Skip to main content
Log in

Population development by phenotypic selection with subsequent marker-assisted selection for line extraction in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.; 2n=2x=14) has a narrow genetic base, and commercial yield of US processing cucumber has plateaued in the last 15 years. Yield may be increased by altering plant architecture to produce unique early flowering (days to flower, DTF), female (gynoecious, GYN), highly branched (multiple lateral branching, MLB), long-fruited (length:diameter ratio, L:D) cultivars with diverse plant statures. The genetic map position of QTL conditioning these quantitatively inherited yield component traits is known, and linked molecular markers may have utility in marker-assisted selection (MAS) programs to increase selection efficiency, and effectiveness. Therefore, a base population (C0), created by intermating four unique but complementary lines, was subjected to three cycles (C1–C3) of phenotypic (PHE) mass selection for DTF, GYN, MLB, and L:D. In tandem, two cycles of marker-assisted backcrossing for these traits began with selected C2 progeny (C2S) to produce families (F1[i.e., C2S × C2S], and BC1 [i.e., F1 × C2S]) for line extraction, and for comparative analysis of gain from selection by PHE selection, and MAS. Frequencies of marker loci were used to monitor selection-dependent changes during PHE selection, and MAS. Similar gain from selection was detected as a result of PHE selection, and MAS for MLB (~0.3 branches/cycle), and L:D (~0.1 unit increase/cycle) with concomitant changes in frequency at linked marker loci. Although genetic gain was not realized for GYN during PHE selection, the percentage of female flowers of plants subjected to MAS was increased (5.6–9.8% per cycle) depending upon the BC1 population examined. Selection-dependent changes in frequency were also detected at marker loci linked to female sex expression during MAS. MAS operated to fix favorable alleles that were not exploited by PHE selection in this population, indicating that MAS could be applied for altering plant architecture in cucumber to improve its yield potential.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Astmon D, Tabback C (1979) Comparative effects of gibberellin, silver nitrate and aminoethoxyvinylglycine on sexual tendency and ethylene evolution in the cucumber plant (Cucumis sativus L.). Plant Cell Physiol 20:1547–1556

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohn FM, Melchinger AE (2000) PLABSIM: software for simulation of marker-assisted backcrossing. J Hered 91:86–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cantliffe DJ (1981) Alteration of sex expression in cucumber due to changes in temperature, light intensity, and photoperiod. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 106:133–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer CS, Wehner TC (2000) Path analysis of the correlation between fruit number and plant traits of cucumber populations. HortScience 35:708–711

    Google Scholar 

  • Darvasi A, Soller M (1994) Optimum spacing of genetic markers for determining linkage between marker loci and quantitative trait loci. Theor Appl Genet 89:351–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkhuizen A, Staub JE (2003) Effects of environment and genetic background on QTL affecting yield and fruit quality traits in a wide cross in cucumber [Cucumis sativus L. x Cucumis hardwickii (R.) Alef.]. J New Seeds 4:1–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fazio G (2001) Comparative study of marker-assisted and phenotypic selection and genetic analysis of yield components in cucumber. Dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison

  • Fazio G, Staub JE, Chung SM (2002) Development and characterization of PCR markers in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). J Am Soc Hortic Sci 127:545–557

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fazio G, Staub JE, Stevens MR (2003a) Genetic mapping and QTL analysis of horticultural traits in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) using recombinant inbred lines. Theor Appl Genet 107:864–874

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fazio G, Chung SM, Staub JE (2003b) Comparative analysis of response to phenotypic and marker-assisted selection for multiple lateral branching in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Theor Appl Genet 107:875–883

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flint-Garcia SA, Darrah LL, McMullen MD, Hibbard BE (2003) Phenotypic versus marker-assisted selection for stalk strength and second-generation European corn borer resistance in maize. Theor Appl Genet 107:1331–1336

