Skip to main content
Log in

Investigation on the fouling mechanism at different water velocities in internally enhanced tubes

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Heat and Mass Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fouling deposition is dependent of deposit rate and removal rate, corresponding to sticking probability and deposit bond strength, respectively. As indicated by existing studies, heat transfer tubes with different geometries have different sticking probabilities. However, the effect of water velocity and the sticking probability have not been studied in depth. In this study, the particulate fouling on two internally enhanced tubes and a plain tube was tested at three water velocities for more than 500 h. As demonstrated by the experimental results, the asymptotic fouling resistance increased with the decrease in water velocity. According to the simulation result, the sticking probability was proportional to the surface temperature, which decreased with the increase in water velocity. Thus, it was indicated that the water velocity could have an effect on the characteristics of fouling deposition. Compared with the enhanced tubes, the plain tube with lower heat exchange capacity had a higher sticking probability, and it was more sensitive to the flow that had a significant effect on the deposit bond strength. Besides, the internal structure of enhanced tube had an effect on fouling deposition by changing the flow field near wall. The enhanced tube with the start-number of 45 had a lower sticking probability, compared with that with the start-number of 10. However, the particulate fouling on the enhanced tube with the start-number of 45 was hardly denuded by flow due to the larger deposit bond strength. With a focus on the water velocity, this study investigated the fouling mechanism, which can provide suggestions for designers to select heat transfer tubes with less fouling in accordance with operating conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A :

Heat transfer area, m2

B :

Time factor, 1/s

\({C}_{b}\) :

Particle concentration, kg/m3

c p :

Specific heat capacity, J/kg·K

D :

Mass diffusivity, m2/s

\({D}_{i}\) :

Inner diameter of tube, m

\({d}_{p}\) :

Particle size, m

e :

Rib height, m

f :

Friction factor of tube, dimensionless

j :

Colburn j-factor, dimensionless

\({k}_{f}\) :

Thermal conductivity of deposition, W/m·K

\({K}_{B}\) :

Boltzmann constant, J/K

\({K}_{D}\) :

Particle deposit coefficient, m/s

\({K}_{m}\) :

Mass transfer coefficient, m/s

LMTD :

Logarithmic mean temperature difference, oC

N s :

Number of starts (or ribs) on the cross section of enhanced tube, dimensionless

Nu :

Nusselt number, dimensionless

\(P\) :

Sticking probability, dimensionless

p :

Rib pitch, m

PEC:

Performance Evaluation Criteria, dimensionless

Q :

Total heat transfer rate, W

q :

Heat flux, W/m2

\({R}_{f}\) :

Fouling thermal resistance, m2·K/W

\({R}_{f}^{*}\) :

Asymptotic fouling resistance, m2·K/W

\(Re\) :

Reynolds number, dimensionless

\(Sc\) :

Schmidt number, dimensionless

T :

Temperature, oC

\({T}_{w,i}\) :

Inlet water temperature, oC

\({T}_{w,o}\) :

Outlet water temperature, oC

\({T}_{r,sat}\) :

Saturation temperature of refrigerant, oC

t :

Time, s

u :

Fluid velocity (water), m/s

U :

Overall heat transfer coefficient, W/m2·K

V :

Water flow rate, m3/s

\(\sum {x}_{i}\) :

Sum the calculated data based on all x1, x2xn

\({Y}_{q}\) :

Correction factor of overall heat transfer coefficient caused by heat flux deviation, dimensionless

\({Y}_{u}\) :

Correction factor of overall heat transfer coefficient caused by velocity deviation, dimensionless

\(\alpha\) :

Helix angle, degrees

\({\tau }_{s}\) :

Wall shear stress, N/m2

\(\xi\) :

Deposit bond strength, N·s/m2

\(v\) :

Kinematic viscosity, m2/s

\(\mu\) :

Dynamic viscosity, Pa·s

\({\rho }_{w}\) :

Density of water, kg/m3

\({\rho }_{f}\) :

Density of fouling, kg/m3

\(\phi\) :

Covering particle volume fractions, dimensionless

ave :

Average value

f :

Fouling condition

p :

Plain surface

ref :

The reference point

w :

Working water

References

  1. Research and Markets (2018) Heat Exchangers Market by Type (Shell & Tube, Plate & Frame, Air Cooled), Application (Chemical, Petrochemical and Oil & Gas, HVACR, Food & Beverage, Power Generation, Pulp & Paper), and Region - Global Forecast to 2023 Research and Markets, Dublin, Ireland

  2. Guo J, Zou B, Wang Y, Jiang Y (2020) Space heating performance of novel ventilated mortar blocks integrated with phase change material for floor heating. Build Environ 185:107175

  3. Yang Y, Wu W, Fu S, Zhang H (2020) Study of a novel ceramsite-based shape-stabilized composite phase change material (PCM) for energy conservation in buildings. Construct Build Mater 246:118479

  4. Research and Markets (2019) Heat Exchangers – A Global Market Overview Research and Markets, Dublin, Ireland

  5. Wang Y, Shen C, Sun P, Li C, Zhang C (2020) Utilization of waste heat from commercial kitchen exhaust for water heating and dish drying. J Build Engineer 32:101788

  6. Liang C, Li X, Shi W, Wang B (2021) A direct expansion air handling unit assisted by liquid desiccant for different sensible and latent heat ratios. Energy Build 238:110672

  7. Guo J, Jiang Y, Wang Y, Zou B (2020) Thermal storage and thermal management properties of a novel ventilated mortar block integrated with phase change material for floor heating: an experimental study. Energy Convers Manag 205:112288

  8. Müller-Steinhagen H, Malayeri MR, Watkinson AP (2011) Heat exchanger fouling: mitigation and cleaning strategies. Heat Transfer Eng 32:189–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Li W (2003) The internal surface area basis, a key issue of modeling fouling in enhanced heat transfer tubes. Int J Heat Mass Tran 46:4345–4349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Somerscales EFC (1990) Fouling of heat transfer surfaces: an historical review. Heat Transfer Eng 11:19–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li W, Li G (2010) Modeling cooling tower fouling in helical-rib tubes based on Von-Karman analogy. Int J Heat Mass Tran 53:2715–2721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Webb RL, Li W (2000) Fouling in enhanced tubes using cooling tower water Part I: long-term fouling data. Int J Heat Mass Tran 43:3567–3578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shen C, Gao R, Wang X, Yao Y (2019) Investigation on fouling of enhanced tubes used in a cooling tower water system based on a long-term test. Int J Refrig 104:9–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Webb RL (2009) Single-phase heat transfer, friction, and fouling characteristics of three-dimensional cone roughness in tube flow. Int J Heat Mass Tran 52:2624–2631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Abedin MZ, Kim N-H (2016) An experimental study on accelerated fouling of aluminum oxide and ferric oxide particles in internally enhanced tubes. J Mech Sci Technol 30:5707–5714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang N, Wei X, Yang Q, Li N, Yao E (2019) Numerical simulation and experimental study of the growth characteristics of particulate fouling on pipe heat transfer surface. Heat Mass Transfer 55:687–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shen C, Wang Y, Tang Z, Yao Y, Huang Y, Wang X (2019) Experimental study on the interaction between particulate fouling and precipitation fouling in the fouling process on heat transfer tubes. Int J Heat Mass Tran 138:1238–1250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim N-H (2018) Particulate fouling and on-line cleaning of ferric oxide particles in internally enhanced tubes. Heat Transfer Eng 39:40–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu T, Li X, Wang H, Sun X (2002) Formation process of mixed fouling of microbe and CaCO3 in water systems. Chem Eng J 88:249–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Li W, Webb RL (2000) Fouling in enhanced tubes using cooling tower water Part II: combined particulate and precipitation fouling. Int J Heat Mass Tran 43:3579–3588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pu J, Shen C, Yang H, Wen M (2021) Investigating heat transfer and frosting performance of air source heat pumps with the impact of particulate fouling. Energy Sustain Dev 65:194–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yang Q, Zhang Z, Yao E, Zhang N, Li N (2019) Experimental study of the particulate dirt characteristics on pipe heat transfer surface. J Therm Sci 28:1054–1064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cremaschi L, Wu X, Lim E, Barve A, Ramesh A (2012) Waterside fouling performance of brazed-plate type condensers in cooling tower applications ASHRAE Research Project Report: ASHRAE-RP-1345

