Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Varus malalignment has no influence on clinical outcome in midterm follow-up after total knee replacement

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Varus malalignment after total knee replacement is mentioned to be a major risk factor for postoperative pain and functional impairments. This wide spread opinion is based on the historical data derived from implantations performed in the late 1970s and early 1980s. We tested the hypothesis whether significant varus malalignment leads to minor functional results and early loosening using modern implants and operating techniques.

Methods

Two hundred and eighteen knee joints (184 patients) having been replaced with a PFC Sigma or Natural Knee II with a minimum follow-up of 5 years were included in this case control study. From the 30 most varus malaligned knees (30 patients) 25 patients were available for clinical and radiographical examination (group A) and were compared with a control group without significant varus malalignment that was matched for sex, age and implant (group B). The Knee Society Score (KSS), the WOMAC and the SF36 were determined.

Results

No implant showed radiological signs of loosening or had been revised. The deviation from the mechanical axis was 6.3° [3.9°–10.7° varus] in group A and 0° [2.6° valgus to 2.1° varus] in group B (P < 0.001). The KSS was 158 [99–199] points in group A and 142 [78–198] points in group B (n.s.). The WOMAC did not reveal any significant differences between the groups either (group A 22 ± 27 points, group B 21 ± 21 points). Likewise in the SF36, neither in the sum nor in the individual scores was a significant difference found between groups A (56 ± 24 [8–90] points) and B (56 ± 18 [26–86] points).

Conclusions

The present data do not support the assumption that there is a correlation between varus malalignment and a bad medium-term radiological and clinical outcome after total knee arthroplasty. This questions the indication for revision of painful and varus malaligned prostheses, since an improvement of the clinical outcome is not to be expected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jones CA, Voaklander DC, Johnston DW, Suarez-Almazor ME (2000) Health related quality of life outcomes after total hip and knee arthroplasties in a community based population. J Rheumatol 27:1745–1752

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register (SKAR) (2008). http://www.knee.se.

  3. Malik MH, Wadia F, Porter ML (2007) Preliminary radiological evaluation of the vector vision CT-free knee module for implantation of the LCS knee prosthesis. Knee 14:19–21

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Robinson M, Eckhoff DG, Reinig KD, Bagur MM, Bach JM (2006) Variability of landmark identification in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 442:57–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bolognesi M, Hofmann A (2005) Computer navigation versus standard instrumentation for TKA: a single-surgeon experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res 440:162–169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Anderson KC, Buehler KC, Markel DC (2005) Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: comparison with conventional methods. J Arthroplasty 20:132–138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lotke PA, Ecker ML (1977) Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 59:77–79

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bargren JH, Blaha JD, Freeman MA (1983) Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Correlated biomechanical and clinical observations. Clin Orthop Relat Res178–183

  9. Hvid I, Nielsen S (1984) Total condylar knee arthroplasty: prosthetic component positioning and radiolucent lines. Acta Orthop Scand 55:160–165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rand JA, Coventry MB (1988) Ten-year evaluation of geometric total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 232:168–173

    Google Scholar 

  11. Windsor RE, Scuderi GR, Moran MC, Insall JN (1989) Mechanisms of failure of the femoral and tibial components in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 15–19

  12. Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA (1991) Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:709–714

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB (1994) Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res 299:153–156

    Google Scholar 

  14. Berend ME, Ritter MA, Meding JB, Faris PM, Keating EM, Redelman R, Faris GW, Davis KE (2004) Tibial component failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 428:26–34

    Google Scholar 

  15. Morgan SS, Bonshahi A, Pradhan N, Gregory A, Gambhir A, Porter ML (2008) The influence of postoperative coronal alignment on revision surgery in total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 32:639–642

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ensini A, Catani F, Leardini A, Romagnoli M, Giannini S (2007) Alignments and clinical results in conventional and navigated total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 457:156–162

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Spencer JM, Chauhan SK, Sloan K, Taylor A, Beaver RJ (2007) Computer navigation versus conventional total knee replacement: no difference in functional results at two years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:477–480

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cooke TD, Scudamore RA, Bryant JT, Sorbie C, Siu D, Fisher B (1991) A quantitative approach to radiography of the lower limb: principles and applications. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:715–720

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wright JG, Treble N, Feinstein AR (1991) Measurement of lower limb alignment using long radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:721–723

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Werner FW, Ayers DC, Maletsky LP, Rullkoetter PJ (2005) The effect of valgus/varus malalignment on load distribution in total knee replacements. J Biomech 38(2):349–355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM (2002) Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:7–13

    Google Scholar 

  22. Green GV, Berend KR, Berend ME, Glisson RR, Vail TP (2002) The effects of varus tibial alignment on proximal tibial surface strain in total knee arthroplasty: the posteromedial hot spot. J Arthroplasty 17(8):1033–1039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Akagi M, Matsusue Y, Mata T, Asada Y, Horiguchi M, Iida H, Nakamura T (1999) Effect of rotational alignment on patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 366:155–163

    Google Scholar 

  24. Insall JN, Scuderi GR, Komistek RD, Math K, Dennis DA, Anderson DT (2002) Correlation between condylar lift-off and femoral component alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 143–152

  25. Barrack RL, Schrader T, Bertot AJ, Wolfe MW, Myers L (2001) Component rotation and anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 46–55

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Orthopaedic Department, Charité University Hospital Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany

    Georg Matziolis, Joern Adam & Carsten Perka

Authors
  1. Georg Matziolis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joern Adam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Carsten Perka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georg Matziolis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matziolis, G., Adam, J. & Perka, C. Varus malalignment has no influence on clinical outcome in midterm follow-up after total knee replacement. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130, 1487–1491 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-010-1064-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-010-1064-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation