Abstract
Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) perceive both soluble signals and biomechanical inputs from their microenvironment and cells themselves. Emerging as critical regulators of the blood program, biomechanical cues such as extracellular matrix stiffness, fluid mechanical stress, confined adhesiveness, and cell-intrinsic forces modulate multiple capacities of HSCs through mechanotransduction. In recent years, research has furthered the scientific community’s perception of mechano-based signaling networks in the regulation of several cellular processes. However, the underlying molecular details of the biomechanical regulatory paradigm in HSCs remain poorly elucidated and researchers are still lacking in the ability to produce bona fide HSCs ex vivo for clinical use. This review presents an overview of the mechanical control of both embryonic and adult HSCs, discusses some recent insights into the mechanisms of mechanosensing and mechanotransduction, and highlights the application of mechanical cues aiming at HSC expansion or differentiation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) refer to a very small amount of cell population sitting at the top of the hematopoietic hierarchy. They are responsible for the production of the full complement of blood and immune cells in the body within a unique microenvironment known as niches [1]. Like other stem cells, HSCs also possess the highly complex and controlled ‘SMART’ physiological features of self-renewal, maturation (differentiation), apoptosis, resting mode (quiescence), and trafficking (migration), for maintaining hematopoietic homeostasis in vivo [2]. The origin and maturation of definitive HSCs during development involve a series of successive processes that are robustly templated in time and space with micrometer accuracy [3,4,5]. In detail, HSCs bud off from the ventral floor of the dorsal aorta (DA) within the aorta–gonad–mesonephros (AGM) region, umbilical, and vitelline arteries via a carefully choreographed and highly conserved process termed endothelial-to-hematopoietic transition (EHT) [6, 7]. Afterwards, they migrate to and develop in sequential anatomical sites of hematopoiesis including the caudal hematopoietic tissue (CHT) in zebrafish or the fetal liver (FL) in mammals, the bilateral thymus, and eventually populate in the kidney or the bone marrow (BM) postnatally. As the dominant site of hematopoiesis in adulthood, BM offers a favorable microenvironment for HSC homeostasis and/or progenitor maturation [5]. A diagram in Fig. 1 illustrates the origin and development of definitive HSCs within different sites during embryogenesis. The nature of the local HSC niche varies along countless spatial and temporal transitions, providing multiple supportive soluble signals and mechanical cues associated with HSC fate decisions and additional fine-tuning of HSC heterogeneity [5, 8,9,10].
At the molecular level, it is considered that the transcription factor Tal1 plays an indispensable role in acquiring the identity of hemogenic endothelium (HE) whereas Runxl serves as a master regulator of EHT and definitive HSC specification [6, 11,12,13,14]. Both in zebrafish and mice, arterial identity is a prerequisite for aortic HE as definitive HE originates from arterial progenitor [15,16,17,18]. Many mutants with arterial specification defects (e.g., EfnB2-/- mice) also displayed definitive hematopoietic defects [19], while activation of the arterial program in HE promotes definitive hematopoiesis from human pluripotent stem cell (hPSC) [20]. Then, the subsequent activation of Runx1 mediates the suppression of arterial genes and the upregulation of hematopoietic genes in HE, allowing a further commitment towards the hematopoietic fate. If Runx1 is inactivated, the pre-existing arterial programme in the HE cannot be repressed, resulting in HE maintaining integrated within the DA and failing to undergo the EHT process [15].
The replication of this developmental process will definitely promote the generation of bona fide hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs) with BM reconstitution capabilities in vitro. Therefore, it is of considerable importance to holistically understand the precise mechanisms for instructing the HSC program from both developmentally and clinically relevant perspectives. Researchers were fascinated by the fundamentals of the biochemical regulatory paradigm for decades, and until lately, have paid extensive attention to biomechanical signals due to their equally pivotal impact on the phenotypic specification and functional outputs of HSCs. No single article can be comprehensively concerned with all of the HSC regulatory signaling. This review focuses on the mechanistic principles of HSCs at distinct stages of their ontogeny including embryonic and adult HSCs, predominantly drawing on data from studies on zebrafish, mice and pluripotent stem cells (PSCs), which may provide some insights into future corresponding researches.
Mechanics in the regulation of endothelium biopsy-beyond the endothelium
Hematopoietic and endothelial lineages have long been considered to be closely related, both of which have actually been demonstrated by quite a few in vitro studies to be derived from a same bipotential mesodermal precursor called hemangioblast. Nevertheless, the presence or lack of hemangioblast in vivo remains fiercely debated and keeps on polarizing the field of hematopoiesis [11, 21]. It has been postulated that the generation of definitive hematopoietic cells in vitro from embryonic stem cells (ESCs) is orchestrated in a stepwise pattern, characterized by discrete developmental stages including the emergence of hemangioblast committed to a DA fate and the formation of a HE intermediate, with EHT being the culmination of these consecutive programming events [11]. Visually, lineage tracing experiments authenticated the endothelial origin of definitive hematopoiesis [6, 22]. Further, human endothelial cells rigorously isolated from distinct hematopoietic tissues including aorta, yolk sac, embryonic liver, and fetal BM all exhibited blood-forming potential when cultured ex vivo [23].
Based on these reasons and more, HE and HSC can be absolutely perceived to be a specialized subpopulation of endothelium and retain endothelial characteristics to some extent. Endothelial cells possess the capability of sensing and discriminating distinct types of mechanical stimuli and responding with unique biological outputs [24, 25]. Therefore, it is tempting to speculate that a number of molecules and proteins involved in endothelial mechanotransduction may also participate in controlling HSC fate. Hence, taking the vascular niche into consideration and appreciating the mechanotransduction process from the angle of endothelium will be of great reference value for the understanding of how mechanical signals regulate HSC biology.
Mechanics in the regulation of HSC fate determination
HSCs residing in specific niches inevitably perceive a variety of mechanical stimuli such as tensile strain, hydrostatic pressure, fluid shear stress, and even mechanical unloading in microgravity [9]. While subject to mechanical stresses from external loads, cells generate and exert intrinsic forces on the extracellular matrix (ECM) and the neighboring cells reciprocally [26]. Hence, forces generated intracellularly and employed extracellularly are not two entirely separate items but a tensegrity model coexisting and influencing each other, whose interwoven effects control hematopoiesis and maintain the homeostasis of HSCs in an organism [26, 27].
Intrinsic forces
Intrinsic forces are produced intracellularly in an adenosine triphosphate (ATP)—dependent process by the cross-bridging interactions between actin fibers and myosin filaments [26, 28]. Effects of matrix biophysical features on the fate decisions (viability, morphology, proliferation, lineage commitment) of cultured primary murine Lin-Sca-1 + c-Kit + (LSK) can be selectively eliminated by disrupting the interplay between actomyosin contractility and integrin activation [29], which is in line with an earlier study highlighting the pivotal role of actin contractility in HSC adhesion to extracellular matrices and matrix sensing [30]. Gene expression analysis of human peripheral blood (PB) CD34 + HSPCs using cDNA arrays manifested the expression of several mechanobiological elements such as alpha-actinin, dynein, and dynamin [31,32,33,34]. Yet, the precise functions of these genes in HSCs remain to be elucidated.
Additionally, cell-intrinsic forces were tightly associated with cellular function and the biomechanical properties of an individual cell inevitably involved the organization of actin cytoskeletal networks and related regulatory cascades [35]. A label-free microfluidic technique taking differences in cell stiffness as a sorting biomarker can efficiently enrich high-purity live cells because dead cells were generally stiffer than the live ones, whose significant practical superiority was validated by increasing the purity of viable nucleated cells from the samples of thawed cord blood (CB) cells [36]. Compared with mature blood cells, normal BM HSCs appear to be more rigid and less compliant in terms of morphology, accounting for their stable retention within the marrow niche and little mobilization into the circulation [37, 38]. Moreover, cell contractile forces generated by nonmuscle myosin II (NMII), with myosin IIB (NMIIB) being the major one among three mammal isoforms of myosin IIA (NMIIA)-myosin IIC (NMIIC) in human hematopoiesis, contribute to the polarized motility and asymmetric division of adult HSCs underpinning self-renewal and differentiation, which is consistent with earlier reported contributions of NMIIB in the differentiation of megakaryocytes and the asymmetry of erythroid enucleation [39,40,41]. With functional differences between NMIIA conferring survival and MIIB driving differentiation, the programmatic switch of NMII isoforms from B-and-A to only A occurs, corresponding to the differentiation trajectory of HSCs [39].
The nucleus is a mechanosensitive organelle that is semi-permeable to transcription factors regulated by cytoplasmic biomechanical signaling and, therefore, cellular mechanics is revealed to be highly dependent on the nucleus [42, 43]. Levels of lamins, intermediate filament proteins responsible for the assembly of nuclear structure, seem to control the nuclear tension of hematopoietic cells, which thus results in the discrepancy of trafficking into the bloodstream through the endothelial barrier [37]. Lamins are involved in HSC differentiation as well [44]. Moreover, intrinsic forces can be physically directly propagated to the nucleus through lamin A/C (LMNA), a component of nuclear lamina proteins coupling the linker of nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton (LINC) complex to chromatin via lamina–chromatin interactions so as to modify chromatin structure and control epigenetic transcription [45]. In leukemia cells, the absence of cytoskeletal mechanical tension and subsequent weak adhesion to BM niches contribute to their chemoresistance and residual disease persistence, prompting leukemia progression and/or relapse [46]. Similarly, in Ptpn21 deletion HSCs, cytoskeleton instability attenuated the quiescence and hematopoietic reconstitution capabilities of HSCs that can be overcome by restoring cellular mechanics [38]. Immediately after, in the following year, the same research team found that the recipient mice inoculated with MLL-AF9-Ptpn21-/-leukemic cells exhibited shortened survival, increased leukemic burden, and more severe leukemic cell infiltration compared with MLL-AF9-Ptpn21 + / + cell recipients. Further data suggested that these phenotypes were independent of the impact on cell signaling but probably a result of cell mechanical alterations (decreased cellular mechanical rigidity and increased cell deformability) in Ptpn21-deleted leukemic cells, strongly implying a biomechanical regulatory role of Ptpn21 in leukemic development and progression [47]. These lines of evidence suggest that in the adult system, cell-intrinsic force plays a vital role in the regulation of HSC morphology, HSC differentiation, and their response to extracellular mechanical stimuli. An important concept arising from recent work of cell mechanics is that long-lived cytoskeletal structures may even act as epigenetic determinants, delivering to and profoundly affecting the behavior of subsequent generations of cells [35]. During embryonic hematopoiesis, it seems that intrinsic force is a likely factor in modulating HSC cell deformation, motility, and migration which underlie their spatio-temporal transitions through distinct anatomical sites. By means of real-time imaging combined with transgenic reporter lines, researchers can clearly visualize the dynamic EHT procedure as morphologically flat HE bends, contracts along with the blood flow orientation until the very end of its departure from the aortic floor, developing into spherical hematopoietic cells [6, 7, 22]. Investigations into the unique biomechanical traits in zebrafish showed that the EHT process is facilitated by the assembly of rings of actin and myosin proteins into anisotropic contractile circumferential actomyosin around stem cells [48]. Poullet et al. observed the morphological alterations of DA endothelium and their collective migration from the sides down towards the aorta floor prior to HSPCs extrusion, compensating surface reduction of emerging HSPCs and hence ensuring overall aorta integrity. Likewise, the actomyosin contractility around the emerging cells drives the final phase of EHT which precisely refers to their individualization from the aorta into the sub-aortic region [49]. Slight cell deformation was also observed in the intravasation of CD41-GFPlow multipotent hematopoietic precursors from the AGM into the posterior cardinal vein (PCV), further signifying the existence of intrinsic forces in this dynamic process [50].
Based on above-mentioned findings, it is highly feasible that HSCs can not only interpret changes in mechanical inputs from outside as variations in the presentation of intrinsic forces, but also directly harness intrinsic forces in themselves as tools for manipulating their fate. Nevertheless, the role and mechanism of cell-intrinsic forces in both the adult and embryonic HSCs have not been studied in great detail as of yet.