  24. Shen C, Wang Y, Gao R, Yao Y, Wang X (2019) An improved modeling method of water-side fouling in enhanced tubes of condensers in application of cooling water tower. J Therm Sci 28:30–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gao R, Shen C, Wang X, Yao Y (2019) Experimental study on the sticking probability and deposit bond strength of fouling in enhanced tubes. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer 103:17–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang Y, Shen C, Tang Z, Yao Y, Wang X, Park B (2019) Interaction between particulate fouling and precipitation fouling: Sticking probability and deposit bond strength. Int J Heat Mass Tran 144:118700

  27. Kern DQ, Seaton RE (1959) A theoretical analysis of thermal surface fouling. ChemEng Prog 4:258–262

    Google Scholar 

  28. Shen C, Cirone C, Wang X (2015) A method for developing a prediction model of water-side fouling on enhanced tubes. Int J Heat Mass Tran 85:336–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Chamra LM, Webb RL (1994) Modeling liquid-side particulate fouling in enhanced tubes. Int J Heat Mass Tran 37:571–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Epstein N (1988) Particulate fouling of heat transfer surfaces: mechanisms and model. In: Melo LF, Bott TR, Bernardo CA (eds) Fouling Sci Technol 143–164

  31. Newell DB, Cabiati F, Fischer J, Fujii K, Karshenboim SG, Margolis HS, de Mirandés E, Mohr PJ, Nez F, Pachucki K, Quinn TJ, Taylor BN, Wang M, Wood BM, Zhang Z (2018) The CODATA 2017 values of h, e, k, and NA for the revision of the SI. Metrologia 55:L13–L16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Webb RL, Narayanamurthy R, Thors P (2000) Heat transfer and friction characteristics of internal helical-rib roughness. J Heat Transfer 122:134–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mueller S, Llewellin EW, Mader HM (2010) The rheology of suspensions of solid particles. Proc Royal Soc A: Mathematic, Phys Engineer Sci 466:1201–1228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Thomas DG (1965) Transport characteristics of suspension: VIII. A note on the viscosity of Newtonian suspensions of uniform spherical particles. J Colloid Sci 20:267–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Shen C, Wang Y, Zhao Z, Jiang Y, Yao Y (2018) Decoupling analysis on the variations of liquid velocity and heat flux in the test of fouling thermal resistance. Int J Heat Mass Tran 123:227–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Bansal B, Müller-Steinhagen H, Chen XD (1997) Effect of suspended particles on crystallization fouling in plate heat exchangers. J Heat Transfer 119:568–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kim N-H, Webb RL (1991) Particulate fouling of water in tubes having a two-dimensional roughness geometry. Int J Heat Mass Tran 34:2727–2738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Xu Z, Han Z, Wang J, Li Y (2019) Numerical simulation of CaSO4 crystallization fouling in a rectangular channel with vortex generators. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer 101:42–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Xu Z, Han Z, Sun A, Yu X (2019) Numerical study of particulate fouling characteristics in a rectangular heat exchange channel. Appl Therm Eng 154:657–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Somerscales EFC, Ponteduro AF, Bergles AE (1991) Particulate fouling of heat transfer tubes enhanced on their inner surface. Fouling Enhanc Interact 164:17–28

    Google Scholar 

  41. Li W, Fu P, Li H, Li G, Thors P (2016) Numerical–theoretical analysis of heat transfer, pressure drop, and fouling in internal helically ribbed tubes of different geometries. Heat Transfer Eng 37:279–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Han Z, Xu Z, Wang J (2018) CaSO4 fouling characteristics on the rectangular channel with half-cylinder vortex generators. Appl Therm Eng 128:1456–1463

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the funding support from the Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province (YQ2020E019), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52106203). We are also grateful to Mr. Zhenbo Tang, Guoquan Lyu and Zilong Zhao for helping in experimentations. In addition, Yuan Wang especially thanks to Dr. Shen Wei and Ms. Chenyu Ma for valuable discussion during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y.W. conceived and designed the study with the assistance from C.S. Y.W. built the experimental apparatus. Y.W. performed the data calculations, mapping work and analysis with the assistance from Z.W. Y.W. and C.S. formulated the structure of the manuscript. Y.W. wrote the manuscript with support from C.S., Z.L. and Y.Y. All authors participated in the discussions and improvements of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Chao Shen or Yang Yao.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Y., Shen, C., Wan, Z. et al. Investigation on the fouling mechanism at different water velocities in internally enhanced tubes. Heat Mass Transfer 58, 1485–1506 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-022-03177-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-022-03177-3

Navigation