Skip to main content
Log in

Predictive model of regional coseismic landslides’ permanent displacement considering uncertainty

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Landslides Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Coseismic landslides are common secondary earthquake geohazards in meizoseismal areas. Newmark sliding block permanent displacement method has been widely adopted to develop regional coseismic landslide hazard maps. However, uncertainties from the slope parameters (e.g., cohesion, pore water pressure, and block thickness) are not commonly considered in the ground displacement predictions. This study proposes a novel framework that consists of two uncertainty assessment methods of Monte Carlo and logic tree simulations (MCS and LTS) with seven different displacement regression functions to predict the regional coseismic landslides' permanent displacement. Compared with the existing methods, the proposed framework is argument-driven, avoiding huge number of repetitive simulations. The Jiuzhaigou earthquake, in China, is considered as an illustrative example to compare the performance of the framework with considered regression functions. The corresponding results show that using LTS, with a certain regression function, leads to better predictions compared to using MCS. It is demonstrated that the proposed framework can provide a meaningful measure for making informed decisions to diminish the potential risk of earthquake induced landslides, and/or generating emergency strategies to mitigate post-earthquake consequences. It should be noted that the application of the proposed method for deposits where the soil strength parameter values do not fit the normal distribution may be limited as only normal distribution for soil strengths is considered in this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

References

  • Agterberg FP (1992) Combining indicator patterns in weights of evidence modeling for resource evaluation. Nonrenew Resour 1(1):39–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alejano LR, González J, Muralha J (2014) Comparison of different techniques of tilt testing and basic friction angle variability assessment. Rock Mech Rock Eng 45:1023–1035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambraseys NN, Menu JM (1988) Earthquake-induced ground displacements. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 16:985–1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azarafza M, Akgün H, Ghazifard A, Asghari-Kaljahi E, Rahnamarad J, Derakhshani R (2021) Discontinuous rock slope stability analysis by limit equilibrium approaches–a review. Int J Digital Earth 14(12):1918–1941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azarafza M, Azarafza M, Akgün H, Atkinson PM, Derakhshani R (2021) Deep learning-based landslide susceptibility mapping. Sci Rep 11(1):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azarafza M, Ghazifard A, Akgün H, Asghari-Kaljahi E (2018) Landslide susceptibility assessment of South Pars Special Zone, southwest Iran. Environ Earth Sci 77(24):1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandis SC, Lumsden AC, Barton NR (1983) Fundamentals of rock joint deformation. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. 20:249–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnhart KR, Hutton EWH, Tucker GE, Gasparini NM, Istanbulluoglu E, Hobley DEJ et al (2020) Short communication: Landlab v2.0: a software package for Earth-surface dynamics. Earth Surf Dynam 8(2):379-397

  • Bui DT, Hoang ND, Nguyen H, Tran XL (2019) Spatial prediction of shallow landslide using Bat algorithm optimized machine learning approach: A case study in Lang Son Province Vietnam. Adv Eng Inform 42:100978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2019.100978

  • Bui DT, Tuan TA, Klempe H, Pradhan B, Revhaug I (2016) Spatial prediction models for shallow landslide hazards: a comparative assessment of the efficacy of support vector machines, artificial neural networks, kernel logistic regression, and logistic model tree. Landslides 13(2):361–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang M, Zhou Y, Zhou C et al (2020) Coseismic landslides induced by the 2018 Mw 6.6 Iburi, Japan, earthquake: spatial distribution, key factors weight, and susceptibility regionalization. Landslides 18(1):755–772

  • Cherubini C (1997) Data and considerations on the variability of geotechnical properties of soils. Proc Int Conf Safety Reliab (ESREL 97) 2:1583–1591

  • Cherubini C (2000) Reliability evaluation of shallow foundation bearing capacity on c′, ϕ′ soils. Can Geotech J 37:264–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho SE (2007) Effects of spatial variability of soil properties on slope stability. Eng Geol 92(3):97-109

  • Clough RW (1960) The finite element method in plane stress analysis. Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Electronic Computation. Am Soc Civil Eng Struct Division. Pittsburgh, PA

  • Delgado J, Rosa J, Peláez JA, Rodríguez-Peces MJ, Garrido J, Tsigé M (2020) On the applicability of available regression models for estimating Newmark displacements for low to moderate magnitude earthquakes. the case of the betic cordillera (sspain). Eng Geol 274:105710

  • Di Matteo L, Valigi D, Ricco R (2013) Laboratory shear strength parameters of cohesive soils: variability and potential effects on slope stability. Bull Eng Geol Environ 72(1):101–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dou HQ, Han TC, Gong XN, Zhang J (2014) Probabilistic slope stability analysis considering the variability of hydraulic conductivity under rainfall infiltration–redistribution conditions. Eng Geol 183:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dou J, Yunus AP, Merghadi A, Shirzadi A, Nguyen H et al (2020) Different sampling strategies for predicting landslide susceptibilities are deemed less consequential with deep learning. Sci Total Environ 720:137320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du WQ, Huang D, Wang G (2018) Quantification of model uncertainty and variability in Newmark displacement analysis. Soil Dynam Earthquake Eng 109(201):286-298, ISSN 0267-7261

  • Du W, Wang G (2014) Fully probabilistic seismic displacement analysis of spatially distributed slopes using spatially correlated vector intensity measures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 43(5):661–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan X, Scaringi G, Xu Q, Zhan W, Dai L, Li Y et al (2018) Coseismic landslides triggered by the 8th August 2017 Ms 7.0 Jiuzhaigou earthquake (Sichuan, China): factors controlling their spatial distribution and implications for the seismogenic blind fault identification. Landslides 15(5):967-983

  • Fang H, Chen YF, Hou Z, Xu G, Wu J (2020) Probabilistic analysis of a cohesion-frictional slope using the slip-line field theory in a Monte-Carlo framework. Comput. Geotech. 120:103398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gameiro S, Riffel ES, Oliveira G, Guasselli LA (2021) Artificial neural networks applied to landslide susceptibility: the effect of sampling areas on model capacity for generalization and extrapolation. Appl Geograph 102598

  • Gigovi´c L, Drobnjak S, Pamučar D (2019) The application of the hybrid GIS spatial multi-criteria decision analysis best–worst methodology for landslide susceptibility mapping. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf 8(2):79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gironacci E, Nezhad M, Rezania M, Lancioni G (2018) A non-local probabilistic method for modeling of crack propagation. Int J Mech Sci 144:897–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorsevski PV, Brown MK, Panter K, Onasch CM, Simic A, Snyder J (2016) Landslide detection and susceptibility mapping using LiDAR and an artificial neural network approach: a case study in the Cuyahoga Valley National Park. Ohio. Landslides 13(3):467–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths DV, Huang J, Fenton GA (2011) Probabilistic infinite slope analysis. Comput Geotech 38(4):577–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond C, Hall D, Miller S, Swetik P (1992) Level 1 stability analysis (LISA), documentation for Version 2.0. USDA, For. Serv., Moscow, ID. Intermountain Res Sta Gen Tech Rep INT-285

  • He K, Liu B, Hu X, Zhou R, Xi C, Ma G, Han M, Li Y, Luo G (2022b) Rapid characterization of landslide-debris flow chains of geologic hazards using multimethod investigation: case study of the Tiejiangwan LDC. Rock Mech Rock Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-022-02905-9

  • He K, Li Y, Ma G, Hu X, Liu B, Ma Z, Xu Z (2021a) Failure mode analysis of post-seismic rockfall in shattered mountains exemplified by detailed investigation and numerical modeling. Landslides 18(1):425–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He K, Ma G, Hu X (2021b) Formation mechanisms and evolution model of the tectonic-related ancient giant basalt landslide in Yanyuan County. China Nat Hazards 106(3):2575–2597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He K, Ma G, Hu X, Liu B, Han M (2022a) The July 2, 2017, Lantian landslide in Leibo, China: mechanisms and mitigation measures. Geomech Eng 28(3):283–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobley DE, Adams JM, Nudurupati SS, Hutton EW, Gasparini NM, Istanbulluoglu E, Tucker GE (2017) Creative computing with Landlab: an open-source toolkit for building coupling and exploring two dimensional numerical models of Earth-surface dynamics. Earth Surf Dyn 5(1) 21–46. https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-5-21-2017

  • Hong H, Chen W, Xu C, Youssef AM, Pradhan B, Tien Bui D (2017) Rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility assessment at the Chongren area (China) using frequency ratio, certainty factor, and index of entropy. Geocarto Int 32(2):139–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu Q, Zhou Y, Wang S, Wang F (2020) Machine learning and fractal theory models for landslide susceptibility mapping: case study from the Jinsha River Basin. Geomorphology 351:106975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hua Y, Wang X, Li Y, Xu P, Xia W (2021) Dynamic development of landslide susceptibility based on slope unit and deep neural networks. Landslides 18:281–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Yang H (2014) Slope stability analysis by the limit equilibrium method. ASCE Publications, Reston