Niche geometry
The intricate construction of HSC niches (e.g., BM) serves as a three-dimensional (3D) architectural scaffold and provides a variety of biophysical cues for HSCs and HSC-related accessory cells [26, 51, 52]. To better support and expand HSCs, 3D scaffolds for BM biomimicry have emerged as a preferable approach that fulfills key mechanical requirements of native niches otherwise obscured in conventional 2D culture systems [53,54,55,56]. An optimal 3D scaffold for HSC support usually presents the following topographical features, namely adequate surface area for cell attachment, high porosity for cell migration and nutrient delivery as well as alterability in scaffold structure for control of cell interactions [57]. A great amount of research has reported that human umbilical cord blood (UCB) HSCs expand much more robustly in 3D scaffolds than in 2D conditions [58,59,60,61,62]. Murine ESCs (mESCs) exhibited increased survival and proliferation and enhanced differentiation into hematopoietic cells when cultured on electrospun 3D polycaprolactone (PCL) nanofiber in comparison to gelatin-coated tissue culture plates [63].
In BM compartment, HSPCs interact functionally with niche cells which are often referred to as mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and/or derivatives thereof [64]. Substrate geometrical features (e.g., nanofiber diameter, pore size and density) have multifaceted effects on these BM niche cells. For instance, human BM-stromal cells (hBMSCs) cultured on a rough surface [arithmetic average roughness (Ra) 11.30 ± 0.43 µm] are more prone to differentiating into osteocytes than those on a smooth surface (Ra 0.05 ± 0.01 µm), with higher secretion of osteogenic-related protein Laminin-5 (Ln-5) and stronger activation of Ln-5 binding integrins [65]. On a microgrooved bearing surface partially mimicking the physiological reticulated microenvironment, mouse BM-derived MSCs showed a twofold to threefold increase in cell proliferation and expressed higher levels of pluripotency-related markers versus a standard 2D culture [66]. Within a certain diameter range (74–148 nm), the ability of TiO2 nanotubes to promote the osteogenic differentiation of MSCs strengthened with the increase of nanosize [67]. Micro/nano hierarchical structures generated by different nanotopographies (nanoneedle, nanosheet, and nanorod) and micropatterns of different sizes (4 µm, 12 µm, and 36 µm) gave rise to significant differences in the osteogenic differentiation potential of hBMSCs and the angiogenesis of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) through macrophage immunomodulation [68]. Substrate fiber orientation, random or aligned, also is a key factor directing stem cell fate [69].
It seems that a similar geometrical machinery conferring cell fate commitment operated in ex vivo cultures of HSPCs as aminated polyethersulfone (PES) nanofiber meshes (a diameter of 529 nm) among PES-based substrates modified by different chemical treatments (amino, hydroxyl, and carboxyl, respectively) exerted the most powerful and positive effect on the adhesion and expansion of human UCB HSPCs [58]. In addition, aminated nanofibers with different spacers, by which amino groups were conjugated to nanofiber surface, also resulted in significant differences in the adhesion and expansion of cryopreserved human UCB HSPCs [59].
As for embryonic niches, in addition to multiple biochemical cues that have been reviewed in other excellent papers [70, 71], physical interactions between HSCs and stromal cells are part of the AGM microenvironment, explant studies confirmed that tissues located ventrally but not dorsally to the DA promotes AGM HSC activity in light of instructive hedgehog signaling from ventral tissues, suggesting that positional information in the AGM compartment plays an important role in the development of functional HSCs and progenitors [72, 73]. Similarly, the abilities of AGM endothelial cells to support HSCs differ based upon their distinct location, as the ventral subregion-derived populations support both HSC maintenance and differentiation while the urogenital subregion-derived populations facilitate HSC maintenance yet fail to induce HSC activity [73,74,75], implying that cooperative regulation among biochemical signals and physical adhesions is required for embryonic HSC activity.
Biomechanical properties of the ECM
Like ECM diversity within other tissues, the structural and physical properties of HSC niches such as stiffness, matrix ligand type, and spatial distribution of adhesive ligands present significant anatomical variations due to their heterogeneities [76]. Taking the BM microenvironment as an example, the endosteum region is replete with abundant fibronectin (FN) and seems to be comparatively stiff (Young’s modulus of 40–50 kPa) while the perivascular space presents a high content of laminin and thus is reported to be softer (3 kPa) [64, 77]. The central medullary region mainly composed of adipocytes and fatty marrow is more compliant (3 kPa) [64]. Analysis of the intact BM of porcine models indicated that the marrow is viscoelastic, with gradations in effective Young’s modulus ranging from 0.25 to 24.7 kPa [78]. The spatial variations of BM niche in cellular and extracellular matrix (ECM) components, soluble, physical, and biomechanical factors are intertwined to create functional niches [1, 79] (Fig. 2).
The cellular morphology of HSCs is closely associated with matrix stiffness because HSCs remain largely round on soft substrates but more scattered on stiffer ones [29]. Moreover, HSCs react to stiffer substrates with increased cell adhesion and motility, which can promote the exit of HSCs from the niche [82]. Colony-forming units (CFUs) assay manifested that more multipotent CFUs (CFU-EM and CFU-GEMM) were generated on stiff (> 44 kPa) relative to soft (3.7 kPa) FN-coated substrates although the effect of matrix ligand cues cannot be totally excluded. It was reflected that matrix ligand type had a selective but significant impact on the lineage specification of HSCs as HSCs cultured on FN-, collagen-, and laminin-coated substrates displayed totally different commitments to myeloid lineage [29]. An analogical inclination was found in ex vivo cultures of mouse BM-derived hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) (LSK) with different matrix stiffness (a shear storage modulus of 50–800 Pa) as Chitteti et al. advocated that higher matrix stiffness facilitated the clonogenicity of LSK cells but lower matrix stiffness seemed to be more related to cell proliferation and differentiation [83]. Moreover, substrate elasticity greatly influences HSPC expansion [30]. Nanopatterns of cell ligands on the matrix also are important physical factors affecting HSC actions as the nanometer-scale spacing between the integrin ligands of the matrix was found to be correlated with HSPC adhesion and subsequent cell signaling transduction [84].
Biomechanical forces
Adult HSCs residing within the BM or trafficking into peripheral vessels and embryonic HSCs colonizing in discrete anatomical regions at different stages of development are poised to experience biophysical forces [27, 85]. In particular, one of the most important findings concerns the role of blood flow in definitive hematopoiesis [86, 87]. Ever since the initiation of heartbeats and the immediate establishment of blood circulation, vascular endothelial cells, and hematopoietic cells are constantly subjected to hemodynamic forces [87,88,89]. In general, three types of fluid mechanical forces which are shear stress, circumferential strain as well as hydrostatic pressure are generated because of pulsatile blood flow going through a vessel. Shear stress is the frictional force tangential to ECs while circumferential strain refers to the force perpendicular to the flow direction [90, 91].
With regard to embryonic HSCs, previous studies have unraveled that not only hematopoietic precursors and mechano-responsive vascular endothelium are of developmental and anatomical relevance [92, 93], but also the onset of blood flow and the appearance of hematopoietic cells are temporally connected, suggesting the possibility of blood flow within the “vascular niche” as a local modifier of HSC development [94]. As expected, this original assumption was confirmed in seminal works in zebrafish and mice, and shear stress was the most widely investigated one among the three types of fluid mechanical forces [48, 86, 87, 89, 95,96,97,98]. At about the same time, the researches of North TE and Adamo L provided the first experimental evidence that blood flow drives HSC formation [86, 87]. Subsequently, Wang et al. advocated the parallel results in zebrafish [97]. Zebrafish and mouse embryos absent of blood circulation both exhibited a significant reduction in the number of HSCs and severe defects in definitive hematopoiesis [86, 87, 97], one of which, however, can be rescued if exposed to shear stress [86]. Moreover, the application of external wall shear stress (WSS) in ESC cultures and murine embryos induced hematopoietic commitment and enhanced the expansion of hematopoietic progenitors [99]. Most recently, it has been revealed that the impact of the circumferential strain component of blood flow on HSC development is important as well and seems to be conserved between zebrafish and human [95].
Blood flow also contributes to the organization of contractile circumferential actomyosin during EHT and HSPC homing towards the BM [48, 100]. In addition to the luminal hemodynamic forces, DA is constantly exposed to the outer compressive stresses exerted by the surrounding tissues because of embryonic development [101]. The FL is also highly vascularized, yet little is known about the patterns of mechanical forces in this hematopoietic organ for support of HSPC expansion [102].
Adult HSCs sheltered in the BM may not be exposed to blood flow directly. However, BM niche cells do experience fluid flow and could affect HSCs via paracrine signaling. For example, endothelial cells and pericytes might be impacted by the relatively sluggish fluid flow in the blood vessels that feed the medullary cavities of bones throughout the skeleton, further regulating the cycling and quiescence of HSCs [80]. Fluid flow in the lacunar-canalicular network of the bone around osteocytes produces shear stresses of 6–50 dyne/cm2, which is implicated in conveying nutrients and signaling elements to osteocytes as well as their mechanical activation [85]. Moreover, it has been reported in mice that a minimal amount of HSCs circulating in the blood flow can experience shear stress that exceeds 600 dyne/cm2 in some regions of the aortic walls, a value much higher than the magnitude experienced by cells in human [102]. Mechanical loading, on the other hand, is required for proper BM HSC differentiation. Hematopoietic disorders have been widely reported in humans during exposure to microgravity (spaceflight, for instance), including leukocyte proliferation, reduced number and activity of T-lymphocytes and natural killer (NK) cells, megakaryocyte loss and erythrocyte retention in the BM compartment [103,104,105,106], possibly because of the abnormal differentiation potential of BM HSCs under conditions of reduced gravitational mechanical loading [106].
Mechanosensors and mechanotransduction
On the basis of the above-mentioned research findings, HSCs are somehow endowed with the ability to detect and discriminate a variety of mechanical constituents and convert into different cell actions. However, no consensus is currently reached on how the sensing apparatus and transduction of mechanical signals operates in HSCs. At present, the discovery of numerous promising hints and the proposal of several plausible hypotheses may contribute to unveiling the mystery of how mechanical signals shape the behavior and function of HSCs.
Cilium
As a hairy-like and microtubule-based (apical membrane) sensory organelle, primary cilia widely exist in mammalian cells such as ECs, embryonic hematopoietic progenitors and almost all human blood and BM cells (97–99%) [107,108,109]. Cilia have long been considered as the only vestigial evolutionary remnant until being proven by growing evidence to indeed function as a key signaling point decoding miscellaneous mechanical and chemical stimuli in the microenvironment [108, 110]. Notably, calcium channels and receptors are abundant in the ciliary membrane, which further points out that cilia are a communication hub for signal transduction [111, 112]. Human MSCs can sense their mechanical environment through primary cilia, which is required for their osteogenic response and controlled proliferation [113]. Disruption of this mechano-sensory organelle crippled the pro-osteogenic effect of mechanical signals [114]. This is important because both osteoblastic cells and MSCs are essential components of BM niches that support HSCs [115]. Besides, fluid-flow sensing in vascular endothelial cells depending on primary cilia was shown to regulate the biosynthesis of nitric oxide (NO) [116, 117], which is a well-known essential modulator of HSC functions [118]. As BM HSCs are often found in close proximity of the vasculature [119], whether mechanical stimulation of NO production through primary cilia is sufficient to further influence the outputs of HSCs remains unclear but is an intriguing possible mechanism for regulation of HSC fate.
As for developmental HSPCs, a canonical “9 + 0” axoneme 3D ultrastructure of primary cilia was directly visualized in zebrafish vascular endothelium in the AGM region, and a primary cilia-dependent Notch signaling axis was found to be required for HE specification. Primary cilia-dysfunction embryos exhibited severe HSPC defects that can be prevented by the overexpression of the Notch intracellular domain (NICD) [108]. Furthermore, Notch target gene (ephrinB2a), on the other hand, was downregulated in blood flow-deficient embryos [87, 97], in combination with previous evidence showing that endothelial primary cilia can mediate blood flow in the zebrafish vascular development [107] and above-mentioned studies demonstrating that blood flow is a positive regulator of HSPC development, it is reasonable to hypothesize that primary cilia may act as a mechanotransducer relaying signals from blood flow to embryonic HSPCs. These events strongly suggested the affirmative role of cilia in mechanosensing and mechanotransduction in spite of remaining to be definitively demonstrated in HSCs.
Nitric oxide
As a diffusible gas transmitter generated from arginine by nitric oxide (NO) synthases (NOS), NO exerts a broad effect on cellular biological activities including mechanotransduction [87]. When encountering blood flow, vascular endothelial cells are capable of producing NO, functioning as an essential vasodilator in the regulation of vascular tone [117]. Both fluid shear stress and vertical mechanical stretch can trigger the rapid production of NO [120,121,122]. Three NOS genes were found in the mammalian genome, referring to the neuronal, endothelial, and inducible NOS isoforms (nNOS, eNOS, and iNOS, respectively), each of which can be reliably detected in mouse BM [118]. Aleksinskaya et al. provided the first experimental confirmation of free NO radicals in rodent BM using a NO spin trapping and electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy. Besides, eNOS is the dominant source of basal NO (66%) and the iNOS isoform also accounts for a significant proportion (23%) [123]. Moreover, various biological steps in adult HSCs/HSPCs are regulated by NO signaling and the modulation depends on HSC source because opposite effects can be observed when HSCs of different origin are compared. For example, it induced BM HSC proliferation and myeloid differentiation and reduced their capacity of long-term reconstitution [124] but promoted the homing and engraftment of CB HSC [125]. Therefore, the exploitation of NO-releasing agents or the pharmacological activation of NO-dependent intracellular pathways to bolster the number or activity of HSPCs are suggested to be a promising strategy suitable for therapeutic applications [125]. However, another study demonstrated that iNOS-deficient mice were easily mobilized and their BM-derived mononuclear cells were endowed with intensified homing and engraftment [126]. NO depletion in human PB HSCs led to their shift from differentiation to proliferation [127].
Physiological functions involving NO have also been described in developing HSCs. As a process resembling embryonic HSC budding, NO-induced endothelial podokinesis plays a permissive role in mediating the execution of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-guided program of directional endothelial cell movement by interfering cell-ECM adhesive interactions [128]. With regard to definitive hematopoiesis, the researchers hypothesized that NO produced locally by endothelial cells must also affect HSC formation since DA is the requisite de novo site for HSC emergence [129, 130]. As expected, a wide spectrum of independent studies has successively corroborated that NO signaling is required in vascular niche for blood flow-dependent HSC generation during embryogenesis. Ectopic NO strengthens hematopoiesis and mitigates hematopoietic defects resulting from cardiac dysfunction, while abrogating NO signaling would diminish the pro-hematopoietic effects of blood flow [86, 87, 97]. Parallel results were reported in phospholipase C gamma 1 mutants (plcg1-/-) that the perturbations of arterial specification and HSPC formation caused by the absence of blood circulation can be prevented by Ginger-induced robust NO upregulation [131]. In zebrafish embryos, NO synthase (nNOS and iNOS) appears to be directly activated by klf2a, which is required for blood flow-dependent HSC maintenance [97]. Further, NO was found to lie downstream of Runx1 based on the ability of NO antagonists in significantly attenuating the expansion of hematopoietic progenitors induced by shear stress without affecting the upregulation of Runx1 [86].
To sum up, in embryonic HSCs/HSPCs, NO often serves as a definite downstream player of blood flow that mediates its positive effect on HSPC formation. Its impact on adult HSCs/HSPCs, however, is largely obscure due to quite contradictory conclusion among different literature, which we think might be a result of distinct analyzed HSC types. As NO is a locally acting signaling molecule and HSCs of different origin (BM HSCs, CB HSCs, and PB HSCs) occupy totally different niches.
Mechanically gated ion channel
Plenty of flow-modifying agents that regulate the formation of AGM HSCs are indeed well-known modulators of ion channels. Thereinto, Ca2 + -channel blocker nifedipine and Na + /K + fluxes modulator glycoside digoxin both enhance HSC formation, while BayK8644, a potent Ca2 + -channel activator, diminishes the number of HSCs [87]. As a major class of ion channels, cationic stretch-activated channels (SACs) are capable of sensing mechanical forces with high sensitivity and wide dynamic range and permeable to calcium (Ca2 +), a significant second messenger implicated in cell fate decisions [132, 133]. Thereinto, piezo channels can be triggered by the NMII-dependent intracellular traction forces in response to mechanics like substrate elasticity and matrix topography, governing the mechanosensitive fate of stem cells [134, 135].
Calcium flux has been documented in the AGM-derived cells exposed to WSS, stimulating intracellular calcium signaling that directly potentiates the production of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) responsible for hematopoietic potential modulation, in agreement with the identification of calcium signaling as the second most enriched pathway in WSS vs. static cultures of AGM-derived cells [89]. The deformation of primary cilia like bending induced by mechanical stimuli causes intracellular Ca2 + oscillation followed by modifications in calcium signaling cascades [110]. Moreover, it is well appreciated that eNOS binds calmodulin, whose activity is regulated by Ca2 + [136]. Many events sensitizing eNOS to Ca2 + can stimulate the release of NO [137].
Crosstalk with known signaling pathways controlling HSC development
In addition to unique mechanosensation and mechanotransduction, the activation of multifarious well-established developmental HSC regulatory signaling pathways was identified in endothelial cells exposed to force, suggesting their potential interplay within HE and/or HSCs [138, 139].These classic regulatory transcriptional programs include PGE2, Wnt, Hedgehog, Notch, bone morphogenetic protein (BMP), and VEGF signaling. Expectedly, ingenuity pathway analysis showed that Prostaglandin, Wnt (especially non-canonical Wnt) and Notch signaling all manifest varying degrees of upregulation after being exposed to WSS and elevated PGE2 production is obvious in the AGM mediated by calcium flux [89]. PGE2 production can be induced by WSS to control the expansion of hematopoietic populations in the developing embryo. BMP was identified as a downstream target of shear stress-protein kinase A (PKA)-cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) pathway for promoting HSC emergence [98]. The rescue of arteriogenesis and hematopoiesis by ginger treatment in aforementioned VEGF pathway mutants plcg1-/- displaying complete disruption of blood flow are BMP and Notch-dependent [131]. Shear stress promotes the formation of a mechanical sensor complex composed of VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR2 also called FLK1), vascular endothelial (VE)-cadherin and β-catenin [140]. These wide-ranging possibilities of complicated crosstalk under mechanical conditions provide a cooperative control system working in concert to dictate HSC fate.
Cell–cell and cell–ECM adhesions
Cells are not just as a single entity with innate cytoarchitecture and cytoskeleton, but also in the condition of concatenating adjacent cells and the ECM via cell–cell and cell–ECM adhesions [26]. Likewise, both in embryonic and adult HSCs, interactions between HSCs and ECM/supportive cells are essential microenvironmental constituents of various HSC niches closely relevant to HSC fate [74, 141,142,143]. Here, we will emphasize some key adhesive molecules or structures that are known to play a crucial role in HSCs and/or the mechanotransduction process.
During development, the engagement of Notch signaling in HE specification requires posterior lateral plate mesoderm (PLPM) cells migrating over the somite boundary and their close physical contact with somatic cells via ITGB1-mediated adhesion to FN [144, 145]. Within FL hematopoietic compartment, some HSPCs were observed in both the luminal and parenchymal aspects of sinusoidal endothelial cells ECM comprised of laminin and FN, interacting with sinusoidal endothelial cells through endothelial protein C receptor (EPCR) [146]. Time-lapse live imaging of HSPCs in the zebrafish embryo also revealed striking physical anchorage of HSPCs to perivascular endothelial cells in the CHT niche microenvironment which further orient their mitotic divisions [143]. Imaging of the mouse BM uncovered that most quiescent HSCs are adjacent to arterioles [146]. Malignant HPCs like leukemia blasts often exhibit aberrant adhesive structures and signaling and that targeting adhesion signaling is considered as a potential strategy of rational anti-leukemia therapy [147,148,149].
These junctions are often sites for mechanical convergence capable of sensing and conveying physical forces, of which cadherin-mediated cell–cell adhesions and focal adhesions (FAs) are the most remarkable ones [150, 151]. Specially, VE-cadherin expressing cells stands for a primitive HSC population [152, 153]. Besides, EHT was regarded as a partial epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) process featured by a transitional phenotype of post-EHT cells situated in the intra-aortic clusters with decreased VE-cadherin-mediated endothelial cell–cell and MMP2-mediated cell-ECM interactions [154, 155] Biomechanical forces derived from blood flow have been reported to promote the dissociation of the post-EHT HSPC clusters into individual HSPCs [87]. Previous findings highlighted the junctional stability of cadherins to withstand mechanical forces and their mechanosensitive ability for variations in substrate rigidity [153, 156, 157]. In VE-cadherin-null endothelial cells, several flow-responsive actions were absent [140]. As another mechano-responsive receptor localized to cell–cell junctions in endothelial cells, platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM-1) became activated under fluid shear stress, transmitted mechanical signals to VE-cadherin and activated VEGFR2 [158]. CD44-mediated cell rolling interactions underpinning lymphocyte trafficking and HPC homing were strengthened by tensile mechanical force through inducing the rapid allosteric transition of CD44 to a high-affinity state [159]. Similarly, HSPC homing was directed by the rolling adhesion of HSPCs to endothelium via selectins upon shear stress. Adhesion reorganization within HSPCs was observed during this process, corroborating previous studies demonstrating that mechanical stimuli play a positive role in regulating the composition and kinetics of adhesive junctions [100, 160,161,162].
Cell-ECM interactions enable cells to sense and react autonomically to the mechanical cues of their context. Also present in HSPCs, cell-ECM contacts are mechanical sensors and/or mechanotransducers of matrix elasticity [30]. The intracellular transmission of mechanical stimuli like topography and forces is attributed to the effect of cell-ECM attachment. In brief, mechanical stimuli activate integrins at cell-ECM adhesion and intrinsic forces are utilized by cells to form mature FAs, a common load-bearing anchorage site, acting as mechanosensitive rheostats to drive single-cell mechanical homeostasis [163,164,165]. Postulated mechanisms of mechanotransduction include but are not limited to the specific type of integrin receptors expressed in cells and ligands present in the ECM, given the nonspecific characteristics of mechanical inputs [26, 159]. As described for anchorage—dependent cells, it has also been revealed for HSCs that multiple ECM proteins such as FN, laminin and collagen provide structural form and modulate their behavior possibly through integrins [64, 166,167,168], because it is well-established that these ECM proteins shared common integrin recognition motif termed RGD (Arg–Gly–Asp) [85]. Also, many substrates do actually elicit mechanosensitive responses in HSCs through integrins [39, 82, 169], which may be a likely mechanism for the regulation of HSCs by distinct matrix stiffness. Notably, integrin aIIb (CD41) featuring low-level expression in developmental emerging HSCs in the AGM region is specifically used as a nascent HSC marker [170, 171]. Within FL hematopoietic niche, the interaction between HSPCs and ECM is dependent on β 1-integrin present on the HSPCs binding to vitronectin and FN generated by hepatoblasts [142].
In addition, the recruitment of FA kinase (FAK) to FAs is required to relay external mechanical information into cells. The ratio of phosphorylated FAK to total FAK which symbolizes the activity of FAK dramatically increased with substrate stiffness. Blocking of FAK activity in myoblasts led to abrogated stretch-induced alignment and differentiation [172, 173]. FAK plays a predominant role in the activation of the Rho family of small GTPases (Rho-GTPases) [174] which are mechanotransducers responsible for relaying signals from blood flow to YAP in the embryonic HSPC production [95]. Besides, cell-ECM interactions have a bilateral effect on mechanotransduction, while matrix stiffness or loading influences the behavior of cells which in turn exert traction forces on the ECM and secrete ECM remodeling proteins like matrix components or proteases to strengthen or degrade the ECM and enhance or cleave adhesive interactions [175, 176]. The HSC niche is particularly dependent upon ECM remodeling proteins to control HSC quiescence and mobilization and hematopoiesis [154, 177, 178]. All in all, although the role of cell–cell and cell–ECM interactions in HSCs has been studied extensively, a detailed picture of adhesion force transduction is still lacking.
Mechano-responsive transcription factors
Mechanical effects can be converted into protein-level through mechano-responsive transcription factors (TFs). Yes-associated protein (YAP) and Transcriptional coactivator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ) are two well-appreciated mechanics-induced transcriptional coactivators [179]. In most cases, YAP/TAZ activity is restricted to cells experiencing mechanical stresses [180]. YAP activation can be triggered by different types of mechanical cues such as substrate stiffness, cyclic stretch, and shear stress through facilitating its sub-cellular translocalization from the cytoplasm to the nucleus [95, 179, 181]. YAP is also required for the mechano-morphogenetic process by controlling actomyosin-mediated tissue tension [182, 183]. Goode D. K and his colleagues observed a precise temporal nuclear localization of YAP in endothelium just before the EHT process during murine hematopoietic development. Further functional validation experiments identified that TEAD/YAP interaction is a stage-specific regulator necessary for early hematopoietic specification [184]. Most recently, it has been shown that YAP activation and the up-regulation of YAP target genes are sensitive to the cyclic stretch and inform HE commitment towards HSPC fate, for the first time confirming a connection between biomechanical cues and YAP in determining HSC fate [95].
