Zusammenfassung
Hintergrund
Nach knieendoprothetischer Versorgung sind ca. 20 % der Patienten mit dem postoperativen Ergebnis unzufrieden. Hauptursachen hierfür sind die periprothetische Infektion, die aseptische Lockerung, Instabilität, Malalignment und in selteneren Fällen die sekundäre Retropatellararthrose, periprothetische Frakturen, Streckapparatinsuffizienzen, Polyethylenabrieb und die Arthrofibrose. Die Identifikation der Schmerzursache ist dabei häufig schwierig, jedoch Voraussetzung für eine erfolgreiche Therapie.
Fragestellung
Ziel dieser Arbeit ist es, durch einen reproduzierbaren diagnostischen Algorithmus eine effiziente Analyse der schmerzhaften Knieendoprothese (Knie-TEP) zu erreichen.
Diskussion
Grundlegende Bausteine sind die Anamnese mit den Kernfragen nach Nacht- oder Ruheschmerz sowie dem zeitlichen Verlauf des Schmerzcharakters. Daran sollte sich die Basisdiagnostik mit klinischer, radiologischer und infektiologischer Untersuchung anschließen. Eindeutige Versagensursachen, wie eine Infektion oder aseptische Lockerung, lassen sich hierdurch in den überwiegenden Fällen diagnostizieren. Ist die Schmerzursache mit der Basisdiagnostik nicht eindeutig zuordenbar, ist die weiterführende infektiologische oder bildgebende Diagnostik notwendig. Bei unklaren Befundergebnissen sind seltenere Ursachen der Beschwerden wie extraartikuläre Schmerzursachen, Kausalgien oder die Arthrofibrose zu bedenken. Kann trotz dieser Maßnahmen keine eindeutige Ursache objektiviert werden, ist eine Revision nicht indiziert, sondern die Reevaluation im zeitlichen Verlauf.
Abstract
Background
Approximately 20 % of patients are unsatisfied with their postoperative results after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Main causes for revision surgery are periprosthetic infection, aseptic loosing, instability and malalignment. In rare cases secondary progression of osteoarthritis of the patella, periprosthetic fractures, extensor mechanism insufficiency, polyethylene wear and arthrofibrosis can cause the necessity for a reintervention. Identifying the reason for a painful knee arthroplasty can be very difficult, but is a prerequisite for a successful therapy.
Aim
The aim of this article is to provide an efficient analysis of the painful TKA by using a reproducible algorithm.
Discussion
Basic building blocks are the medical history with the core issues of pain character and the time curve of pain concerning surgery. This is followed by the basic diagnostics, including clinical, radiological, and infectiological investigations. Unique failures like periprosthetic infection or aseptic loosening can thereby be diagnosed in the majority of cases. If the cause of pain is not clearly attributable using the basic diagnostics tool, further infectiological investigation or diagnostic imaging are necessary. If the findings are inconsistent, uncommon causes of symptoms, such as extra-articular pathologies, causalgia or arthrofibrosis, have to be considered. In cases of ongoing unexplained pain, a revision is not indicated. These patients should be re-evaluated after a period of time.
Literatur
Carr AJ, Robertsson O, Graves S, Price AJ, Arden NK, Judge A, Beard DJ (2012) Knee replacement. Lancet 379(9823):1331–1340
Kurtz SM et al (2007) Future clinical and economic impact of revision total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(Suppl 3):144–151
Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM (2002) Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res (404):7–13
Thiele K, Perka C, Matziolis G, Mayr HO, Sostheim M, Hube R (2015) Current failure mechanisms after knee arthroplasty have changed: polyethylene wear is less common in revision surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97(9):715–720
Winkler T, Trampuz A, Hardt S, Janz V, Kleber C, Perka C (2014) [Periprosthetic infection after hip arthroplasty]. Orthopade 43(1):70–78
Dexel J, Kirschner S, Gunther KP, Lutzner J (2014) Agreement between radiological and computer navigation measurement of lower limb alignment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22(11):2721–2727
Hauschild O, Konstantinidis L, Baumann T, Niemeyer P, Suedkamp NP, Helwig P (2010) Correlation of radiographic and navigated measurements of TKA limb alignment: a matter of time? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18(10):1317–1322
Johnson SM, Saint John BE, Dine AP (2008) Local anesthetics as antimicrobial agents: a review. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 9(2):205–213
Schafer P, Fink B, Sandow D, Margull A, Berger I, Frommelt L (2008) Prolonged bacterial culture to identify late periprosthetic joint infection: a promising strategy. Clin Infect Dis 47(11):1403–1409
Morgan PM, Sharkey P, Ghanem E, Parvizi J, Clohisy JC, Burnett RS, Barrack RL (2009) The value of intraoperative Gram stain in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(9):2124–2129
Trampuz A, Perka C, Borens O (2013) [Prosthetic joint infection: new developments in diagnosis and treatment]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 138(31–32):1571–1573
Berger RA, Crossett LS, Jacobs JJ, Rubash HE (1998) Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (356):144–153
Rasouli MR, Harandi AA, Adeli B, Purtill JJ, Parvizi J (2012) Revision total knee arthroplasty: infection should be ruled out in all cases. J Arthroplasty 27(6):1239–1243 e1–2
Zmistowski B, Karam JA, Durinka JB, Casper DS, Parvizi J (2013) Periprosthetic joint infection increases the risk of one-year mortality. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(24):2177–2184
Berend KR, Lombardi AV Jr, Morris MJ, Bergeson AG, Adams JB, Sneller MA (2013) Two-stage treatment of hip periprosthetic joint infection is associated with a high rate of infection control but high mortality. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(2):510–518
Parvizi J et al (2011) New definition for periprosthetic joint infection: from the Workgroup of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(11):2992–2994
Krenn V et al (2014) Revised histopathological consensus classification of joint implant related pathology. Pathol Res Pract 210(12):779–786
Muller M, Morawietz L, Hasart O, Strube P, Perka C, Tohtz S (2009) [Histopathological diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection following total hip arthroplasty: use of a standardized classification system of the periprosthetic interface membrane]. Orthopade 38(11):1087–1096
Aggarwal VK, Higuera C, Deirmengian G, Parvizi J, Austin MS (2013) Swab cultures are not as effective as tissue cultures for diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(10):3196–3203
Trampuz A et al (2007) Sonication of removed hip and knee prostheses for diagnosis of infection. N Engl J Med 357(7):654–663
Yue B, Tang T (2015) The use of nuclear imaging for the diagnosis of periprosthetic infection after knee and hip arthroplasties. Nucl Med Commun 36(4):305–311
Palestro CJ (2014) Nuclear medicine and the failed joint replacement: past, present, and future. World J Radiol 6(7):446–458
Jacovides CL, Kreft R, Adeli B, Hozack B, Ehrlich GD, Parvizi J (2012) Successful identification of pathogens by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based electron spray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (ESI-TOF-MS) in culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94(24):2247–2254
Deirmengian C, Kardos K, Kilmartin P, Cameron A, Schiller K, Parvizi J (2014) Diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection: has the era of the biomarker arrived? Clin Orthop Relat Res 472(11):3254–3262
Dalury DF, Pomeroy DL, Gorab RS, Adams MJ (2013) Why are total knee arthroplasties being revised? J Arthroplasty 28(8 Suppl):120–121
Schroer WC, Berend KR, Lombardi AV, Barnes CL, Bolognesi MP, Berend ME, Ritter MA, Nunley RM (2013) Why are total knees failing today? Etiology of total knee revision in 2010 and 2011. J Arthroplasty 28(8 Suppl):116–119
Allen AM, Ward WG, Pope TL Jr (1995) Imaging of the total knee arthroplasty. Radiol Clin North Am 33(2):289–303
Ewald FC (1989) The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res (248):9–12
Math KR, Zaidi SF, Petchprapa C, Harwin SF (2006) Imaging of total knee arthroplasty. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 10(1):47–63
Gulati A, Chau R, Pandit HG, Gray H, Price AJ, Dodd CA, Murray DW (2009) The incidence of physiological radiolucency following Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement and its relationship to outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(7):896–902
Hofmann AA, Wyatt RW, Daniels AU, Armstrong L, Alazraki N, Taylor A Jr (1990) Bone scans after total knee arthroplasty in asymptomatic patients. Cemented versus cementless. Clin Orthop Relat Res (251):183–188
Mulhall KJ, Ghomrawi HM, Scully S, Callaghan JJ, Saleh KJ (2006) Current etiologies and modes of failure in total knee arthroplasty revision. Clin Orthop Relat Res 446:45–50
McNabb DC, Kim RH, Springer BD (2015) Instability after total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 28(2):97–104
Firestone TP, Eberle RW (2006) Surgical management of symptomatic instability following failed primary total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(Suppl 4):80–84
Dennis DA (2004) Evaluation of painful total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 19(4 Suppl 1):35–40
Gromov K, Korchi M, Thomsen MG, Husted H, Troelsen A (2014) What is the optimal alignment of the tibial and femoral components in knee arthroplasty? Acta Orthop 85(5):480–487
Kim YH, Park JW, Kim JS, Park SD (2014) The relationship between the survival of total knee arthroplasty and postoperative coronal, sagittal and rotational alignment of knee prosthesis. Int Orthop 38(2):379–385
Lombardi AV Jr, Berend KR, Ng VY (2011) Neutral mechanical alignment: a requirement for successful TKA: affirms. Orthopedics 34(9):e504–e506
Matziolis G, Adam J, Perka C (2010) Varus malalignment has no influence on clinical outcome in midterm follow-up after total knee replacement. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130(12):1487–1491
Parratte S, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ (2010) Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(12):2143–2149
Matziolis G, Krocker D, Tohtz S, Perka C (2006) [Variance of identification of femoral epicondyles in navigated total knee arthroplasty]. Orthopade 35(8):848–852