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Huang F, Zhang J, Zhou C et al (2020) A deep learning algorithm using a fully connected sparse autoencoder neural network for landslide susceptibility prediction. Landslides 17:217–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh S, Chyi-Tyi Lee (2011) Empirical estimation of the Newmark displacement from the Arias intensity and critical acceleration. Eng Geol 122:34–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Javadi A, Rezania M, Nezhad M (2006) Evaluation of liquefaction induced lateral displacements using genetic programming. Comput Geotech 33(4–5):222–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jibson RW (2007) Regression models for estimating coseismic landslide displacement. Eng Geol 91:209–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jibson RW (2011) Methods for assessing the stability of slopes during earthquakes—a retrospective. Eng Geol 122(1–2):43–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jibson RW, Harp EL, Michael JM (1998) A method for producing digital probabilistic seismic landslide hazard maps: an example from the Los Angeles, California area. US Geol Surv Open-File Rep 98-113 17

  • Jibson RW, Harp EL, Michael JA (2000) A method for producing digital probabilistic seismic landslide hazard maps. Eng Geol 58(3-4):271–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(00)00039-9

  • Jibson RW, Michael JA (2009) Maps showing seismic landslide hazards in Anchorage, Alaska. In: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3077. Scale 1:25.000, (11-p)

  • Kalatehjari R, Ali N (2013) A review of three-dimensional slope stability analyses based on limit equilibrium method. Electron J Geotech Eng 18:119–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Kargel JS, Leonard GJ, Shugar DH, Haritashya UK, Bevington A et al (2016) Geomorphic and geologic controls of geohazards induced by Nepal’s 2015 Gorkha earthquake. Science 351(6269):aac8353

  • Keefer DK (1984) Landslides caused by earthquakes. Geol Soc Am Bull 95:406–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Gupta V, Kumar P, Sundriyal YP (2021) Coseismic landslide hazard assessment for the future scenario earthquakes in the Kumaun Himalaya, India. Bullet Eng Geol Environ 80:5219–5235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li L, Lan H, Guo C et al (2017) A modified frequency ratio method for landslide susceptibility assessment. Landslides 14:727–741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li D, Wang M, Du W (2020) Influence of spatial variability of soil strength parameters on probabilistic seismic slope displacement hazard analysis. Eng Geol 276:105744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ling S, Sun C, Li X, Ren Y, Xu J, Huang T (2021) Characterizing the distribution pattern and geologic and geomorphic controls on earthquake-triggered landslide occurrence during the 2017 M s 7.0 Jiuzhaigou earthquake, Sichuan, China. Landslides 18(4):1275-1291

  • Liu B, Hu X, He K et al (2020) The starting mechanism and movement process of the co-seismic rockslide: a case study of the Laoyingyan rockslide induced by the “5·12” Wenchuan earthquake. J Mountain Sci 17(5):1188–1205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu B, He K, Han M, Hu X et al (2021a) Dynamic process simulation of the Xiaogangjian rockslide occurred in shattered mountain based on 3DEC and DFN. Comput Geotech 134:104122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu B, Hu X, Ma G, He K, Wu M, Liu D (2021b) Back calculation and hazard prediction of a debris flow in Wenchuan meizoseismal area, China. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 80(4):3457–3474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo N, Bathurst RJ (2018) Probabilistic analysis of reinforced slopes using RFEM and considering spatial variability of frictional soil properties due to compaction. Georisk 12(2):87–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo LG, Pei XJ, H RQ (2020) Earthquake-triggered landslide occurrence probability in strong seismically mountainous area: a case study of Jiuzhaigou National Geopark. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 1000-6915, CN 42-1397/O3 (In Chinese)

