Abstract
The positivity bounds, derived from the axiomatic principles of quantum field theory (QFT), constrain the signs of Wilson coefficients and their linear combinations in the Standard Model Effective Field Theory (SMEFT). The precise determination of these bounds, however, can become increasingly difficult as more and more SM modes and oper- ators are taken into account. We study two approaches that aim at obtaining the full set of bounds for a given set of SM fields: 1) the traditional elastic positivity approach, which exploits the elastic scattering amplitudes of states with arbitrarily superposed helicities as well as other quantum numbers, and 2) the newly proposed extremal positivity approach, which constructs the allowed coefficient space directly by using the extremal representation of convex cones. Considering the electroweak gauge-bosons as an example, we demonstrate how the best analytical and numerical positivity bounds can be obtained in several ways. We further compare the constraining power and the efficiency of various approaches, as well as their applicability to more complex problems. While the new extremal approach is more constraining by construction, we also find that it is analytically easier to use, nu- merically much faster than the elastic approach, and much more applicable when more SM particle states and operators are taken into account. As a byproduct, we provide the best positivity bounds on the transversal quartic-gauge-boson couplings, required by the axiomatic principles of QFT, and show that they exclude ≈ 99.3% of the parameter space currently being searched at the LHC.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
B. Henning, X. Lu, T. Melia and H. Murayama, 2, 84, 30, 993, 560, 15456, 11962, 261485, . . . : higher dimension operators in the SM EFT, JHEP 08 (2017) 016 [Erratum ibid. 09 (2019) 019] [arXiv:1512.03433] [INSPIRE].
C.W. Murphy, Dimension-8 operators in the Standard Model effective field theory, JHEP 10 (2020) 174 [arXiv:2005.00059] [INSPIRE].
H.-L. Li, Z. Ren, J. Shu, M.-L. Xiao, J.-H. Yu and Y.-H. Zheng, Complete set of dimension-8 operators in the Standard Model effective field theory, arXiv:2005.00008 [INSPIRE].
C. Zhang and S.-Y. Zhou, Positivity bounds on vector boson scattering at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 095003 [arXiv:1808.00010] [INSPIRE].
Q. Bi, C. Zhang and S.-Y. Zhou, Positivity constraints on aQGC: carving out the physical parameter space, JHEP 06 (2019) 137 [arXiv:1902.08977] [INSPIRE].
B. Bellazzini and F. Riva, New phenomenological and theoretical perspective on anomalous Z Z and Z γ processes, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 095021 [arXiv:1806.09640] [INSPIRE].
G.N. Remmen and N.L. Rodd, Consistency of the Standard Model effective field theory, JHEP 12 (2019) 032 [arXiv:1908.09845] [INSPIRE].
G.N. Remmen and N.L. Rodd, Flavor constraints from unitarity and analyticity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 081601 [arXiv:2004.02885] [INSPIRE].
C. Zhang and S.-Y. Zhou, Convex geometry perspective on the (Standard Model) effective field theory space, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 201601 [arXiv:2005.03047] [INSPIRE].
B. Fuks, Y. Liu, C. Zhang and S.-Y. Zhou, Positivity in electron-positron scattering: testing the axiomatic quantum field theory principles and probing the existence of UV states, arXiv:2009.02212 [INSPIRE].
A. Adams, N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dubovsky, A. Nicolis and R. Rattazzi, Causality, analyticity and an IR obstruction to UV completion, JHEP 10 (2006) 014 [hep-th/0602178] [INSPIRE].
C. de Rham, S. Melville, A.J. Tolley and S.-Y. Zhou, Positivity bounds for scalar field theories, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 081702 [arXiv:1702.06134] [INSPIRE].
C. de Rham, S. Melville, A.J. Tolley and S.-Y. Zhou, UV complete me: positivity bounds for particles with spin, JHEP 03 (2018) 011 [arXiv:1706.02712] [INSPIRE].
T.N. Pham and T.N. Truong, Evaluation of the derivative quartic terms of the meson chiral Lagrangian from forward dispersion relation, Phys. Rev. D 31 (1985) 3027 [INSPIRE].
M.R. Pennington and J. Portoles, The chiral Lagrangian parameters, l1, l2, are determined by the ρ resonance, Phys. Lett. B 344 (1995) 399 [hep-ph/9409426] [INSPIRE].
B. Ananthanarayan, D. Toublan and G. Wanders, Consistency of the chiral pion pion scattering amplitudes with axiomatic constraints, Phys. Rev. D 51 (1995) 1093 [hep-ph/9410302] [INSPIRE].
J. Comellas, J.I. Latorre and J. Taron, Constraints on chiral perturbation theory parameters from QCD inequalities, Phys. Lett. B 360 (1995) 109 [hep-ph/9507258] [INSPIRE].
A.V. Manohar and V. Mateu, Dispersion relation bounds for ππ scattering, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 094019 [arXiv:0801.3222] [INSPIRE].
I. Low, R. Rattazzi and A. Vichi, Theoretical constraints on the Higgs effective couplings, JHEP 04 (2010) 126 [arXiv:0907.5413] [INSPIRE].
J.J. Sanz-Cillero, D.-L. Yao and H.-Q. Zheng, Positivity constraints on the low-energy constants of the chiral pion-nucleon Lagrangian, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 2763 [arXiv:1312.0664] [INSPIRE].
B. Bellazzini, Softness and amplitudes’ positivity for spinning particles, JHEP 02 (2017) 034 [arXiv:1605.06111] [INSPIRE].
N. Arkani-Hamed, T.-C. Huang and Y.-T. Huang, The EFT-hedron, arXiv:2012.15849 [INSPIRE].
C. de Rham, S. Melville, A.J. Tolley and S.-Y. Zhou, Positivity bounds for massive spin-1 and spin-2 fields, JHEP 03 (2019) 182 [arXiv:1804.10624] [INSPIRE].
C. de Rham, S. Melville, A.J. Tolley and S.-Y. Zhou, Massive Galileon positivity bounds, JHEP 09 (2017) 072 [arXiv:1702.08577] [INSPIRE].
D. Baumann, D. Green, H. Lee and R.A. Porto, Signs of analyticity in single-field inflation, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 023523 [arXiv:1502.07304] [INSPIRE].
B. Bellazzini, C. Cheung and G.N. Remmen, Quantum gravity constraints from unitarity and analyticity, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 064076 [arXiv:1509.00851] [INSPIRE].
C. Cheung and G.N. Remmen, Positive signs in massive gravity, JHEP 04 (2016) 002 [arXiv:1601.04068] [INSPIRE].
J. Bonifacio, K. Hinterbichler and R.A. Rosen, Positivity constraints for pseudolinear massive spin-2 and vector Galileons, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 104001 [arXiv:1607.06084] [INSPIRE].
M.-L. Du, F.-K. Guo, U.-G. Meißner and D.-L. Yao, Aspects of the low-energy constants in the chiral Lagrangian for charmed mesons, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 094037 [arXiv:1610.02963] [INSPIRE].
B. Bellazzini, F. Riva, J. Serra and F. Sgarlata, Beyond positivity bounds and the fate of massive gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 161101 [arXiv:1710.02539] [INSPIRE].
K. Hinterbichler, A. Joyce and R.A. Rosen, Massive spin-2 scattering and asymptotic superluminality, JHEP 03 (2018) 051 [arXiv:1708.05716] [INSPIRE].
B. Bellazzini, F. Riva, J. Serra and F. Sgarlata, The other effective fermion compositeness, JHEP 11 (2017) 020 [arXiv:1706.03070] [INSPIRE].
J. Bonifacio and K. Hinterbichler, Bounds on amplitudes in effective theories with massive spinning particles, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 045003 [arXiv:1804.08686] [INSPIRE].
B. Bellazzini, M. Lewandowski and J. Serra, Positivity of amplitudes, weak gravity conjecture, and modified gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 251103 [arXiv:1902.03250] [INSPIRE].
S. Melville and J. Noller, Positivity in the sky: constraining dark energy and modified gravity from the UV, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 021502 [Erratum ibid. 102 (2020) 049902] [arXiv:1904.05874] [INSPIRE].
S. Melville, D. Roest and D. Stefanyszyn, UV constraints on massive spinning particles: lessons from the gravitino, JHEP 02 (2020) 185 [arXiv:1911.03126] [INSPIRE].
C. de Rham and A.J. Tolley, Speed of gravity, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 063518 [arXiv:1909.00881] [INSPIRE].
L. Alberte, C. de Rham, A. Momeni, J. Rumbutis and A.J. Tolley, Positivity constraints on interacting spin-2 fields, JHEP 03 (2020) 097 [arXiv:1910.11799] [INSPIRE].
L. Alberte, C. de Rham, A. Momeni, J. Rumbutis and A.J. Tolley, Positivity constraints on interacting pseudo-linear spin-2 fields, JHEP 07 (2020) 121 [arXiv:1912.10018] [INSPIRE].
G. Ye and Y.-S. Piao, Positivity in the effective field theory of cosmological perturbations, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 421 [arXiv:1908.08644] [INSPIRE].
Y.-J. Wang, F.-K. Guo, C. Zhang and S.-Y. Zhou, Generalized positivity bounds on chiral perturbation theory, JHEP 07 (2020) 214 [arXiv:2004.03992] [INSPIRE].
L. Alberte, C. de Rham, S. Jaitly and A.J. Tolley, Positivity bounds and the massless spin-2 pole, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 125023 [arXiv:2007.12667] [INSPIRE].
Y.-T. Huang, J.-Y. Liu, L. Rodina and Y. Wang, Carving out the space of open-string S-matrix, arXiv:2008.02293 [INSPIRE].
J. Tokuda, K. Aoki and S. Hirano, Gravitational positivity bounds, JHEP 11 (2020) 054 [arXiv:2007.15009] [INSPIRE].
J. Distler, B. Grinstein, R.A. Porto and I.Z. Rothstein, Falsifying models of new physics via W W scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 041601 [hep-ph/0604255] [INSPIRE].