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Foolad R, Zhang P, Khan AA, Nino-Liu D, Lin Y (2002) Identification of QTL for early blight (Alternaria solani) resistance in tomato using backcross populations of a Lycopersicon esculentum × L. hirsutum cross. Theor Appl Genet 104:945–958; J Amer Soc Hortic Sci 114:332–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Gimelfarb A, Lande R (1994) Simulation of marker assisted selection in hybrid populations. Genet Res 63:39–47

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • GuWK, Weeden NF, Yu J, Wallace DH (1995) Large-scale, cost-effective screening of PCR products in marker-assisted selection applications. Theor Appl Genet 91:465–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeck JA, Fehr WR, Shoemaker RC, Welke GA, Johnson SL, Cianzio SR (2003) Molecular marker analysis of seed size in soybean. Crop Sci 43:68–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horejsi T, Staub JE (1999) Genetic variation in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) as assessed by random amplified polymorphic DNA. Genet Res Crop Evol 46:337–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horejsi T, Staub JE, Thomas C (2000) Linkage of random amplified polymorphic DNA markers to downy mildew resistance in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Euphytica 115:105–113

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hospital F, Chevalet C, Mulsant P (1992) Using markers in gene introgression breeding programs. Genetics 132:1199–1921

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hospital F, Moreau L, Lacoudre F, Charcosset A, Gallais A (1997) More on the efficiency of marker-assisted selection. Theor Appl Genet 95:1181–1189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hospital F, Goldringer I, Openshaw S (2000) Efficient marker-based recurrent selection of multiple quantitative trait loci. Genet Res 75:357–368

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jeuken MJW, Lindout P (2004) The development of lettuce backcross inbred lines (BILs) for exploitation of the Lactuca saligna (wild lettuce) germplasm. Theor Appl Genet 109:394–401

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knapp S (1998) Marker-assisted selection as a strategy for increasing the probability of selecting superior genotypes. Crop Sci 38:1164–1174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kupper RS, Staub JE (1988) Combining ability between lines of Cucumis sativus L. and Cucumis sativus var. hardwickii (R.) Alef. Euphytica 38:197–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lande R, Thompson R (1990) Efficiency of marker-assisted selection in the improvement of quantitative traits. Genetics 124:743–756

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lecomte L, Duffe P, Buret M, Servin B, Hospital F, Causse M (2004) Marker-assisted introgression of five QTL controlling fruit quality traits into three tomato lines revealed interaction between QTLs and genetic backgrounds. Theor Appl Genet 109:658–668

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD (1996) SAS system for mixed models. SAS Institute Inc., Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu P, Zhu J, Lu Y (2004) Marker-assisted selection in segregating generations of self-fertilizing crops. Theor Appl Genet 109:370–376

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lu HJ, Bernardo R, Ohm HW (2003) Mapping QTL for popping expansion volume in popcorn with simple sequence repeat markers. Theor Appl Genet 106:423–427

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Luo ZW, Thompson R, Woolliams JA (1997) A population genetics model of marker-assisted selection. Genetics 146:1173–1183

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moreau L, Charcosset A, Gellais A (2004) Experimental evaluation of several cycles of marker-assisted selection in maize. Euphytica 137:111–118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, M. D., Staub JE, Fazio G (2002) Deployment of molecular markers for multi-trait selection in cucumber. In: Proceeding Cucurbitaceae 2002, December 8–12, Amer. Soc. Hort. Press, Naples, Florida. p. 41–47

  • Robbins MD, Staub JE (2004) Strategies for selection of multiple quantitatively inherited yield components in cucumber. 2004. In: Proceedings the 8th Eucarpia conference, Cucurbitaceae (2004) Progress in cucurbit genetics and breeding research. Olomouc, The Czech Republic. July 12–17, pp 401–410

  • SAS software, Version 8 of SAS System for Unix (1999) SAS Institute Inc., Cary

  • Serquen FC, Bacher J, Staub JE (1997a) Mapping and QTL analysis of a narrow cross in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) using random amplified polymorphic DNA markers. Mol Breed 3:257–268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Serquen FC, Bacher J, Staub JE (1997b) Genetic analysis of yield components in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) at low plant density. J Amer Soc Hortic Sci 122:522–528:1997

