Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative analysis of response to phenotypic and marker-assisted selection for multiple lateral branching in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)

  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Yield increase in processing cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) is positively correlated with an increase in number of fruit-bearing branches. Multiple lateral branching (MLB) is a metric trait controlled by at least five effective factors. Breeding efficacy might be improved through marker-assisted selection (MAS) for MLB. Experiments were designed to independently confirm previously determined linkage of molecular markers (L18-2-H19A SNP, CSWTAAA01 SSR, CSWCT13 SSR, W7-2 RAPD and BC-551 RAPD) to MLB, and to determine their utility in MAS. These markers were present in significantly higher frequency than expected (1, presence:3, absence; p < 0.001) in BC2 plants selected based on a high MLB phenotype (BC2PHE). However, markers that were considered selectively neutral fit the expected segregation of donor parent DNA in BC2 progeny. Markers linked to MLB were used in MAS of BC1 and BC2 plants to produce BC2MAS, and BC3MAS progeny. Means for MLB in MAS populations were compared with backcross populations developed through phenotypic selection (BC2PHE, BC3PHE) and by random mating where no selection had been applied (BC2RND, BC3RND). Statistical analysis showed no significant differences (p < 0.001) between means of phenotypic (BC2PHE = 3.02, BC3PHE = 3.29) and marker-aided selection (BC2MAS = 3.12, BC3MAS = 3.11) for MLB. However, both phenotypic and MAS population means were significantly higher than the random control (BC2RND = 2.27, BC3RND = 2.41) for MLB. Thus, given the observed response to selection and the rapid life-cycle of cucumber (4 months), markers linked to MLB when used in MAS will most likely be effective tools in cucumber improvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allard RW (1960) Principles of plant breeding. Wiley, New York

  • Beavis WD (1998) QTL analyses: power, precision, and accuracy. In: Paterson AH (ed) Molecular dissection of complex traits. CRC Press, Boca Raton pp 145–162

  • Beyer EMJ (1976) Silver ion: a potent anti-ethylene agent in cucumber and tomato. HortScience 11:195–196

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bradeen JM, Staub JE, Wye C, Antonise R, Peleman J (2001) Towards an expanded and integrated linkage map of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Genome 44:111–119

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Causse M, Lecomte L, Baffert N, Duffe P, Hospital F (2001) Marker-assisted selection for the transfer of QTLs controlling fruit quality traits into tomato elite lines. Acta Hort 546:557–564

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cramer CS, Wehner TC (2000) Path analysis of the correlation between fruit number and plant traits of cucumber populations. HortScience 35:708–711

    Google Scholar 

  • Denna DW (1973) Effects on genetic parthenocarpy and gynoecious flowering habit on fruit production and growth in cucumber, Cucumis sativus. J Am Soc Hort Sci 98:602–604

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijkhuizen A, Kennard WC, Havey MJ, Staub JE (1996) RFLP variation and genetic relationships in cultivated cucumber. Euphytica 90:79–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudley JW (1993) Molecular markers in plant improvement: manipulation of genes affecting quantitative traits. Crop Sci 33:660–668

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer DS, Mackay FC (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman Ltd, Harlow Essex, England

  • Fazio G (2001) Comparative study of marker-assisted and phenotypic selection and genetic analysis of yield components in cucumber. Dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison

  • Fazio G, Staub JE, Chung SM (2002a) Development and characterization of PCR markers in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). J Am Soc Hort Sci 127:545–557

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fazio G, Staub JE, Stevens MR (2002b) Genetic mapping and QTL analysis of horticultural traits in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) using recombinant inbred lines. Theor Appl Genet (in press)

  • Fuller GL, Leopold CA (1977) The role of nucleic acid synthesis in cucumber fruit set. J Am Soc Hort Sci 102:384–388

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Horejsi T, Staub JE (1999) Genetic variation in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) as assessed by random amplified polymorphic DNA. Genet Res Crop Evol 46:337–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hospital F, Charcosset A (1997) Marker-assisted introgression of quantitative trait loci. Genetics 147:1469–1485

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hospital F, Chevalet C, Mulsant P (1992) Using markers in gene introgression breeding programs. Genetics 132:1199–1210

