Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How did They Say That? Ethics Statements and Normative Frameworks at Best Companies to Work For

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This empirical study explores aspects of how companies that are positively recognized by their workforce as “Best Companies to Work For” convey the underlying principles of their “trustworthy” culture. The study examines the normative ethical frameworks (deontological, teleological, and ethic of care) and affective language utilized in the ethics statements. Although multiple studies have considered normative ethical frameworks in individual ethical decision making, few have considered normative ethical frameworks in organization ethics statements. In addition, this study expands the analysis to include the ethic of care. Of the “Best Companies to Work for” in this study, 93 had accessible online ethics statements. Findings indicated 70 % (65 of 93) of the ethics statements utilized combinations of three types of normative ethics studied, while 30 % (28 of 93) used a single framework. In statements with combined frameworks, the deontological framework had the highest frequency (40 %), while the ethic of care was present in 33 % of statements and the teleological framework had the lowest frequency (27 %). In ethics statements with a singular framework, the framework rankings were consistent with findings for combined frameworks. Using the Dictionary of Affect in Language, there were statistically significant differences on pleasantness between statements that mentioned ethic of care and those that did not. This study sheds light on how these trustworthy companies communicate (1) by publishing their ethics statements and (2) by using a multidimensional approach in their ethics statements that has greater pleasantness when an ethic of care is utilized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arkansas Children’s Hospital (2010). Code of conduct. Retrieved October 11, 2010, from http://www.archildrens.org/Careers/ACH-Culture/Code-of-Conduct.aspx.

  • Arvidsson, S. (2010). Communication of corporate social reasonability: A study of the views of management teams in large companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(3), 339–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, J., Burns, J. H., & Hart, H. L. A. (1996). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, S. (2004). Organizational factors encouraging ethical decision making: An exploration into the case of an exemplar. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(4), 311–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brief, A. P., & Weiss, H. M. (2002). Organizational behavior: Affect in the workplace. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 279–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavanagh, G. F., Moberg, D. J., & Velasquez, M. (1981). The ethics of organizational politics. Academy of Management Review, 6(3), 363–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Center for Business Ethics. (1992). Instilling ethical values in large corporations. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(11), 863–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatov, R. (1980). What corporate ethics statements say. California Management Review, 22(4), 20–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleek, M. A., & Leonard, S. L. (1998). Can corporate codes of ethics influence behavior? Journal of Business Ethics, 17(6), 619–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, J. (1998). Theorizing the ethical organization. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8(3), 621–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, T. (2001). Creating the multicultural organization: A strategy for capturing the power of diversity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T. (1982). Corporations and morality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erwin, P. M. (2011). Corporate codes of conduct: The effects of code conduct and quality on ethical performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(4), 535–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ethisphere Institute (2013). World’s most ethical Scoring and methodology. Retrieved September 18, 2013 from http://ethisphere.com/worlds-most-ethical/scoring-methodology/.

  • Ferrell, O. C., Gresham, L. G., & Fraedrich, J. (1989). A synthesis of ethical decision models for marketing. Journal of Macromarketing, 9(2), 55–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, B. (2005). The ethical foundation of PR: An analysis of public relations firms’ codes of ethics. Paper presented at the International Communication Association (New York, NY).

  • Fisher, C. D., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2000). The emerging role of emotions in work life: An introduction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 123–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C., & Foss, C. (2004). Business ethics: Corporate responses to scandal. Corporate Reputation Review, 7, 284–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritzsche, D. J., & Becker, H. (1984). Linking management behavior to ethical philosophy: An empirical investigation. Academy of Management Journal, 27(1), 166–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 13–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S., Bartlett, C. A., & Moran, P. (1995). A new manifesto for management. Sloan Management Review, 40(3), 9–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbane (2010).Core values. Retrieved October 11, 2010 from http://www.gilbaneco.com/meetgilbanebuilding/missionandvalues/.

  • Gilligan, C. (1977). In a different voice: Women’s conceptions of self and of morality. Harvard Educational Review, 47(4), 481–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gotsis, G., & Kortezi, Z. (2010). Ethical considerations in organizational politics: Expanding the perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(4), 497–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, M., & Van Buren III, H. J. (2010). Trust and stakeholder theory: Trustworthiness in the organization-stakeholder relationship. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(3), 425–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, C. P., & Allard, M. J. (2005). Understanding and managing diversity: Readings, cases and exercises. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herring, C. (2006). Does diversity pay?: Racial composition of firms and the business case for diversity. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Montreal Convention Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Aug 11, 2006.

  • Higgs-Kleyn, N., & Kapelianis, D. (1999). The role of professional codes in regulating ethical conduct. Journal of Business Ethics, 19(4), 363–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hite, R. E., Bellizzi, J. A., & Fraser, C. (1988). A content analysis of ethical policy statements regarding marketing activities. Journal of Business Ethics, 7(10), 771–776.

  • Hosmer, L. T. (1995). Trust: The connecting link between organizational theory and philosophical ethics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 379–403.

  • Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. (1986). A general theory of marketing ethics. Journal of Macromarketing, 6(1), 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C., Parker, M., & ten Bos, R. (2005). For business ethics: A critical approach. London, UK: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kaptein, M. (2004). Business codes of multinational firms: What do they say? Journal of Business Ethics, 50(1), 13–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ki, E., & Kim, S. (2010). Ethics statements of public relations firms: What do they say? Journal of Business Ethics, 91(2), 223–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimley-Horn and Associates (2010). Our philosophy. Retrieved October 11, 2010 from http://www.kimley-horn.com/about/our-philosophy.

  • Kujala, J., Lamsa, A., & Penttila, K. (2011). Managerial moral decision-making patterns over time: A multidimensional approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(2), 191–2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laczniak, G. R., & Murphy, P. E. (1985). Marketing ethics. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, A., & Breeden, R. C. (2003). Our ethical erosion (Vol. A16). New York, NY: Wall Street Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertens, J. F., & Dhillon, A. (1999). Relative utilitarianism. Econometrica, 67(3), 471–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Micewski, E. R., & Troy, C. (2007). Business ethics: Deontologically revisited. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(1), 17–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon, J., Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2005). Can corporations be citizens? Corporate citizenship as a metaphor for business participation in society. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(3), 429–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. (1999). Corporate moral agency: Review and implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 21(4), 329–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. (2005). Corporate character: Modern virtue ethics and the virtuous corporation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(4), 659–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mossholder, K. W., Settoon, R. P., Harris, S. G., & Armenakis, A. A. (1995). Measuring emotion in open-ended survey responses: An application of textual data analysis. Journal of Management, 21(2), 335–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P. E. (1995). Corporate ethics statements: Current status and future prospects. Journal of Business Ethics, 14(9), 727–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennebaker, J., Mehl, M., & Niederhoffer, K. (2003). Psychological aspects of natural language use: Our words, ourselves. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 547–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrone, B., & Whissell, C. (1988). The dictionary of affective language as a tool for the assessment of affective tone in a descriptive task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 67(3), 789–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Premeaux, S. (2004). The current link between management behavior and ethical philosophy. Journal of Business Ethics, 51(3), 269–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Premeaux, S. R., & Mondy, R. W. (1993). Linking management behavior to ethical philosophy. Journal of Business Ethics, 12(5), 349–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pruzan, P. (2001). The question of organizational consciousness: Can organizations have values, virtues, and visions? Journal of Ethics, 29(3), 271–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reidenbach, R. E., & Robin, D. P. (1988). Some initial steps toward improving the measurement of ethical evaluations of marketing activities. Journal of Business Ethics, 7(11), 871–879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reidenbach, R. E., & Robin, D. P. (1990). Toward the development of a multi-dimensional scale for improving evaluations of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(8), 639–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reidenbach, R. E., & Robin, D. P. (1991). A conceptual model of corporate moral development. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(4), 273–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riffe, D., Lacy, S., & Fico, F. G. (1998). Analyzing media messages: Using quantitative analysis in research. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberson, Q. M., & Stevens, C. K. (2006). Making sense of diversity in the workplace: Organizational justice and language abstraction in employees’ accounts of diversity-related incidents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 379–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rude, S., Gortner, E., & Pennebaker, J. (2004). Language use of depressed and depression-vulnerable college students. Cognition and Emotion, 18(8), 1121–1133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson, R., & Varner, I. I. (1984). What’s wrong with corporate codes of conduct? Management Accounting, 66, 28–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M. S. (2005). Universal moral values for corporate codes of ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(1–2), 27–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York, NY: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seo, M., Barrett, L. F., & Bartunek, J. M. (2004). The role of affective experience in work motivation. Academy of Management Review, 29, 423–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, B. (1994). An analysis of corporate ethical code studies: Where do we go from here? Journal of Business Ethics, 13(1), 63–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, B. (2008). Corporate ethical codes: Effective instruments for influencing behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(4), 601–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, C., & Whissell, K. (1984). A dictionary of affect in language. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 59, 695–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swift, T. (2001). Trust, reputation and corporate accountability to stakeholders. Business Ethics: A European Review, 10(1), 16–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uslaner, E. M. (2002). The moral foundations of trust. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velasquez, M. G. (1998). Business ethics: Concepts and cases (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, G. R. (2006). Virtue in organizations: Moral identity as a foundation for moral agency. Organization Studies, 27(3), 341–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, G. R., Trevino, L. K., & Cochran, P. L. (1999). Corporate ethics practices in mid-1990s: An empirical study of Fortune 1000. Journal of Business Ethics, 18(3), 283–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whissell, C. M. (1998). A parsimonious technique for the analysis of word-use patterns in English texts and transcripts. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 86, 595–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whissell, C. M. (2011a). Challenging an authorial attribution: Vocabulary and emotion in a translation of Goethe’s Faust attributed to Samuel Taylor Coleridge. Psychological Reports, 108(2), 358–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whissell, C. M. (2011b). Explaining inconsistencies in Shakespeare’s character Henry V on the basis of the emotional undertones of his speeches. Psychological Reports, 108(3), 843–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, B. J., & Montgomery, R. (1980). Corporate codes of conduct. California Management Review, 23(2), 80–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, R. D., & Dominick, J. R. (2000). Mass media research: An introduction (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, S. J., Saunders, C. & Hart, P. (2003). Electronic window dressing: Impression management with websites. European Journal of Information Systems, 12(4), 309–322. http://search.proquest.com/docview/218758038?accountid=1557.

  • Wright, D. K. (1993). Enforcement dilemma: Voluntary nature of public relations codes. Public Relations Review, 19(1), 13–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yizraeli, D., & Shilo, L. (2000). An ethics program as part of an organizational culture. Jerusalem: The Center for Business Research in Israel.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Gonzaga University, 502 East Boone Avenue, Spokane, WA, 99258, USA

    Kristine F. Hoover & Molly B. Pepper

Authors
  1. Kristine F. Hoover
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Molly B. Pepper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristine F. Hoover.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hoover, K.F., Pepper, M.B. How did They Say That? Ethics Statements and Normative Frameworks at Best Companies to Work For. J Bus Ethics 131, 605–617 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2255-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2255-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation