Skip to main content
Log in

Acquisition of reading and written spelling in a transparent orthography: Two non parallel processes?

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reading and written spelling skills for words and non-words of varying length and orthographic complexity were investigated in normal Italian first and second graders. The regularity and transparency of the mapping between letters and phonemes make Italian orthography an unlikely candidate for discrepancies between reading and spelling to emerge. This notwithstanding, the results showed that reading accuracy is significantly better than spelling. The difference is particularly striking in first graders, but it is still evident in 2nd graders, though most strongly on non-words. The data show that reading and written spelling are non parallel processes and that the developmental asynchrony reflects a partial structural independence of the two systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agard, F. B. & Di Pietro, R. J. (1965).The sounds of English and Italian. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, L. (1985). Dissociation of reading and spelling behaviour. In: D. D. Duane & C. K. Leong (eds.),Understanding learning disabilities (pp. 65–85). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, L. & Bryant, P. E. (1979). The independence of reading and spelling in backward and normal readers,Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 21: 504–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, P. E. & Bradley, L. (1980). Why children sometimes write words which they do not read. In: U. Frith (ed.),Cognitive processes in spelling (pp. 355–370). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, P. E. & Bradley, L. (1983). Auditory organization and backwardness in reading. In: M. Rutter (ed.),Developmental neuropsychiatry (pp. 489–497). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caramazza, A. & Miceli, G. (1989). Orthographic structure, the graphemic buffer and the spelling process. In: C. von Euler, I. Lundberg & G. Lennerstrand (eds.),Brain and reading (pp. 257–268). London: The MacMillan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbonell de Grompone, M. A. (1974). Children who spell better than they read,Academic Therapy 9: 281–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, F., Elenius, K., Granstrom, B. & Hunnicut, S. (1985). Phonetic and orthographic properties of the basic vocabulary of five European languages,KTH Speech Transmission Laboratory, Quarterly Report 1: 63–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, C. (1971). Write first; read later,Childhood Education 47: 296–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cossu, G. & Marshall, J. C. (1985). Dissociation between reading and written spelling in two Italian children: Dyslexia without dysgraphia?,Neuropsychologia 23: 697–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dejerine, J. (1892). Contribution à l'étude anatomopathologique et clinique des différentes varietés de cécité verbale,Comptes Rendues de Séances de la Sociéte de Biologie 4: 61–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrero, F. E., Magno-Caldognetto, E., Vagges, K. & Lavagnoli, C. (1978). Some acoustic characteristics of the Italian vowels,Journal of Italian Linguistics 3: 87–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, C., Liberman, I. Y. & Shankweiler, D. (1977). On interpreting the error pattern in beginning reading,Language and Speech 20: 162–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith, U. (1980). Unexpected spelling problems. In: U. Frith (ed.),Cognitive processes in spelling (pp. 495–515). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith, U. (1983). The similarities and differences between reading and spelling problems. In: M. Rutter (ed.),Developmental neuropsychiatry (pp. 453–472). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In: K. E. Patterson, J. C. Marshall & M. Coltheart (eds.),Surface dyslexia (pp. 301–330). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordinier, H. C. (1903). Arguments in favour of the existence of a separate centre for writing,American Journal of Medical Science 126: 490–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harshman, R. & Krashen, S. (1972). An ‘unbiased’ procedure for comparing degree of lateralization of dichotically presented stimuli,UCLA, Working Papers in Phonetics 23: 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, G., Friedman, M. P., Welch, V. & Desberg, P. A. (1980). Development of strategies in learning to spell. In: U. Frith (ed.),Cognitive processes in spelling (pp. 339–352). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, G., Friedman, M. P., Welch, V. & Desberg, P. A. (1981). A cognitive developmental theory of reading acquisition. In: T. G. Waller & G. Mckinnon (eds.),Reading research: Advances in theory and practice, Vol. 3 (pp. 199–221). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, J. C., Caplan, D. & Holmes, J. M. (1975). The measure of laterality,Neuropsychologia 13: 315–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ognjenovic, V., Lukatela, G., Feldman, L. & Turvey, M. (1983). Misreadings by beginning readers of Serbo-Croatian,Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 35: 581–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, C. (1971). Preschool children's knowledge of English phonology,Harvard Education Review 41: 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, C. (1986).Children's creative spelling. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shallice, T. (1988).From neuropsychology to mental structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valtin, R., Jung, U. O. H. & Scheerer-Neuman, G. (1981).Legasthenie in Wissenschaft und Unterricht. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, G. S., Bruck, M. & Seidenberg, M. (1985). Do children use similar processes to read and spell words?,Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 39: 511–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, H. & Hummer, P. (1990). How German-speaking first graders read and spell: Doubts on the importance of the logographic stage,Applied Psycholinguistics 11: 349–368.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cossu, G., Gugliotta, M. & Marshall, J.C. Acquisition of reading and written spelling in a transparent orthography: Two non parallel processes?. Read Writ 7, 9–22 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01026945

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01026945

Key words

Navigation