Sun L, Sangare L, Folly YME (2014) Antagonistic action of Bacillus subtilis strain SG6 on Fusarium graminearum. PLoS ONE 9:e92486
Zheng Y-K, Qiao X-G, Miao C-P, Liu K, Chen Y-W, Li-Hua Xu, Zhao L-X (2016) Diversity, distribution and biotechnological potential of endophytic fungi. Ann Microbiol 66:529–542
Zhou Na, Zhao S, Tian C-Y (2017) Effect of halotolerant rhizobacteria isolated from halophytes on the growth of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) under salt stress. FEMS Microbiol Lett 364:fnx091
Acknowledgements
We would like to thanks Miss Rawan Alasmar and Miss Fatma Amara for their assistance in the lab work. The authors are thankful to Mrs. Muneera Al Mesaifri (Herbarium supervisor at Qatar University) for her help in the field trips for sample collection.
Funding
Open Access funding provided by the Qatar National Library. Open Access funding provided by the Qatar National Library. This work was supported by the Qatar National Research Fund (a member of Qatar Foundation). UREP award [UREP 25-065-1-007].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
FA and MHA designed the study, FA and ZB performed the experiments, FA, MHA, analyzed the results, FA wrote the manuscript. MHA edited the manuscript. MHA reviewed the manuscript and MHA supervised the work.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Handling Author: Showkat kanie.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Alhaddad, F.A., Bitaar, Z.M. & Abu-Dieyeh, M.H. Diversity, Characterization, and Potential Applications of Bacterial Endophytes Isolated from the Halophyte Limonium axillare. J Plant Growth Regul (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-024-11254-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-024-11254-6