Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Relative Interdependency of Colloquial and Mathematical Discourses Regarding the Notion and Calculations of Limit: an Evidence-Based Cross-Cultural Study

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study compares English- and Korean-speaking university students’ colloquial and mathematical discourses on the notion and practice of limit. There exists a lexical discontinuity in Korean with the word limit, since the mathematical word for limit is not commonly used as a colloquial word in Korean, unlike its use in English. This study discusses similarities and differences with regard to ways students in each country use the word limit in colloquial contexts and in mathematical tasks. Data include surveys and interviews, and participants’ discourses, which were analyzed using Sfard’s (2008) discursive framework. Findings indicate that the mathematical discourse of the Korean speakers was structural (i.e. formal or mathematical) and the one for the English speakers was processual. Further, the differences between the US and Korean participants’ use of limit in everyday and mathematical discourses informed the language-dependent properties of school mathematics discourses in terms of word use, routines, endorsed narratives, and visual mediators. This study discusses different discursive needs—linguistically and culturally—to support meaningful mathematical discourses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ben-Yehuda, M., Lavy, I., Linchevski, L., & Sfard, A. (2005). Doing wrong with words or what are students’ access to arithmetical discourses. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36, 176–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bintz, W. P., & Moore, S. D. (2002). Using literature to support mathematical thinking in middle school. Middle School Journal, 34, 25–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, P. C. (1992). Language and mathematics: A comparison of bilingual and monolingual students of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23(4), 417–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornu, B. (1992). Limits. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 153–166). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cotter, J. A. (2000). Using language and visualization to teach place value. Teaching Children Mathematics, 7, 108–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottrill, J., Dubinsky, E., Nichols, D., Schwingendorf, K., Thomas, K., & Vidakovic, D. (1996). Understanding the limit concept: Beginning with a coordinated process scheme. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15, 167–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, R., & Vinner, S. (1986). The notion of limit: Some seemingly unavoidable misconception stages. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 5, 281–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischbein, E., Tirosh, D., & Hess, P. (1979). The intuition of infinity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 10, 3–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuson, K. C., & Kwon, Y. (1992). Learning addition and subtraction: Effects of number word and other cultural tools. In J. Bideau, C. Meljac, & J. P. Fisher (Eds.), Pathways to number (pp. 351–374). Hillsdale, MI: Erlbaum.

  • Güçler, B. (2013). Examining the discourse on the limit concept in a beginning-level calculus classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82(3), 439–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez, R. (2002). Beyond essentialism: The complexity of language in teaching mathematics to Latina/o students. American Educational Research Journal, 39, 1047–1088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, Y., & Ginsburg, H. P. (2001). Chinese and English mathematics language: The relationship between linguistic clarity and mathematics performance. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 3(2–3), 201–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D. (2009). Comparison of native-English and native-Korean speaking university students’ discourses on infinity and limit (Doctoral dissertation). Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.

  • Kim, D., Kang, H., & Lee, H. (2015). Two different epistemologies about limit concepts. International Education Studies, 8(3), 138–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, C. (2005). Mathematical vocabulary: Fixers of knowledge or points of exploration? Language and Education, 19, 126–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, C., & Nuttall, R. (2001). Writing Chinese and mathematics achievement: A study with Chinese-American undergraduates. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 13(1), 15–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medrano, I., & Pino-Fan, L. (2016). Estadios de comprensión de la noción matemática de límite finito desde el punto de vista histórico [Stages of understanding of the mathematical notion of finite limit from the historical point of view]. REDIMAT, Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 5(3), 287–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miura, I. T., Okamoto, Y., Kim, C. C., Chang, C. M., Steere, M., & Fayol, M. (1994). Comparisons of children’s cognitive representation of number: China, France, Japan, Korea, Sweden, and the United States. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 17, 401–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moschkovich, J. (2007). Using two languages when learning mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 64(2), 121–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimm, D. (1984). Who is we? Mathematics Teaching, 107, 39–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Przenioslo, M. (2004). Image of the limit of function formed in the course of mathematical studies at the university. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 55, 103–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raiker, A. (2002). Spoken language and mathematics. Cambridge Journal of Education, 32, 45–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

  • Schwarzenberger, R., & Tall, D. (1978). Conflict in the learning of real numbers and limits. Mathematics Teaching, 82, 44–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Setati, M. (2002). Researching mathematics education and language in multilingual South Africa. Mathematics Educator, 12, 6–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27, 4–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sfard, A. (2000). Steering (dis)course between metaphors and rigor: Using focal analysis to investigate an emergence of mathematical objects. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31, 296–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating: Human development, the growth of discourses and mathematizing. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

  • Sfard, A., & Lavie, I. (2005). Why cannot children see as the same what grown-ups cannot see as different? – Early numerical thinking revisited. Cognition and Instruction, 23(2), 237–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, M. J., & Ginsburg, H. P. (1988). The effect of the Korean number system on young children’s counting: A natural experiment in numerical bilingualism. International Journal of Psychology, 23, 319–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tall, D. (1992). The transition to advanced mathematical thinking: Functions, limits, infinity and proof. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 495–511). New York, NY: Macmillan.

  • Thomas, G. (2005). In M. Weir, J. Hass, & F. Giordano (Eds.), Thomas’ calculus (11th ed.). New York, NY: Addison Wesley.

  • TIMSS (2003). Student questionnaire: Grade 8. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS International Study Center.

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Weller, K., Brown, A., Dubinsky, E., McDonald, M., & Stenger, C. (2004). Intimations of infinity. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 51, 741–750.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mathematics Education, College of Education, Korea University, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea

    Dong-Joong Kim

  2. College of Education, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, 87131, USA

    Woong Lim

Authors
  1. Dong-Joong Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Woong Lim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Woong Lim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, DJ., Lim, W. The Relative Interdependency of Colloquial and Mathematical Discourses Regarding the Notion and Calculations of Limit: an Evidence-Based Cross-Cultural Study. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 16, 1561–1579 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9848-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9848-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation