Skip to main content
Log in

Some initial steps toward improving the measurement of ethical evaluations of marketing activities

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study reports on the development of scale items derived from the pluralistic moral philosophy literature. In addition, the manner in which individuals combine aspects of the different philosophies in making ethical evaluations was explored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, Cheryl S. and Henry Jay Becker: 1978, ‘The Use of Vignettes in Survey Research’, Public Opinion Quarterly 42, 93–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, Tom L. and Norman E. Bowie: 1983, Ethical Theory and Business, 2nd ed., Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning, John and Noel B. Zabriskie: 1983, ‘How Ethical Are Industrial Buyers?’, Industrial Marketing Management 12, 219–224.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DeGeorge, Richard R.: 1986, Business Ethics, 2nd. ed., New York: Macmillan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, Thomas and Patricia H. Werhane: 1983, Ethical Issues on Business, 2nd ed., Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dornoff, Ronald J. and Clint B. Tankersley: 1975, ‘Perceptual Differences in Market Transactions: A Source of Consumer Frustration’, Journal of Consumer Affairs (Summer), 97–103.

  • Dubinsky, Alan J. and William Rudelius: 1980, ‘Ethical Beliefs: How Students Compare with Industrial Sales-people’, Proceedings of the American Marketing Association Educators Conference, Chicago: American Marketing Association, 73–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, O. C. and Larry G. Gresham: 1985, ‘A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision-Making in Marketing’, Journal of Marketing (Summer), 87–96.

  • Hunt, Shelby and Scott Vitell: 1986, ‘A General Theory of Marketing Ethics’, Journal of Macromarketing 6 (Spring), 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerlinger, Fred N.: 1986, Foundations of Behavioral Research, 3rd. ed., New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, Dean M. and O. C. Ferrell: 1981, ‘The Organizational Ethics of Advertising: Corporate and Agency Views’, Journal of Advertising 10, 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazis, Michael B., Olli T. Ahtola, and R. Eugene Klippel: 1974, ‘A Comparison of Four Multi-Attribute Models in the Prediction of Consumer Attitudes’, Journal of Consumer Research 2 (June), 38–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, Jum C: 1967, Psychometric Theory, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter, J. Paul: 1979, ‘Reliability: A Review of Psychometric Basics and Recent Marketing Practices’, Journal of Marketing Research XVI (February), 6–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reidenbach, R. Eric and Sharon Grimes: 1985, ‘How Concept Knowledge Affects Concept Evaluations’, Journal of Innovation Management (Winter), 25–26.

  • Rest, James R: 1979, Development in Judging Moral Issues, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robin, Donald P. and R. Eric Reidenbach: 1987, ‘Social Responsibility, Ethics, and Marketing Strategy: Closing the Gap Between Concept and Application’, Journal of Marketing 51 (January), 44–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuptrine, F. Kelly: 1979, ‘Evaluating the Ethics of Marketing Practices: Student Perceptions’, Proceedings of the American Marketing Association Educators Conference, Chicago: American Marketing Association, pp. 124–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturdivant, Frederick D. and A. Benton Cocanougher: 1973, ‘What Are Ethical Marketing Practices?’, Harvard Business Review 51 (November–December), 10–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, Barbara G. and Linda S. Fidell: 1983, Using Multivariate Statistics, New York: Harper & Row, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

R. Eric Reidenbach holds a Ph.D. in Business Administration from Michigan State University. At present he is a Professor of Marketing and Director of the Center for Business Development and Research at the University of Southern Mississippi. He has published a number of articles in different marketing journals. In addition, he is the co-author of several books on bank marketing.

Dr. Donald P. Robin received his DBA degree from Louisiana State University in 1969 and is currently Professor of Marketing in the College of Business, Louisiana Tech University. His basic marketing textbook entitled, Marketing: Basic Concepts for Decision Making (Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc.), and his co-authored readings book, Classics in Marketing (Goodyear Press), were both published in 1978. He is the author of articles in a wide variety of topics that have appeared in such journals as the Journal of Marketing, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, Business and Professional Ethics Journal, The Journal of Business Communications, Journal of Business Research, and Academy of Management Journal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reidenbach, R.E., Robin, D.P. Some initial steps toward improving the measurement of ethical evaluations of marketing activities. J Bus Ethics 7, 871–879 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383050

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383050

Keywords

Navigation