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hospital F, Moreau L, Lacoudre F, Charcosset A, Gallais A (1997) More on the efficiency of marker-assisted selection. Theor Appl Genet 95:1181–1189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knapp SJ (1998) Marker-assisted selection as a strategy for increasing the probability of selecting superior genotypes. Crop Sci 38:1164–1174

    Google Scholar 

  • Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD (1996) SAS System for Mixed Models. SAS Istitute Inc, Cary, North Carolina

  • Meglic V, Staub JE (1996) Genetic diversity in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). II. An evaluation of selected cultivars released between 1846 and 1978. Genet Res Crop Evol 43:547–558

    Google Scholar 

  • Meglic V, Serquen F, Staub JE (1996) Genetic diversity in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). I. A re-evaluation of the U.S. germplasm collection. Genet Res Crop Evol 43:533–546

    Google Scholar 

  • Melchinger AE (1990) Use of molecular markers in breeding for oligogenic disease resistance. Plant Breed 104:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Melchinger AE, Utz HF, Schon CC (1998) Quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping using different testers and independent population samples in maize reveals low power of QTL detection and large bias in estimates of QTL effects. Genetics 149:383–403

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ribaut JM, Hoisington D (1998) Marker-assisted selection: new tools and strategies. Trends Plant Sci 3:236–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romagosa I, Han F, Ullrich SE, Hayes PM, Wesenberg DM (1999) Verification of yield QTLs through realized molecular marker-assisted selection responses in a barley cross. Mol Breed 5:143–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serquen FC, Bacher J, Staub JE (1997a) Genetic analysis of yield components in cucumber at low plant density. J Am Soc Hort Sci 122:522–528

    Google Scholar 

  • Serquen FC, Bacher J, Staub JE (1997b) Mapping and QTL analysis of horticultural traits in a narrow cross in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) using random-amplified polymorphic DNA markers. Mol Breed 3:257–268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shen L, Courtois B, McNally KL, Robin S, Li Z (2001) Evaluation of near-isogenic lines of rice introgressed with QTLs for root depth through marker-aided selection. Theor Appl Genet 103:75–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Staub JE (1989) Source-sink relationships in cucumber. Cucurbit Genet Coop Rep 12:11–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Staub JE, Knerr LD, Hopen HJ (1992) Plant density and herbicides affect cucumber productivity. J Am Soc Hort Sci 117:48–53

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Staub JE, Bacher J, Crubaugh L (1995) Problems associated with the selection of determinate cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) plant types in a multiple lateral background. Cucurbit Genet Coop Rep 18:7–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuber CW (1994) Breeding multigenic traits. Adv Cell Mol Biol Plant 1:97–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuber CW, Polacco M, Senior ML (1999) Synergy of empirical breeding, marker-assisted selection, and genomics to increase crop yield potential. Crop Sci 39:1571–1583

    Google Scholar 

  • University of Arkansas-Fayetteville (1993) H-19 Cucumber Plant Variety Protection Certificate PVP no. 8900073. United States Dept of Agriculture, Agricultural marketing service Washington D.C., USA

  • USDA-NASS (1999) Statistical Bulletin 946c

  • Wehner TC, Staub JE, Peterson CE (1987) Inheritance of littleleaf and multi-branched plant habit in cucumber. Cucurbit Genet Coop Rep 10:33–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Widders IE, Price HC (1989) Effects of plant density on growth and biomass partitioning in pickling cucumbers. J Am Soc Hort Sci 114:751–755

    Google Scholar 

  • Yousef GG, Juvik JA (2001) Comparison of phenotypic and marker-assisted selection for quantitative traits in sweet corn. Crop Sci 41:645–655

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was partially supported by grant No. IS-2708-96 from the U.S.-Israel Binational Agricultural Research and Development (BARD) Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. E. Staub.

Additional information

Communicated by H. Nybom

Mention of trade name, proprietary product, or specific equipment does not constitute a guarantee or warranty by the USDA and does not imply its approval to the exclusion of other products that may be suitable

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fazio, G., Chung, S.M. & Staub, J.E. Comparative analysis of response to phenotypic and marker-assisted selection for multiple lateral branching in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Theor Appl Genet 107, 875–883 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-003-1313-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-003-1313-1

Keywords

Navigation