Abdel MP, Oussedik S, Parratte S, Lustig S, Haddad FS (2014) Coronal alignment in total knee replacement: historical review, contemporary analysis, and future direction. Bone Joint J 96-B(7):857–862
Bell SW, Young P, Drury C, Smith J, Anthony I, Jones B, Blyth M, McLean A (2014) Component rotational alignment in unexplained painful primary total knee arthroplasty. Knee 21(1):272–277
Minoda Y, Kobayashi A, Iwaki H, Ohashi H, Takaoka K (2009) TKA sagittal alignment with navigation systems and conventional techniques vary only a few degrees. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(4):1000–1006
Iacono F et al (2015) The adductor tubercle: an important landmark to determine the joint line level in revision total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
Maderbacher G, Keshmiri A, Schaumburger J, Springorum HR, Zeman F, Grifka J, Baier C (2014) Accuracy of bony landmarks for restoring the natural joint line in revision knee surgery: an MRI study. Int Orthop 38(6):1173–1181
Servien E, Viskontas D, Giuffre BM, Coolican MR, Parker DA (2008) Reliability of bony landmarks for restoration of the joint line in revision knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16(3):263–269
Bonnin MP, Saffarini M, Shepherd D, Bossard N, Dantony E (2015) Oversizing the tibial component in TKAs: incidence, consequences and risk factors. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
Bonnin MP, Schmidt A, Basiglini L, Bossard N, Dantony E (2013) Mediolateral oversizing influences pain, function, and flexion after TKA. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(10):2314–2324
Lo CS, Wang SJ, Wu SS (2003) Knee stiffness on extension caused by an oversized femoral component after total knee arthroplasty: a report of two cases and a review of the literature. J Arthroplasty 18(6):804–808
Nam D, Abdel MP, Cross MB, LaMont LE, Reinhardt KR, McArthur BA, Mayman DJ, Hanssen AD, Sculco TP (2014) The management of extensor mechanism complications in total knee arthroplasty. AAOS exhibit selection. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96(6):e47
Schnurr C, Jarrous M, Gudden I, Eysel P, Konig DP (2013) Pre-operative arthritis severity as a predictor for total knee arthroplasty patients’ satisfaction. Int Orthop 37(7):1257–1261
Manning BT, Lewis N, Tzeng TH, Saleh JK, Potty AG, Dennis DA, Mihalko WM, Goodman SB, Saleh KJ (2015) Diagnosis and Management of Extra-articular Causes of Pain After Total Knee Arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 64:381–388
Post ZD, Orozco FR, Ong AC (2013) Metal sensitivity after TKA presenting with systemic dermatitis and hair loss. Orthopedics 36(4):e525–e528
Thomsen M, Rozak M, Thomas P (2011) Pain in a chromium-allergic patient with total knee arthroplasty: disappearance of symptoms after revision with a special surface-coated TKA – a case report. Acta Orthop 82(3):386–388
Lutzner J, Hartmann A, Dinnebier G, Spornraft-Ragaller P, Hamann C, Kirschner S (2013) Metal hypersensitivity and metal ion levels in patients with coated or uncoated total knee arthroplasty: a randomised controlled study. Int Orthop 37(10):1925–1931
Zeng Y, Feng W, Li J, Lu L, Ma C, Zeng J, Li F, Qi X, Fan Y (2014) A prospective study concerning the relationship between metal allergy and post-operative pain following total hip and knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 38(11):2231–2236
Granchi D, Cenni E, Tigani D, Trisolino G, Baldini N, Giunti A (2008) Sensitivity to implant materials in patients with total knee arthroplasties. Biomaterials 29(10):1494–1500
Thienpont E, Berger Y (2013) No allergic reaction after TKA in a chrome-cobalt-nickel-sensitive patient: case report and review of the literature. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(3):636–640
Scuderi GR (2005) The stiff total knee arthroplasty: causality and solution. J Arthroplasty 20(4 Suppl 2):23–26
Brander VA, Stulberg SD, Adams AD, Harden RN, Bruehl S, Stanos SP, Houle T (2003) Predicting total knee replacement pain: a prospective, observational study. Clin Orthop Relat Res (416):27–36
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Interessenkonflikt
K. Thiele, J. Fussi, C. Perka und T. Pfitzner geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.
Es liegt eine retrospektive Studie vor mit Vorlage eine Ethikvotums. Die Nachuntersuchungen sind jedoch alle im Rahmen der normalen Nachuntersuchungen erfolgt, so dass keine explizite Vorlage einer Patienteneinwilligung notwendig war bzw. gefordert war.
Alle beschriebenen Untersuchungen am Menschen wurden mit Zustimmung der zuständigen Ethik-Kommission, im Einklang mit nationalem Recht sowie gemäß der Deklaration von Helsinki von 1975 (in der aktuellen, überarbeiteten Fassung) durchgeführt. Von allen beteiligten Patienten liegt eine Einverständniserklärung vor.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thiele, K., Fussi, J., Perka, C. et al. Berliner diagnostischer Algorithmus der schmerzhaften Knie-TEP. Orthopäde 45, 38–46 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-015-3196-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-015-3196-7