Abstract
Biogas from anaerobic digestion (AD), as an important alternative to fossil fuels, has contributed to energy recovery and environmental sustainability. Incomplete or inefficient mixing within anaerobic reactors can result in poor biogas production or energy wastage. Thus, identifying mixing performance is meaningful for the digester design, operation and maximum biogas production. Over the years, various experimental and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) techniques have been developed to characterize the mixing performance of digesters. This review described the critical impact of mixing on biogas production in AD. Then, experimental techniques available on local and global scales were reviewed and compared in terms of their advantages, disadvantages, characterization capabilities and scope of application. Moreover, the implementation, reliability, indicators and application of CFD techniques in AD were thoroughly discussed. Based on the above discussion, mixing significantly affects AD methane production, and intermittent mixing is preferred for maximum biogas production. Local experimental techniques have been considered to be the simplest and cheapest for arbitrarily sized digesters; global experimental techniques relying on computer systems have received increasing attention for their applications in AD flow fields. More research efforts are needed to discover new experimental techniques that overcome the limitations of digestate opacity and industrial reactor geometries, in addition, compartmental models based on CFD to couple hydrodynamics with biokinetics are interesting and allow for greater implementation of CFD applications.
Graphical abstract
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- AD:
-
Anaerobic digestion
- ADM1:
-
Anaerobic digestion model no. 1
- CFD:
-
Computational fluid dynamics
- CARPT:
-
Computer automated radioactive particle tracking
- CT:
-
Computer tomography
- DES:
-
Detached-Eddy simulations
- ERT:
-
Electrical resistance tomography
- ECT:
-
Electrical capacitance tomography
- HRT:
-
Hydraulic retention time
- LDA:
-
Laser Doppler anemometer
- LES:
-
Large Eddy simulation
- MRF:
-
Multiple reference frame
- UI:
-
Uniformity Index
- OLR:
-
Organic loading rate
- PIV:
-
Particle image velocimetry
- PLIF:
-
Planar laser-induced fluorescence
- PEPT:
-
Positron emission particle tracking
- RPT:
-
Radioactive particle tracking
- RTD:
-
Residence time distribution
- RANS:
-
Reynolds-averaged Navier Stokes
- RSM:
-
Reynolds stress models
- RNG:
-
Re-normalization group
- Re:
-
Reynolds numbers
- SST:
-
Shear stress transfer
- VOF:
-
Volume of fluid
References
Abdrakhmanov RK, Dvornikov NA, Lukashov VV (2017) Dynamics of two-phase swirling flow in a vortex chamber with a lower end swirler. Thermophys Aeromech+ 24:339–346. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0869864317030027
Achkaribegdouri A, Goodrich PR (1992) Rheological properties of moroccan dairy-cattle manure. Bioresour Technol 40:149–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-8524(92)90201-8
Adaze E, Al-Sarkhi A, Badr HM, Elsaadawy E (2019) Current status of CFD modeling of liquid loading phenomena in gas wells: A literature review. J Pet Explor Prod Technol 9:1397–1411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-018-0534-4
Afari L, Yekta SS, Ejlertsson J, Safari M et al (2019) A comparative study of biogas reactor fluid rheology—implications for mixing profile and power demand. Processes 7:700. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7100700
Andersson B, Andersson R, Hakansson L et al (2011) Computational fluid dynamics for engineers: index. pp 181–184. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139093590
Azargoshasb H, Mousavi SM, Amani T, Jafari A, Nosrati M (2015) Three-phase CFD simulation coupled with population balance equations of anaerobic syntrophic acidogenesis and methanogenesis reactions in a continuous stirred bioreactor. J Ind Eng Chem 27:207–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2014.12.037
Batstone DJ, Keller J, Steyer JP (2006) A review of ADM1 extensions, applications, and analysis: 2002–2005. Water Sci Technol 54:1–10. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2006.520
Battista F, Fino D, Mancini G, Ruggeri B (2016) Mixing in digesters used to treat high viscosity substrates: The case of olive oil production wastes. J Environ Chem Eng 4:915–923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2015.12.032
Behzadi M, Ahmadi MH, Ommi F (2021) Hot-film/hot-wire anemometer calibration for low velocities using image processing. Sci Iran 28:265–272. https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2019.51318.2119
Benbelkacem H, Garcia-Bernet D, Bollon J et al (2013) Liquid mixing and solid segregation in high-solid anaerobic digesters. Bioresour Technol 147:387–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.08.027
Bergamo U, Viccione G, Coppola S, Landi A, Gualtieri C (2020) Analysis of anaerobic digester mixing: comparison of long shafted paddle mixing vs gas mixing. Water Sci Technol 81:1406–1419. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2020.248
Beugre EYM, Gnagne T (2022) Vane geometry for measurement of influent rheological behaviour in dry anaerobic digestion. Renew Sust Energ Rev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111928
Borroto JI, Dominguez J, Griffith J, Fick M, Leclerc JP (2003) Technetium-99m as a tracer for the liquid RTD measurement in opaque anaerobic digester: Application in a sugar wastewater treatment plant. Chem Eng Process 42:857–865. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0255-2701(02)00109-5
Bridgeman J (2012) Computational fluid dynamics modelling of sewage sludge mixing in an anaerobic digester. Adv Eng Softw 44:54–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2011.05.037
Cabaret F, Bonnot S, Fradette L, Tanguy PA (2007) Mixing time analysis using colorimetric methods and image processing. Ind Eng Chem Res 46:5032–5042. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie0613265
Capela I, Bile MJ, Silva F et al (2009) Hydrodynamic behaviour of a full-scale anaerobic contact reactor using residence time distribution technique. J Chem Technol Biot 84:716–724. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.2104
Chiti F, Bakalis S, Bujalski W et al (2011) Using positron emission particle tracking (PEPT) to study the turbulent flow in a baffled vessel agitated by a Rushton turbine: Improving data treatment and validation. Chem Eng Res Des 89:1947–1960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2011.01.015
Coleman HW, Stern F (1997) Uncertainties and CFD code validation. J Fluid Eng-T Asme 119:795–803. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2819500
Coppeta J, Rogers C (1998) Dual emission laser induced fluorescence for direct planar scalar behavior measurements. Exp Fluids 25:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003480050202
Coughtrie AR, Borman DJ, Sleigh PA (2013) Effects of turbulence modelling on prediction of flow characteristics in a bench-scale anaerobic gas-lift digester. Bioresour Technol 138:297–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.03.162
Craig KJ, Nieuwoudt MN, Niemand LJ (2013) CFD simulation of anaerobic digester with variable sewage sludge rheology. Water Res 47:4485–4497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.05.011
Cui Z, Fan LS (2004) Turbulence energy distributions in bubbling gas-liquid and gas-liquid-solid flow systems. Chem Eng Sci 59:1755–1766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2004.01.031
Dai XH, Gai X, Dong B (2014) Rheology evolution of sludge through high-solid anaerobic digestion. Bioresour Technol 174:6–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.09.122
Dapelo D, Bridgeman J (2018a) Assessment of mixing quality in full-scale, biogas-mixed anaerobic digestion using CFD. Bioresour Technol 265:480–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.06.036
Dapelo D, Bridgeman J (2018b) Euler-Lagrange computational fluid dynamics simulation of a full-scale unconfined anaerobic digester for wastewater sludge treatment. Adv Eng Softw 117:153–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2017.08.009
Dapelo D, Bridgeman J (2020) A CFD strategy to retrofit an anaerobic digester to improve mixing performance in wastewater treatment. Water Sci Technol 81:1646–1657. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2020.086
Dapelo D, Alberini F, Bridgeman J (2015) Euler-Lagrange CFD modelling of unconfined gas mixing in anaerobic digestion. Water Res 85:497–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.08.042
Dapelo D, Trunk R, Krause MJ, Bridgeman J (2019) Towards Lattice-Boltzmann modelling of unconfined gas mixing in anaerobic digestion. Comput Fluids 180:11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2018.12.008
D’Bastiani C, Alba JL, Mazzarotto GT et al (2021) Three-phase hydrodynamic simulation and experimental validation of an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor. Comput Math Appl 83:95–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2020.02.017
Delaplace G, Bouvier L, Moreau A, Guerin R, Leuliet JC (2004) Determination of mixing time by colourimetric diagnosis: application to a new mixing system. Exp Fluids 36:437–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-003-0741-7
Dixon AG, Partopour B (2020) Computational fluid dynamics for fixed bed reactor design. Annu Rev Chem Biomol 11:109–130. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-092319-075328
Donoso-Bravo A, Sadino-Riquelme C, Gomez D et al (2018) Modelling of an anaerobic plug-flow reactor: process analysis and evaluation approaches with non-ideal mixing considerations. Bioresour Technol 260:95–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.03.082
