Skip to main content
Log in

Development of Printable Natural Cartilage Matrix Bioink for 3D Printing of Irregular Tissue Shape

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Aims and scope

Abstract

The extracellular matrix (ECM) is known to provide instructive cues for cell attachment, proliferation, differentiation, and ultimately tissue regeneration. The use of decellularized ECM scaffolds for regenerative-medicine approaches is rapidly expanding. In this study, cartilage acellular matrix (CAM)-based bioink was developed to fabricate functional biomolecule-containing scaffolds. The CAM provides an adequate cartilage tissue–favorable environment for chondrogenic differentiation of cells. Conventional manufacturing techniques such as salt leaching, solvent casting, gas forming, and freeze drying when applied to CAM-based scaffolds cannot precisely control the scaffold geometry for mimicking tissue shape. As an alternative to the scaffold fabrication methods, 3D printing was recently introduced in the field of tissue engineering. 3D printing may better control the internal microstructure and external appearance because of the computer-assisted construction process. Hence, applications of the 3D printing technology to tissue engineering are rapidly proliferating. Therefore, printable ECM-based bioink should be developed for 3D structure stratification. The aim of this study was to develop printable natural CAM bioink for 3D printing of a tissue of irregular shape. Silk fibroin was chosen to support the printing of the CAM powder because it can be physically cross-linked and its viscosity can be easily controlled. The newly developed CAM-silk bioink was evaluated regarding printability, cell viability, and tissue differentiation. Moreover, we successfully demonstrated 3D printing of a cartilage-shaped scaffold using only this CAM-silk bioink. Future studies should assess the efficacy of in vivo implantation of 3D-printed cartilage-shaped scaffolds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chan BP, Leong KW. Scaffolding in tissue engineering: general approaches and tissue-specific considerations. Eur Spine J. 2008;17:467–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Bolland F, Korossis S, Wilshaw SP, Ingham E, Fisher J, Kearney JN, et al. Development and characterisation of a full-thickness acellular porcine bladder matrix for tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2007;28:1061–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Agmon G, Christman KL. Controlling stem cell behavior with decellularized extracellular matrix scaffolds. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci. 2016;20:193–201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Wade RJ, Burdick JA. Engineering ECM signals into biomaterials. Mater Today (Kidlington). 2012;15:454–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Scarritt ME, Pashos NC, Bunnell BA. A review of cellularization strategies for tissue engineering of whole organs. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2015;3:43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Benders KE, van Weeren PR, Badylak SF, Saris DB, Dhert WJ, Malda J. Extracellular matrix scaffolds for cartilage and bone regeneration. Trends Biotechnol. 2013;31:169–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yang Q, Peng J, Guo Q, Huang J, Zhang L, Yao J, et al. A cartilage ECM-derived 3-D porous acellular matrix scaffold for in vivo cartilage tissue engineering with PKH26-labeled chondrogenic bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials. 2008;29:2378–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Park JH, Jang J, Lee JS, Cho DW. Three-dimensional printing in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2016;13:612–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ahn SH, Lee J, Park SA, Kim WD. Three-dimensional bio-printing equipment technologies for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2016;13:663–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Park SH, Jung CS, Min BH. Advances in three-dimensional bioprinting for hard tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2016;6:622–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Peltola SM, Melchels FP, Grijpma DW, Kellomäki M. A review of rapid prototyping techniques for tissue engineering purposes. Ann Med. 2008;40:268–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shivalkar S, Singh S. Solid freeform techniques application in bone tissue engineering for scaffold fabrication. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2017;14:187–200.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim JH, Yoo JJ, Lee SJ. Three-dimensional cell-based bioprinting for soft tissue regeneration. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2016;6:647–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sobral JM, Caridade SG, Sousa RA, Mano JF, Reis RL. Three-dimensional plotted scaffolds with controlled pore size gradients: effect of scaffold geometry on mechanical performance and cell seeding efficiency. Acta Biomater. 2011;7:1009–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pati F, Jang J, Ha DH, Won Kim S, Rhie JW, Shim JH, et al. Printing three-dimensional tissue analogues with decellularized extracellular matrix bioink. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3935.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Murphy SV, Atala A. 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32:773–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Combellack EJ, Jessop ZM, Naderi N, Griffin M, Dobbs T, Ibrahim A, et al. Adipose regeneration and implications for breast reconstruction: update and the future. Gland Surg. 2016;5:227–41.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Jin HJ, Kaplan DL. Mechanism of silk processing in insects and spiders. Nature. 2003;424:1057–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu W, Li Z, Zheng L, Zhang X, Liu P, Yang T, et al. Electrospun fibrous silk fibroin/poly(L-lactic acid) scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2016;13:516–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kundu B, Kurland NE, Bano S, Patra C, Engel FB, Yadavalli VK, et al. Silk proteins for biomedical applications: bioengineering perspectives. Prog Polym Sci. 2014;39:251–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Floren M, Migliaresi C, Motta A. Processing techniques and applications of silk hydrogels in bioengineering. J Funct Biomater. 2016;7:E26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Park SH, Gil ES, Cho H, Mandal BB, Tien LW, Min BH, et al. Intervertebral disk tissue engineering using biphasic silk composite scaffolds. Tissue Eng Part A. 2012;18:447–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Trachtenberg JE, Placone JK, Smith BT, Fisher JP, Mikos AG. Extrusion-based 3D printing of poly(propylene fumarate) scaffolds with hydroxyapatite gradients. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2017;28:532–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tallawi M, Rosellini E, Barbani N, Cascone MG, Rai R, Saint-Pierre G, et al. Strategies for the chemical and biological functionalization of scaffolds for cardiac tissue engineering: a review. J R Soc Interface. 2015;12:20150254.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Xia Y, Zhou P, Cheng X, Xie Y, Liang C, Li C, et al. Selective laser sintering fabrication of nano-hydroxyapatite/poly-epsilon-caprolactone scaffolds for bone tissue engineering applications. Int J Nanomedicine. 2013;8:4197–213.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Guvendiren M, Molde J, Soares RM, Kohn J. Designing biomaterials for 3D Printing. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2016;2:1679–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a grant of the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea (HI14C2143 and HI14C0744).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Byoung-Hyun Min or Sang-Hyug Park.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

Ethical statement

This research protocol was approved by the IACUC of Ajou University (IACUC no.2013-0045).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jung, C.S., Kim, B.K., Lee, J. et al. Development of Printable Natural Cartilage Matrix Bioink for 3D Printing of Irregular Tissue Shape. Tissue Eng Regen Med 15, 155–162 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13770-017-0104-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13770-017-0104-8

Keywords

Navigation