KLF2 serves as another crucial mechano-activated TF whose expression mirrors the onset of fluid shear forces in the developing mouse embryos [185], and is an immediate responder to shear stress in mouse ESC-derived CD41 + Flk-1 + cells and during ESC differentiation towards hematopoietic and endothelial potential [86, 99]. Likewise, it was found that the expression of its zebrafish ortholog, klf2a is dramatically reduced or even absent in the vasculature without blood circulation. In addition, klf2a is a pivotal mediator in blood flow-induced HSC production [97].
As a member of the basic leucine zipper (bZIP) TF family, cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) can also be activated by miscellaneous mechanical loadings [186,187,188] and trigger the endothelial and hematopoietic differentiation of ESCs via their recruitment to the Etv2 promoter [189]. Moreover, it has lately been described to be abundantly expressed in the AGM and act as a downstream effector of fluid shear stress affecting the EHT process and HSC emergence through a PKA-CREB-BMP signaling pathway [98]. Roughly in agreement with this experimental data, Ncx1 heartbeat mutants and static cultures of AGM exhibited a significant reduction in the phosphorylation of CREB and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2)-cAMP-PKA signaling axis mediated the effects of WSS on definitive HSCs [89].
Cytoskeleton
As a cellular interconnected scaffold composed of three main polymers including actin filaments, intermediate filaments and microtubules, cytoskeleton forms intricate structural networks with different architectures [35]. It is reported that the primary machinery of cellular force-sensing and force-generating comes from changes in the cytoskeleton [35, 190, 191]. Cell-intrinsic forces are generated through either the concerted polymerization or slide of actin filaments along the bipolar filaments of NMII [190, 192]. The suppression of NMII activities attenuated the expansion of LSK cells conferred by matrix elasticity [30]. Moreover, the extent of cytoskeletal contractility was proportional to the degree of adhesion strength [193, 194]. Therefore, cytoskeleton has important implications for mechanical transmission as a hub of communication between cells and the external physical microenvironment [179, 180, 195]. When external mechanical stimuli were directly exerting on the cytoskeleton or on the transmembrane adhesive receptors that were connected to the cytoskeleton, cytoskeleton remodeling and cytoskeletal tension rearrangement occurred under the action of a myriad of actin-binding proteins [196, 197]. Endothelium bearing steady laminar shear stress exhibited a typical phenotype of “apical stress fibers” enriching robust actin- and myosin-containing filaments in the apical cell membrane because of cytoskeleton-related gene activation [24]. Similar “apical constriction” event also occurred in EHT cells which may rely on the activity of actomyosin recruited at the circumferential actin belt controlled by myosin regulatory light chain 9 (Myl9) [48].
Apart from focusing on the structural changes of cytoskeleton, researchers have long observed the upregulation of cytoskeletal proteins induced by forces [198]. In addition, cytoskeleton was identified as a key regulatory input for YAP/TAZ due to the abrogation of YAP/TAZ activity by Cofilin, CapZ, Gelsolin, and other F-actin-capping/severing proteins and the enhancement of YAP nuclear translocation by cortical actin bundling in response to shear stress [180, 181]. Another research on mouse kidney development also revealed that CDC42 Rho-GTPase, a well-established promoter of F-actin polymerization, contributes to the nuclear retention of YAP [199]. Rho-GTPase mediated blood flow-induced YAP activation and HSPC production in zebrafish embryos and in vitro [95]. Defective cytoskeletal architecture in HE or EHT undergoing cells followed by the abrogation of blood flow resulted in the severe impairment of their morphodynamics and thus higher susceptibility to cell death, which may explain a significant decrease in the number of HSPCs previously reported upon blood flow obliteration treatment [4, 48, 200].
Below, we mainly highlight the key molecular mechanisms involved in the regulation of HSC actions under mechanical conditions, illustrated in Fig. 3.
In-vitro mechanical mimicry platforms for HSC support
Research aiming to recapitulate the developmental processes of HSCs in vitro relies heavily on the establishment of robust and reproducible methods, one of which is the effective biochemical and biomechanical simulation of in vivo milieus. However, common HSC supportive strategies are confined to biochemical exposure like the delivery of various growth factors and cytokines, with only meager attention paid to the effects of biomechanical cues. Systems of this kind enhance HSPC proliferation but induce substantial differentiation [201, 202]. To circumvent this limitation, mechanical engineering and materials science where biomechanical cues such as substrate elasticity/rigidity, micropattern, nanotopography, and externally applied forces are well-designed have thrived to be more conducive to achieving sustained expansion of HSCs while keeping their stemness and multipotency [56, 203]. Among them, specially fabricated 3D nanofibers were most frequently reported in the literature [56, 203,204,205], which are often hierarchically structured scaffolds constituted by different biomaterials including natural polymers such as fibrin, collagen [205], tropoelastin [30] and silk fibroin [60], synthetic polymers such as PCL (an extensively used scaffold material in tissue engineering), hydroxyapatite (HA, one dominant component of bone), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), PES, hydrogel, polyurethane (PU), and poly L-Lactic (PLLA), ceramics and a hybrid of them. Electrospun nanofiber ceramics have been lately reported as bone mimicking materials [206]. Selected studies carried out in the last 5 years on the expansion and differentiation of HSCs utilizing synthetic nanofibers are compiled and highlighted in Tables 1 and 2. All these 3D nanofiber platforms have been adopted as analogs of the BM niche. By altering the ratio of distinct constituents, crosslinking levels, concentrations, bond with other components, and the density of cell adhesion ligands, biomaterials are mechanically tunable to generate nanofibers equivalent to those of the natural ECM (in size, structure and elasticity) [207].
Besides, the application of fluid shear stress mimicking cardiovascular forces within the AGM niche is another manageable means to attain optimal mechanical conditions, which can be readily included into scalable bioreactors. Flow experiments exposing cells (differentiating ESCs, embryonic HE or HSCs) to a defined pattern of laminar shear stress can be generated by a 2D adherent parallel plate configuration or through the assembly of a microfluidic platform [96, 99, 208]. Different mechanical parameters like varying modes (pulsatile or continuous) and magnitudes (1–10 dyn/cm2) of fluid shear stress can be investigated predictably and systematically, among which a shear stress of 5 dyn/cm2 is a value roughly amounting to the physiological magnitude experienced by cells in the dorsal aorta of E10.5 mouse embryos [86]. By seeding cells on a stretchable micropost array (SµPA) cytometry, Weng et al. employed varying degrees of defined static equibiaxial cell stretches [163]. Alginate beads with osteoblasts encapsulated were used to bio-mimic the low 3D stiffness of the BM niche [209]. The application of intermittent hydrostatic pressure (IHP) also is a widely used approach to simulate the BM mechanical microenvironment [69, 209, 210].
Conclusion and perspective
The acquisition of sufficient functional HSCs in vitro prevails as a holy grail in the field of hematopoiesis that holds great promise for clinic-scale therapeutics. The identification of specific cues during HSC development and the fundamental grasp of mysteries in the underlying mechanism will be of help to decipher key points required for prolonged proliferation and pluripotency of HSCs. Significantly, the incorporation of biomechanical signals is a groundbreaking replenished theory that has revolutionized the scientific community’s current understanding of HSC regulatory signal types. This manuscript attempts to provide an integrated picture of the biophysical processes and probable mechanisms driving the phenotypic and functional outputs of HSCs. Besides, the practical aspects of mechanical signals are outlined with the focus on the mechanical mimicry platforms and the application of mechanical forces in an attempt to derive or expand HSCs in vitro.
Albeit certain mechanosensors and mechano-activated signaling pathways have been uncovered in several cell types and processes, some critical unanswered questions should be emphasized, such as, how natural fluctuations in the pattern, magnitude and duration of mechanical stimuli result in the discrepancy of genetic/epigenetic variations in HSCs, the precise definition of mechanical components presented in synthetic niches, and several pieces of evidence proved that biomechanical activation can successfully specify HSCs in vitro, but how long mechanical effects will last or whether they will be retained in transplant recipients, all of which remain to be explored and are interesting avenues for future research. In addition, aforementioned molecules or structures involved in cellular mechanotransduction and downstream events are highly interconnected rather than mutually exclusive. Several quintessential examples should be cited that, the primary cilium is actually a microtubular extension of cytoskeleton, whose basal body region is particularly a microtubule organizing center [221]. Cilium bending induces cytoskeletal deformation and membrane stretching at the base of the primary cilium [222], initiating extracellular Ca2 + influx through calcium channels in the ciliary membrane [223].
Cell junction receptors and associated proteins generally represent a mechanical linkage between the ECM and actin cytoskeleton. In the face of mechanical stimuli, adhesion complexes actively facilitate cytoskeleton assembly and stress fibers made of F-actin support the maturation and stabilization of focal adhesion. Therefore, the integrins-FAs-F-actin axis obviously works as an integrated whole in the process of mechanotransduction [46, 196, 197, 224,225,226]. In this respect, the regulation of biomechanical signals is a multifactorial event that can hardly be replicated by the manipulation of a single signaling axis, which may be why the interpretation of results obtained from synthetic niches seems to be challenging. Due to the complexity of these mechanical interactions, deeper mining is required to not only reveal the integrated characterization of various mechanical regulatory networks in a temporal and spatial manner at the cellular level, but also dissect the relative contribution of individual signaling in the related process.
In conclusion, we have summarized how biomechanical cues are pivotal for offering robust and instructive principles in HSC fate determination. Nevertheless, mechanical signals as regulators of HSC biology are still in their infancy, and the identification of several known mechanosensitive and mechanotransductive components suggests the possibility of more awaiting discovery. Fortunately, it is not naive to assume that researchers may be one step closer to fully appreciate the overall perspective of the mechanical regulatory paradigm within HSCs in the future because of the burgeoning experimental techniques ranging from high spatio-temporal resolution imaging to CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing technique and bioengineering, single-cell sequencing and mass spectrometry. Mechanical inclusion strategy may be a favorable approach more suitable for HSC support with an expectation for the accelerated translation of mechanistic knowledge into the development of HSC-based regenerative medicine technologies.
