Abstract
Self-interacting massive particles with spin ≥ 1 unavoidably violate unitarity; the question is at what scale. For spin-1 the strong coupling scale (at which perturbative unitarity is lost) cannot be raised by any finite tuning of the interactions, while for spin-2 there exists a special tuning of the Wilson coefficients which can raise this scale (and enjoys numerous special properties such as ghost-freedom). Here, we fill in the missing piece by describing how the self-interactions of a massive spin-3/2 field, or “massive gravitino”, become strongly coupled at high energies. We show that while several different structures appear in the leading order potential, the strong coupling scale cannot be raised (in the absence of additional fields). At the level of the off-shell Lagrangian, it is always the non- linear symmetries of the longitudinal Stückelberg mode that dictate the strong coupling, and we show that in general it is only possible to parametrically raise the strong coupling scale if Wess-Zumino structures exist for these symmetries. We complement this off-shell approach with a first analysis of positivity bounds for a massive spin-3/2 particle, showing that any potential self-interaction which contributes to an on-shell 2-to-2 elastic process at tree level must vanish if this low-energy theory is to have a standard UV completion. We identify the mixing between the longitudinal mode and the transverse modes as the main obstacle to positivity, and clarify how the non-Abelian nature of non-linear (dRGT) massive gravity allows it to satisfy positivity where all known spin ≥ 3/2 Abelian theories fail. Our results imply that a massive gravitino cannot appear alone in a controlled EFT — it must be accompanied by other particles, e.g. as part of a supermultiplet. Together with the spin-1 and spin-2 cases, we suggest features which will persist in even higher spin massive theories.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
C. de Rham and G. Gabadadze, Generalization of the Fierz-Pauli action, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 044020 [arXiv:1007.0443] [INSPIRE].
C. de Rham, G. Gabadadze and A.J. Tolley, Resummation of massive gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 231101 [arXiv:1011.1232] [INSPIRE].
S. Folkerts, A. Pritzel and N. Wintergerst, On ghosts in theories of self-interacting massive spin-2 particles, arXiv:1107.3157 [INSPIRE].
K. Hinterbichler, Ghost-free derivative interactions for a massive graviton, JHEP 10 (2013) 102 [arXiv:1305.7227] [INSPIRE].
J. Bonifacio, K. Hinterbichler and R.A. Rosen, Constraints on a gravitational Higgs mechanism, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 084017 [arXiv:1903.09643] [INSPIRE].
W. Rarita and J. Schwinger, On a theory of particles with half integral spin, Phys. Rev. 60 (1941) 61 [INSPIRE].
S. Weinberg, Phenomenological Lagrangians, Physics A 96 (1979) 327.
A. Manohar and H. Georgi, Chiral quarks and the nonrelativistic quark model, Nucl. Phys. B 234 (1984) 189.
M. Porrati and R. Rahman, A model independent ultraviolet cutoff for theories with charged massive higher spin fields, Nucl. Phys. B 814 (2009) 370 [arXiv:0812.4254] [INSPIRE].
J. Bonifacio, Aspects of massive spin-2 effective field theories, Ph.D. thesis, University of Oxford, Oxford U.K. (2017).
B. Bellazzini, F. Riva, J. Serra and F. Sgarlata, Massive higher spins: effective theory and consistency, JHEP 10 (2019) 189 [arXiv:1903.08664] [INSPIRE].
K. Hinterbichler and A. Joyce, Goldstones with extended shift symmetries, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 23 (2014) 1443001 [arXiv:1404.4047] [INSPIRE].
J. Bonifacio, K. Hinterbichler and R.A. Rosen, Positivity constraints for pseudolinear massive spin-2 and vector Galileons, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 104001 [arXiv:1607.06084] [INSPIRE].
C. Cheung and G.N. Remmen, Positive signs in massive gravity, JHEP 04 (2016) 002 [arXiv:1601.04068] [INSPIRE].
C. de Rham, S. Melville, A.J. Tolley and S.-Y. Zhou, Positivity bounds for massive spin-1 and spin-2 fields, JHEP 03 (2019) 182 [arXiv:1804.10624] [INSPIRE].
B. Bellazzini, F. Riva, J. Serra and F. Sgarlata, Beyond positivity bounds and the fate of massive gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 161101 [arXiv:1710.02539] [INSPIRE].
C. de Rham, S. Melville and A.J. Tolley, Improved positivity bounds and massive gravity, JHEP 04 (2018) 083 [arXiv:1710.09611] [INSPIRE].
G. Velo and D. Zwanziger, Propagation and quantization of Rarita-Schwinger waves in an external electromagnetic potential, Phys. Rev. 186 (1969) 1337 [INSPIRE].
M. Porrati and R. Rahman, Causal propagation of a charged spin 3/2 field in an external electromagnetic background, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 025009 [arXiv:0906.1432] [INSPIRE].
N. Arkani-Hamed, H. Georgi and M.D. Schwartz, Effective field theory for massive gravitons and gravity in theory space, Annals Phys. 305 (2003) 96 [hep-th/0210184] [INSPIRE].
R. Casalbuoni et al., A gravitino-goldstino high-energy equivalence theorem, Phys. Lett. B 215 (1988) 313 [INSPIRE].
S.R. Coleman, J. Wess and B. Zumino, Structure of phenomenological Lagrangians. 1., Phys. Rev. 177 (1969) 2239 [INSPIRE].
C.G. Callan Jr., S.R. Coleman, J. Wess and B. Zumino, Structure of phenomenological Lagrangians. 2., Phys. Rev. 177 (1969) 2247 [INSPIRE].
D.V. Volkov, Phenomenological lagrangians, Fiz. Elem. Chast. Atom. Yadra 4 (1973) 3.
G. Goon, K. Hinterbichler, A. Joyce and M. Trodden, Galileons as Wess-Zumino terms, JHEP 06 (2012) 004 [arXiv:1203.3191] [INSPIRE].
R. Klein, D. Roest and D. Stefanyszyn, Spontaneously broken spacetime symmetries and the role of inessential Goldstones, JHEP 10 (2017) 051 [arXiv:1709.03525] [INSPIRE].
M. Fierz and W. Pauli, On relativistic wave equations for particles of arbitrary spin in an electromagnetic field, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 173 (1939) 211.
H. van Dam and M.J.G. Veltman, Massive and massless Yang-Mills and gravitational fields, Nucl. Phys. B 22 (1970) 397 [INSPIRE].
V.I. Zakharov, Linearized gravitation theory and the graviton mass, JETP Lett. 12 (1970) 312 [Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 12 (1970) 447] [INSPIRE].
K. Hinterbichler, Theoretical aspects of massive gravity, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84 (2012) 671 [arXiv:1105.3735] [INSPIRE].
A. Nicolis, R. Rattazzi and E. Trincherini, The galileon as a local modification of gravity, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 064036 [arXiv:0811.2197] [INSPIRE].
C. de Rham, Massive gravity, Living Rev. Rel. 17 (2014) 7 [arXiv:1401.4173] [INSPIRE].
E.A. Ivanov and V.I. Ogievetsky, The inverse Higgs phenomenon in nonlinear realizations, Teor. Mat. Fiz. 25 (1975) 164 [INSPIRE].
I. Low and A.V. Manohar, Spontaneously broken space-time symmetries and Goldstone’s theorem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 101602 [hep-th/0110285] [INSPIRE].
J. Goldstone, A. Salam and S. Weinberg, Broken symmetries, Phys. Rev. 127 (1962) 965 [INSPIRE].
J. Bonifacio and K. Hinterbichler, Bounds on amplitudes in effective theories with massive spinning particles, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 045003 [arXiv:1804.08686] [INSPIRE].
H.K. Dreiner, H.E. Haber and S.P. Martin, Two-component spinor techniques and Feynman rules for quantum field theory and supersymmetry, Phys. Rept. 494 (2010) 1 [arXiv:0812.1594] [INSPIRE].
S. Nagy, A. Padilla and I. Zavala, The super-Stückelberg procedure and dS in pure supergravity, arXiv:1910.14349 [INSPIRE].
