Abstract
The accurate computation of gravitational effects from topographic and atmospheric masses is one of the core issues in gravity field modeling. Using gravity forward modeling based on Newton’s integral, mass distributions are generally decomposed into regular mass bodies, which can be represented by rectangular prisms or polyhedral bodies in a rectangular coordinate system, or tesseroids in a spherical coordinate system. In this study, we prefer the latter representation because it can directly take the Earth’s curvature into account, which is particularly beneficial for regional and global applications. Since the volume integral cannot be solved analytically in the case of tesseroids, approximation solutions are applied. However, one well-recognized issue of these solutions is that the accuracy decreases as the computation point approaches the tesseroid. To overcome this problem, we develop a method that can precisely compute the gravitational potential \(\left( V\right) \) and vector \(\left( V_x, V_y, V_z\right) \) on the tesseroid surface. In addition to considering a constant density for the tesseroid, we further derive formulas for a linearly varying density. In the near zone (up to a spherical distance of 15 times the horizontal tesseroid dimension from the computation point), the gravitational effects of the tesseroids are computed by Gauss–Legendre quadrature using a two-dimensional adaptive subdivision technique to ensure high accuracy. The tesseroids outside this region are evaluated by means of expanding the integral kernel in a Taylor series up to the second order. The method is validated by synthetic tests of spherical shells with constant and linearly varying density, and the resulting approximation error is less than \(10^{-4}\,\hbox {m}^2\,\hbox {s}^{-2}\) for V, \(10^{-5}\,\hbox {mGal}\) for \(V_x\), \(10^{-7}\,\hbox {mGal}\) for \(V_y\), and \(10^{-4}\,\hbox {mGal}\) for \(V_z\). Its practical applicability is then demonstrated through the computation of topographic reductions in the White Sands test area and of global atmospheric effects on the Earth’s surface using the US Standard Atmosphere 1976.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amante C, Eakins BW (2009) ETOPO1 1 arc-minute global relief model: procedures, data sources and analysis. NOAA technical memorandum NESDIS NGDC-24. National Geophysical Data Center, NOAA. https://doi.org/10.7289/V5C8276M
Anderson EG (1976) The effect of topography on solutions of Stokes’ problem. UNISURV S-14 report, School of Surveying, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia
Asgharzadeh MF, Von Frese RRB, Kim HR, Leftwich TE, Kim JW (2007) Spherical prism gravity effects by Gauss-Legendre quadrature integration. Geophys J Int 169:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03214.x
Benedek J, Papp G (2009) Geophysical inversion of on board satellite gradiometer data—a feasibility study in the ALPACA region, central Europe. Acta Geod Geophys Hung 44:179–190. https://doi.org/10.1556/AGeod.44.2009.2.4
Benedek J, Papp G, Kalmár J (2018) Generalization techniques to reduce the number of volume elements for terrain effect calculations in fully analytical gravitational modelling. J Geod 92:361–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-017-1067-1
Chai Y, Hinze WJ (1988) Gravity inversion of an interface above which the density contrast varies exponentially with depth. Geophysics 53:837–845. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442518
Conway JT (2015) Analytical solution from vector potentials for the gravitational field of a general polyhedron. Celest Mech Dyn Astron 121:17–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-014-9588-x
Deng X, Grombein T, Shen W, Heck B, Seitz K (2016) Corrections to “A comparison of the tesseroid, prism and point-mass approaches for mass reductions in gravity field modelling” (Heck and Seitz, 2007) and “Optimized formulas for the gravitational field of a tesseroid” (Grombein et al., 2013). J Geod 90:585–587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-016-0907-8
Denker H (2013) Regional gravity field modeling: theory and practical results. In: Xu G (ed) Sciences of geodesy—II. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 185–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28000-9_5
D’Urso MG (2013) On the evaluation of the gravity effects of polyhedral bodies and a consistent treatment of related singularities. J Geod 87:239–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-012-0592-1
D’Urso MG (2014a) Analytical computation of gravity effects for polyhedral bodies. J Geod 88:13–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-013-0664-x
D’Urso MG (2014b) Gravity effects of polyhedral bodies with linearly varying density. Celest Mech Dyn Astron 120:349–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-014-9578-z
D’Urso MG, Trotta S (2017) Gravity anomaly of polyhedral bodies having a polynomial density contrast. Surv Geophys 38:781–832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-017-9411-9
Forsberg R (1984) A study of terrain reductions, density anomalies and geophysical inversion methods in gravity field modelling. OSU report 355, Department of Geodetic Science and Surveying, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
Fukushima T (2018) Accurate computation of gravitational field of a tesseroid. J Geod. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-018-1126-2
García-Abdeslem J (1992) Gravitational attraction of a rectangular prism with depth-dependent density. Geophysics 57:470–473. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443261
García-Abdeslem J (2005) Gravitational attraction of a right rectangular prism with density varying with depth following a cubic polynomial. Geophysics 70:J39–J42. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2122413
Götze HJ, Lahmeyer B (1988) Application of three-dimensional interactive modeling in gravity and magnetics. Geophysics 53:1096–1108. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442546
Gradshteyn IS, Ryzhik IM (2007) Table of integrals, series, and products, 7th edn. Academic Press, New York
Grombein T, Seitz K, Heck B (2013) Optimized formulas for the gravitational field of a tesseroid. J Geod 87:645–660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-013-0636-1
Grüninger W (1990) Zur topographisch-isostatischen Reduktion der Schwere. PhD thesis, Universität Karlsruhe
Hamayun, Prutkin I, Tenzer R (2009) The optimum expression for the gravitational potential of polyhedral bodies having a linearly varying density distribution. J Geod 83:1163–1170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-009-0334-1
Hansen RO (1999) An analytical expression for the gravity field of a polyhedral body with linearly varying density. Geophysics 64:75–77. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444532
Heck B, Seitz K (2007) A comparison of the tesseroid, prism and point-mass approaches for mass reductions in gravity field modelling. J Geod 81:121–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-006-0094-0
Holstein H (2003) Gravimagnetic anomaly formulas for polyhedra of spatially linear media. Geophysics 68:157–167. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1543203
Holstein H, Ketteridge B (1996) Gravimetric analysis of uniform polyhedra. Geophysics 61:357–364. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443964
Holstein H, Schürholz P, Starr AJ, Chakraborty M (1999) Comparison of gravimetric formulas for uniform polyhedra. Geophysics 64:1438–1446. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444648
Jiang L, Zhang J, Feng Z (2017) A versatile solution for the gravity anomaly of 3D prism-meshed bodies with depth-dependent density contrast. Geophysics 82:G77–G86. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2016-0394.1
Ku CC (1977) A direct computation of gravity and magnetic anomalies caused by 2- and 3-dimensional bodies of arbitrary shape and arbitrary magnetic polarization by equivalent-point method and a simplified cubic spline. Geophysics 42:610–622. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1440732
Kuhn M (2003) Geoid determination with density hypotheses from isostatic models and geological information. J Geod 77:50–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-002-0297-y
Li Z, Hao T, Xu Y, Xu Y (2011) An efficient and adaptive approach for modeling gravity effects in spherical coordinates. J Appl Geophys 73:221–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2011.01.004
MacMillan WD (1930) Theoretical mechanics, vol 2: the theory of the potential. McGraw-Hill, New York
Mader K (1951) Das Newtonsche Raumpotential prismatischer Körper und seine Ableitungen bis zur dritten Ordnung. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Vermessungswesen Sonderheft 11