References
Morrison SJ, Scadden DT (2014) The bone marrow niche for haematopoietic stem cells. Nature 505(7483):327–334
Cheng T (2008) Toward ‘SMART’ stem cells. Gene Ther 15(2):67–73
Jin H, Xu J, Wen Z (2007) Migratory path of definitive hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells during zebrafish development. Blood 109(12):5208–5214
Murayama E, Kissa K, Zapata A, Mordelet E, Briolat V, Lin HF, Handin RI, Herbomel P (2006) Tracing hematopoietic precursor migration to successive hematopoietic organs during zebrafish development. Immunity 25(6):963–975
Orkin SH, Zon LI (2008) Hematopoiesis: an evolving paradigm for stem cell biology. Cell 132(4):631–644
Kissa K, Herbomel P (2010) Blood stem cells emerge from aortic endothelium by a novel type of cell transition. Nature 464(7285):112–115
Boisset J-C, van Cappellen W, Andrieu-Soler C, Galjart N, Dzierzak E, Robin C (2010) In vivo imaging of haematopoietic cells emerging from the mouse aortic endothelium. Nature 464(7285):116–120
Gao X, Chunliang Xu, Asada N, Frenette PS (2018) The hematopoietic stem cell niche: from embryo to adult. Development 145(2):dev139691
Zhang P, Zhang C, Li J, Han J, Liu X, Yang H (2019) The physical microenvironment of hematopoietic stem cells and its emerging roles in engineering applications. Stem Cell Res Ther 10(1):1–13
Crane GM, Jeffery E, Morrison SJ (2017) Adult haematopoietic stem cell niches. Nat Rev Immunol 17(9):573–590
Lancrin C, Sroczynska P, Stephenson C, Allen T, Kouskoff V, Lacaud G (2009) The haemangioblast generates haematopoietic cells through a haemogenic endothelium stage. Nature 457(7231):892–895
Swiers G, De Bruijn M, Speck NA (2010) Hematopoietic stem cell emergence in the conceptus and the role of runx1. Int J Dev Biol 54:1151–1163
Chen MJ, Yokomizo T, Zeigler BM, Dzierzak E, Speck NA (2009) Runx1 is required for the endothelial to haematopoietic cell transition but not thereafter. Nature 457(7231):887–891
Okuda T, van Deursen J, Hiebert SW, Grosveld G, Downing JR (1996) Aml1, the target of multiple chromosomal translocations in human leukemia, is essential for normal fetal liver hematopoiesis. Cell 84(2):321–330
Bonkhofer F, Rispoli R, Pinheiro P, Krecsmarik M, Schneider-Swales J, Tsang IHC, De Bruijn M, Monteiro R, Peterkin T, Patient R (2019) Blood stem cell-forming haemogenic endothelium in zebrafish derives from arterial endothelium. Nat Commun 10(1):1–14
Chen I-I, Caprioli A, Ohnuki H, Kwak H, Porcher C, Tosato G (2016) Ephrinb2 regulates the emergence of a hemogenic endothelium from the aorta. Sci Rep 6:27195
Iacovino M, Chong D, Szatmari I, Hartweck L, Rux D, Caprioli A, Cleaver O, Kyba M (2011) Hoxa3 is an apical regulator of haemogenic endothelium. Nat Cell Biol 13(1):72–78
Mizuochi C, Fraser ST, Biasch K, Horio Y, Kikushige Y, Tani K, Akashi K, Tavian M, Sugiyama D (2012) Intra-aortic clusters undergo endothelial to hematopoietic phenotypic transition during early embryogenesis. PLoS ONE 7(4):e35763
Slukvin II, Uenishi GI (2019) Arterial identity of hemogenic endothelium: a key to unlock definitive hematopoietic commitment in human pluripotent stem cell cultures. Exp Hematol 71:3–12
Park MA, Kumar A, Jung HS, Uenishi G, Moskvin OV, Thomson JA, Slukvin II (2018) Activation of the arterial program drives development of definitive hemogenic endothelium with lymphoid potential. Cell Rep 23(8):2467–2481
Lacaud G, Kouskoff V (2017) Hemangioblast, hemogenic endothelium, and primitive versus definitive hematopoiesis. Exp Hematol 49:19–24
Bertrand JY, Chi NC, Santoso B, Teng S, Stainier DYR, Traver D (2010) Haematopoietic stem cells derive directly from aortic endothelium during development. Nature 464(7285):108–111
Oberlin E, Tavian M, Blazsek I, Peautt B (2002) Blood-forming potential of vascular endothelium in the human embryo. Development 129(17):4147–4157
Garcia-Cardea G, Comander J, Anderson KR, Blackman BR, Gimbrone MA (2001) Biomechanical activation of vascular endothelium as a determinant of its functional phenotype. Proc Natl Acad Sci 98(8):4478–4485
Yuan S, Yurdagul A, Peretik JM, Alfaidi M, Yafeai ZA, Pardue S, Pearson BH, Kevil CG, Wayne Orr A (2018) Cystathionine γ-lyase modulates flow-dependent vascular remodeling. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 38(9):2126–2136
Vining KH, Mooney DJ (2017) Mechanical forces direct stem cell behaviour in development and regeneration. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 18(12):728–742
Garcia-Cardena G, Slegtenhorst BR (2016) Hemodynamic control of endothelial cell fates in development. Ann Rev Cell Dev Biol 32:633–648
Straight AF, Cheung A, Limouze J, Chen I, Westwood NJ, Sellers JR, Mitchison TJ (2003) Dissecting temporal and spatial control of cytokinesis with a myosin II inhibitor. Science 299(5613):1743–1747
Choi JS, Harley BAC (2017) Marrow-inspired matrix cues rapidly affect early fate decisions of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Sci Adv 3(1):e1600455
Holst J, Watson S, Lord MS, Eamegdool SS, Bax DV, Nivison-Smith LB, Kondyurin A, Ma L, Oberhauser AF, Weiss AS et al (2010) Substrate elasticity provides mechanical signals for the expansion of hemopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Nat Biotechnol 28(10):1123–1128
Steidl U, Bork S, Schaub S, Selbach O, Seres J, Aivado M, Schroeder T, Rohr U-P, Fenk R, Kliszewski S, Maercker C, Neubert P, Bornstein SR, Haas HL, Kobbe G, Tenen DG, Haas R, Kronenwett R (2004) Primary human CD34+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells express functionally active receptors of neuromediators. Blood 104(1):81–88
Roca-Cusachs P, del Rio A, Puklin-Faucher E, Gauthier NC, Biais N, Sheetz MP (2013) Integrin-dependent force transmission to the extracellular matrix by -actinin triggers adhesion maturation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110(15):E1361–E1370
Hk P (2010) The mechanical components of the dynein motor. Sci World J 10(797653):8
Zhang R, Lee DM, Jimah JR, Gerassimov N, Yang C, Kim S, Luvsanjav D, Winkelman J, Mettlen M, Abrams ME et al (2020) Dynamin regulates the dynamics and mechanical strength of the actin cytoskeleton as a multifilament actinbundling protein. Nat Cell Biol 22(6):674–688
Fletcher DA, Dyche Mullins R (2010) Cell mechanics and the cytoskeleton. Nature 463(7280):485–492
Islam M, Brink H, Blanche S, DiPrete C, Bongiorno T, Stone N, Liu A, Philip A, Wang G, Lam W et al (2017) Microfluidic sorting of cells by viability based on differences in cell stiffness. Sci Rep 7(1):1–12
Shin J-W, Spinler KR, Swift J, Chasis JA, Mohandas N, Discher DE (2013) Lamins regulate cell trafficking and lineage maturation of adult human hematopoietic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110(47):18892–18897
Ni F, Wen-Mei Yu, Wang X, Fay ME, Young KM, Qiu Y, Lam WA, Sulchek TA, Cheng T, Scadden DT, Cheng-Kui Qu (2019) Ptpn21 controls hematopoietic stem cell homeostasis and biomechanics. Cell Stem Cell 24(4):608-620.e6
Shin J-W, Buxboim A, Spinler KR, Swift J, Christian DA, Hunter CA, Lon C, Gachet C, Dingal PCDP, Ivanovska IL, Rehfeldt F, Chasis JA, Discher DE (2014) Contractile forces sustain and polarize hematopoiesis from stem and progenitor cells. Cell Stem Cell 14(1):81–93
Lordier L, Bluteau D, Jalil A, Legrand C, Pan J, Rameau P, Jouni D, Bluteau O, Mercher T, Leon C et al (2012) Runx1-induced silencing of nonmuscle myosin heavy chain IIb contributes to megakaryocyte polyploidization. Nat Commun 3(1):1–10
Ubukawa K, Guo Y-M, Takahashi M, Hirokawa M, Michishita Y, Nara M, Tagawa H, Takahashi N, Komatsuda A, Nunomura W et al (2012) Enucleation of human erythroblasts involves non-muscle myosin IIB. Blood J Am Soc Hematol 119(4):1036–1044
Shin J-W, Swift J, Ivanovska I, Spinler KR, Buxboim A, Discher DE (2013) Mechanobiology of bone marrow stem cells: from myosin-II forces to compliance of matrix and nucleus in cell forms and fates. Differentiation 86(3):77–86
AJS Ribeiro, KN Dahl (2010) The nucleus as a central structure in defining the mechanical properties of stem cells. In: 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, pp 831–834.
Peric-Hupkes D, Meuleman W, Pagie L, Bruggeman SWM, Solovei I, Brugman W, Grf S, Flicek P, Kerkhoven RM, van Lohuizen M, Reinders M, Wessels L, van Steensel B (2010) Molecular maps of the reorganization of genome-nuclear lamina interactions during differentiation. Mol Cell 38(4):603–613
Tajik A, Zhang Y, Wei F, Sun J, Jia Q, Zhou W, Singh R, Khanna N, Belmont AS, Wang N (2016) Transcription upregulation via force-induced direct stretching of chromatin. Nat Mater 15(12):1287–1296
Roselova P, Obr A, Holoubek A, Grebeova D, Kuzelova K (2018) Adhesion structures in leukemia cells and their regulation by src family kinases. Cell Adhes Migr 12(3):286–298
Linping Hu, Ni F, Wang X, Fay ME, Young KM, Lam WA, Sulchek TA, Cheng-Kui Qu (2020) Decreased cell stiffness enhances leukemia development and progression. Leukemia 34(9):2493–2497
Lancino M, Majello S, Herbert S, De Chaumont F, Tinevez J-Y, Olivo-Marin J-C, Herbomel P, Schmidt A (2018) Anisotropic organization of circumferential actomyosin characterizes hematopoietic stem cells emergence in the zebrafish. Elife 7:e37355
Poullet N, Golushko I, Lorman V, Travnickova J, Bureau C, Chalin D, Rochal S, Parmeggiani A, Kissa K (2019) Mechanical instabilities of aorta drive blood stem cell production: a live study. Cell Mol Life Sci 77:3453–3464
Kissa K, Murayama E, Zapata A, Cortes A, Perret E, Machu C, Herbomel P (2008) Live imaging of emerging hematopoietic stem cells and early thymus colonization. Blood 111(3):1147–1156
Frantz C, Stewart KM, Weaver VM (2010) The extracellular matrix at a glance. J Cell Sci 123(24):4195–4200
Lee-Thedieck C, Spatz JP (2014) Biophysical regulation of hematopoietic stem cells. Biomater Sci 2:1548–1561
Moore CA, Shah NN, Smith CP, Rameshwar P (1842) 3d bioprinting and stem cells. Methods Mol Biol 93–103:2018
El-Ali J, Sorger PK, Jensen KF (2006) Cells on chips. Nature 442(7101):403–411
Whitesides GM (2006) The origins and the future of microfluidics. Nature 442(7101):368–373
Yulin Xu, Shan W, Li X, Wang B, Liu S, Wang Y, Long Y, Tie R, Wang L, Cai S et al (2016) A synthetic three-dimensional niche system facilitates generation of functional hematopoietic cells from human-induced pluripotent stem cells. J Hematol Oncol 9(1):1–16
Nichols JE, Cortiella J, Lee J, Niles JA, Cuddihy M, Wang S, Bielitzki J, Cantu A, Mlcak R, Valdivia E, Yancy R, McClure ML, Kotov NA (2009) In vitro analog of human bone marrow from 3d scaffolds with biomimetic inverted colloidal crystal geometry. Biomaterials 30(6):1071–1079
Chua K-N, Chai C, Lee P-C, Tang Y-N, Ramakrishna S, Leong KW, Mao H-Q (2006) Surface-aminated electrospun nanofibers enhance adhesion and expansion of human umbilical cord blood hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells. Biomaterials 27(36):6043–6051
Chua K-N, Chai C, Lee P-C, Ramakrishna S, Leong KW, Mao H-Q (2007) Functional nanofiber scaffolds with different spacers modulate adhesion and expansion of cryopreserved umbilical cord blood hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells. Exp Hematol 35(5):771–781
Das H, Abdulhameed N, Joseph M, Sakthivel R, Mao H-Q, Pompili VJ (2009) Ex vivo nanofiber expansion and genetic modification of human cord blood-derived progenitor/stem cells enhances vasculogenesis. Cell Transplant 18(3):305–318