  • Ma G, Rezania M, Nezhad M (2022a) Effects of spatial autocorrelation structure for friction angle on the runout distance in heterogeneous sand collapse. Transport Geotech 33:100705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma G, Rezania M, Nezhad M (2022b) Stochastic assessment of landslide influence zone by material point method and generalized geotechnical random field theory. Int J Geomech 22(4):04022002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma G, Rezania M, Nezhad M (2022c) Uncertainty quantification of landslide runout motion considering soil interdependent anisotropy and fabric orientation. Landslides 19:1231–1247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nanehkaran YA, Mao Y, Azarafza M, Kockar MK, Zhu HH (2021) Fuzzy-based multiple decision method for landslide susceptibility and hazard assessment: a case study of Tabriz. Iran Geomech Eng 24(5):407–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmark NM (1965) Effects of earthquakes on dams and embankments. Géotechnique 15(2):139–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng CWW, Yang B, Liu ZQ et al (2021) Spatiotemporal modelling of rainfall-induced landslides using machine learning. Landslides 18:2499–2514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen VB, Kim YT (2020) Rainfall-earthquake-induced landslide hazard prediction by Monte Carlo simulation: a case study of MT. Umyeon in Korea. KSCE J Civ Eng 24:73–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phoon K, Kulhawy FM (1999) Characterization of geotechnical variability. Can Geotech J 36:612–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradel D, Smith PM, Stewart JP, Raad G (2005) Case history of landslide movement during 392the Northridge earthquake. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 393131(11):1360–1369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahardjo H, Satyanaga A, Leong EC, Ng YS, Pang HTC (2012) Variability of residual soil properties. Eng Geol 141:124–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran P, Varoquaux G (2011) Mayavi: 3D visualization of scientific data. IEEE Comput Sci Eng 13(2):40–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rathje EM, Kottke AR, Trent WL (2010) The influence of input motion and site property uncertainties on seismic site response analyses. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 136(4):607–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rathje EM, Saygili G (2008) Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for the sliding displacement of slopes: Scalar and vector approaches. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 134(6) 804-814. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:6(804)

  • Refice A, Capolongo D (2002) Probabilistic modeling of uncertainties in earthquake-induced landslide hazard assessment. Computers Geosciences 28(6):735–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regmi AD, Devkota KC, Yoshida K, Pradhan B, Pourghasemi HR, Kumamoto T, Akgun A (2014) Application of frequency ratio, statistical index, and weights-of-evidence models and their comparison in landslide susceptibility mapping in Central Nepal Himalaya. Arab J Geosci 7(2):725–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezania M (2008) Evolutionary polynomial regression based constitutive modelling and incorporation in finite element analysis (Doctoral dissertation, University of Exeter)

  • Rezania M, Ma G (2020) Stress-strain modelling of soils in drained and undrained conditions using a multi-model intelligent approach. In: Correia, A., Tinoco, J., Cortez, P., Lamas, L. (eds) Information Technology in Geo-Engineering. ICITG 2019. Springer Ser Geomechanics Geoeng (pp. 419-428). Springer, Cham

  • Rodríguez-Peces MJ, Pérez-García JL, García-Mayordomo J, Azañón JM et al (2011) Applicability of Newmark method at regional, subregional and site scales: seismically induced Bullas and La Paca rock-slide cases (Murcia, SE Spain). Nat Hazards 59:1109–1124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saygili G, Rathje EM (2008) Empirical predictive models for earthquake-Induced sliding displacements of slopes. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 134(6):790–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saygili G, Rathje EM (2009) Probabilistically based seismic landslide hazard maps: an application in Southern California. Eng Geol 109(2009):183–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahabi H, Khezri S, Ahmad BB, Hashim M (2014) Landslide susceptibility mapping at central Zab basin, Iran: a comparison between analytical hierarchy process, frequency ratio and logistic regression models. Catena 115:55–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh TN, Kainthola A, Venkatesh A (2012) Correlation between point load index and uniaxial compressive strength for different rock types. Rock Mech Rock Eng 45:259–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauch R, Istanbulluoglu E, Nudurupati SS, Bandaragoda C, Gasparini NM, Tucker GE (2018) A hydro-climatological approach to predicting regional landslide probability using Landlab, Earth Surf. Dynamics 6:49–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Terzhagi K (1950) Mechanism of landslides. In: Paige S (ed) Application of Geology to Engineering Practice (Berkey Volume). Geological Society of America, New York, NY, pp 83–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian Y, Xu C, Ma S et al (2019) Inventory and spatial distribution of landslides triggered by the 8th August 2017 MW 6.5 Jiuzhaigou earthquake. China J Earth Sci 30:206–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tien Bui D, Hoang ND, Martínez-Álvarez F, Ngo P-TT, Hoa PV, Pham TD, Samui P et al (2020) A novel deep learning neural network approach for predicting flash flood susceptibility: a case study at a high frequency tropical storm area. Sci Total Environ 701:134413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Akeju OV (2016) Quantifying the cross-correlation between effective cohesion and friction angle of soil from limited site-specific data. Soils Found 56(6):1055–1070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Rathje EM (2015) Probabilistic seismic landslide hazard maps including epistemic uncertainty. Eng Geol 196:313–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang F, Fan X, Yunus AP, Subramanian SS, Huang R (2019) Coseismic landslides triggered by the 2018 Hokkaido, Japan (Mw6.6), earthquake: spatial distribution, controlling factors, and possible failure mechanism. Landslides 16:1551–1566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wen H, Wu X, Liao X, Wang D, Huang K et al (2022) Application of machine learning methods for snow avalanche susceptibility mapping in the Parlung Tsangpo catchment, southeastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Cold Regions Sci Technol 198:103535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson RC, Keefer DK (1983) Dynamic analysis of a slope failure from the 6 August 1979 Coyote lake, California, earthquake. B Seismol Soc Am 73(3):863–877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson RC, Keefer DK (1985) Predicting areal limits of earthquake-induced landsliding. Geol Surv Prof Pap 1360:317–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff TF (1985) Analysis and design of embankment dam slopes: a probabilistic approach (Ph.D. thesis). Purdue University, Lafayette, IN., USA

  • Wong LNY, Zhou Y (2021) Boulder falls in Hong Kong-insights from power law relationships and supervised machine learning. Landslides 18:3227–3253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu XZ (2013) Trivariate analysis of soil ranking-correlated characteristics and its application to probabilistic stability assessments in geotechnical engineering problems. Soils Found 53(4):540–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xi C, Hu X, He K, Liu B (2021) GIS-based coseismic landslide susceptibility assessment using ensemble learning approach: a case of the 2017.8.8 Jiuzhaigou earthquake event. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 861:062034

  • Xi C, Han M, Hu X et al (2022) Effectiveness of Newmark-based sampling strategy for coseismic landslide susceptibility mapping using deep learning, support vector machine, and logistic regression. Bull Eng Geol Environ 81:174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-022-02664-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao T, Segoni S, Chen L, Yin K, Casagli N (2019) A step beyond landslide susceptibility maps: a simple method to investigate and explain the different outcomes obtained by different approaches. Landslides 1–14

  • Xu C, Xu X, Yao X, Dai F (2014) Three (nearly) complete inventories of landslides triggered by the May 12, 2008 Wenchuan Mw 7.9 earthquake of China and their spatial distribution statistical analysis. Landslides 11:441–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu XW, Chen GH, Wang QX, Chen LC, Ren ZK, Xu C et al (2017) Discussion on seismogenic structure of Jiuzhaigou earthquake and its implication for current strain state in the southern Qinghai Tibet Plateau. Chin J Geophys 60:4018–4026 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yiğit A (2020) Prediction of amount of earthquake-induced slope displacement by using Newmark method. Eng Geol 264(2020):105385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yong R, Ye J, Liang QF, Huang M, Du SG (2018) Estimation of the joint roughness coefficient (JRC) of rock joints by vector similarity measures. B Eng Geol Environ 77:735–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young DS (1986) A generalized probabilistic approach for slope analysis: practical application to an open pit iron ore mine. Int J Min Geol Eng 4(1):3–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yue X, Wu S, Yin Y et al (2018) Risk identification of seismic landslides by joint newmark and rockfall analyst models: a case study of roads affected by the Jiuzhaigou earthquake. Int J Disaster Risk Sci 9:392–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zang M, Qi S, Zou Y, Sheng Z, Zamora BS (2020) An improved method of Newmark analysis for mapping hazards of coseismic landslides. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 20:713–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu AX, Miao Y, Liu J, Bai S, Zeng C, Ma T, Hong H (2019) A similarity-based approach to sampling absence data for landslide susceptibility mapping using data-driven methods. Catena 183:104188

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The research was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program (2018YFC1505401) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41731285, 52150610492).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xiewen Hu or Guotao Ma.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xi, C., Hu, X., Ma, G. et al. Predictive model of regional coseismic landslides’ permanent displacement considering uncertainty. Landslides 19, 2513–2534 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-022-01918-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-022-01918-3

Keywords

Navigation