Makhloof AA, Ilk KH (2008) Effects of topographic–isostatic masses on gravitational functionals at the earth’s surface and at airborne and satellite altitudes. J Geod 82:93–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-007-0159-8
Marotta AM, Barzaghi R (2017) A new methodology to compute the gravitational contribution of a spherical tesseroid based on the analytical solution of a sector of a spherical zonal band. J Geod 91:1207–1224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-017-1018-x
Martinec Z, Vaníc̆ek P (1994) Direct topographical effect of Helmert’s condensation for a spherical approximation of the geoid. Manuscr Geod 19:257–268
Mikuška J, Marušiak I, Pašteka R, Karcol R, Beňo J (2008) The effect of topography in calculating the atmospheric correction in gravimetry. In: SEG Las Vegas annual meeting, expanded abstracts, pp 784–788. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3063762
Nagy D, Papp G, Benedek J (2000) The gravitational potential and its derivatives for the prism. J Geod 74:552–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001900000116
Nagy D, Papp G, Benedek J (2002) Corrections to “The gravitational potential and its derivatives for the prism”. J Geod 76:475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-002-0264-7
Novák P, Grafarend EW (2005) Ellipsoidal representation of the topographical potential and its vertical gradient. J Geod 78:691–706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-005-0435-4
Okabe M (1979) Analytical expressions for gravity anomalies due to homogeneous polyhedral bodies and translations into magnetic anomalies. Geophysics 44:730–741. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1440973
Pohánka V (1988) Optimum expression for computation of the gravity field of a homogeneous polyhedral body. Geophys Prospect 36:733–751. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1988.tb02190.x
Pohánka V (1998) Optimum expression for computation of the gravity field of a polyhedral body with linearly increasing density. Geophys Prospect 46:391–404. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2478.1998.960335.x
Ren Z, Chen C, Pan K, Kalscheuer T, Maurer H, Tang J (2017) Gravity anomalies of arbitrary 3D polyhedral bodies with Horizontal and vertical mass contrasts. Surv Geophys 38:479–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-016-9395-x
Ren Z, Zhong Y, Chen C, Tang J, Pan K (2018) Gravity anomalies of arbitrary 3D polyhedral bodies with horizontal and vertical mass contrasts up to cubic order. Geophysics 83:G1–G13. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2017-0219.1
Roussel C, Verdun J, Cali J, Masson F (2015) Complete gravity field of an ellipsoidal prism by Gauss–Legendre quadrature. Geophys J Int 203:2220–2236. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggv438
Shen W, Deng X (2016) Evaluation of the fourth-order tesseroid formula and new combination approach to precisely determine gravitational potential. Stud Geophys Geod 60:583–607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-016-0402-y
Stroud AH, Secrest D (1966) Gaussian quadrature formulas. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey
Tenzer R, Vajda P, Hamayun (2009) Global atmospheric effects on the gravity field quantities. Contrib Geophys Geod 39:221–236. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10126-009-0008-2
Tsoulis D (1999) Analytical and numerical methods in gravity field modelling of ideal and real masses. Reihe C, Heft Nr. 510, Deutsche Geodätische Kommission, München
Tsoulis D (2012) Analytical computation of the full gravity tensor of a homogeneous arbitrarily shaped polyhedral source using line integrals. Geophysics 77:F1–F11. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2010-0334.1
Tsoulis D, Novák P, Kadlec M (2009) Evaluation of precise terrain effects using high-resolution digital elevation models. J Geophys Res 114:B02404. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JB005639
Uieda L, Barbosa VCF, Braitenberg C (2016) Tesseroids: forward-modeling gravitational fields in spherical coordinates. Geophysics 81:F41–F48. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2015-0204.1
Wessel P, Smith WHF (1998) New, improved version of generic mapping tools released. Eos Trans AGU 79:579. https://doi.org/10.1029/98EO00426
Wild-Pfeiffer F (2008) A comparison of different mass elements for use in gravity gradiometry. J Geod 82:637–653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-008-0219-8