N. Arkani-Hamed, G.L. Kane, J. Thaler and L.-T. Wang, Supersymmetry and the LHC inverse problem, JHEP 08 (2006) 070 [hep-ph/0512190] [INSPIRE].
S. Dawson, S. Homiller and S.D. Lane, Putting Standard Model EFT fits to work, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 055012 [arXiv:2007.01296] [INSPIRE].
J. Gu and L.-T. Wang, Sum rules in the Standard Model effective field theory from helicity amplitudes, arXiv:2008.07551 [INSPIRE].
J. Ellis and S.-F. Ge, Constraining gluonic quartic gauge coupling operators with gg → γγ, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 041801 [arXiv:1802.02416] [INSPIRE].
S. Alioli, R. Boughezal, E. Mereghetti and F. Petriello, Novel angular dependence in Drell-Yan lepton production via dimension-8 operators, Phys. Lett. B 809 (2020) 135703 [arXiv:2003.11615] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Search for anomalous electroweak production of vector boson pairs in association with two jets in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 798 (2019) 134985 [arXiv:1905.07445] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Measurements of production cross sections of same-sign WW and WZ boson pairs in association with two jets in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, Tech. Rep. CMS-PAS-SMP-19-012, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland (2020).
CMS collaboration, Measurement of the cross section for electroweak production of a Z boson, a photon and two jets in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV and constraints on anomalous quartic couplings, JHEP 06 (2020) 076 [arXiv:2002.09902] [INSPIRE].
J. Ellis, S.-F. Ge, H.-J. He and R.-Q. Xiao, Probing the scale of new physics in the ZZγ coupling at e+ e− colliders, Chin. Phys. C 44 (2020) 063106 [arXiv:1902.06631] [INSPIRE].
J. Ellis, H.-J. He and R.-Q. Xiao, Probing new physics in dimension-8 neutral gauge couplings at e+ e− colliders, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 64 (2021) 221062 [arXiv:2008.04298] [INSPIRE].
M. Rauch, Vector-boson fusion and vector-boson scattering, arXiv:1610.08420 [INSPIRE].
A. Azatov, R. Contino, C.S. Machado and F. Riva, Helicity selection rules and noninterference for BSM amplitudes, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 065014 [arXiv:1607.05236] [INSPIRE].
Limits on anomalous triple and quartic gauge couplings webpage, https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMSPublic/PhysicsResultsSMPaTGC.
P. Azzi et al., Report from working group 1: Standard Model physics at the HL-LHC and HE-LHC, CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr. 7 (2019) 1 [arXiv:1902.04070] [INSPIRE].
O.J.P. Eboli, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia and J.K. Mizukoshi, pp → jje± μ± νν and jje± μ∓ νν at O(\( {\alpha}_{\mathrm{em}}^6 \)) and O(\( {\alpha}_{\mathrm{em}}^4{\alpha}_s^2 \)) for the study of the quartic electroweak gauge boson vertex at CERN LHC, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 073005 [hep-ph/0606118] [INSPIRE].
C. Degrande et al., Monte Carlo tools for studies of non-standard electroweak gauge boson interactions in multi-boson processes: a Snowmass white paper, in Community summer study 2013: Snowmass on the Mississippi, (2013) [arXiv:1309.7890] [INSPIRE].
O.J.P. Éboli and M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, Classifying the bosonic quartic couplings, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 093013 [arXiv:1604.03555] [INSPIRE].
B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek, Dimension-six terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian, JHEP 10 (2010) 085 [arXiv:1008.4884] [INSPIRE].
N.D. Christensen and C. Duhr, FeynRules — Feynman rules made easy, Comput. Phys. Commun. 180 (2009) 1614 [arXiv:0806.4194] [INSPIRE].
A. Alloul, N.D. Christensen, C. Degrande, C. Duhr and B. Fuks, FeynRules 2.0 — a complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 2250 [arXiv:1310.1921] [INSPIRE].
T. Hahn, Generating Feynman diagrams and amplitudes with FeynArts 3, Comput. Phys. Commun. 140 (2001) 418 [hep-ph/0012260] [INSPIRE].
T. Hahn and M. Pérez-Victoria, Automatized one loop calculations in four-dimensions and D-dimensions, Comput. Phys. Commun. 118 (1999) 153 [hep-ph/9807565] [INSPIRE].
D. Avis and K. Fukuda, A pivoting algorithm for convex hulls and vertex enumeration of arrangements and polyhedra, Discrete Comput. Geom. 8 (1992) 295.
D. Avis, lrs webpage, http://cgm.cs.mcgill.ca/∼avis/C/lrs.html.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 2009.04490
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Yamashita, K., Zhang, C. & Zhou, SY. Elastic positivity vs extremal positivity bounds in SMEFT: a case study in transversal electroweak gauge-boson scatterings. J. High Energ. Phys. 2021, 95 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2021)095
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2021)095