    Google Scholar 

  • Staub JE, Kupper RS (1985) Results of the use of Cucumis sativus var. hardwickii germplasm following backcrossing with Cucumis sativus var. sativus. HortScience 20:436–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Staub JE (1989) Source-sink relationships in cucumber. Cucurbit Genet Coop Rep 12:11–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Staub JE, Meglic V (1993) Molecular genetic markers and their legal relevance for cultigen discrimination: a case study in cucumber. HortTechnology 3:291–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Staub JE, Serquen F, Gupta M (1996) Genetic markers, map construction and their application in plant breeding. HortScience 31:729–741

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Staub JE, Bacher J (1997) Cucumber as a processed vegetable. In: Processing vegetables: science and technology, vol IV. Technomic Publishing Co., Inc., Lancaster, pp 129–194

  • Staub JE, Robbins MD, López-Sesé IA (2002) Molecular methodologies for improved genetic diversity assessment in cucumber and melon. In: Proceedings XXVI IRC, Horticulture: Art and science for life- Advances in vegetable Breeding. Toronto, Canada. August 11–17, 2002. Acta Hortic 642:41–47

  • Steele KA, Edwards G, Zhu J, Witcombe RC (2004) Marker-evaluated selection in rice: shifts in allele frequency among bulks selected in contrasting agricultural environments identify genomic regions of importance to rice adaptation and breeding. Theor Appl Genet 109:1247–1260

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steele R, Torrie JH (1980) Principles and procedures of statistics, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Thabuis A, Palloix A, Servin B, Daubeze AM, Signoret P, Hospital F, Lefebvre V (2004) Marker-assisted introgression of 4 Phytophthora capsici resistance QTL alleles into a bell pepper line: validation of additive and epistatic effects. Mol Breed 14:9–20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wehner TC, Lower RL, Staub JE, Tolla GE (1989) Convergent–divergent selection for cucumber fruit yield. HortScience 24:667–669

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehner TC (1998) Three pickling cucumber populations: NCWBP, NCMBP and NCEP1. HortScience 32:941–944

    Google Scholar 

  • Widrlechner MP, Knerr LD, Staub JE, Reitsma KR (1992) Biochemical evaluation of germplasm regeneration methods for cucumber, Cucumis sativus L. FAO/IBPGR Plant Genet Res Newslett 88/89:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Willcox MC, Khairallah MM, Bergvinson D, Crossa J, Deutsch JA, Edmeades GO, Gonzalez de Leon D, Jiang C, Jewell DC, Mihm JA, Williams WP, Hoisington D (2002) Selection for resistance to southwestern corn borer using marker-assisted and conventional backcrossing. Crop Sci 42:1516–1528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie C, Xu S (1998) Efficiency of multistage marker-assisted selection in the improvement of multiple quantitative traits. Heredity 80:489–498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yousef GG, Juvik JA (2001) Comparison of phenotypic and marker-assisted selection for quantitative traits in sweet corn. Crop Sci 41:645–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yousef GG, Juvik JA (2002) Enhancement of seedling emergence in sweet corn by marker-assisted backcrossing of beneficial QTL. Crop Sci 42:96–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jack E. Staub.

Additional information

Communicated by I. Paran

The cost of publishing this paper was defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. Under postal regulations, this paper therefore must be hereby, marked advertisement solely to indicate this fact. Mention of a trade name, proprietary product, or specific equipment does not constitute a guarantee or warranty by the USDA and does not imply its approval to the exclusion of other products that may be suitable.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fan, Z., Robbins, M.D. & Staub, J.E. Population development by phenotypic selection with subsequent marker-assisted selection for line extraction in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Theor Appl Genet 112, 843–855 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-005-0186-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-005-0186-x

Keywords

Navigation