Wu L, Chen L (2016) Fourier forward modeling of vector and tensor gravity fields due to prismatic bodies with variable density contrast. Geophysics 81:G13–G26. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2014-0559.1
Zhou X (2009) 3D vector gravity potential and line integrals for the gravity anomaly of a rectangular prism with 3D variable density contrast. Geophysics 74:I43–I53. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3239518
Zhou X (2010) Analytic solution of the gravity anomaly of irregular 2D masses with density contrast varying as a 2D polynomial function. Geophysics 75:I11–I19. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3294699
Acknowledgements
We thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments that helped to significantly improve the manuscript. This work was financially supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) within CRC 1128 “Relativistic Geodesy and Gravimetry with Quantum Sensors (geo-Q)”, project C04. Most of the figures were plotted by the Generic Mapping Tools (GMT; Wessel and Smith 1998).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix A
1.1 A.1 Approximation of volume integrals by Gauss–Legendre quadrature
By moving the constant term \(G\rho \) into the integral kernels in Eqs. (1a)–(1d), the volume integral can be expressed as
Using the GLQ decomposition (Stroud and Secrest 1966; Asgharzadeh et al. 2007; Li et al. 2011), the least-squares numerical solution of Eq. (12) is obtained as
where
\({w_i^{r}}\), \({w_j^{\varphi }}\), and \({w_k^{\lambda }}\) are denoted by the GLQ weights corresponding to the GLQ nodes \({x_i^{r}}\), \({x_j^{\varphi }}\), and \({x_k^{\lambda }}\) in the interval \(\left[ -1,1\right] \) (Wild-Pfeiffer 2008). In practical computation using Eq. (13), the GLQ nodes must be scaled to the integration domain \(\left[ r_1,r_2\right] \times \left[ \varphi _1,\varphi _2\right] \times \left[ \lambda _1,\lambda _2\right] \) using
Equation (13) shows that the effect of a tesseroid at each computation point is approximated by a weighted sum of \(N^r \times N^\varphi \times N^\lambda \) equivalent point mass effects, where each point mass is located at the source coordinate \(({\hat{r}}_i,\,{\hat{\varphi }}_j,\,{\hat{\lambda }}_k)\) inside the tesseroid. If \(N^r = N^\varphi = N^\lambda = 1\), this method is equivalent to the point mass method.
1.2 A.2 Analytical integration over radial direction and surface integrals by Gauss–Legendre quadrature
In this method, Newton’s integral in Eqs. (1a)–(1d) is decomposed into a one-dimensional integral over the radial direction \(r'\) and a two-dimensional integral over \(\varphi '\) and \(\lambda '\), yielding
where \(H^{V}\), \(H^{V_x}\), \(H^{V_y}\), and \(H^{V_z}\) are the integral kernels for the surface integral, whose analytical formulas are available in Wild-Pfeiffer (2008).
By moving the term \(G \rho \times \cos \varphi '\) into the integral kernels in Eqs. (16a)–(16d), the general expression can be written in the form of
which can be approximated by GLQ as
with
1.3 A.3 Taylor series expansion
Another method to solve the elliptical integral is achieved by means of expanding the integral kernels of Eqs. (1a)–(1d) in a Taylor series and solving a subsequent volume integral. Similar to Eqs. (10a) and (10b), the gravitational potential and vector of a homogeneous tesseroid read
The zeroth and second order coefficients \(K^{V}_{ijk}\) and \(K^{V_\alpha }_{ijk}\) are given in Heck and Seitz (2007) and Wild-Pfeiffer (2008). Notice that the zeroth-order approximation is equivalent to the point mass method.
1.4 A.4 Approximation of tesseroids by rectangular prisms
If a tesseroid is replaced by a rectangular prism in the spherical system, the gravitational effects are computed in the local edge system of the prism first, and then these effects are transformed to the local topocentric coordinate system of the computation point. Since the horizontal dimension of the used tesseroid is very small \(\left( \sin \varDelta \varphi \approx \varDelta \varphi \right) \) and its vertical dimension is much smaller than the distance to the origin of the geocentric coordinate system \(\left( \varDelta {r} \ll r_1\right) \) in this study, the conversion of a tesseroid into a rectangular prism is achieved by (Wild-Pfeiffer 2008)
where \(r_0\), \(\varphi _0\), \(\lambda _0\) refer to Eq. (5d) and \(\varDelta {r}\), \(\varDelta \varphi \), \(\varDelta \lambda \) refer to Eq. (11). The condition assuming that both mass bodies have the same mass is also taken into account.
The formulas of the gravitational effects of a rectangular prism in a rectangular coordinate system can be found in, e.g., Mader (1951), Forsberg (1984), Nagy et al. (2000, 2002), and Wild-Pfeiffer (2008). The transformation of the prism effect from the local edge system into the system of the computation point follows the formulas given in Heck and Seitz (2007) and Wild-Pfeiffer (2008).
1.5 A.5 Approximation of tesseroids by point masses
A tesseroid can also simply be replaced by a point mass of the same mass located at the mass center \(\left( r_c,\varphi _c,\lambda _c\right) \) of the tesseroid. According to Anderson (1976), the mass center of a small-size homogeneous tesseroid can be approximated as
and the mass of tesseroid is computed by
Replacing \(\rho \,\int _{\lambda _1}^{\lambda _2}\int _{\varphi _1}^{\varphi _2}\int _{r_1}^{r_2}\kappa \,\mathrm {d}r' \mathrm {d}\varphi ' \mathrm {d}\lambda '\) by \(m_\text {pm}\) and \(\left( r',\varphi ',\lambda '\right) \) by \(\left( r_c,\varphi _c,\lambda _c\right) \) in the integral kernels of Eqs. (1a)–(1d) yields the point mass formulas for the gravitational potential and vector:
where
Appendix B
The analytical gravitational potential \(V^\text {s}\) and attraction \(V_z^\text {s}\) of a homogeneous spherical shell at an arbitrary point with a radial distance r above, below, on, or inside the shell mass can be computed by (Tsoulis 1999; Heck and Seitz 2007; Makhloof and Ilk 2008; Grombein et al. 2013)
and
Due to the isotropy of the homogeneous spherical shell, \(V_x^\text {s}\) and \(V_y^\text {s}\) are zero at an arbitrary point.
Appendix C
1.1 C.1 Zeroth and second order coefficients \({\widetilde{K}}^V_{000}\), \({\widetilde{K}}^V_{200}\), \({\widetilde{K}}^V_{020}\), and \({\widetilde{K}}^V_{002}\) in Eq. (10a)
where \(\ell _0\), \(\cos \psi _0\), \(\delta \lambda _0\), \(r_0\), \(\varphi _0\), and \(\lambda _0\) are the same as in Eq. (5), and
1.2 C.2 Zeroth and second order coefficients \({\widetilde{K}}^{V_x}_{000}\), \({\widetilde{K}}^{V_x}_{200}\), \({\widetilde{K}}^{V_x}_{020}\), and \({\widetilde{K}}^{V_x}_{002}\) in Eq. (10b)
1.3 C.3 Zeroth and second order coefficients \({\widetilde{K}}^{V_y}_{000}\), \({\widetilde{K}}^{V_y}_{200}\), \({\widetilde{K}}^{V_y}_{020}\), and \({\widetilde{K}}^{V_y}_{002}\) in Eq. (10b)
1.4 C.4 Zeroth and second order coefficients \({\widetilde{K}}^{V_z}_{000}\), \({\widetilde{K}}^{V_z}_{200}\), \({\widetilde{K}}^{V_z}_{020}\), and \({\widetilde{K}}^{V_z}_{002}\) in Eq. (10b)
Appendix D
1.1 D.1 The gravitational potential \(V^{*\text {c}}\) of a spherical cap with a linear density \(d\rho \times r'\)
Analogous to the derivations in Appendix A3 of Heck and Seitz (2007), the gravitational potential \(V^{*\text {c}}\) of a spherical cap with a linear density \(d\rho \times r'\) at the computation point located on the axis passing through the north pole is given by Newton’s integral
where \(\ell ' = \sqrt{r^2 + r'^2 - 2rr'\cos \theta '}\) is the Euclidean distance between the computation point \(P\left( r, \theta = 0^{\circ }\right) \) and the running integration point \(Q\left( r', \theta ', \alpha '\right) \). Integration with respect to the azimuth \(\alpha '\) for the rotational symmetric cap and the spherical distance \(\theta '\) results in
Finally, after the integration with respect to the radial distance (Gradshteyn and Ryzhik 2007), the formula for \(V^{*\text {c}}\) is given by
where \(\ell '_c = \sqrt{r^2 + r'^2 - 2rr'\cos \theta _c}\). If the extension of the cap tends to \(\theta _c = \pi \), the gravitational potential of a spherical shell with a linear density \(d\rho \times r'\) simplifies to
When the computation point is inside the shell mass (i.e., \(r_1< r < r_2\)), the analytical expression for \(V^{*\text {s}}\) is given by \(\pi G d\rho \left( \frac{4 r_2^3}{3} - \frac{r^3}{3} - \frac{r_1^4}{r}\right) \).
