Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The simple view of reading in a transparent orthography: the stronger role of oral comprehension

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Comprehension is the ultimate goal of reading, but it is a very complex task consisting of multiple component skills. A number of studies have tested the simple view of reading (SVR; Gough & Tunmer, 1986) in opaque languages, but few investigations of the SVR components have been conducted on transparent languages. In the present study, we tested the SVR model in a sample of 1895 Italian children attending primary school, from first to fifth grade. An assessment battery was used, which included five different tasks: word and non-word reading, passage reading, reading comprehension, and oral comprehension. Hybrid models combining confirmatory factor analysis with path analysis were run separately for each grade. Results indicated that oral comprehension was always the best predictor of reading comprehension, whereas reading accuracy played a significant but minor role. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adlof, S. M., Catts, H. W., & Little, T. D. (2006). Should the simple view of reading include a fluency component? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 19, 933–958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bonifacci, P., Tobia, V., Lami, L., & Snowling, M. J. (2014). ALCE. Assessment di lettura e comprensione in età evolutiva [ALCE. Assessment for reading and comprehension in development age]. Hogrefe & Huber Publishing.

  • Brizzolara, D. (2001). Imparare la lingua scritta [Learning the written language]. In L. Camaioni (Ed.), Psicologia dello sviluppo del linguaggio. Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burani, C., Barca, L., & Arduino, L. S. (2001). Una base di dati sui valori di età di acquisizione, frequenza, familiarità, immaginabilità, concretezza, e altre variabili lessicali e sublessicali per 626 nomi dell’italiano [Dataset on age of acquisition, familiarity, imageability, concreteness, and other lexical and sublexical variables for 626 Italian words]. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 28, 839–856.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carretti, B., Borella, E., Cornoldi, C., & De Beni, R. (2009). Role of working memory in explaining the performance of individuals with specific reading comprehension difficulties: A meta-analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(2), 246–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carretti, B., & Zamperlin, C. (2010). La relazione fra lettura strumentale, comprensione da ascolto e comprensione del testo in studenti italiani [The relationship between instrumental reading, listening comprehension and reading comprehension in Italian students]. Ricerche di Psicologia, 3, 361–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, P. J., Snowling, M. J., Truelove, E., & Hulme, C. (2010). Ameliorating children’s reading-comprehension difficulties a randomized controlled trial. Psychological Science, 21, 1106–1116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, P. J., Truelove, E., Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. J. (2013). Developing reading comprehension. West Sussex: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Conners, F. A. (2009). Attentional control and the simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22, 591–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cossu, G., Gugliotta, M., & Marshall, J. C. (1995). Acquisition of reading and written spelling in a transparent orthography: Two non parallel processes? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 7, 9–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutting, L. E., & Scarborough, H. S. (2006). Prediction of reading comprehension: Relative contributions of word recognition, language proficiency, and other cognitive skills can depend on how comprehension is measured. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 277–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daneman, M., & Merikle, P. M. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3, 422–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dell’Orletta, F., Montemagni, S., & Venturi, G. (2011). READ-IT: Assessing readability of Italian texts with a view to text simplification. In Proceedings of the 2nd workshop on speech and language processing for assistive technologies. Association for Computational Linguistics.

  • Dreyer, L. G., & Katz, L. (1992). An examination of ‘The simple view of reading’. National Reading Conference Yearbook, 41, 169–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Droop, M., & Verhoeven, L. (2003). Language proficiency and reading ability in first- and second-language learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 38, 78–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florit, E., & Cain, K. (2011). The simple view of reading: Is it valid for different types of alphabetic orthographies? Educational Psychology Review, 23, 553–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florit, E., Levorato, M. C., & Roch, M. (2008). Verba volant, scripta manent. Cambiamenti evolutivi nella comprensione del testo scritto e orale [Verba volant, scripta manent. Developmental changes in reading and listening comprehension]. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 3, 641–662.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goff, D. A., Pratt, C., & Ong, B. (2005). The relations between children’s reading comprehension, working memory, language skills, and components of reading decoding in a normal sample. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 18, 583–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberger, A. S., & Duncan, O. D. (Eds.). (1973). Structural equation models in the social sciences. New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, P., & Tunmer, W. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagtvet, B. E. (2003). Listening comprehension and reading comprehension in poor decoders: Evidence for the importance of syntactic and semantic skills as well as phonological skills. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16, 505–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2, 127–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for t indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, R. M., & Aaron, P. G. (2000). The component model of reading: Simple view of reading made a little more complex. Reading Psychology, 21, 85–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, J. M., Betjemann, R. S., & Olson, R. K. (2008). Reading comprehension tests vary in the skills they assess: Differential dependence on decoding and oral comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12, 281–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, J. M., Betjemann, R. S., Wadsworth, S. J., DeFries, J. C., & Olson, R. K. (2006). Genetic and environmental influences on reading and listening comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 29, 75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendeou, P., van den Broek, P., White, M. J., & Lynch, J. S. (2009). Predicting reading comprehension in early elementary school: The independent contributions of oral language and decoding skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 765–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch, W., & Rawson, K. A. (2005). Comprehension. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 209–226). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, J. R., & Savage, R. S. (2008). Can the simple view deal with the complexities of reading? Literacy, 42, 75–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, H., & Jungmann, T. (2000). Abhängigkeit der Entwicklung des Leseverstehens von Hörverstehen und grundlegenden Lesefertigkeiten im Grundschulalter: eine Prüfung des Simple View of reading-Ansatzes [Dependency of reading comprehension development on listening and basic reading skills. An examination of the simple view of reading]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 32(2), 81–93.

