Abstract
A new methodology for computing the gravitational effect of a spherical tesseroid has been devised and implemented. The methodology is based on the rotation from the global Earth-Centred Rotational reference frame to the local Earth-Centred P-Rotational reference frame, referred to the computation point P, and it requires knowledge of the height and the angular extension of each topographic column. After rotation, the gravitational effect of the tesseroid is computed via the effect of a sector of the spherical zonal band. In this respect, two possible procedures for handling the rotated tesseroids have been proposed and tested. The results obtained with the devised methodology are in good agreement with those derived by applying other existing methodologies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amante C, Eakins BW (2009) ETOPO1 1 arc-minute global relief model: procedures, data sources and analysis. NOAA Technical Memorandum NESDIS NGDC-24. National Geophysical Data Center, NOAA. doi:10.7289/V5C8276M
Asgharzadeh MF, von Frese RRB, Kim HR, Leftwich TE, Kim JW (2007) Spherical prism gravity effects by Gauss–Legendre quadrature integration. Geophys J Int 169:1–11. doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03214.x
Balmino G, Vales N, Bonvalot S, Briais A (2012) Spherical harmonic modelling to ultra-high degree of Bouguer and isostatic anomalies. J Geod 86:499–520. doi:10.1007/s00190-011-0533-4
Biagi L, Sansò F (2000) TcLight: a new technique for fat RTC computation. In: Sideris (ed) International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol. 123. Springer, Berlin
Claessens SJ, Hirt C (2013) Ellipsoidal topographic potential: new solutions for spectral forward gravity modeling of topography with respect to a reference ellipsoid. JGR Solid Earth 118:5991–6002. doi:10.1002/2013JB010457
Forsberg R (1984) A study of the terrain reductions, density anomalies and geophysical inversion methods in gravity filed modelling. OSU Report No 355, Columbus, Ohio
Grombein T, Seitz K, Heck B (2013) Optimized formulas for the gravitational field of a tesseroid. J Geod 87:645–660
Heck B, Seitz K (2007) A comparison of the tesseroid, prism and point-mass approaches for mass reductions in gravity field modelling. J Geod 81:121–136. doi:10.1007/s00190-006-0094-0
Heiskanen WA, Moritz H (1967) Physical geodesy. W. H. Freeman and CO, San Francisco
Hirt C, Kuhn M (2012) Evaluation of high-degree series expansions of the topographic potential to higher-order powers. J Geophys Res 117:B12407
Hirt C, Kuhn M (2014) Band-limited topographic mass distribution generates full-spectrum gravity field: gravity forward modeling in the spectral and spatial domains revisited. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 119:3646–3661. doi:10.1002/2013JB010900
Kuipers JB (2002) Quaternions and rotation sequences. Princeton University Press, Princeton
La Fehr TR (1991) An exact solution for the gravity curvature (Bullard B) correction. Geophysics 56:1179–1184
Mac Millan WD (1958) Theoretical mechanics. The theory of the potential, vol 2. Dover, New York
Mader K (1951) Das Newtonsche Raumpotential prismatischer Körper und seine Ableitungen bis zur 3. Ordnung. Österr. Z. f, Vermessungswesen, Sonderheft, p 11
Pavlis NK, Rapp RH (1990) The development of an isostatic gravitational model to degree 360 and its use in global gravity modelling. Geophys J Int 100:369–378. doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.1990.tb00691.x
Rabus B, Eineder M, Roth A, Bamler R (2003) The shuttle radar topography mission—a new class of digital elevation models acquired by space borne radar. Photograms Rem Sens 57:241–262. doi:10.1016/S0924-2716(02)00124-7
Roussel C, Verdun J, Cali J, Masson F (2015) Complete gravity field of an ellipsoidal prism by Gauss-Legendre quadrature. Geophys J Int 203:2220–2236. doi:10.1093/gji/ggv438
Rummel R, Rapp RH, Suenkel H, Tschernin CC (1985) Comparison of Global Topographic/Isostatic Models to the Earth’s Observed Gravity Field. OSU Report No 388, Columbus, Ohio
Sansò F (2013a) Observables of physical geodesy and their analytical representation. In: Sansò, Sideris (eds) Geoid determination. Springer, Heidelberg
Sansò F (2013b) The local modelling of the gravity field: the terrain effect. In: Sansò, Sideris (eds) Geoid determination. Springer, Heidelberg
Sideris MG (1985) A fast Fourier transform method of computing terrain corrections. Manuscripta Geodaetica 10(1):66–73
Smith DA, Robertson DS, Milbert DG (2001) Gravitational attraction of local crustal masses in spherical coordinates. J Geod 74:783–795. doi:10.1007/s001900000142
Torge W, Műller J (2012) Geodesy. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin
Tscherning CC, Knudsen P, Forsberg R (1994) Description of the GRAVSOFT package. Geophysical Institute, University of Copenhagen, Technical Report
Tsoulis D, Wziontek H, Petrović S (2003) A bilinear approximation of the surface relief in terrain correction computation. J Geod 77:338–344. doi:10.1007/s00190-003-0332-7
Turcotte DL, Schubert G (1982) Geodynamics: applications of continuum physics to geological problems, 450 pp
Uieda L, Barbosa V, Braitenberg C (2015) Tesseroids: forward-modeling gravitational fields in spherical coordinates. Geophysics. doi:10.1190/geo2015-0204.1
Wessel P, Smith WHF (1998) New, improved version of the Generic Mapping Tools released. EOS Trans AGU 79:579
Acknowledgements
A. M. Marotta was supported by SISMA project, ASI Contract No. I/093/06/0. The authors thank K. Seitz, B. Heck and T. Grombein for supplying the numerical solution and C. Hirt and M. Kuhn for supplying the solution based on the spectral method used in Sect. 3. All figures have been made using GMT—The Generic Mapping Tools (Wessel and Smith 1998).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1
Transformation from the global ECR reference frame to the local ECP reference frame.