Dube O, Dube D, Chaouki J, Bertrand F (2014) Optimization of detector positioning in the radioactive particle tracking technique. Appl Radiat Isotopes 89:109–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2014.02.019
El Ibrahimi M, Khay I, El Maakoul A et al (2020) Anaerobic co-digestion in a liquid recirculation pilot-scale reactor: Thermal and hydraulic study. Energy Rep 6:496–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2019.09.014
El Ibrahimi M, Khay I, El Maakoul A, Bakhouya M (2021) Food waste treatment through anaerobic co-digestion: Effects of mixing intensity on the thermohydraulic performance and methane production of a liquid recirculation digester. Process Saf Environ 147:1171–1184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2021.01.027
El-Mashad HM, van Loon WKP, Zeeman G, Bot GPA (2005) Rheological properties of dairy cattle manure. Bioresour Technol 96:531–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2004.06.020
Eltayeb A, Tan SC, Qi Z, Ala AA, Ahmed NM (2019) PLIF experimental validation of a FLUENT CFD model of a coolant mixing in reactor vessel down-corner. Ann Nucl Energy 128:190–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2018.12.051
EPA U S (1979) Process design manual for sludge treatment and disposal. Center for Environmental Research Information Technology Transfer, Cincinnati
Etminan A, Jafarizadeh H, Moosavi M, Akramian K (2012) Determination of flow characteristics and turbulent heat transfer in a ribbed roughened square duct, Part 1: Turbulence models. Appl Mech Mater 110–116:2359. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.110-116.2359
Fu J, Tang Y, Li JX et al (2016) Four kinds of the two-equation turbulence model’s research on flow field simulation performance of DPF’s porous media and swirl-type regeneration burner. Appl Therm Eng 93:397–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.09.116
Grobicki A, Stuckey DC (1992) Hydrodynamic characteristics of the anaerobic baffled reactor. Water Res 26:371–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(92)90034-2
Gunes C, Chowdhury SM, Zuccarelli CE, Marashdeh QM, Teixeira FL (2019) Displacement-current phase tomography for water-dominated two-phase flow velocimetry. IEEE Sens J 19:1563–1571. https://doi.org/10.1109/Jsen.2018.2883293
Hamad FA, He S (2010) Evaluation of hot-film, dual optical and pitot tube probes for liquid-liquid two-phase flow measurements. Flow Meas Instrum 21:302–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2010.03.004
Hashemi SA, Spelay RB, Sanders RS, Hjertaker BT (2021) A novel method to improve Electrical Resistance Tomography measurements on slurries containing clays. Flow Meas Instrum. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2021.101973
Heiker M, Kraume M, Mertins A, Wawer T, Rosenberger S (2021) Biogas plants in renewable energy systems: A systematic review of modeling approaches of biogas production. Appl Sci-Basel. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11083361
Holm-Nielsen JB, Al Seadi T, Oleskowicz-Popiel P (2009) The future of anaerobic digestion and biogas utilization. Bioresour Technol 100:5478–5484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.12.046
Hong E, Yeneneh AM, Sen TK, Ang HM, Kayaalp A (2018) A comprehensive review on rheological studies of sludge from various sections of municipal wastewater treatment plants for enhancement of process performance. Adv Colloid Interfac 257:19–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2018.06.002
Hu YY, Zhang SH, Wang X et al (2021a) Visualization of mass transfer in mixing processes in high solid anaerobic digestion using Laser Induced Fluorescence (LIF) technique. Waste Manage 127:121–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.04.038
Hu YY, Zheng XH, Zhang SH et al (2021b) Investigation of hydrodynamics in high solid anaerobic digestion by particle image velocimetry and computational fluid dynamics: Role of mixing on flow field and dead zone reduction. Bioresour Technol 319:124130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124130
Huang RY, Mei ZL, Long Y et al (2015) Impact of optimized flow pattern on pollutant removal and biogas production rate using wastewater anaerobic fermentation. Bioresources 10:4826–4842
Humair N, Theodore JH (2018) Review of noninvasive methods to characterize granular mixing. Powder Technol 332:331–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2018.03.035
Huo SH, Wang FP et al (2017) Influence of fluid dynamics on anaerobic digestion of food waste for biogas production. Environ Technol 38:1160–1168. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2016.1220429
Hurtado FJ, Kaiser AS, Zamora B (2015) Fluid dynamic analysis of a continuous stirred tank reactor for technical optimization of wastewater digestion. Water Res 71:282–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.11.053
