Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pain regulation and health-related quality of life after thoracolumbar fractures of the spine

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fractures of the thoracolumbar spine rank among the severest injuries of the human skeleton. Especially in younger patients they often result from high-energy accidents. Recently, a shift in paradigm towards more aggressive treatment strategies including anterior procedures could be observed. However, so far only few data exist reflecting the quality of life (QoL) after such injuries. The aim of this study was to evaluate medium-term QoL and further to identify factors that influence the clinical outcome in patients with fractures of the thoracolumbar spine. Data of 906 patients who were treated during a 10-year period in our institution were evaluated retrospectively. Only patients with single-level traumatic injuries aged between 18 and 65 years without neurological deficits, concomitant injuries of other locations and internal comorbidities were included into the investigation (n = 204). Three different treatment groups (i.e. non-operative, dorsal and dorsoventral stabilisation) were compared to healthy controls as well as different pain populations. The QoL was assessed using established questionnaires (SF-36, HFAQ, VAS-Spinescore, PRQ, and PTSD). Sixty-five percent of the included patients (n = 133) were studied at an average follow-up of 5.3 ± 1.7 years after injury. All treatment groups revealed an identical gender and age distribution. More severe and unstable injuries were found in the surgical groups associated with higher treatment costs and a longer inability to work. Compared to healthy controls, QoL was compromised to the same extent in all groups. Furthermore, all patients treated in this study did significantly better than low back pain individuals with regard to QoL and pain regulation parameters. In our study, patients with thoracolumbar spine fractures showed a reduced QoL compared to healthy controls. Thus, patients do not seem to regain their former QoL. However, the level of discomfort was comparably low in all groups, even in patients with more severe injuries requiring extensive surgery. Overall, outcome and QoL after traumatic fractures of the thoracolumbar spine rather seem to be determined by the severity of injury than by pain regulation or other psychosocial factors which is likely the case in low back pain disorders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Been HD, Poolman RW, Ubags LH (2004) Clinical outcome and radiographic results after surgical treatment of post-traumatic thoracolumbar kyphosis following simple type A fractures. Eur Spine J 13(2):101–107

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Been HD, Bouma GJ (1999) Comparison of two types of surgery for thoraco-lumbar burst fractures: combined anterior and posterior stabilisation vs. posterior instrumentation only. Acta Neurochir 141:349–357

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bergner M, Bobbit RA, Carter WB, Gilson BS (1981) The sickness impact profile: development and final revision of health status measure. Med Care 19:787–805

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Blauth M, Tscherne H, Gotzen L, Haas N (1987) Results of different surgical procedures in the treatment of fresh injuries of the thoracic and lumbar spine. Unfallchirurg 90(6):260–273

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Boden SD (1998) Outcome assessment after spinal fusion: why and how ? Orthop Clin North Am 29(4):717–728

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bombardier C (2000) Outcome assessments in the evaluation of treatment of spinal disorders: summary and general recommendations. Spine 25:3100–3103

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Boucher M, Bhandari M, Kwok D (2001) Health-related quality of life after short segment instrumentation of lumbar burst fractures. J Spinal Disord 14:417–426

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M (2002) The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ 21:271–292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Briem D, Lehmann W, Ruecker AH, Windolf J, Rueger JM, Linhart W (2004) Factors influencing the quality of life after burst fractures of the thoracolumbar transition. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124:461–468

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Briem D, Linhart W, Lehmann W, Bullinger M, Schoder V, Meenen NM, Windolf J, Rueger JM (2003) Investigation of the health-related quality of life after a dorso ventral stabilization of the thoracolumbar junction. Unfallchirurg 106:625–632

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Briem D, Rueger JM, Linhart W (2003) Osseous integration of autogenous bone grafts following combined dorso-ventral instrumentation of unstable thoracolumbar spine fractures. Unfallchirurg 106:195–203

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bullinger M (1995) German translation and psychometric testing of the SF-36 health survey: preliminary results from the IQOLA Project. International quality of life assessment. Soc Sci Med 41:1359–1366

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Daniaux H, Wagner M, Kathrein A, Lang T (1999) Fractures of the thoraco-lumbar junction. Conservative management. Orthopäde 28(8):682–691

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dick W (1987) The “fixateur interne” as a versatile implant for spine surgery. Spine 12(9):882–900

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Elfering A (2006) Work-related outcome assessment instruments. Eur Spine J 15(Suppl 1):S32–S43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. The EuroQol Group (1990) EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. The EuroQol Group. Health Policy 16:199–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gatchel RJ, Mayer T, Dersh J, Robinson R, Polatin P (1999) The association of the SF-36 health status survey with 1-year socioeconomic outcomes in a chronically disabled spinal disorder population. Spine 24:2162–2170

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Glassman SD, Dimar JR, Johnson JR, Minkow R (1998) Preoperative SF-36 responses as a predictor of reoperation following lumbar fusion. Orthopedics 21:1201–1203

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Greenough CG (2006) Outcome assessment: recommendations for daily practice. Eur Spine J 15(Suppl 1):S118–S123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Grevitt M, Khazim R, Webb J, Mulholland R, Shepperd J (1997) The short form-36 health survey questionnaire in spine surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79:48–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. von Gumppenberg S, Vieweg J, Claudi B, Harms J (1991) Primary management of fresh injuries of the thoracic and lumbar vertebrae. Aktuelle Traumatol 21(6):265–273

    Google Scholar 

  22. Haas N, Blauth M, Tscherne H (1991) Anterior plating in thoracolumbar spine injuries. Indication, technique, and results. Spine 16(3 Suppl):S100–S111

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Haase I, Schwarz A, Burger A, Kladny B (2001) Comparison of Hannover functional ability questionnaire (FFbH) and the SF-36 subscale “Physical Functioning”. Rehabilitation 40(1):40–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Haefeli M, Elfering A (2006) Pain assessment. Eur Spine J 15(Suppl 1):S17–S24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hansson E, Hansson T, Jonsson T (2006) Predictors for work ability and disability in men and women with low-back or neck problems. Eur Spine J 15(6):780–793

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hartwig E, Schultheiss M, Bischoff M (2002) Flat rate reimbursement system for minimally invasive management of unstable vertebral fractures. An analysis of costs and benefits. Unfallchirurg 105(8):755–758

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hiebert R, Nordin M (2006) Methodological aspects of outcomes research. Eur Spine J 15(Suppl 1):S4–S16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hunt SM, McKenna SP, McEwen J, Williams J, Papp E (1981) The Nottingham health profile: subjective health status and medical consultations. Soc Sci Med 15:221–229

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kaneda K, Taneichi H, Abumi K, Hashimoto T, Satoh S, Fujiya M (1997) Anterior decompression and stabilization with the Kaneda device for thoracolumbar burst fractures associated with neurological deficits. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79(1):69–83

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Knop C, Blauth M, Bühren V, Arand M, Egbers HJ, Hax PM, Nothwang J, Oestern HJ, Pizanis A, Roth R, Weckbach A, Wentzensen A (2001) Surgical treatment of injuries of the thoracolumbar transition-3: follow-up examination. Results of a prospective multi-center study by the “Spinal” study group of the German Society of Trauma Surgery. Unfallchirurg 104:583–600

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Knop C, Fabian HF, Bastian L, Blauth M (2001) Late results of thoracolumbar fractures after posterior instrumentation and transpedicular bone grafting. Spine 26:88–99

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Knop C, Oeser M, Bastian L, Lange U, Zdichavsky M, Blauth M (2001) Development and validation of the visual analogue scale (VAS) spine score. Unfallchirurg 104:488–497

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Knop C, Blauth M, Bühren V, Hax PM, Kinzl L, Mutschler W, Pommer A, Ulrich C, Wagner S, Weckbach A, Wentzensen A, Wörsdorfer O (1999) Surgical treatment of injuries of the thoracolumbar transition. 1: Epidemiology. Unfallchirurg 102(12):924–935

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Knop C, Blauth M, Bühren V, Hax PM, Kinzl L, Mutschler W, Pommer A, Ulrich C, Wagner S, Weckbach A, Wentzensen A, Wörsdorfer O (2000) Surgical treatment of injuries of the thoracolumbar transition. 2: Operation and roentgenologic findings. Unfallchirurg 103(12):1032–1047

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Kohlmann T, Raspe H (1996) Hannover functional questionnaire in ambulatory diagnosis of functional disability caused by backache. Rehabilitation 35(1):I–VIII

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Korovessis P, Baikousis A, Zacharatos S, Petsinis G, Koureas G, Iliopoulos P (2006) Combined anterior plus posterior stabilization versus posterior short-segment instrumentation and fusion for mid-lumbar (L2-L4) burst fractures. Spine 31(8):859–868

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kossmann T, Ertel W, Platz A, Trentz O (1999) Combined surgery for fractures of the thoraco-lumbar junction using the inlay-span method. Orthopäde 28(5):432–440

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Kovacs FM, Llobera J, Abraira V, Lazaro P, Pozo F, Kleinbaum D (2002) Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis of neuroreflexotherapy for subacute and chronic low back pain in routine general practice: a cluster randomized, controlled trial. Spine 27:1149–1159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kraemer WJ, Schemitsch EH, Lever J, McBroom RJ, McKee MD, Waddell JP (1996) Functional outcome of thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficit. J Orthop Trauma 10:541–544