D. Roest, P. Werkman and Y. Yamada, Internal supersymmetry and small-field goldstini, JHEP 05 (2018) 190 [arXiv:1710.02480] [INSPIRE].
D. Roest, D. Stefanyszyn and P. Werkman, An algebraic classification of exceptional EFTs, JHEP 08 (2019) 081 [arXiv:1903.08222] [INSPIRE].
L. Alberte et al., Positivity constraints on interacting spin-2 fields, arXiv:1910.11799 [INSPIRE].
A. Adams et al., Causality, analyticity and an IR obstruction to UV completion, JHEP 10 (2006) 014 [hep-th/0602178] [INSPIRE].
A. Jenkins and D. O’Connell, The story of O: positivity constraints in effective field theories, hep-th/0609159 [INSPIRE].
A. Adams, A. Jenkins and D. O’Connell, Signs of analyticity in fermion scattering, arXiv:0802.4081 [INSPIRE].
A. Nicolis, R. Rattazzi and E. Trincherini, Energy’s and amplitudes’ positivity, JHEP 05 (2010) 095 [Erratum ibid. 11 (2011) 128] [arXiv:0912.4258] [INSPIRE].
B. Bellazzini, L. Martucci and R. Torre, Symmetries, sum rules and constraints on effective field theories, JHEP 09 (2014) 100 [arXiv:1405.2960] [INSPIRE].
B. Bellazzini, C. Cheung and G.N. Remmen, Quantum gravity constraints from unitarity and analyticity, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 064076 [arXiv:1509.00851] [INSPIRE].
D. Baumann, D. Green, H. Lee and R.A. Porto, Signs of analyticity in single-field inflation, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 023523 [arXiv:1502.07304] [INSPIRE].
B. Bellazzini, Softness and amplitudes’ positivity for spinning particles, JHEP 02 (2017) 034 [arXiv:1605.06111] [INSPIRE].
C. de Rham, S. Melville, A.J. Tolley and S.-Y. Zhou, Positivity bounds for scalar field theories, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 081702 [arXiv:1702.06134] [INSPIRE].
C. de Rham, S. Melville, A.J. Tolley and S.-Y. Zhou, Massive galileon positivity bounds, JHEP 09 (2017) 072 [arXiv:1702.08577] [INSPIRE].
C. de Rham, S. Melville, A.J. Tolley and S.-Y. Zhou, UV complete me: positivity bounds for particles with spin, JHEP 03 (2018) 011 [arXiv:1706.02712] [INSPIRE].
B. Bellazzini, M. Lewandowski and J. Serra, Amplitudes’ positivity, weak gravity conjecture and modified gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 251103 [arXiv:1902.03250] [INSPIRE].
R. Rahman, Higher spin theory — Part I, PoS(Modave VIII)004 [arXiv:1307.3199] [INSPIRE].
A. Aubert, Strong coupling in massive gravity by direct calculation, Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 087502 [hep-th/0312246].
H. Georgi, Vector realization of chiral symmetry, Nucl. Phys. B 331 (1990) 311.
G.F. Giudice, C. Grojean, A. Pomarol and R. Rattazzi, The strongly-interacting light Higgs, JHEP 06 (2007) 045 [hep-ph/0703164].
M. T. Grisaru and H. N. Pendleton, Soft spin 3/2 fermions require gravity and supersymmetry, Phys. Lett. B 67 (1977) 323.
F. Farakos, C. Germani and A. Kehagias, On ghost-free supersymmetric galileons, JHEP 11 (2013) 045 [arXiv:1306.2961] [INSPIRE].
H. Elvang, M. Hadjiantonis, C.R.T. Jones and S. Paranjape, On the supersymmetrization of galileon theories in four dimensions, Phys. Lett. B 781 (2018) 656 [arXiv:1712.09937] [INSPIRE].
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
ArXiv ePrint: 1911.03126
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Melville, S., Roest, D. & Stefanyszyn, D. UV constraints on massive spinning particles: lessons from the gravitino. J. High Energ. Phys. 2020, 185 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2020)185
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2020)185