Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of genetic variation and differentiation among annual Cicer species using start codon targeted (SCoT) polymorphism, DAMD-PCR, and ISSR markers

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three molecular markers, including start codon targeted (SCoT) polymorphism, directed amplification of minisatellite-region DNA polymerase chain reaction (DAMD-PCR), and inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers, were compared in terms of their informativeness and efficiency for analysis of genetic relationships among 38 accessions of eight annual Cicer species. The results were as follows: (1) the highest level of detected polymorphism was observed for all three marker types; (2) the rate of diversity for the three marker techniques was approximately equal, and the correlation coefficients of similarity were statistically significant for all three marker systems; (3) the three molecular markers showed relatively similar phylogenetic grouping for examined species. Diversity analysis showed that Cicer reticulatum is the closest wild species to the cultivated chickpea, and this finding supports the hypothesis that C. reticulatum is the most probable progenitor of the cultivated species. C. bijugum, C. judaicum, and C. pinnatifidum were clustered together, and in other clusters C. yamashitae and C. cuneatum were grouped close together. To our knowledge, this is the first detailed comparison of performance among two targeted DNA region molecular markers (SCoT and DAMD-PCR) and the ISSR technique on a set of samples of Cicer. The results provide guidance for future efficient use of these molecular methods in genetic analysis of Cicer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmad F, Slinkard AE (1992) Genetic relationships in the genus Cicer L. as revealed by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of seed storage proteins. Theor Appl Genet 84:688–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad F, Slinkard AE, Scoler GJ (1987) The cytogenetic relationship between Cicer judaicum Boiss and Cicer chroassannicum (Bge). M Pop Genome 29:883–886

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad F, Gaur PM, Slinkard AE (1992) Isozyme polymorphism and phylogenetic interpretations in the genus Cicer L. Theor Appl Genet 83:620–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akem C, Caccarelli S, Erkine W, Lenne J (2000) Using genetic diversity for disease resistance in agricultural production. Outlook Agric 29:25–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen JR, Lubberstedt T (2003) Functional markers in plants. Trends Plant Sci 8:554–560

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (1995) Kabuli chickpea improvement. Annu rep germplasm program: legumes. ICARDA, Aleppo, pp 59–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Aruna R, Rao DM, Sirvaramakrishnan S, Reddy LJ, Bramel P, Upadhaya H (2008) Efficiency of three DNA markers in revealing genetic variation among wild Cajanus species. Plant Genet Resour 7(2):113–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botstein B, White RL, Skolnick M, Davis RW (1980) Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Ann J Hum Genet 32:314–331

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Collard BCY, Mackill DJ (2009) Start Codon Targeted (SCoT) polymorphism: a simple novel DNA marker technique for generating gene-targeted markers in plants. Plant Mol Biol 27:86–93

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Excoffier L, Smouse P, Quattro J (1992) Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: applications to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131:479–491

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia GM, Stalker HT, Shroeder E, Kochert G (1996) Identification of RAPD, SCAR and RFLP markers tightly linked to nematode resistance genes introgressed from Arachis cardenasii into Arachis hypogaea. Genome 39:836–845

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gascuel O (1997) Concerning the NJ algorithm and its unweighted version, UNJ. In: Mirkin B, McMorris FR, Roberts FS, Rzhetsky A (eds) Mathematical hierarchies and biology. DIMACS series in discrete mathematics and theoretical computer science. Providence, RI. Amer Math Soc 149–170

  • Gupta PK, Rustgi S (2004) Molecular markers from the transcribed/expressed region of the genome in higher plants. Funct Integr Geonomics 4:139–162

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Iruela M, Rubio J, Cubero JI, Gil J, Milan T (2002) Phylogenetic analysis in the genus Cicer and cultivated chickpea using RAPD and ISSR markers. Theor Appl Genet 104:643–651

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kalendar R (2007) FastPCR: a PCR primer design and repeat sequence searching software with additional tools for the manipulation and analysis of DNA and protein. Available at www.biocenter

  • Kang HW, Park DS, Go SJ, Eun MY (2002) Fingerprinting of diverse genomes using PCR with universal rice primers generated from repetitive sequence of Korean weedy rice. Mol Cells 13:281–287

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karaca M, Saha S, Zipf A, Jenkins JN, Lang DJ (2002) Genetic diversity among forage bermudagrass (Cynodon spp.): evidence from chloroplast and nuclear DNA fingerprinting. Crop Sci 42:2118–2127

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kazan K, Muehlbauer FJ (1991) Allozyme variation and phylogeny in annual species of Cicer (Leguminosae). Plant Syst Evol 175:11–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Labdi M, Robertson LD, Singh KB, Charrier A (1996) A genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships among the annual Cicer species as revealed by isozyme polymorphism. Euphytica 88:181–188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ladizinsky and Adler (1976) Genetic relationships among the annual species of Cicer L. Theor Appl Genet 48:197–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lassner MW, Peterson P, Yoder JI (1989) Simultaneous amplification of multiple DNA fragments by polymerase chain reaction in the analysis of transgenic plants and their progeny. Plant Mol Biol Rep 7:116–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mantel NA (1967) The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 27:209–220

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCoy TJ, Echt CS (1993) Potential of trispecies bridge crosses and random amplified polymorphic DNA markers for introgression of Medicago daghestanica and Medicago pironae germplasm into alfalfa (Medicago sativa). Genome 36:594–601

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muehlbauer FJ, Kaiser WJ, Simon CJ (1994) Potential for wild species in cool season food legume breeding. Euphytica 73:109–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen TT, Taylor PWJ, Redden RJ, Ford R (2004) Genetic diversity estimates in Cicer using AFLP analysis. Plant Breed 123:173–179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ocampo B, Venora G, Errico A, Singh KB, Saccardo F (1992) Karyotype analysis in the genus Cicer. J Genet Breed 46:229–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Patil P, Vrinten PL, Scoles GJ, Slinkard AE (1995) Variation in the ribosomal RNA units of the genera Lens and Cicer. Euphytica 83:33–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perrier X, Flori A, Bonnot F (2003) Data analysis methods. In: Hamon P, Seguin M, Perrier X, Glaszmann JC (eds) Genetic diversity of cultivated tropical plants. Science, Enfield, pp 43–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Pundir RPS, Vander Maesen LJG (1983) Interspecific hybridization in Cicer. Int Chickpea Newsl 8:4–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajesh PN, Sant VJ, Gupta VS, Muehlbauer FJ, Ranjekar PK (2002) Genetic relationships among annual and perennial wild species of Cicer using inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) polymorphism. Euphytica 129:15–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson LD, Ocampo B, Singh KB (1997) Morphological variation in wild annual Cicer species in comparison to the cultigens. Euphytica 95:309–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohlf FJ (1997) NTSYS-Pc. Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system version 2.1. Exeter Software, Setauket, p 7

    Google Scholar 

  • Saini N, Jain N, Jain RK (2004) Assessment of genetic diversity within and among Basmati and non-Basmati rice varieties using AFLP, ISSR and SSR markers. Euphytica 140:133–146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sant VJ, Sainani MN, Sami-subbu R, Ranjekar PK, Gupta VS (2000) Ty1-copia retrotransposon-like elements in chickpea genome: their identification, distribution and use for diversity analysis. Gene 257:157–166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh KB, Ocampo B (1993) Interspecific hybridization in annual Cicer species. J Genet Breed 47:199–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh KB, Ocampo B (1997) Exploitation of wild Cicer species for yield improvement in chickpea. Theor Appl Genet 95:418–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh KB, Malhotra RS, Halila MH, Knights EJ, Verma MM (1994) Current status and future strategy in breeding chickpea for resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses. Euphytica 73:137–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sudupak MA (2004) Inter and intra-species Inter Simple Sequence Repeat (ISSR) variations in the genus Cicer. Euphytica 135:229–238

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sudupak MA, Akkaya MS, Kence A (2002) Analysis of genetic relationships among perennial and annual Cicer species growing in turkey using RAPD markers. Theor Appl Genet 105:1220–1228

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Talebi R, Jelodar NB, Mardi M, Fayaz F, Furman BJ, Bagheri NA (2009) Phylogenetic diversity relationship among annual Cicer species using random amplified polymorphic DNA. Gener Appl Plant Physiol 35:3–12

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tayyar RI, Lukaszewiski AJ, Waines JG (1994) Chromosome banding patterns in the annual species of Cicer. Genome 37:656–663

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Torres AM, Weeden NF, Martin A (1993) Linkage among isozyme, RFLP and RAPD markers in Vicia faba. Theor Appl Genet 85:935–945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Udupa SM, Robertson LD, Weigand F, Baum M, Kahl G (1999) Allelic variation at (TAA) microsatellite loci in a world collection of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L) germplasm. Mol Gen Genet 261:354–363

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vairinhos F, Murray DR (1983) The seed proteins of chickpea comparative studies of Cicer arietinum, C. reticulatum and C.echinospermum (Leguminosae). Plant Syst Evol 142:15–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Maesen LJG (1987) Origin, history and taxonomy of chickpea. In: Saxena MC, Singh KB (eds) The chickpea. CAB Int Publ, UK, pp 11–34

    Google Scholar 

  • van Rheenen HA, Pundir PRS, Miranda JH (1993) How to accelerate the genetic improvement of a recalcitrant crop species such as chickpea. Curr Sci 65:414–417

    Google Scholar 

  • Vavilov NI (1926) The origin of the cultivation of ‘primary’ crops, in particular cultivated hemp. In: Studies on the origin of cultivated plants, Institute of applied botany and plant breeding, Leningrad, USSR, pp 221–233

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj Branch for support of this study. Also, we wish to present our special thanks to the International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), Aleppo, Syria and the Australian Temperate Field Crops Collection (ATFCC) at the Victorian Institute for Dryland Agriculture (VIDA), Horsham, Australia for kindly supplying seeds of Cicer species.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reza Talebi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Amirmoradi, B., Talebi, R. & Karami, E. Comparison of genetic variation and differentiation among annual Cicer species using start codon targeted (SCoT) polymorphism, DAMD-PCR, and ISSR markers. Plant Syst Evol 298, 1679–1688 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-012-0669-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-012-0669-6

Keywords

Navigation