Jardon-Perez LE, Amaro-Villeda A, Gonzalez-Rivera C et al (2019) Introducing the planar laser-induced fluorescence technique (PLIF) to measure mixing time in gas-stirred ladles. Metall Mater Trans B 50:2121–2133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-019-01631-y
Jegede AO, Zeeman G, Bruning H (2019) Evaluation of liquid and solid phase mixing in Chinese dome digesters using residence time distribution (RTD) technique. Renew Energ 143:501–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.04.160
Jegede AO, Gualtieri C, Zeeman G, Bruning H (2020) Three-phase simulation of the hydraulic characteristics of an optimized Chinese dome digester using COMSOL Multiphysics. Renew Energ 157:530–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.05.011
Jia XW, Wen JP, Feng W, Yuan Q (2007) Local hydrodynamics modeling of a gas-liquid-solid three-phase airlift loop reactor. Ind Eng Chem Res 46:5210–5220. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie061697l
Jiang JK, Wu J, Poncin S, Li HZ (2016) Effect of hydrodynamic shear on biogas production and granule characteristics in a continuous stirred tank reactor. Process Biochem 51:345–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2015.12.014
Jiang YW, Murray A, di Mare L, Ireland P (2022) Mesh sensitivity of RANS simulations on film cooling flow. Int J Heat Mass Tran. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.121825
Kaparaju P, Buendia I, Ellegaard L, Angelidaki I (2008) Effects of mixing on methane production during thermophilic anaerobic digestion of manure: Lab-scale and pilot-scale studies. Bioresour Technol 99:4919–4928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.09.015
Karaeva JV, Khalitova GR (2015) Evaluation of mixing quality in anaerobic digester. J Renew Sustain Ener 7:053111. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4923327
Karim K, Varma R, Vesvikar M, Al-Dahhan MH (2004) Flow pattern visualization of a simulated digester. Water Res 38:3659–3670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2004.06.009
Karim K, Hoffmann R, Klasson KT, Al-Dahhan MH (2005a) Anaerobic digestion of animal waste: Effect of mode of mixing. Water Res 39:3597–3606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2005.06.019
Karim K, Hoffmann R, Klasson T, Al-Dahhan MH (2005b) Anaerobic digestion of animal waste: Waste strength versus impact of mixing. Bioresour Technol 96:1771–1781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2005.01.020
Kariyama ID, Zhai XD, Wu BX (2018) Influence of mixing on anaerobic digestion efficiency in stirred tank digesters: A review. Water Res 143:503–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.06.065
Karpinska AM, Bridgeman J (2016) CFD-aided modelling of activated sludge systems: A critical review. Water Res 88:861–879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.11.008
Kelly WJ (2008) Using computational fluid dynamics to characterize and improve bioreactor performance. Biotechnol Appl Bioc 49:225–238. https://doi.org/10.1042/Ba20070177
Koerich DM, Rosa LM (2017) Optimization of bioreactor operating conditions using computational fluid dynamics techniques. Can J Chem Eng 95:199–204. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.22635
Kowalczyk A, Harnisch E, Schwede S, Gerber M, Span R (2013) Different mixing modes for biogas plants using energy crops. Appl Energ 112:465–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.03.065
Kress P, Nagele HJ, Oechsner H, Ruile S (2018) Effect of agitation time on nutrient distribution in full-scale CSTR biogas digesters. Bioresour Technol 247:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.054
Latha K, Velraj R, Shanmugam P, Sivanesan S (2019) Mixing strategies of high solids anaerobic co-digestion using food waste with sewage sludge for enhanced biogas production. J Clean Prod 210:388–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.219
Lebranchu A, Delaunay S, Marchal P et al (2017) Impact of shear stress and impeller design on the production of biogas in anaerobic digesters. Bioresour Technol 245:1139–1147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.113
Lee TH, Park GC, Lee DJ (2002) Local flow characteristics of subcooled boiling flow of water in a vertical concentric annulus. Int J Multiphas Flow 28:1351–1368. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-9322(02)00026-5
Leonzio G (2018) Study of mixing systems and geometric configurations for anaerobic digesters using CFD analysis. Renew Energ 123:578–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.02.071
Li YQ, Song ZY, Yuan Y, Zhang QQ, Zhu HT (2020) Rheology improvement in an osmotic membrane bioreactor for waste sludge anaerobic digestion and the implication on agitation energy consumption. Bioresour Technol 295:122313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122313
Li LL, Wang K, Wei LL et al (2022) CFD simulation and performance evaluation of gas mixing during high solids anaerobic digestion of food waste. Biochem Eng J 178:108279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2021.108279
Lindmark J, Eriksson P, Thorin E (2014a) The effects of different mixing intensities during anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Waste Manage 34:1391–1397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.04.006
Lindmark J, Thorin E, Fdhila RB, Dahlquist E (2014b) Effects of mixing on the result of anaerobic digestion: review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 40:1030–1047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.182
Liu XL, Ren NQ, Wan CL (2007) Hydrodynamic characteristics of a four-compartment periodic anaerobic baffled reactor. J Environ Sci-China 19:1159–1165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(07)60189-2
Liu JB, Yu DW, Zhang J et al (2016) Rheological properties of sewage sludge during enhanced anaerobic digestion with microwave-H2O2 pretreatment. Water Res 98:98–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.03.073
Liu YQ, Chen JJ, Lu XH, Ji XY, Wang CS (2019) Reducing the agitation power consumption in anaerobic digestion of corn straw by adjusting the rheological properties. Enrgy Proced 158:1267–1272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2019.01.314
Low SC, Parthasarathy R, Slatter P, Eshtiaghi N (2012) Hydrodynamics study of sludge in anaerobic digesters. Chem Eng Trans 29:1321–1326. https://doi.org/10.3303/Cet1229221
Low SC, Eshtiaghi N, Shu L, Parthasarathy R (2017) Flow patterns in the mixing of sludge simulant with jet recirculation system. Process Saf Environ 112:209–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2017.08.016
Low SC, Allitt D, Eshtiaghi N, Parthasarathy R (2018) Measuring active volume using electrical resistance tomography in a gas-sparged model anaerobic digester. Chem Eng Res Des 130:42–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2017.11.039
Lucas GP, Cory JC, Waterfall RC (2000) A six-electrode local probe for measuring solids velocity and volume fraction profiles in solids-water flows. Meas Sci Technol 11:1498–1509. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/11/10/311
Luo HP, Al-Dahhan MH (2008) Local characteristics of hydrodynamics in draft tube airlift bioreactor. Chem Eng Sci 63:3057–3068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2008.03.015
Mansouri Y, Zinatizadeh AA, Mohammadi P et al (2012) Hydraulic characteristics analysis of an anaerobic rotatory biological contactor (AnRBC) using tracer experiments and response surface methodology (RSM). Korean J Chem Eng 29:891–902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-011-0269-0
Mao LW, Zhang JX, Dai YJ, Tong YW (2019) Effects of mixing time on methane production from anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and chicken manure: Experimental studies and CFD analysis. Bioresour Technol 294:122177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122177
Mao LW, Tsui TH, Zhang JX, Dai YJ, Tong YW (2021) Mixing effects on decentralized high-solid digester for horticultural waste: Startup, operation and sensitive microorganisms. Bioresour Technol 333:125216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125216
Markis F, Baudez JC, Parthasarathy R, Slatter P, Eshtiaghi N (2016) The apparent viscosity and yield stress of mixtures of primary and secondary sludge: Impact of volume fraction of secondary sludge and total solids concentration. Chem Eng J 288:577–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.11.107
Melton LA, Lipp CW, Spradling RW, Paulson KA (2002) DISMT - determination of mixing time through color changes. Chem Eng Commun 189:322–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986440212077
Menter FR (2009) Review of the shear-stress transport turbulence model experience from an industrial perspective. Int J Comput Fluid D 23:305–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/10618560902773387
Montante G, Paglianti A (2015) Fluid dynamics characterization of a stirred model bio-methanation digester. Chem Eng Res Des 93:38–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2014.05.003
Mühlbauer A, Hlawitschka M, Bart H (2019) Models for the numerical simulation of bubble columns: A review. Chem Ing Tec 91:1747–1765. https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.201900109
Muhlbauer A, Hlawitschka MW, Bart HJ (2019) Models for the numerical simulation of bubble columns: A review. Chem Ing Tec 91:1747–1765. https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.201900109
Munoz-Cobo JL, Rivera Y, Berna C, Escriva A (2020) Analysis of conductance probes for two-phase flow and holdup applications. Sensors-Basel 20:7042. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20247042