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Krismer M, Auckenthaler T, Gruber R, Wimmer C, Sterzinger W, Ogon M (1997) Lumbar fusion in adults-dorsal or combined ventral/dorsal approach ? Orthopäde 26(6):568–571

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Leferink VJ, Keizer HJ, Oosterhuis JK, van der Sluis CK, ten Duis HJ (2003) Functional outcome in patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures treated with dorsal instrumentation and transpedicular cancellous bone grafting. Eur Spine J 12:261–267

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Leferink VJ, Zimmerman KW, Veldhuis EF, ten Vergert EM, ten Duis HJ (2001) Thoracolumbar spinal fractures: radiological results of transpedicular fixation combined with transpedicular cancellous bone graft and posterior fusion in 183 patients. Eur Spine J 10(6):517–523

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Mannion AF, Elfering A (2006) Predictors of surgical outcome and their assessment. Eur Spine J 15(Suppl 1):S93–S108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Mercado AC, Carroll LJ, Cassidy JD, Cote P (2005) Passive coping is a risk factor for disabling neck or low back pain. Pain 117:51–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Müller U, Roder C, Greenough CG (2006) Back related outcome assessment instruments. Eur Spine J 15(Suppl 1):S25–S31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Németh G (2006) Health related quality of life outcome instruments. Eur Spine J 15(Suppl 1):S44–S51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Pape HC, Mahlke L, Schaefer O, Krettek C (2003) Thoughts on the economic aspects of management of severely injured patients with reference to “diagnostic related groups” (DRG). An initiative of the Specialized Committee of the German Health Care System. Unfallchirurg 106(10):869–873

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Post RB, Keizer HJ, Leferink VJ, van der Sluis CK (2005) Functional outcome 5 years after non-operative treatment of type A spinal fractures. Eur Spine J 15(4):472–478

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Reinhold M, Knop C, Lange U, Bastian L, Blauth M (2003) Non-operative treatment of thoracolumbar spinal fractures. Long-term clinical results over 16 years. Unfallchirurg 106(7):566–576

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. van der Roer N, Boos N, van Tulder MW (2006) Economic evaluations: a new avenue of outcome assessment in spinal disorders. Eur Spine J 15(Suppl 1):S109–S117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger H (1991) Empirical validation of the “pain intensity” construct. Z Klin Psychol Psychopathol Psychother 39:369–381

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Schneider S, Lipinksi S, Schiltenwolf M (2006) Occupations associated with a high risk of self-reported back pain: representative outcomes of a back pain prevalence study in the Federal Republic of Germany. Eur Spine J 15(6):821–833

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Shen WJ, Shen YS (1999) Nonsurgical treatment of three-column thoracolumbar junction burst fractures without neurologic deficit. Spine 24:412–415

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Sjolie AN (2002) Psychosocial correlates of low-back pain in adolescents. Eur Spine J 11:582–588

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Stieglitz RD, Frommberger U, Foa EB, Berger M (2001) Evaluation of the German version of the PTSD Symptom Scale (PSS). Psychopathology 34(3):128–133

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Tropiano P, Huang RC, Louis CA, Poitout DG, Louis RP (2003) Functional and radiographic outcome of thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fractures managed by closed orthopaedic reduction and casting. Spine 28(21):2459–2465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Verlaan JJ, Diekerhof CH, Buskens E, van der Tweel I, Verbout AJ, Dhert WJ, Oner FC (2004) Surgical treatment of traumatic fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine: a systematic review of the literature on techniques, complications, and outcome. Spine 29(7):803–814

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Wälchli B, Heini P, Berlemann U (2001) Loss of correction after dorsal stabilization of burst fractures of the thoracolumbar junction. The role of transpedicular spongiosa plasty. Unfallchirurg 104(8):742–747

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Ware J Jr (2000) SF-36 health survey update. Spine 25:3130–3139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD (1996) A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 34:220–233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Wilke HJ, Kemmerich V, Claes LE, Arand M (2001) Combined anteroposterior spinal fixation provides superior stabilisation to a single anterior or posterior procedure. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83(4):609–617

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Wood K, Buttermann G, Mehbod A, Garvey T, Jhanjee R, Sechriest V, Butterman G (2003) Operative compared with nonoperative treatment of a thoracolumbar burst fracture without neurological deficit. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:773–781

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Briem.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Briem, D., Behechtnejad, A., Ouchmaev, A. et al. Pain regulation and health-related quality of life after thoracolumbar fractures of the spine. Eur Spine J 16, 1925–1933 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-007-0395-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-007-0395-x

Keywords

Navigation