Ehring B, Biber K, Upton TM, Plosky D, Pykett M, Rosenzweig M (2003) Expansion of hpcs from cord blood in a novel 3d matrix. Cytotherapy 5(6):490–499
Arabkari V, Amirizadeh N, Nikougoftar M, Soleimani M (2019) microrna expression profiles in two- and three-dimensional culture conditions of human-umbilical-cord blood-derived cd34+ cells. J Cell Physiol 234(11):20072–20084
Dehdilani N, Shamsasenjan K, Movassaghpour A, Akbarzadehlaleh P, Tabrizi BA, Parsa H, Sabagi F (2016) Improved survival and hematopoietic differentiation of murine embryonic stem cells on electrospun polycaprolactone nanofiber. Cell Journal (Yakhteh) 17(4):629
Choi JS, Mahadik BP, Harley BAC (2015) Engineering the hematopoietic stem cell niche: frontiers in biomaterial science. Biotechnol J 10(10):1529–1545
Zou J, Wang W, Nie Y, Xun Xu, Ma N, Lendlein A (2019) Microscale roughness regulates laminin-5 secretion of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 73(1):237–247
Chaudhary JK, Rath PC (2017) Microgrooved-surface topography enhances cellular division and proliferation of mouse bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. PLoS ONE 12(8):1–22
Tong Z, Liu Y, Xia R, Chang Y, Yi Hu, Liu P, Zhai Z, Zhang J, Li H (2020) F-actin regulates osteoblastic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells on TiO2 nanotubes through MKL1 and YAP/TAZ. Nanoscale Res Lett 15(1):1–16
Yang C, Zhao C, Wang X, Shi M, Zhu Y, Jing L, Chengtie Wu, Chang J (2019) Stimulation of osteogenesis and angiogenesis by micro/nano hierarchical hydroxyapatite via macrophage immunomodulation. Nanoscale 11:17699–17708
Reinwald Y, El Haj AJ (2018) Hydrostatic pressure in combination with topographical cues affects the fate of bone marrow-derived human mesenchymal stem cells for bone tissue regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res, Part A 106(3):629–640
Al-Drees MA, Yeo JH, Boumelhem BB, Antas VI, Brigden KWL, Colonne CK, Fraser ST (2015) Making blood: the haematopoietic niche throughout ontogeny. Stem Cells Int 2015:14
Yamane T (2018) Mouse yolk sac hematopoiesis. Front Cell Dev Biol 6:80
Peeters M, Ottersbach K, Bollerot K, Orelio C, de Bruijn M, Wijgerde M, Dzierzak E (2009) Ventral embryonic tissues and Hedgehog proteins induce early AGM hematopoietic stem cell development. Development 136(15):2613–2621
Oostendorp RAJ, Harvey KN, Kusadasi N, de Bruijn MFTR, Saris C, Ploemacher RE, Medvinsky AL, Dzierzak EA (2002) Stromal cell lines from mouse aorta-gonads-mesonephros subregions are potent supporters of hematopoietic stem cell activity. Blood 99(4):1183
Ohneda O, Fennie C, Zheng Z, Donahue C, La H, Villacorta R, Cairns B, Lasky LA (1998) hematopoietic stem cell maintenance and differentiation are supported by embryonic aorta-gonad-mesonephros region derived endothelium. Blood 92(3):908–919
Oostendorp RAJ, Robin C, Steinhoff C, Marz S, Bruer R, Nuber UA, Dzierzak EA, Peschel C (2005) Long-term maintenance of hematopoietic stem cells does not require contact with embryo-derived stromal cells in cocultures. Stem Cells 23(6):842
Hines M, Nielsen L, Cooper-White J (2008) The hematopoietic stem cell niche: what are we trying to replicate? J Chem Technol Biotechnol 83(4):421–443
Kopp H-G, Avecilla ST, Hooper AT, Rafii S (2005) The bone marrow vascular niche: home of hsc differentiation and mobilization. Physiology 20(5):349–356
Jansen LE, Birch NP, Schiffman JD, Crosby AJ, Peyton SR (2015) Mechanics of intact bone marrow. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 50:299–307
Sacma M, Pospiech J, Bogeska R, de Back W, Mallm J-P, Sakk V, Soller K, Marka G, Vollmer A, Karns R et al (2019) Haematopoietic stem cells in perisinusoidal niches are protected from ageing. Nat Cell Biol 21(11):1309–1320
Kunisaki Y, Bruns I, Scheiermann C, Ahmed J, Pinho S, Zhang D, Mizoguchi T, Wei Q, Lucas D, Ito K et al (2013) Arteriolar niches maintain haematopoietic stem cell quiescence. Nature 502(7473):637–643
Pinho S, Frenette PS (2019) Haematopoietic stem cell activity and interactions with the niche. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 20(5):303–320
Lee-Thedieck C, Rauch N, Fiammengo R, Klein G, Spatz JP (2012) Impact of substrate elasticity on human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell adhesion and motility. J Cell Sci 125(16):3765–3775
Chitteti BR, Kacena MA, Voytik-Harbin SL, Srour EF (2015) Mod ulation of hematopoietic progenitor cell fate in vitro by varying collagen oligomer matrix stiffness in the presence or absence of osteoblasts. J Immunol Methods 425:108–113
Altrock E, Muth CA, Klein G, Spatz JP, Lee-Thedieck C (2012) The significance of integrin ligand nanopatterning on lipid raft clustering in hematopoietic stem cells. Biomaterials 33(11):3107–3118
Lee HJ, Li N, Evans SM, Diaz MF, Wenzel PL (2013) Biomechanical force in blood development: extrinsic physical cues drive pro-hematopoietic signaling. Differentiation 86(3):92–103
Adamo L, Naveiras O, Wenzel PL, McKinney-Freeman S, Mack PJ, Gracia-Sancho J, Suchy-Dicey A, Yoshimoto M, Lensch MW, Yoder MC et al (2009) Biomechanical forces promote embryonic haematopoiesis. Nature 459(7250):1131–1135
North TE, Goessling W, Peeters M, Li P, Ceol C, Lord AM, Weber GJ, Harris J, Cutting CC, Huang P, Dzierzak E, Zon LI (2009) Hematopoietic stem cell development is dependent on blood flow. Cell 137(4):736–748
Gimbrone Jr MA, Topper JN, Nagel T, Anderson KR, Guillermo G-C (2000) Endothelial dysfunction, hemodynamic forces, and atherogenesis a. Ann NY Acad Sci 902(1):230–240
Diaz MF, Li N, Lee HJ, Adamo L, Evans SM, Willey HE, Arora N, Torisawa Y-S, Vickers DA, Morris SA et al (2015) Biomechanical forces promote blood development through prostaglandin E2 and the cAMP–PKA signaling axis. J Exp Med 212(5):665–680
Davies PF, Barbee KA, Volin MV, Robotewskyj A, Chen J, Joseph L, Griem ML, Wernick MN, Jacobs E, Polacek DC, DePaola N, Barakat AI (1997) Spatial relationships in early signaling events of flow-mediated endothelial mechanotransduction. Ann Rev Physiol 59(1):527–549
Hahn C, Schwartz MA (2009) Mechanotransduction in vascular physiology and atherogenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10(1):53–62
Tavian M, Zheng Bo, Oberlin E, Crisan M, Sun B, Huard J, Peault B (2005) The vascular wall as a source of stem cells. Ann NY Acad Sci 1044(1):41–50
Garin G, Berk BC (2006) Flow-mediated signaling modulates endothelial cell phenotype. Endothelium 13(6):375–384
Ji RP, Phoon CKL, Aristizbal O, McGrath KE, Palis J, Turnbull DH (2003) Onset of cardiac function during early mouse embryogenesis coincides with entry of primitive erythroblasts into the embryo proper. Circ Res 92(2):133–135
Lundin V, Sugden WW, Theodore LN, Sousa PM, Han A, Chou S, Wrighton PJ, Cox AG, Ingber DE, Goessling W, Daley GQ, North TE (2020) YAP regulates hematopoietic stem cell formation in response to the biomechanical forces of blood flow. Dev Cell 52(4):446–460
Li N, Diaz MF, Wenzel PL (2015) Application of fluid mechanical force to embryonic sources of hemogenic endothelium and hematopoietic stem cells. Springer, NY, pp 183–193
Wang L, Zhang P, Wei Y, Gao Y, Patient R, Liu F (2011) A blood flow-dependent klf2a-NO signaling cascade is required for stabilization of hematopoietic stem cell programming in zebrafish embryos. Blood 118(15):4102
Kim PG, Nakano H, Das PP, Chen MJ, Grant Rowe R, Chou SS, Ross SJ, Sakamoto KM, Zon LI, Schlaeger TM et al (2015) Flow-induced protein kinase A-CREB pathway acts via BMP signaling to promote HSC emergence. J Exp Med 212(5):633
Wolfe RP, Ahsan T (2013) Shear stress during early embryonic stem cell differentiation promotes hematopoietic and endothelial phenotypes. Biotechnol Bioeng 110(4):1231–1242
AbuZineh K, Joudeh LI, Al Alwan B, Hamdan SM, Merzaban JS, Habuchi S (2018) Microfluidics-based super-resolution microscopy enables nanoscopic characterization of blood stem cell rolling. Sci Adv 4(7):eaat5304
Kimmel CB, Ballard WW, Kimmel SR, Ullmann B, Schilling TF (1995) Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish. Dev Dyn 203(3):253–310
Suo J, Ferrara DE, Sorescu D, Guldberg RE, Robert Taylor W, Giddens DP (2007) Hemodynamic shear stresses in mouse aortas. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 27(2):346–351
Artur Plett P, Abonour R, Frankovitz SM, Orschell CM (2004) Impact of modeled microgravity on migration, differentiation, and cell cycle control of primitive human hematopoietic progenitor cells. Exp Hematol 32(8):773–781
Gridley DS, Slater JM, Luo-Owen X, Rizvi A, Chapes SK, Stodieck LS, Ferguson VL, Pecaut MJ (2009) Spaceflight effects on t lymphocyte distribution, function and gene expression. J Appl Physiol 106(1):194–202
Sonnenfeld G, Shearer WT (2002) Immune function during space flight. Nutrition 18(10):899–903
Blaber EA, Dvorochkin N, Torres ML, Yousuf R, Burns BP, Globus RK, Almeida EAC (2014) Mechanical unloading of bone in microgravity reduces mesenchymal and hematopoietic stem cell-mediated tissue regeneration. Stem Cell Res 13(2):181–201
Goetz JG, Steed E, Ferreira RR, Roth S, Ramspacher C, Boselli F, Charvin G, Liebling M, Wyart C, Schwab Y, Vermot J (2014) Endothelial cilia mediate low flow sensing during zebrafish vascular development. Cell Rep 6(5):799–808
Liu Z, Haiqing Tu, Kang Y, Xue Y, Ma D, Zhao C, Huiyan L, Wang L, Feng L (2019) Primary cilia regulate hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell specification through Notch signaling in zebrafish. Nat Commun 10(1):1–11
Singh M, Chaudhry P, Merchant AA (2016) Primary cilia are present on human blood and bone marrow cells and mediate hedgehog signaling. Exp Hematol 44(12):1181–1187
Pala R, Alomari N, Nauli SM (2017) Primary cilium-dependent signaling mechanisms. Int J Mol Sci 18(11):2272
Singla V, Reiter JF (2006) The primary cilium as the cell’s antenna: signaling at a sensory organelle. Science 313(5787):629–633
Berbari NF, O’Connor AK, Haycraft CJ, Yoder BK (2009) The primary cilium as a complex signaling center. Curr Biol 19(13):R526–R535
Hoey DA, Tormey S, Ramcharan S, O’Brien FJ, Jacobs CR (2012) Primary cilia-mediated mechanotransduction in human mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells 30(11):2561–2570
Chen JC, Hoey DA, Chua M, Bellon R, Jacobs CR (2016) Mechanical signals promote osteogenic fate through a primary cilia-mediated mechanism. FASEB J 30(4):1504–1511
Lucas D (2017) The bone marrow microenvironment for hematopoietic stem cells. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 5–18
AbouAlaiwi WA, Takahashi M, Mell BR, Jones TJ, Ratnam S, Kolb RJ, Nauli SM (2009) Ciliary polycystin-2 is a mechanosensitive calcium channel involved in nitric oxide signaling cascades. Circ Res 104(7):860–869
Nauli SM, Kawanabe Y, Kaminski JJ, Pearce WJ, Ingber DE, Zhou J (2008) Endothelial cilia are fluid shear sensors that regulate calcium signaling and nitric oxide production through polycystin-1. Circulation 117(9):1161–1171
Michurina T, Krasnov P, Balazs A, Nakaya N, Vasilieva T, Kuzin B, Khrushchov N, Mulligan RC, Enikolopov G (2004) Nitric oxide is a regulator of hematopoietic stem cell activity. Mol Ther 10(2):241–248
Kiel MJ, Yilmaz OH, Iwashita T, Yilmaz OH, Terhorst C, Morrison SJ (2005) Slam family receptors distinguish hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells and reveal endothelial niches for stem cells. Cell 121(7):1109–1121
Jin Z-G, Ueba H, Tanimoto T, Lungu AO, Frame MD, Berk BC (2003) Ligand-independent activation of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 by fluid shear stress regulates activation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Circ Res 93(4):354–363
Dragovich MA, Chester D, Fu BM, Chenyu Wu, Yan Xu, Goligorsky MS, Frank Zhang X (2016) Mechanotransduction of the endothelial glycocalyx mediates nitric oxide production through activation of trp channels. Am J Physiol-Cell Physiol 311(6):C846–C853
Rahnert J, Fan X, Case N, Murphy TC, Grassi F, Sen B, Rubin J (2008) The role of nitric oxide in the mechanical repression of RANKL in bone stromal cells. Bone 43(1):48–54
Aleksinskaya MA, van Faassen EEH, Nelissen J, Janssen BJA, De Mey JGR, Hanemaaijer R, Rabelink T, van JanZonneveld A (2013) Identification of free nitric oxide radicals in rat bone marrow: implications for progenitor cell mobilization in hypertension. PLoS ONE 8(3):1–7
Nogueira-Pedro A, Dias CC, Helena Regina C, Segreto PC, Addios L, Lungato VD, Barros CC, Higa EMS, Buri MV, Ferreira AT, Paredes-Gamero EJ (2014) Nitric oxide-induced murine hematopoietic stem cell fate involves multiple signaling proteins, gene expression, and redox modulation. Stem Cells 32(11):2949–2960
Xu D, Yang M, Capitano M, Guo B, Liu S, Wan J, Broxmeyer HE, Huang X (2020) Pharmacological activation of nitric oxide signaling promotes human hematopoietic stem cell homing and engraftment. Leukemia 35(1):229–234
Adamiak M, Abdelbaset-Ismail A, Moore JB, Zhao J, Abdel-Latif A, Wysoczynski M, Ratajczak MZ (2017) Inducible nitric oxide synthase (inos) is a novel negative regulator of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell trafficking. Stem Cell Rev Rep 13(1):92–103
Tiribuzi R, Crispoltoni L, Tartacca F, Orlacchio A, Martino S, Palmerini CA, Orlacchio A (2013) Nitric oxide depletion alters hematopoietic stem cell commitment toward immunogenic dendritic cells. Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA)-Gen Subj 1830(3):2830–2838
Noiri E, Lee E, Testa J, Quigley J, Colflesh D, Keese CR, Giaever I, Goligorsky MS (1998) Podokinesis in endothelial cell migration: role of nitric oxide. Am J Physiol-Cell Physiol 274(1):C236–C244
de Marella FTR, Bruijn XM, Robin C, Ottersbach K, Sanchez M-J, Dzierzak E (2002) Hematopoietic stem cells localize to the endothelial cell layer in the midgestation mouse aorta. Immunity 16(5):673–683
Frstermann U, Xia N, Li H (2017) Roles of vascular oxidative stress and nitric oxide in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Circ Res 120(4):713–735
Ferri-Lagneau KF, Haider J, Sang S, Leung TC (2019) Rescue of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells formation in plcg1 zebrafish mutant. Sci Rep 9(1):244
Leclerc C, Moreau M, Neant I (2012) The calcium: an early signal that initiates the formation of the nervous system during embryogenesis. Front Mol Neurosci 5:64
Tonelli FMP, Santos AK, Gomes DA, da Silva SL, Gomes KN, Ladeira LO, Resende RR (2012) Stem cells and calcium signaling. Calcium signaling. Springer, pp 891–916
Pathak MM, Nourse JL, Tran T, Hwe J, Arulmoli J, Dai TT, Le EB, Flanagan LA, Tombola F (2014) Stretch-activated ion channel piezo1 directs lineage choice in human neural stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111(45):16148–16153
Barzegari A, Omidi Y, Ostadrahimi A, Gueguen V, Meddahi-Pelle A, Nouri M, Pavon-Djavid G (2020) The role of piezo proteins and cellular mechanosensing in tuning the fate of transplanted stem cells. Cell Tissue Res 381:1–12
Michel T, Feron O (1997) Nitric oxide synthases: which, where, how, and why? J Clin Investig 100(9):2146–2152
Frstermann U, Sessa WC (2011) Nitric oxide synthases: regulation and function. Eur Heart J 33(7):829–837
Brooks AR, Lelkes PI, Rubanyi GM (2002) Gene expression profiling of human aortic endothelial cells exposed to disturbed flow and steady laminar flow. Physiol Genom 9(1):27–41
Chen BPC, Yi-Shuan LI, Zhao Y, Chen K-D, Li S, Lao J, Yuan S, Shyy J-J, Chien S (2001) Dna microarray analysis of gene expression in endothelial cells in response to 24 h shear stress. Physiol Genom 7(1):55–63
Shay-Salit A, Shushy M, Wolfovitz E, Yahav H, Breviario F, Dejana E, Resnick N (2002) Vegf receptor 2 and the adherens junction as a mechanical transducer in vascular endothelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99(14):9462–9467
Yin T, Li L (2006) The stem cell niches in bone. J Clin Investig 116(5):1195–1201
Sugiyama D, Kulkeaw K, Mizuochi C (2013) Tgf-beta-1 up-regulates extra-cellular matrix production in mouse hepatoblasts. Mech Dev 130(2):195–206
Tamplin OJ, Durand EM, Carr LA, Childs SJ, Hagedorn EJ, Li P, Yzaguirre A-da D, Speck NA, Zon LI (2015) Hematopoietic stem cell arrival triggers dynamic remodeling of the perivascular niche. Cell 160(1):241–252
Kobayashi I, Kobayashi-Sun J, Kim AD, Pouget C, Fujita N, Suda T, Traver D (2014) Jam1a–jam2a interactions regulate haematopoietic stem cell fate through notch signalling. Nature 512(7514):319–323
Rho S-S, Kobayashi I, Oguri-Nakamura E, Ando K, Fujiwara M, Kamimura N, Hirata H, Iida A, Iwai Y, Mochizuki N, Fukuhara S (2019) Rap1b promotes notch-signal-mediated hematopoietic stem cell development by enhancing integrin-mediated cell adhesion. Dev Cell 49(5):681–696
Iwasaki H, Arai F, Kubota Y, Dahl M, Suda T (2010) Endothelial protein C receptorexpressing hematopoietic stem cells reside in the perisinusoidal niche in fetal liver. Blood 116(4):544–553
Gattazzo C, Martini V, Frezzato F, Trimarco V, Tibaldi E, Castelli M, Facco M, Zonta F, Brunati AM, Zambello R, Semenzato G, Trentin L (2014) Cortactin, another player in the lyn signaling pathway, is over-expressed and alternatively spliced in leukemic cells from patients with b-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Haematologica 99(6):1069–1077
Dos Santos C, McDonald T, Ho YW, Liu H, Lin A, Forman SJ, Kuo Y-H, Bhatia R (2013) The src and c-kit kinase inhibitor dasatinib enhances p53-mediated targeting of human acute myeloid leukemia stem cells by chemotherapeutic agents. Blood 122(11):1900–1913
Hanke M, Hoffmann I, Christophis C, Schubert M, Hoang VT, Zepeda-Moreno A, Baran N, Eckstein V, Wuchter P, Rosenhahn A, Anthony DH (2014) Differences between healthy hematopoietic progenitors and leukemia cells with respect to cd44 mediated rolling versus adherence behavior on hyaluronic acid coated surfaces. Biomaterials 35(5):1411–1419
Esfahani AM, Rosenbohm J, Reddy K, Jin X, Bouzid T, Riehl B-D, Kim E, Lim JY, Yang R (2019) Tissue regeneration from mechanical stretching of cellcell adhesion. Tissue Eng Part C: Methods 25(11):631–640
Humphrey JD, Dufresne ER, Schwartz MA (2014) Mechanotransduction and extracellular matrix homeostasis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 15(12):802–812
Oberlin E, Fleury M, Clay D, Petit-Cocault L, Candelier J-J, Mennesson B, Jaffredo T, Souyri M (2010) VE-cadherin expression allows identification of a new class of hematopoietic stem cells within human embryonic liver. Blood 116(22):4444–4455
Kourtidis A, Ruifeng Lu, Pence LJ, Anastasiadis PZ (2017) A central role for cadherin signaling in cancer. Exp Cell Res 358(1):78–85
Theodore LN, Hagedorn EJ, Cortes M, Natsuhara K, Liu SY, Perlin JR, Yang S, Daily ML, Zon LI, North TE (2017) Distinct roles for matrix metalloproteinases 2 and 9 in embryonic hematopoietic stem cell emergence, migration, and niche colonization. Stem Cell Rep 8(5):1226–1241
Costa G, Mazan A, Gandillet A, Pearson S, Lacaud G, Kouskoff V (2012) SOX7 regulates the expression of VE-cadherin in the haemogenic endothelium at the onset of haematopoietic development. Development 139(9):1587–1598
Collins C, Denisin AK, Pruitt BL, James Nelson W (2017) Changes in ecadherin rigidity sensing regulate cell adhesion. Proc Natl Acad Sci 114(29):E5835–E5844
Ebert LM, Tan LY, Zahied Johan M, Min KKM, Cockshell MP, Parham KA, Betterman KL, Szeto P, Boyle S, Silva L et al (2016) A non-canonical role for desmoglein-2 in endothelial cells: implications for neoangiogenesis. Angiogenesis 19(4):463–486
Privratsky JR, Newman DK, Newman PJ (2010) Pecam-1: conflicts of interest in inflammation. Life Sci 87(3):69–82
Suzuki T, Suzuki M, Ogino S, Umemoto R, Nishida N, Shimada I (2015) Mechanical force effect on the two-state equilibrium of the hyaluronan-binding domain of cd44 in cell rolling. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112(22):6991–6996
Hoffman BD, Yap AS (2015) Towards a dynamic understanding of cadherin-based mechanobiology. Trends Cell Biol 25(12):803–814
Leckband DE, de Rooij J (2014) Cadherin adhesion and mechanotransduction. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 30(1):291–315
Priest AV, Shafraz O, Sivasankar S (2017) Biophysical basis of cadherin mediated cell-cell adhesion. Exp Cell Res 358(1):10–13
Weng S, Shao Y, Chen W, Jianping Fu (2016) Mechanosensitive subcellular rheostasis drives emergent single-cell mechanical homeostasis. Nat Mater 15(9):961–967
Geiger B, Spatz JP, Bershadsky AD (2009) Environmental sensing through focal adhesions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10(1):21–33
Galbraith CG, Yamada KM, Sheetz MP (2002) The relationship between force and focal complex development. J Cell Biol 159(4):695–705
Choi JS, Harley BAC (2016) Challenges and opportunities to harnessing the (hematopoietic) stem cell niche. Curr Stem Cell Rep 2(1):85–94
Klamer S, Voermans C (2014) The role of novel and known extracellular matrix and adhesion molecules in the homeostatic and regenerative bone marrow microenvironment. Cell Adh Migr 8(6):563–577
Gattazzo F, Urciuolo A, Bonaldo P (2014) Extracellular matrix: A dynamic microenvironment for stem cell niche. Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA)-Gen Subj 1840(8):2506–2519
Choi JS, Harley BAC (2012) The combined influence of substrate elasticity and ligand density on the viability and biophysical properties of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Biomaterials 33(18):4460–4468
Bertrand JY, Giroux S, Golub R, Klaine M, Jalil A, Boucontet L, Godin I, Cumano A (2005) Characterization of purified intraembryonic hematopoietic stem cells as a tool to define their site of origin. Proc Natl Acad Sci 102(1):134–139
Mikkola HKA, Orkin SH (2006) The journey of developing hematopoietic stem cells. Development 133(19):3733–3744
Andersen JI, Pennisi CP, Fink T, Zachar V (2018) Focal adhesion kinase activation is necessary for stretch-induced alignment and enhanced differentiation of myogenic precursor cells. Tissue Eng Part A 24(7–8):631–640
Lachowski D, Cortes E, Robinson B, Rice A, Rombouts K, Del Ro AE, Hernndez, (2018) Fak controls the mechanical activation of yap, a transcriptional regulator required for durotaxis. FASEB J 32(2):1099–1107
Mitra SK, Hanson DA, Schlaepfer DD (2005) Focal adhesion kinase: in command and control of cell motility. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 6(1):56–68
Khetan S, Guvendiren M, Legant WR, Cohen DM, Chen CS, Burdick JA (2013) Degradation-mediated cellular traction directs stem cell fate in covalently crosslinked three-dimensional hydrogels. Nat Mater 12(5):458–465
Kasper G, Glaeser JD, Geissler S, Ode A, Tuischer J, Matziolis G, Perka C, Duda GN (2007) Matrix metalloprotease activity is an essential link between mechanical stimulus and mesenchymal stem cell behavior. Stem Cells 25(8):1985–1994
Hoggatt J, Singh P, Tate TA, Chou B-K, Datari SR, Fukuda S, Liu L, Kharchenko PV, Schajnovitz A, Baryawno N, Mercier FE, Boyer J, Gardner J, Morrow DM, Scadden DT, Pelus LM (2018) Rapid mobilization reveals a highly engraftable hematopoietic stem cell. Cell 172(1):191–204
