Skip to main content
Log in

Occupations associated with a high risk of self-reported back pain: representative outcomes of a back pain prevalence study in the Federal Republic of Germany

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Given the increasing medical and economic implications of back pain, occupation-specific prevalence data may provide important pointers for preventive programmes targeted at promoting preventive behaviour and improving conditions. The National German Health Survey is the first study to provide the basis for a representative nationwide analysis of back pain prevalence by occupational category. The net sample comprises a total of 3,488 earners aged 18–69. One in three earners in the Federal Republic of Germany (34%) experienced back pain during the 7 days prior to being interviewed. The 1-year prevalence rate is 60%. Occupational categories associated with a lower-than-average back pain prevalence are highly qualified professionals, senior management, and production occupations associated with a comparatively low degree of manual labour. In contrast, an above-average prevalence was identified for occupations associated with physically strenuous work involving one-sided postures, moving, carrying and holding heavy weights, and work typically performed in poor conditions or bad weather. Our data demonstrates significant inter-occupational differences in terms of self-reported back pain. The results underline the importance of measures to promote preventive behaviour and improve the working conditions of those in low-skill manual labour occupations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Altman DG (1999) Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bannasch P (1987) Cancer risks. Strategies for elimination. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bellach BM, Knopf H, Thefeld W (1998) Der Bundes-Gesundheitssurvey 1997/98. Gesundheitswesen 60:59–68

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bergenudd H, Nilsson B (1988) Back pain in middle age; occupational workload and psychologic factors: an epidemiologic survey. Spine 13:58–60

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Biering-Sorensen F (1985) Risk of back trouble in individual occupations in Denmark. Ergonomics 28:51–60

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Biering-Sorensen F, Thomsen CE, Hilden J (1989) Risk indicators for low back trouble. Scand J Rehabil Med 21:151–157

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bildt C, Alfredsson I, Michélsen H, Punnett L, Vingard E, Torgén M, Öhman A, Kilbom A (2000) Occupational and nonoccupational risk indicators for incident and chronic low back pain in a sample of the Swedish general population during a 4-year period: an influence of depression? Int J Behav Med 7:372–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bortz J (1985) Lehrbuch der Statistik für Sozialwissenschaftler. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brage S, Bjerkedal T, Bruusgaard D (1997) Occupation-specific morbidity of musculoskeletal disease in Norway. Scand J Soc Med 25:50–57

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brown WJ, Mishra G, Lee C, Bauman A (2000) Leisure time physical activity in Australian women: relationship with well being and symptoms. Res Q Exerc Sport 71:206–216

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Buer N, Linton SJ (2002) Fear-avoidance beliefs and catastrophizing: occurrence and risk factor in back pain and ADL in the general population. Pain 99:485–491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Burdorf A, Sorock G (1997) Positive and negative evidence of risk factors for back disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health 23:243–256

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Byrns G, Agnew J, Curbow B (2002) Attributions, stress, and work-related low back pain. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 17:752–764

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cassidy JD, Carroll LJ, Cote P (1998) The Saskatchewan health and back pain survey. The prevalence of low back pain and related disability in Saskatchewan adults. Spine 23:1860–1866

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cavelaars AE, Kunst AE, Geurts JJ, Helmert U, Lundberg O, Mielck A, Matheson J, et al. (1998) Morbidity differences by occupational class among men in seven European countries: an application of the Erikson–Goldthorpe social class scheme. Int J Epidemiol 27:222–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cole DC, Ibrahim SA, Shannon HS, Scott F, Eyles J (2001) Work correlates of back problems and activity restriction due to musculoskeletal disorders in the Canadian national population health survey (NPHS) 1994-5 data. J Occup Environ Med 58:728–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Croft PR, Rigby AS (1994) Socioeconomic influences on back problems in the community in Britain. J Epidemiol Community Health 48:166–170

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dahl E (1994) Social inequalities in ill-health: the significance of occupational status, education and income results from a Norwegian survey. Sociol Health Illn 16:644–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dahl E (1993) Social inequality in health—the role of the healthy worker effect. Soc Sci Med 36:1077–1086

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Devereux JJ, Buckle PW, Vlachonikolis IG (1999) Interactions between physical and psychosocial risk factors at work increase the risk of back disorders: an epidemiological approach. Occup Environ Med 56:343–353

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dionne C, Koepsell TD, Von Korff M, Deyo RA, Barlow WI, Checkoway H (1995) Formal education and back-related disability. In search of an explanation. Spine 20:2721–2730

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Duch D, Sokolowska M (1990) Health inequalities in Poland. Soc Sci Med 31:343–350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Göbel H (2001) Epidemiologie und Kosten chronischer Schmerzen. Spezifische und unspezifische Rückenschmerzen. Schmerz 15:92–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Guo HR (2002) Working hours spent on repeated activities and prevalence of back pain. Occup Environ Med 59:680–688

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Harkness EF, Macfarlane GJ, Nahit ES, Silman AJ, McBeth J (2003) Risk factors for new-onset low back pain amongst cohorts of newly employed workers. Rheumatology (Oxford) 42(8):959–968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hartvigsen J, Bakketeig LS, Leboeuf-Yde C, Engberg M, Lauritzen T (2001) The association between physical workload and low back pain clouded by the ‘healthy worker’ effect: population-based cross-sectional and 5-year prospective questionnaire study. Spine 26:1788–1792

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hasenbring M (2001) Biopsychosoziale Grundlagen der Chronifizierung am Beispiel von Rückenschmerzen. In: Zenz M, Jurna I (eds) Lehrbuch der Schmerztherapie. Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft, Stuttgart, pp 185–196

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hildebrandt VH (1995) Back pain in the working population: prevalence rates in Dutch trades and professions. Ergonomics 38:1283–1298

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hildebrandt VH, Bongers PM, Dul J, van Dijk FJ, Kemper HC (2000) The relationship between leisure time, physical activities and musculoskeletal symptoms and disability in worker populations. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 73:507–518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hoogendoorn WE, van Poppel MN, Bongers PM, Koes BW, Bouter LM (1999) Physical load during work and leisure time as risk factors for back pain. Scand J Work Environ Health 25:387–403

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Johnston JM, Landsittel DP, Nelson NA, Gardner LI, Wassell JT (2003) Stressful psychosocial work environment increases risk for back pain among retail material handlers. Am J Ind Med 43:179–187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Josephson M, Vingard E (1998) Workplace factors and care seeking for low-back pain among female nursing personnel. MUSIC-Norrtalje Study Group. Scand J Work Environ Health 24:465–472

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kohlmann T (2001) Bevölkerungsbezogene Epidemiologie am Beispiel chronischer Rückenschmerzen. In: Jurna I, Zenz M (eds) Lehrbuch der Schmerztherapie. Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft, Stuttgart, pp 221–229

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kovacs FM, Gestoso M, Gil del Real MT, Lopez J, Mufraggi N, Ignacio MJ (2003) Risk factors for non-specific low back pain in schoolchildren and their parents: a population based study. Pain 103:259–268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Krause N, Ragland DR, Fisher JM, Syme SL (1998) Psychosocial job factors, physical workload, and incidence of work-related spinal injury: a 5-year prospective study of urban transit operators. Spine 23:2507–2516

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kröner-Herwig B (2004) Schmerz–eine Gegenstandsbeschreibung. In: Basler H, Franz C, Kröner-Herwig B, Rehfisch H (eds) Psychologische Schmerztherapie. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 3–16

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lee CY, Kratter R, Duvoisin N, Taskin A, Schilling J (2005) Cross-sectional view of factors associated with back pain. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 78:319–324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Leroux I, Dionne CE, Bourbonnais R, Brisson C (2005) Prevalence of musculoskeletal pain and associated factors in the Quebec working population. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 78:379–386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Levangie PK (1999) Association of low back pain with self-reported risk factors among patients seeking physical therapy services. Phys Ther 79:757–766

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lings S, Leboeuf-Yde C (2000) Whole-body vibration and low back pain: a systematic, critical review of the epidemiological literature 1992–1999. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 73:290–297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Linton SJ (2000) A review of psychological risk factors in back and neck pain. Spine 25:1148–1156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Macfarlane GJ, Thomas E, Papageorgiou AC, Croft PR, Jayson MI, Silman AJ (1997) Employment and physical work activities as predictors of future low back pain. Spine 22:1143–1149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Mannetje A, Kromhout H (2003) The use of occupation and industry classifications in general population studies. Int J Epidemiol 32:419–428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Oppolzer A (1994) Die Arbeitswelt als Ursache gesundheitlicher Ungleichheit. In: Mielck A (ed) Krankheit und soziale Ungleichheit: Ergebnisse der sozialepidemiologischen Forschung in Deutschland. Leske+Budrich, Opladen, pp 125–166

    Google Scholar 

  45. Palmer KT, Griffin MJ, Syddall HE, Pannett B, Cooper C, Coggon D (2003) The relative importance of whole body vibration and occupational lifting as risk factors for low-back pain. Occup Environ Med 60:715–721

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Papageorgiou AC, Croft PR, Ferry S, Jayson MI, Silman AJ (1995) Estimating the prevalence of low back pain in the general population. Evidence from the South Manchester back pain survey. Spine 20:1889–1894

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Pfingsten M, Hildebrandt J (2004) Rückenschmerzen. In: Basler H, Franz C, Kröner-Herwig B, Rehfisch H (eds) Psychologische Schmerztherapie. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 395–414

    Google Scholar 

  48. Potthoff P, Schroeder E, Reis U, Klamert A (1999) [Process and results of field work concerning the Federal Health Survey] Ablauf und Ergebnisse der Feldarbeit beim Bundes-Gesundheitssurvey. Gesundheitswesen 61:62–67

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Raspe H, Wasmus A, Greif G (1990) Rückenschmerzen in Hannover. Aktuelle Rheumatol 15:32–37

    Google Scholar 

  50. Riihimaki H (1991) Low-back pain, its origin and risk indicators. Scand J Work Environ Health 17:81–90

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Schneider S (2002) Lebensstil und Mortalität. Welche Faktoren bedingen ein langes Leben? Westdeutscher Verlag, Wiesbaden

  52. Schneider S, Schiltenwolf M, Zoller S, Schmitt H (2005) The association between social factors, employment status and self-reported back pain. J Public Health 13:30–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Schneider S, Schmitt H, Zoller S, Schiltenwolf M (2005) Workplace stress, Lifestyle and social factors as correlates of backpain. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 78:253–269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Schroeder E, Potthoff P, Reis U, Klamert A (1998) [Data evaluation in the German Health Survey] Erhebungsarbeiten beim Bundes-Gesundheitssurvey. Gesundheitswesen 60:104–107

    Google Scholar 

  55. Skovron ML, Szpalski M, Nordin M, Melot C, Cukier D (1994) Sociocultural factors and back pain. A population-based study in Belgian adults. Spine 19:129–137

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Statistisches Bundesamt (2002) Statistisches Jahrbuch 2002 für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Metzler-Poeschel, Stuttgart

  57. Statistisches Bundesamt (1996) Bevölkerung und Erwerbstätigkeit, Beruf, Ausbildung und Arbeitsbedingungen der Erwerbstätigen 1995. Metzler-Poeschel, Stuttgart

  58. Statistisches Bundesamt (1997) Statistisches Jahrbuch 1997 für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Metzler-Poeschel, Stuttgart

  59. Statistisches Bundesamt (1998) Gesundheitsbericht für Deutschland: Gesundheitsberichtserstattung des Bundes. Metzler-Poeschel, Wiesbaden

  60. Thefeld W, Stolzenberg H, Bellach BM (1999) Bundes-Gesundheitssurvey: Response, Zusammensetzung der Teilnehmer und Non-Responder-Analyse. Gesundheitswesen 61(Spec No):S57–S61

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Torp S, Riise T, Moen BE (2001) The impact of psychosocial work factors on musculoskeletal pain: a prospective study. J Occup Environ Med 43:120–126

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Vingard E, Alfredsson L, Hagberg M, Kilbom A, Theorell T, Waldenstrom M, Hjelm EW, et al. (2000) To what extent do current and past physical and psychosocial occupational factors explain care-seeking for low back pain in a working population? Results from the Musculoskeletal Intervention Center-Norrtalje Study. Spine 25:493–500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Vingard E, Nachemson A (2000) Work-related influences on neck and low back pain. In: Nachemson AL, Jonsson E (eds) Neck and back pain: the scientific evidence of causes, diagnosis, and treatment. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 97–126

    Google Scholar 

  64. Waddell G (1998) The back pain revolution. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  65. Walsh K, Cruddas M, Coggon D (1992) Low back pain in eight areas of Britain. J Epidemiol Community Health 46:227–230

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Winkler G, Filipiak B, Hense HW, Schwertner B (1998) Externe Qualitätskontrolle im Bundes-Gesundheitssurvey 1997/98: Konzept und erste Erfahrungen. Gesundheitswesen 60:108–112

    Google Scholar 

  67. Zoller S (2005) Medizinische und soziale Risikofaktoren des Rückenschmerzes. Dissertation. Orthopädische Universitatsklinik, Heidelberg

Download references

Acknowledgements

Special thanks are due to Dr. Heribert Stolzenberg, Robert-Koch-Institut Berlin, for providing the data sets. We also wish to thank Saskia Tönges for her assistance in drafting and formatting the text. This publication was supported by a grant from the research fund of the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Germany. We declare that the study was conducted in compliance with the pertinent German laws. Ethics committee approval was obtained.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sven Schneider.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schneider, S., Lipinski, S. & Schiltenwolf, M. Occupations associated with a high risk of self-reported back pain: representative outcomes of a back pain prevalence study in the Federal Republic of Germany. Eur Spine J 15, 821–833 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-005-1015-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-005-1015-2

Keywords

Navigation