Skip to main content
Log in

The detection and phylogenetic analysis of Anaplasma phagocytophilum-like 1, A. ovis and A. capra in sheep: A. capra divides into two genogroups

  • Research
  • Published:
Veterinary Research Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, the presence, prevalence, and genotypes of Anaplasma phagocytophilum, A. ovis, and A. capra in sheep were investigated based on 16 S SSU rRNA, groEL, and gtlA gene-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR), respectively. The sequences of the genes were used for detection of the phylogenetic position of the species. Additionally, a restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) were carried out for discrimination of A. phagocytophilum and related variants (A. phagocytophilum-like 1 and 2). The prevalence of Anaplasma spp. was found as 25.8% (101/391), while it was found that A. ovis, A. phagocytophilum-like 1, and A. capra are circulating in the sheep herds in Kyrgyzstan, according to the PCRs, RFLP and the partial DNA sequencing results. The positivity rates of A. phagocytophilum-like 1, A. ovis, and A. capra genotype-1 were 6.9, 22.5, and 5.3%, respectively. A total of 32 (8.2%) sheep were found to be mix infected. Moreover, phylogenetic analyses and sequence comparison with those available in the GenBank showed that A. capra formed two distinct genetic groups (A. capra genotype-1 and A. capra genotype-2). Considering the zoonotic potential of these species, it may be necessary to make changes in the interpretation of anaplasmosis cases in animals and there is a need for further studies to determine the pathogenicity of the species/genotypes circulating in animals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this manuscript.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all veterinarians and technicians for their kind help during sample collection.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Kursat Altay (DVM, PhD, Prof.) Conceptualization, Field Work, Methodology, Validation, Formal Analysis, Supervision, Writing- Original Draft Preparation, Reviewing and Editing. Ufuk EROL (DVM, PhD, Assist. Prof.) Conceptualization, Field Work, Methodology, Validation, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Writing- Original Draft Preparation. Omer Faruk SAHIN (DVM, Res. Assist.) Field Work, Data Curation, Methodology, Formal Analysis. Ayperi AYTMIRZAKIZI (DVM, Res. Assist.) Field Work, Data Curation, Formal Analysis. Ethem Mutlu TEMIZEL (DVM, PhD, Prof.) Field Work, Data Curation, Formal Analysis. Mehmet Fatih AYDIN (DVM, PhD, Assist. Prof.) Data Curation, Methodology, Formal Analysis. Nazir DUMANLI (DVM, PhD, Prof.) Field Work, Data Curation, Methodology, Formal Analysis, Writing- Original Draft Preparation, Reviewing and Editing. Munir AKTAS (DVM, PhD, Prof.) Data Curation, Methodology, Formal Analysis, Writing- Original Draft Preparation, Reviewing and Editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kursat Altay.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards approved by Experimentation Ethics Committee of Kyrgyz-Turkish Manas University (30.06.2017/2017–06/02) and the Sivas Cumhuriyet University Animal Experiments Local Ethics Committee (Approval number: 12.07.2021-564).

Consent to participate

The consent of all animal owners was sorted before this study was carried out.

Consent for publication

All authors have seen and approved the final version of the manuscript being submitted. They warrant that the article is the authors’ original work, has not received prior publication, and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Altay, K., Erol, U., Sahin, O.F. et al. The detection and phylogenetic analysis of Anaplasma phagocytophilum-like 1, A. ovis and A. capra in sheep: A. capra divides into two genogroups. Vet Res Commun 46, 1271–1279 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-022-09998-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-022-09998-1

Keywords

Navigation