1.2 D.2 The gravitational vector \({V_x}^{*\text {c}}\), \({V_y}^{*\text {c}}\), and \({V_z}^{*\text {c}}\) of a spherical cap with a linear density \(d\rho \times r'\)
Since the density of the spherical cap only varies linearly along the radial direction, the horizontal components of gravitational vector \({V_x}^{*\text {c}}\) and \({V_y}^{*\text {c}}\) are zero at the computation point P. In contrast, the radial component \({V_z}^{*\text {c}}\) can be derived from Eq. (47) by differentiation with respect to r:
The gravitational attraction \({V_z}^{*\text {s}}\) of a spherical shell with a linear density \(d\rho \times r'\) results from Eq. (49) with \(\theta _c = \pi \):
According to the above equation, the analytical formula for \({V_z}^{*\text {s}}\) at the point inside the shell mass (i.e., \(r_1< r < r_2\)) is expressed as \(-\,\frac{\pi G d\rho }{r^2}\left( r^4 - r_1^4\right) \). Notice that the vector components \({V_x}^{*\text {s}}\) and \({V_y}^{*\text {s}}\) of the spherical shell are zero at an arbitrary point.
1.3 D.3 The gravitational potential \({V}^{*\text {b}}\) and attraction \({V_z}^{*\text {b}}\) of a spherical zonal band with a linear density \(d\rho \times r'\)
From the analytical solutions of the gravitational potential \({V}^{*\text {c}}\) (Eq. 47) and attraction \({V_z}^{*\text {c}}\) (Eq. 49), the potential \({V}^{*\text {b}}\) and attraction \({V_z}^{*\text {b}}\) of a spherical zonal band between the spherical distances \(\theta _i\) and \(\theta _{i+1}\) at the computation point P can be derived as follows:
Assuming that the spherical zonal band can be uniformly decomposed into K sectors (i.e., tesseroids), the gravitational potential and attraction of each sector at the computation point P are obtained by means of dividing \({V}^{*\text {b}}\) and \({V_z}^{*\text {b}}\) by K, respectively.
Appendix E
List of abbreviations:
2DGLQ | Analytical integration over radial |
direction and surface integrals by | |
Gauss–Legendre quadrature | |
3DGLQ | Volume integrals by |
Gauss–Legendre quadrature | |
AD2D | Two-dimensional adaptive |
subdivision of the tesseroids | |
AD3D | Three-dimensional adaptive |
subdivision of the tesseroids | |
GLQ | Gauss–Legendre quadrature |
NS | No subdivision of the tesseroids |
PM | Point mass |
PR | Prism |
RE | Regular subdivision of the tesseroids |
RTM | Residual terrain model |
STD | Standard deviation |
TC | Topographic correction |
TE | Topographic effect |
TSE2 | Taylor series expansion up to the second order |
USSA1976 | US Standard Atmosphere 1976 |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lin, M., Denker, H. On the computation of gravitational effects for tesseroids with constant and linearly varying density. J Geod 93, 723–747 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-018-1193-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-018-1193-4