Naqi A, Kuhn JN, Joseph B (2019) Techno-economic analysis of producing liquid fuels from biomass via anaerobic digestion and thermochemical conversion. Biomass Bioenerg 130:105395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.105395
Nie W, Cheng L, Yin S et al (2022) Effects of press-in airflow rate and the distance between the pressure duct and the side wall on ventilation dust suppression performance in an excavating tunnel. Environ Sci Pollut R 29:19404–19419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16825-8
Nopens I, Torfs E, Ducoste J, Vanrolleghem PA, Gernaey KV (2015) Population balance models: a useful complementary modelling framework for future WWTP modelling. Water Sci Technol 71:159–167. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2014.500
Ochieng A, Onyango M, Kiriamiti K (2009) Experimental measurement and computational fluid dynamics simulation of mixing in a stirred tank: A review. S Afr J Sci 105:421–426
Parker DJ, Broadbent CJ, Fowles P, Hawkesworth MR, Mcneil P (1993) Positron emission particle tracking: a technique for studying flow within engineering equipment. Nuclear Instrum Methods Phys Res A 326:592–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9002(93)90864-E
Parker DJ, Dijkstra AE, Martin TW, Seville J (1997) Positron emission particle tracking studies of spherical particle motion in rotating drums. Chem Eng Sci 52:2011–2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(97)00030-4
Pianko-Oprych P, Nienow AW, Barigou M (2009) Positron emission particle tracking (PEPT) compared to particle image velocimetry (PIV) for studying the flow generated by a pitched-blade turbine in single phase and multi-phase systems. Chem Eng Sci 64:4955–4968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2009.08.003
Ratanatamskul C, Saleart T (2016) Effects of sludge recirculation rate and mixing time on performance of a prototype single-stage anaerobic digester for conversion of food wastes to biogas and energy recovery. Environ Sci Pollut R 23:7092–7098. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4448-0
Ren TT, Mu Y, Ni BJ, Yu HQ (2009) Hydrodynamics of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors. Aiche J 55:516–528. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.11667
Rezavand M, Winkler D, Sappl J et al (2019) A fully Lagrangian computational model for the integration of mixing and biochemical reactions in anaerobic digestion. Comput Fluids 181:224–235.
Rimpilainen V, Poutiainen S, Heikkinen LM et al (2011) Electrical capacitance tomography as a monitoring tool for high-shear mixing and granulation. Chem Eng Sci 66:4090–4100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2011.05.044
Rocamora I, Wagland ST, Villa R et al (2020) Dry anaerobic digestion of organic waste: A review of operational parameters and their impact on process performance. Bioresour Technol 299:122681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122681
Roy S, Kemoun A, Al-Dahhan M, Dudukovic MP (2001) A method for estimating the solids circulation rate in a closed-loop circulating fluidized bed. Powder Technol 121:213–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-5910(01)00353-9
Sadino-Riquelme C, Hayes RE, Jeison D, Donoso-Bravo A (2018) Computational fluid dynamic (CFD) modelling in anaerobic digestion: General application and recent advances. Crit Rev Env Sci Tec 48:39–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2018.1440853
Sajjadi B, Raman AAA, Parthasarathy R (2016) Fluid dynamic analysis of non-Newtonian flow behavior of municipal sludge simulant in anaerobic digesters using submerged, recirculating jets. Chem Eng J 298:259–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.03.069
Sanchez F, Viedma A, Kaiser AS (2016) Hydraulic characterization of an activated sludge reactor with recycling system by tracer experiment and analytical models. Water Res 101:382–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.05.094
Schmidell W, Craveiro AM, Peres CS, Hirata YS, Varella RF (1986) Anaerobic-digestion of municipal solid-wastes. Water Sci Technol 18:163–175. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1986.0172
Shaikh A, Al-Dahhan M (2010) A new methodology for hydrodynamic similarity in bubble columns. Can J Chem Eng 88:503–517. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.20357
Sharma C, Malhotra D, Rathore AS (2011) Review of computational fluid dynamics applications in biotechnology processes. Biotechnol Progr 27:1497–1510. https://doi.org/10.1002/btpr.689
Shen F, Tian LB, Yuan HR et al (2013) Improving the mixing performances of rice straw anaerobic digestion for higher biogas production by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation. Appl Biochem Biotech 171:626–642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-013-0375-z
Sindall R, Bridgeman J, Carliell-Marquet C (2013) Velocity gradient as a tool to characterise the link between mixing and biogas production in anaerobic waste digesters. Water Sci Technol 67:2800–2806. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2013.206
Sindall RC, Dapelo D, Leadbeater T, Bridgeman J (2017) Positron emission particle tracking (PEPT): A novel approach to flow visualisation in lab-scale anaerobic digesters. Flow Meas Instrum 54:250–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2017.02.009
Singh B, Szamosi Z, Simenfalvi Z (2019) State of the art on mixing in an anaerobic digester: a review. Renew Energ 141:922–936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.04.072
Singh B, Szamosi Z, Simenfalvi Z (2020) Impact of mixing intensity and duration on biogas production in an anaerobic digester: A review. Crit Rev Biotechnol 40:508–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2020.1731413
Smith LC, Elliot DJ, James A (1993) Characterization of mixing patterns in an anaerobic digester by means of tracer curve analysis. Ecol Model 69:267–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3800(93)90030-V
Spalart PR, Allmaras SR (1994) A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. Rech Aerospatiale, 5–21
Sun XD, Paranjape S, Kim S, Ozar B, Ishii M (2004) Liquid velocity in upward and downward air-water flows. Ann Nucl Energy 31:357–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2003.08.002
Taofeeq H, Aradhya S, Shao J, Al-Dahhan M (2018) Advance optical fiber probe for simultaneous measurements of solids holdup and particles velocity using simple calibration methods for gas-solid fluidization systems. Flow Meas Instrum 63:18–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2018.07.001
Terashima M, Goel R, Komatsu K et al (2009) CFD simulation of mixing in anaerobic digesters. Bioresour Technol 100:2228–2233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.07.069
Tian LB, Shen F, Yuan HR et al (2014) Reducing agitation energy-consumption by improving rheological properties of corn stover substrate in anaerobic digestion. Bioresour Technol 168:86–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.03.023
Tobo YM, Bartacek J, Nopens I (2020a) Linking CFD and kinetic models in anaerobic digestion using a compartmental model approach. Processes 8:703–715. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8060703
Tobo YM, Rehman U, Bartacek J, Nopens I (2020b) Partial integration of ADM1 into CFD: understanding the impact of diffusion on anaerobic digestion mixing. Water Sci Technol 81:1658–1667. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2020.076
Trad Z, Fontaine JP, Larroche C, Vial C (2016) Multiscale mixing analysis and modeling of biohydrogen production by dark fermentation. Renew Energ 98:264–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.03.094
Trad Z, Fontaine JP, Larroche C, Vial C (2017) Experimental and numerical investigation of hydrodynamics and mixing in a dual-impeller mechanically-stirred digester. Chem Eng J 329:142–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.07.038
Vesvikar MS, Al-Dahhan M (2005) Flow pattern visualization in a mimic anaerobic digester using CFD. Biotechnol Bioeng 89:719–732. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.20388
Vesvikar MS, Al-Dahhan M (2015) Effect of scale on hydrodynamics of internal gas-lift loop reactor-type anaerobic digester using CFD. Chem Prod Process Model 10:179–192. https://doi.org/10.1515/cppm-2015-0009
Vesvikar MS, Al-Dahhan M (2016) Hydrodynamics investigation of laboratory-scale internal gas-lift loop anaerobic digester using non-invasive CAPRT technique. Biomass Bioenerg 84:98–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.11.014
Wang XY, Wang RQ, Du SJ, Chen J, Tan SC (2016) Flow visualization and mixing quantification in a rod bundle using laser induced fluorescence. Nucl Eng Des 305:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2016.01.007
Wang F, Jin ND, Wang DY, Han YF, Liu DY (2017) Measurement of gas phase characteristics in bubbly oil-gas-water flows using bi-optical fiber and high-resolution conductance probes. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 88:361–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2017.06.017
Wang J, Xue QW, Guo T et al (2018) A review on CFD simulating method for biogas fermentation material fluid. Renew Sust Energ Rev 97:64–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.08.029
Wang Y, Shen C, Tang ZB et al (2019) Interaction between particulate fouling and precipitation fouling: sticking probability and deposit bond strength. Int J Heat Mass Transf. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.118700
Wang Y, Shen C, Wan ZH, Luo Z, Yao Y (2022) Investigation on the fouling mechanism at different water velocities in internally enhanced tubes. Heat Mass Transf. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-022-03177-3