  • Ministry of Education, Universities and Research. (2012). Gli alunni stranieri nel sistema scolastico italiano (AS 2011/2012) [Foreign students in the Italian school system (AS 2011/2012)]. MIUR: Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moll, K., Ramus, F., Bartling, J., Bruder, J., Kunze, S., Neuhoff, N., et al. (2014). Cognitive mechanisms underlying reading and spelling development in five European orthographies. Learning and Instruction, 29, 65–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th edn.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

  • Nation, K., Cocksey, J., Taylor, J. S., & Bishop, D. V. (2010). A longitudinal investigation of early reading and language skills in children with poor reading comprehension. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 51, 1031–1039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nation, K., & Norbury, C. F. (2005). Why reading comprehension fails: Insights from developmental disorders. Topics in Language Disorders, 25, 21–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nation, K., & Snowling, M. J. (2004). Beyond phonological skills: Broader language skills contribute to the development of reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 27, 342–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuhaus, G. F., Roldan, L. W., Boulware-Goodan, R., & Swank, P. R. (2006). Parsimonious reading models: Identifying teachable subskills. Reading Psychology, 27, 58–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oakhill, J. V., & Cain, K. (2012). The precursors of reading ability in young readers: Evidence from a four-year longitudinal study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16, 91–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage, R. (2006). Reading comprehension is not always the product of nonsense word decoding and linguistic comprehension: Evidence from teenagers who are extremely poor readers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 143–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seigneuric, A., & Ehrlich, M. F. (2005). Contribution of working memory capacity to children’s reading comprehension: A longitudinal investigation. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 18, 617–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, P. H. K. (2005). Early reading development in European orthographies. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 296–315). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, P. H. K., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Share, D. L. (2008). On the anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 584–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268, 1632–1634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobia, V., & Marzocchi, G. M. (2013). Predictors of reading fluency in Italian orthography: Evidence from a cross-sectional study of primary school students. Child Neuropsychology, 20, 449–469.

  • Vellutino, F. R., Tunmer, W. E., Jaccard, J. J., & Chen, R. (2007). Components of reading ability: Multivariate evidence for a convergent skills model of reading development. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 3–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, H., Mayringer, H., & Landerl, K. (1998). Poor reading: A deficit in skill-automatization or a phonological deficit? Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 321–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuill, N., & Oakhill, J. (1991). Children’s problems in text comprehension: An experimental investigation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoccolotti, P., De Luca, M., Di Filippo, G., Judica, A., & Martelli, M. (2009). Reading development in an orthographically regular language: Effects of length, frequency, lexicality and global processing ability. Reading and Writing, 22(9), 1053–1079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zoccolotti, P., De Luca, M., Di Pace, E., Judica, A., Orlandi, M., & Spinelli, D. (1999). Markers of developmental surface dyslexia in a language (Italian) with high grapheme-phoneme correspondence. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20, 191–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell’Ateneo Nuovo, 1, 20126, Milan, Italy

    Valentina Tobia

  2. Department of Psychology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

    Paola Bonifacci

Authors
  1. Valentina Tobia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paola Bonifacci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valentina Tobia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tobia, V., Bonifacci, P. The simple view of reading in a transparent orthography: the stronger role of oral comprehension. Read Writ 28, 939–957 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9556-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9556-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation