Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic transformation of sweet sorghum

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Plant Cell Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sweet sorghum has substantial potential as a biofuel feedstock, with advantages in some environments over alternatives such as sugarcane or maize. Gene technologies are likely to be important to achieve yields sufficient for food, fuel and fibre production from available global croplands, but sorghum has proven difficult to transform. Tissue culture recalcitrance and poor reproducibility of transformation protocols remain major challenges for grain sorghum, and there has been no reported success for sweet sorghum. Here we describe a repeatable transformation system for sweet sorghum, based on (1) optimized tissue culture conditions for embryogenic callus production with >90% regenerability in 12-week-old calli, and (2) an effective selection regimen for hygromycin resistance conferred by a Ubi-hpt transgene following particle bombardment. Using this method, we have produced sixteen independent transgenic lines from multiple batches at an overall efficiency of 0.09% transformants per excised immature embryo. Co-expression frequency of a non-selected luciferase reporter was 62.5%. Transgene integration and expression were confirmed in T0 and T1 plants by Southern analysis and luciferase assays. This success using the major international sweet sorghum cultivar Ramada provides a foundation for molecular improvement of sweet sorghum through the use of transgenes. Factors likely to be important for success with other sweet sorghum cultivars are identified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Able JA, Rathus C, Godwin ID (2001) The investigation of optimal bombardment parameters for transient and stable transgene expression in sorghum. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 37:341–348

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ali ML, Rajewski JF, Baenziger PS, Gill KS, Eskridge KM, Dweikat I (2008) Assessment of genetic diversity and relationship among a collection of US sweet sorghum germplasm by SSR markers. Mol Breed 21:497–509

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ash C, Jasny BR, Malakoff DA, Sugden AM (2010) Feeding the future: introduction to special issue on food security. Science 327:797

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bevan M (1984) Binary Agrobacterium vectors for plant transformation. Nucleic Acids Res 12:8711–8721

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskaran S, Smith RH (1989) Control of morphogenesis in sorghum by 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid and cytokinins. Ann Bot 64:217–224

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bower R, Elliott AR, Potier BAM, Birch RG (1996) High-efficiency, microprojectile-mediated cotransformation of sugarcane, using visible or selectable markers. Mol Breed 2:239–249

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cai T, Butler L (1990) Plant regeneration from embryogenic callus initiated from immature inflorescences of several high-tannin sorghums. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 20:101–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai T, Daly B, Butler L (1987) Callus induction and plant regeneration from shoot portions of mature embryos of high tannin sorghums. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 9:245–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho CHS, Zehr UB, Gunaratna N, Anderson J, Kononowicz HH, Hodges TK, Axtell JD (2004) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of sorghum: factors that affect transformation efficiency. Genet Mol Biol 27:259–269

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Casas AM, Kononowicz AK, Zehr UB, Tomes DT, Axtell JD, Butler LG, Bressan RA, Hasegawa PM (1993) Transgenic sorghum plants via microprojectile bombardment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:11212–11216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cho MJ, Jiang W, Lemaux PG (1998) Transformation of recalcitrant barley cultivars through improvement of regenerability and decreased albinism. Plant Sci 138:229–244

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cho MJ, Jiang W, Lemaux PG (1999) High-frequency transformation of oat via microprojectile bombardment of seed-derived highly regenerative cultures. Plant Sci 148:9–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen AH, Quail PH (1996) Ubiquitin promoter-based vectors for high-level expression of selectable and/or screenable marker genes in monocotyledonous plants. Transgenic Res 5:213–218

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1990) Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12:13–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Elhag H, Butler LG (1992) Effect of genotype, explant age and medium composition on callus production and plant-regeneration from immature embryos of sorghum. Arab Gulf J Sci Res 10:109–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkonin LA, Pakhomova NV (2000) Influence of nitrogen and phosphorus on induction embryogenic callus of sorghum. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 61:115–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emani C, Sunilkumar G, Rathore KS (2002) Transgene silencing and reactivation in sorghum. Plant Sci 162:181–192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gao ZS, Xie XJ, Ling Y, Muthukrishnan S, Liang GH (2005) Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated sorghum transformation using a mannose selection system. Plant Biotechnol J 3:591–599

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Girijashankar V, Sharma HC, Sharma KK, Swathisree V, Prasad LS, Bhat BV, Royer M, Secundo BS, Narasu ML, Altosaar I, Seetharama N (2005) Development of transgenic sorghum for insect resistance against the spotted stem borer (Chilo partellus). Plant Cell Rep 24:513–522

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Green CE, Phillips RL (1975) Plant regeneration from tissue cultures of maize. Crop Sci 15:417–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gritz L, Davies J (1983) Plasmid-encoded hygromycin-B resistance: the sequence of hygromycin-B phosphotransferase gene and its expression in Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Gene 25:179–188

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gurel S, Gurel E, Kaur R, Wong J, Meng L, Tan HQ, Lemaux PG (2009) Efficient, reproducible Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of sorghum using heat treatment of immature embryos. Plant Cell Rep 28:429–444

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hagio T (1994) Varietal difference of plant regeneration from callus of sorghum mature seed. Breed Sci 44:121–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanzel JJ, Miller JP, Brinkman MA, Fendos E (1985) Genotype and media effects on callus formation and regeneration in barley. Crop Sci 25:27–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinz DJ, Mee GWP (1969) Plant differentiation from callus tissue of Saccharum species. Crop Sci 9:346–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry RJ (2010) Evaluation of plant biomass resources available for replacement of fossil oil. Plant Biotechnol J 8:288–293

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howe A, Sato S, Dweikat I, Fromm M, Clemente T (2006) Rapid and reproducible Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of sorghum. Plant Cell Rep 25:784–791

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lu L, Wu XR, Yin XY, Morrand J, Chen XL, Folk WR, Zhang ZYJ (2009) Development of marker-free transgenic sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] using standard binary vectors with bar as a selectable marker. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 99:97–108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig SR, Bowen B, Beach L, Wessler SR (1990) A regulatory gene as a novel visible marker for maize transformation. Science 247:449–450

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lusardi MC, Lupotto E (1990) Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration in Sorghum species. Maydica 35:59–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma HT, Gu MH, Liang GH (1987) Plant regeneration from cultured immature embryos of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. Theor Appl Genet 73:389–394

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mackinnon C, Gunderson G, Nabors MW (1986) Plant regeneration by somatic embryogenesis from callus cultures of sweet sorghum. Plant Cell Rep 5:349–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudge SR, Lewis-Henderson W, Birch RG (1996) Comparison of Vibrio and firefly luciferases as reporter gene systems for use in bacteria and plants. Aust J Plant Physiol 23:75–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murray SC, Rooney WL, Hamblin MT, Mitchell SE, Kresovich S (2009) Sweet sorghum genetic diversity and association mapping for brix and height. Plant Genome 2:48–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen TV, Thu TT, Claeys M, Angenon G (2006) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) using an improved in vitro regeneration system. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 91:155–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nirwan RS, Kothari SL (2003) High copper levels improve callus induction and plant regeneration in Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 39:161–164

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rao AM, Sree KP, Kishor PBK (1995) Enhanced plant regeneration in grain and sweet sorghum by asparagine, proline and cefotaxime. Plant Cell Rep 15:72–75

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rooney WL, Blumenthal J, Bean B, Mullet JE (2007) Designing sorghum as a dedicated bioenergy feedstock. Biofuels Bioprod Bioref 1:147–157

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sai NS, Visarada K, Lakshmi YA, Pashupatinath E, Rao SV, Seetharama N (2006) In vitro culture methods in sorghum with shoot tip as the explant material. Plant Cell Rep 25:174–182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sato S, Clemente T, Dweikat I (2004) Identification of an elite sorghum genotype with high in vitro performance capacity. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 40:57–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears RG, Deckard EL (1982) Tissue-culture variability in wheat callus induction and plant regeneration. Crop Sci 22:546–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherf BA, Wood KV (1994) Firefly luciferase engineered for improved genetic reporting. Promega Notes 49:14–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Tadesse Y, Sagi L, Swennen R, Jacobs M (2003) Optimisation of transformation conditions and production of transgenic sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) via microparticle bombardment. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 75:1–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wernicke W, Brettell RIS (1982) Morphogenesis from cultured leaf tissue of Sorghum bicolor: culture initiation. Protoplasma 111:19–27

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams SB, Gray SJ, Laidlaw HKC, Godwin ID (2004) Particle inflow gun-mediated transformation of Sorghum bicolor. In: Curtis IS (ed) Transgenic crops of the world: essential protocols. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 89–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao ZY, Cai TS, Tagliani L, Miller M, Wang N, Pang H, Rudert M, Schroeder S, Hondred D, Seltzer J, Pierce D (2000) Agrobacterium-mediated sorghum transformation. Plant Mol Biol 44:789–798

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Mona Singh, Alam Cheng, Amanda Johnson for outstanding technical assistance. This research was supported through a collaboration between CSR Sugar Limited and The University of Queensland, including a grant under the Australian Government Renewable Energy Development Initiative. We thank Queensland DPI&F and Pacific Seeds for supplying seed material to conduct this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert G. Birch.

Additional information

Communicated by P. Lakshmanan.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Information (DOC 51 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Raghuwanshi, A., Birch, R.G. Genetic transformation of sweet sorghum. Plant Cell Rep 29, 997–1005 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-010-0885-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-010-0885-x

Keywords

Navigation