Let point O and base \(\vec {e}_i \) define the classical ECR (Earth-Centred Rotational) reference frame, where the origin O is coincident with the Earth’s centre of mass, the Z-axis, aligned with the Earth rotational axis, and the X-axis, extending from O to the intersection of the equator and the prime meridian (Fig. 15, panel a). The Y-axis completes the right-handed equatorial system. Let the same origin O and base \(\vec {n}_i \) define the ECP (Earth-Centred P-Rotational) reference frame, where the z-axis is directed along \(\vec {n}_3 \), parallel to the line connecting the centre of the Earth O and point P, from O outwards, and axes x and y are parallel to the spherical directions evaluated in P, i.e. \(\vec {n}_1 \) and \(\vec {n}_2 \), respectively (Fig. 15, panels a\(_{1}\) and a\(_{2})\).
If \(\lambda _{P} \) and \(\theta _{P} \) indicate the longitude and the colatitude of point P, respectively, in the ECR reference frame, the transformation from ECR to ECP can be performed as
or
with \(R_{RP} =\left[ {{\begin{array}{lll} {\cos \theta \cos \lambda }&{} {\cos \theta \sin \lambda }&{} {-\sin \theta } \\ {-\sin \lambda }&{} {\cos \lambda }&{} 0 \\ {\sin \theta \cos \lambda }&{} {\sin \theta \sin \lambda }&{} {\cos \theta } \\ \end{array} }} \right] _{P} \) evaluated at P.
Conversely, the transformation from ECP to ECR can be performed as
or
with \(R_{PR} =\left[ {{\begin{array}{lll} {\cos \theta \cos \lambda }&{} {-\sin \lambda }&{} {\sin \theta \cos \lambda } \\ {\cos \theta \sin \lambda }&{} {\cos \lambda }&{} {\sin \theta \sin \lambda } \\ {-\sin \theta }&{} 0&{} {\cos \theta } \\ \end{array} }} \right] _P \),
where \(R_{PR} =\left( {R_{RP} } \right) ^{-1}=R^{\mathrm{T}}_{RP} \).
If X, Y and Z are the coordinates of a generic point Q given in the ECR reference frame and x, y and z are the coordinates of the same point given in the ECP reference frame, it follows that
and, from A\(_{2}\),
Finally, neglecting base \(\vec {n}_i \) and transposing both terms, we obtain
or, explicitly,
The longitude and the colatitude of point Q in the ECP reference frame, \(\lambda {'}\) and \(\theta {'}\), respectively, can finally be determined as
or
If \(\lambda \) and \(\theta \) are the longitude and colatitude of point Q, respectively, given in the ECR reference frame, then
Panel (a\(_{2})\) of Fig. 15 shows the definitions of \(\lambda {'}\) and \(\theta {'}\).
Appendix 2
To carry out the integration over \(r{'}\) and \(\theta {'} \), we follow the procedure used by Turcotte and Schubert (1982) to calculate the gravitational acceleration due to the whole spherical Earth. Thus, for the law of planar cosines,
and by differentiating the second expression with r and \(r{'}\) held constant,
The integral gives
where \(\left\{ {\begin{array}{l} \ell _1 =\sqrt{r^{2}+r{'}^{2}-2rr{'}\cos \theta {'}_1 } \\ \ell _2 =\sqrt{r^{2}+r{'}^{2}-2rr{'}\cos \theta {'}_2 } \\ \end{array}} \right. \)
The integration over \(\ell \) gives
or
Let \(I_{r{'}} \) be the indefinite integral, defined as
The integration over \(r{'}\) gives the following partial integrals
and, after summing,
Once \(I_{r{'}} \) is evaluated at the integration limits, the following result is found
with
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marotta, A.M., Barzaghi, R. A new methodology to compute the gravitational contribution of a spherical tesseroid based on the analytical solution of a sector of a spherical zonal band. J Geod 91, 1207–1224 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-017-1018-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-017-1018-x