Yahata T, Ibrahim AA, Muguruma Y, Eren M, Shaffer AM, Watanabe N, Kaneko S, Nakabayashi T, Dan T, Hirayama N et al (2017) Tgf-β–induced intracellular pai-1 is responsible for retaining hematopoietic stem cells in the niche. Blood, J Am Soc Hematol 130(21):2283–2294
Dupont S, Morsut L, Aragona M, Enzo E, Giulitti S, Cordenonsi M, Zanconato F, Le Digabel J, Forcato M, Bicciato S et al (2011) Role of YAP/TAZ in mechanotransduction. Nature 474(7350):179–183
Aragona M, Panciera T, Manfrin A, Giulitti S, Michielin F, Elvassore N, Dupont S, Piccolo S (2013) A mechanical checkpoint controls multicellular growth through YAP/TAZ regulation by actin-processing factors. Cell 154(5):1047–1059
Nakajima H, Yamamoto K, Agarwala S, Terai K, Fukui H, Fukuhara S, Ando K, Miyazaki T, Yokota Y, Schmelzer E, Belting H-G, Affolter M, Lecaudey V, Mochizuki N (2017) Flow-dependent endothelial YAP regulation contributes to vessel maintenance. Dev Cell 40(6):523–536
Porazinski S, Wang H, Asaoka Y, Behrndt M, Miyamoto T, Morita H, Hata S, Takashi Sasaki SF, Krens G, Osada Y et al (2015) Yap is essential for tissue tension to ensure vertebrate 3d body shape. Nature 521(7551):217–221
Lay AJ, Coleman PR, FormazPreston A, Ting KK, Roediger B, Weninger W, Schwartz MA, Vadas MA, Gamble JR (2019) ARHGAP18: a flowresponsive gene that regulates endothelial cell alignment and protects against atherosclerosis. J Am Heart Assoc 8(2):e010057
Goode DK, Nadine Obier MS, Vijayabaskar M-A-L, Lilly AJ, Hannah R, Lichtinger M, Batta K, Florkowska M, Patel R, Challinor M, Wallace K, Gilmour J, Assi SA, Cauchy P, Hoogenkamp M, Westhead DR, Lacaud G, Kouskoff V, Gttgens B, Bonifer C (2016) Dynamic gene regulatory networks drive hematopoietic specification and differentiation. Dev Cell 36(5):572–587
Lee JS, Qing Yu, Shin JT, Sebzda E, Bertozzi C, Chen M, Mericko P, Stadtfeld M, Zhou D, Cheng L, Graf T, MacRae CA, Lepore JJ, Lo CW, Kahn ML (2006) Klf2 is an essential regulator of vascular hemodynamic forces in vivo. Dev Cell 11(6):845–857
Ogawa H, Kozhemyakina E, Hung H-H, Grodzinsky AJ, Lassar AB (2014) Mechanical motion promotes expression of prg4 in articular cartilage via multiple CREB-dependent, fluid flow shear stress-induced signaling pathways. Genes Dev 28(2):127–139
Husse B, Isenberg G (2010) Cyclic mechanical strain causes cAMP-response element binding protein activation by different pathways in cardiac fibroblasts. Heart Int 5(1):e3
Li M, Xinxin Liu Yu, Di Zhang M, Wang H, Wang L, Chen Y, Liu X, Cao X, Zeng R et al (2016) Upregulation of dickkopf1 by oscillatory shear stress accelerates atherogenesis. J Mol Med 94(4):431–441
Yamamizu K, Matsunaga T, Katayama S, Kataoka H, Takayama N, Eto K, Nishikawa S-I, Yamashita JK (2012) PKA/CREB signaling triggers initiation of endothelial and hematopoietic cell differentiation via etv2 induction. Stem Cells 30(4):687–696
Svitkina T (2018) The actin cytoskeleton and actin-based motility. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Biol 10(1):a018267
Garca-Cardea G, Slegtenhorst BR (2016) Hemodynamic control of endothelial cell fates in development. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 32(1):633–648
Discher DE, Janmey P, Wang Y-l (2005) Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 310(5751):1139–1143
Yang Y, Wang K, Xiaosong Gu, Leong KW (2017) Biophysical regulation of cell behavior-cross talk between substrate stiffness and nanotopography. Engineering 3(1):36–54
Clark K, Langeslag M, Figdor CG, van Leeuwen FN (2007) Myosin II and mechanotransduction: a balancing act. Trends Cell Biol 17(4):178–186
Calvo F, Ege N, Grande-Garcia A, Hooper S, Jenkins RP, Chaudhry SI, Harrington K, Williamson P, Moeendarbary E, Charras G et al (2013) Mechanotransduction and YAP-dependent matrix remodelling is required for the generation and maintenance of cancer- associated fibroblasts. Nat Cell Biol 15(6):637–646
Berrier AL, Yamada KM (2007) Cellmatrix adhesion. J Cell Physiol 213(3):565–573
Wang N, Tytell JD, Ingber DE (2009) Mechanotransduction at a distance: mechanically coupling the extracellular matrix with the nucleus. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10(1):75–82
Ingber DE (1993) The riddle of morphogenesis: a question of solution chemistry or molecular cell engineering? Cell 75(7):1249–1252
Reginensi A, Scott RP, Gregorieff A, Bagherie-Lachidan M, Chung C, Lim D-S, Pawson T, Wrana J, McNeill H (2013) Yap- and cdc42-dependent nephrogenesis and morphogenesis during mouse kidney development. PLoS Genet 9(3):1–17
Bertrand JY, Kim AD, Teng S, Traver D (2008) CD41+ cmyb+ precursors colonize the zebrafish pronephros by a novel migration route to initiate adult hematopoiesis. Development 135(10):1853–1862
Discher DE, Mooney DJ, Zandstra PW (2009) Growth factors, matrices, and forces combine and control stem cells. Science 324(5935):1673–1677
Murry CE, Keller G (2008) Differentiation of embryonic stem cells toclinically relevant populations: lessons from embryonic development. Cell 132(4):661–680
Mousavi SH, Abroun S, Soleimani M, Mowla SJ (2018) 3-dimensional nano-fibre scaffold for ex vivo expansion of cord blood haematopoietic stem cells. Artif Cell Nanomed Biotechnol 46(4):740–748
Sabaghi F, Shamsasenjan K, Movasaghpour AA, Amirizadeh N, Nikougoftar M, Bagheri N (2016) Evaluation of human cord blood CD34+ hematopoietic stem cell differentiation to megakaryocyte on aminated PES nanofiber scaffold compare to 2-D culture system. Artif Cell Nanomed Biotechnol 44(4):1062–1068
Ventura MS, Ferreira W-D, Labude N, Bovi M, Hieronymus T, Zenke M, Schneider RK, Neurs S (2012) Cord blood-hematopoietic stem cell expansion in 3D fibrin scaffolds with stromal support. Biomaterials 33(29):6987–6997
Esfahani H, Jose R, Ramakrishna S (2017) Electrospun ceramic nanofiber mats today: synthesis, properties, and applications. Materials 10(11):1238
Tse JR, Engler AJ (2010) Preparation of hydrogel substrates with tunable mechanical properties. Curr Protoc Cell Biol 47(1):10.16.1-10.16.16
Huang H, Nakayama Y, Qin K, Yamamoto K, Ando J, Yamashita J, Itoh H, Kanda K, Yaku H, Okamoto Y et al (2005) Differentiation from embryonic stem cells to vascular wall cells under in vitro pulsatile flow loading. J Artif Organs 8(2):110–118
Lee E, Kim J, Kang Y, Shin J-W (2020) A platform for studying of the three-dimensional migration of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells. Tissue Eng Regen Med 17(1):25–31
Kim JE, Lee EJ, Yanru Wu, Kang YG, Shin J-W (2019) The combined effects of hierarchical scaffolds and mechanical stimuli on ex vivo expansion of haematopoietic stem/progenitor cells. Artif Cell Nanomed Biotechnol 47(1):585–592
Braham MVJ, Li ASP, Yim JG, Mateos MC, Minnema WJA, Dhert FC, Oner CR, Alblas J (2019) A human hematopoietic niche model supporting hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells in vitro. Adv Healthcare Mater 8(10):1801444
Bai T, Li J, Sinclair A, Imren S, Merriam F, Sun F, Mary Beth O, Kelly CN, Jain P, Delrow JJ et al (2019) Expansion of primitive human hematopoietic stem cells by culture in a zwitterionic hydrogel. Nat Med 25(10):1566–1575
Kang YG, Shin JW, Park SH, Kim YM, Seo Rin Gu, Yanru Wu, Ban HY, Shin J-W (2016) A three-dimensional hierarchical scaffold fabricated by a combined rapid proto-typing technique and electrospinning process to expand hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells. Biotechnol Lett 38(1):175–181
Pan X, Sun Q, Zhang Y, Cai H, Gao Y, Shen Y, Zhang W (2017) Biomimetic macroporous pcl scaffolds for ex vivo expansion of cord blood-derived cd34+ cells with feeder cells support. Macromol Biosci 17(8):1700054
Islami M, Mortazavi Y, Soleimani M, Nadri S (2018) In vitro expansion of cd 133+ cells derived from umbilical cord blood in poly-l-lactic acid (plla) scaffold coated with fibronectin and collagen. Artif Cell Nanomed Biotechnol 46(5):1025–1033
Darvish M, Payandeh Z, Soleimanifar F, Taheri B, Soleimani M, Islami M (2019) Umbilical cord blood mesenchymal stem cells application in hematopoietic stem cells expansion on nanofiber three-dimensional scaffold. J Cell Biochem 120(7):12018–12026
Eskandari F, Allahverdi A, Nasiri H, Azad M, Kalantari N, Soleimani M, Zare-Zardini H (2015) Nanofiber expansion of umbilical cord blood hematopoietic stem cells. Iran J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 5(4):170–178
Batnyam O, Shimizu H, Saito K, Ishida T, Suye S-I, Fujita S (2015) Biohybrid hematopoietic niche for expansion of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells by using geometrically controlled fibrous layers. RSC Adv 5:80357–80364
Sugimine Y, Niwa A, Matsubara H, Kobayashi K, Tabata Y, Heike T, Nakahata T, Saito MK (2016) A portable platform for stepwise hematopoiesis from human pluripotent stem cells within pet-reinforced collagen sponges. Int J Hematol 104(6):647–660
Shan W, Wang B, Yulin Xu, Li X, Li X, Huafang Wang Yu, Lin RT, Zhao Q, Wang J, Zheng W, Yongxian Hu, Shi J, Xiaohong Yu, Huang He (2020) Generation of hematopoietic cells from mouse pluripotent stem cells in a 3d culture system of self-assembling peptide hydrogel. J Cell Physiol 235(3):2080–2090
May-Simera HL, Kelley MW (2012) Cilia, wnt signaling, and the cytoskeleton. Cilia 1(1):7
Rydholm S, Zwartz G, Kowalewski JM, Kamali-Zare P, Frisk T, Brismar H (2010) Mechanical properties of primary cilia regulate the response to fluid flow. Am J Physiol-Renal Physiol 298(5):F1096–F1102
Jin X, Mohieldin AM, Muntean BS, Green JA, Shah JV, Mykytyn K, Nauli SM (2014) Cilioplasm is a cellular compartment for calcium signaling in response to mechanical and chemical stimuli. Cell Mol Life Sci 71(11):2165–2178
White CR, Frangos JA (2007) The shear stress of it all: the cell membrane and mechanochemical transduction. Philos Transac Royal Soc B: Biol Sci 362(1484):1459–1467
Butler B, Gao C, Mersich AT, Blystone SD (2006) Purified integrin adhesion complexes exhibit actin-polymerization activity. Curr Biol 16(3):242–251
Takai E, Landesberg R, Katz RW, Hung CT, Guo XE (2006) Substrate modulation of osteoblast adhesion strength, focal adhesion kinase activation, and responsiveness to mechanical stimuli. Mol Cell Biomech: MCB 3(1):1–12
Funding
This research was supported by Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81730008), Zhejiang Key R&D Program (Science and Technology Department) (Grant No. 2019C03016), Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. LQ19H080006), National Key R&D Program of China, Stem Cell and Translation Research (2018YFA0109300), Zhejiang Province Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars (LR19H080001), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (81870080, 91949115).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
HL and QL contributed equally to this work. Conceptualization and writing—original draft preparation, HHL and QL; Literature searching and summary, WS, SYC, RXT and YLX; Funding acquisition, YL and HH; Conceptualization, reviewing and editing, PXQ and HH. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Li, H., Luo, Q., Shan, W. et al. Biomechanical cues as master regulators of hematopoietic stem cell fate. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 78, 5881–5902 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-021-03882-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-021-03882-y