Warsito W, Fan LS (2001) Measurement of real-time flow structures in gas-liquid and gas-liquid-solid flow systems using electrical capacitance tomography (ECT). Chem Eng Sci 56:6455–6462. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(01)00234-2
Wei P, Mudde RF, Uijttewaal W et al (2019) Characterising the two-phase flow and mixing performance in a gas-mixed anaerobic digester: Importance for scaled-up applications. Water Res 149:86–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.10.077
Wei LL, Ren YM, Zhu FY et al (2021) Horizontal flow reactor optimization for biogas recovery during high solid organics fermentation: Rheological characteristic analyses. J Water Process Eng 40:101776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101776
Wicklein E, Batstone DJ, Ducoste J et al (2016) Good modelling practice in applying computational fluid dynamics for WWTP modelling. Water Sci Technol 73:969–982. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2015.565
Wu B, Bibeau E L (2006) Development of 3-D anaerobic digester heat transfer model for cold weather applications. T Asabe 49:749–757. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.20482.
Wu BX (2010a) CFD simulation of gas and non-Newtonian fluid two-phase flow in anaerobic digesters. Water Res 44:3861–3874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.04.043
Wu BX (2010b) Computational fluid dynamics investigation of turbulence models for non-Newtonian fluid flow in anaerobic digesters. Environ Sci Technol 44:8989–8995. https://doi.org/10.1021/es1010016
Wu BX (2012a) CFD simulation of mixing for high-solids anaerobic digestion. Biotechnol Bioeng 109:2116–2126. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.24482
Wu BX (2012b) Integration of mixing, heat transfer, and biochemical reaction kinetics in anaerobic methane fermentation. Biotechnol Bioeng 109:2864–2874. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.24551
Wu BX (2014) CFD simulation of gas mixing in anaerobic digesters. Comput Electron Agric 109:278–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2014.10.007
Wu BX, Chen SL (2008) CFD simulation of non-Newtonian fluid flow in anaerobic digesters. Biotechnol Bioeng 99:700–711. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.21613
Yang Y, Zhu H (2020) Clustering and modelling of rheological parameters for anaerobic digestion materials (ADMs) and its application for feed pump selection. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 467:012053. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/467/1/012053
Yu LA, Ma JW, Chen SL (2011) Numerical simulation of mechanical mixing in high solid anaerobic digester. Bioresour Technol 102:1012–1018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.09.079
Zhang JB, Poncin S, Wu J, Li HZ (2011) A multiscale approach for studying an anaerobic multiphase bioreactor. Chem Eng Sci 66:3423–3431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2011.01.021
Zhang Y, Yu GR, Yu L et al (2016) Computational fluid dynamics study on mixing mode and power consumption in anaerobic mono- and co-digestion. Bioresour Technol 203:166–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.12.023
Zhang JX, Mao LW, Nithya K et al (2019) Optimizing mixing strategy to improve the performance of an anaerobic digestion waste-to-energy system for energy recovery from food waste. Appl Energ 249:28–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.04.142
Zhu YF, Wang DM, Shao ZL et al (2020) Investigation on the overpressure of methane-air mixture gas explosions in straight large-scale tunnels. Process Saf Environ 135:101–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2019.12.022
Acknowledgements
This research was funded under the auspices of the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2018YFC1900902) and the State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resources and Environment (2022DX07).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Lili Li: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing–original draft, Writing – review & editing. Kun Wang: Conceptualization. Qingliang Zhao: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing–review & editing, Funding acquisition. Qingwei Gao: Methodology, Writing–review & editing. Huimin Zhou: Writing–original draft. Junqiu Jiang: Funding acquisition. Wangyang Mei: Writing–original draft.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, L., Wang, K., Zhao, Q. et al. A critical review of experimental and CFD techniques to characterize the mixing performance of anaerobic digesters for biogas production. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 21, 665–689 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-022-09626-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-022-09626-z