Abstract
The current study describes a straightforward, biologically and environmentally friendly method for creating magnetic iron oxide (γ-Fe2O3) nanoparticles. We report here that the Bacillus subtilis SE05 strain, isolated from offshore formation water near Zaafarana, the Red Sea, Hurghada, Egypt, can produce highly magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles of the maghemite type (γ-Fe2O3). To the best of our knowledge, the ability of this bacterium to reduce Fe2O3 has yet to be demonstrated. As a result, this study reports on the fabrication of enzyme-NPs and the biological immobilization of α-amylase on a solid support. The identified strain was deposited in GenBank with accession number MT422787. The bacterial cells used for the synthesis of magnetic nanoparticles produced about 15.2 g of dry weight, which is considered a high quantity compared to the previous studies. The XRD pattern revealed the crystalline cubic spinel structure of γ-Fe2O3. TEM micrographs showed the spherically shaped IONPs had an average size of 7.68 nm. Further, the importance of protein-SPION interaction and the successful synthesis of stabilized SPIONs in the amylase enzyme hybrid system are also mentioned. The system showed the applicability of these nanomaterials in biofuel production, which demonstrated significant production (54%) compared to the free amylase enzyme (22%). Thus, it is predicted that these nanoparticles can be used in energy fields.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Extensive research has been completed to explore the possible ways in which the enzymes can be exploited for biotechnological and environmental applications1. However, using free enzymes only shows some significant drawbacks, such as thermal instability, susceptibility to attack by proteases, activity inhibition, high sensitivity to numerous denaturing agents, and the impracticality of separating and reusing free catalysts at the end of the reaction1. A number of techniques are employed for avoiding these limitations and to improve the enzyme features and stability to be used under industrially relevant conditions.
The well-investigated procedure includes enzyme immobilization to improve storage of the enzymes2,3. Enzymes are immobilized on a solid support by surface-reactive functional groups4. Several nanoparticle-based supports, such as Au, Cu, silica, and others, have been utilized for the immobilization of different enzymes5,6. Immobilized enzymes have the advantage of a wider pH range, improved thermal stability, increased enzyme activity, easy separation from the solution, and simple support regeneration, making them suitable as industrial catalysts1. Along with the above-discussed benefits, immobilization of the enzyme on magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) offers the extra benefits of biocompatibility, colloidal stability, superparamagnetic nature (high magnetization), easy magnetic separation, and recycling. The performance of an immobilized enzyme is governed by the structure and character of the carrier materials7,8,9,10. The use of MNPs in the industry provides a high surface area, which is advantageous for the high binding efficiency, increases the reaction rate, diminishes toxicity, lessens mass transfer resistance, and finally reduces fouling9,11.
One of the most important industrial processes is the hydrolysis of starch into low-molecular-weight sugars with higher economic values12,13. α-amylase or glycoside hydrolase hydrolyzes starch, glycogen, and relevant polysaccharides by cleaving the internal a-1, 4-glycosidic bonds in a random fashion14. These products are of considerable interest for industrial applications. α -amylase is in high demand in a variety of industries, including food, textiles, paper, the detergent industry, and medicinal applications1. Nowadays, the need for alternative fuel is a must as a consequence of the increasing price and depletion of crude oil and other non-renewable fossil fuels. Upon so doing, bio-ethanol was found to be the most common biofuel among the total biofuels, representing about 90%15. Seeking for an economically available substrate for bio-ethanol production, researchers found that starch was one of the best sources for biomass conversion through fermentation, where about 60% of bio-ethanol is produced16. In the light of such demand, crop residues plus biomass wastes were estimated to be the cheapest source for fermentation processes as renewable resources17. Furthermore, some countries established light gasoline, which began with 5% bioethanol in gasoline composition18.
There are very few studies dealing with the immobilization of enzymes on magnetic nanoparticles. Among these studies, Meridor and Gedanken describe an attempt to fabricate water-soluble-α-amylase nanoparticles (NPs) in a one-step sonochemical process1. The high thermal stability of this enzyme makes it suitable for NPs preparation. A solid surface was used to immobilize the newly formed NPs enzyme with a spherical morphology. Dhavale and his co-workers optimized the immobilization of α-amylase on chitosan-coated Fe3O4 MNPs (AMNPs) by varying enzyme concentration and incubation time4. Furthermore, the immobilized α-amylase was tested for starch hydrolysis under various physicochemical conditions, and its activity was compared to that of the free enzyme.
While Ajinkya and his team reported that γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles have gained technological importance due to their magnetic and catalytic properties19, iron oxide nanoparticles (IONPs) with a small size of about 10–20 nm have a wide range of significant applications in electronics20, biomedicine21, energy22,23. The ability of the B. subtilis bacterium to reduce Fe2O3 is yet to be demonstrated. Therefore, the present study, aimed at developing a biological synthetic route for the cost-effective, non-toxic production of iron oxide nanoparticles through the use of a newly isolated B. subtilis, is believed to be highly promising. Having efficient, unconventional, and time-safe recycling tools for maximum starch fermentation in terms of nanomagnetic amylase in order to obtain bioethanol was also investigated.
Results and discussion
Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (MIONPs) synthesis by isolated bacteria was evaluated visually by the colour change to the brown or black solution. Positive results found among three isolates out of thirteen recovered from different sources sediments (El-Hamra Lake, Wadi El-Natrun; Zafarana-offshore, Red Sea; Gabal El-Zeit-off shore, Red Sea; Ras Gemsha reef, Red Sea; North Geisum island reef, Red Sea, Hurghada) and formation waters (Gabal El-Zeit-off shore, Red Sea; Zafarana-offshore, Red Sea) (Fig. 1).
A promising isolate that synthesized magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (MIONPs) through colour change to a dark solution was characterized as Gram + ve rod-shaped. The isolated bacterium from formation water (Zafarana-offshore, Red Sea) was identified as Bacillus subtilis SE05 based on 16S rRNA sequence that showed 100% similarity to Bacillus subtilis strain NPPS5 (accession number MT383652.1) and Bacillus subtilis strain PZ-27 (MT184839.1). Accordingly, the sequence was deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) GeneBank under the accession number MT422787 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MT422787). The phylogenetic tree of the 16S rRNA of Bacillus subtilis SE05 with its relation to the available sequences on the NCBI GenBank database illustrated in Fig. 2. This tree is important tool for organizing knowledge of biological diversity. It contains a lot of information about the inferred evolutionary relationships and communicates hypothesized evolutionary relationships among nested groups of taxa (monophyletic groups) that are supported by shared traits known as synapomorphies. The phylogenetic tree analysis can serve as the foundation for "evolutionary synthetic biology," which helps us better understand the evolution of cellular pathways, macromolecular machines, and other emergent properties of early life.
The identified strain Bacillus subtilis SE05 was cultured in nutrient broth (NB) at pH 7 and 30 °C under shaken growth conditions 24 h. Around one gram bacterial cells were used to synthesize magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (MIONPs) that appeared as a black powder dispersed in solution (Fig. 3). The MIONPs produced were purified using an external magnet. It was noticed that after 24 h of incubation, Bacillus subtilis SE05 synthesized an average of 15.2 g/L dried black powder.
Bacillus subtilis has been reported previously for silver and gold nanoparticle synthesis by both extracellular and intracellular means. Moreover, Bacillus subtilis strains isolated from rhizosphere soil succeeded in IONPs production24. This successful synthesis of stabilized Fe3O4 NPs capped by organic molecules allows the bulk synthesis of IONPs by the isolated Bacillus subtilis strain. Also, Wu and his colleagues25 reported that the bacterium Actinobacter sp. was capable of synthesizing γ-Fe2O3NPs with the help of Bharde and his co-workers26 under aerobic conditions when reacted with a ferric chloride precursor. However, the ability of Bacillus subtilis bacterium to reduce Fe2O3 has yet to be demonstrated. The expected mechanism used by the bacterium to reduce Fe2O3 and the end product of this reduction may be as follows: According to the current paradigm, dissimilatory iron-reducing bacteria (DIRB) and sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) activity results in the accumulation of a variety of reactive iron oxides, hydroxides, and sulphides as respiratory end products.
Therefore the present work described for the first time the capability of this strain at developing a biological synthetic route for the cost-effective production of γ-Fe2O3 iron oxide nanoparticles that are believed to be highly promising.
X-ray diffraction analysis of functionalized γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles
The structural and crystalline nature of the synthesized MIONPs was examined using X-ray diffraction analysis. The peak position and relative intensity of the reflection peaks of the XRD pattern of Fe2O3 (Fig. 4) confirm the crystalline cubic spinel structure of the γ-Fe2O3. The average grain size of the MIONPs nanoparticles calculated from the characteristic peaks at 21.409°, 29.720°, and 35.043° was ∼17 nm. These peaks for γ-Fe2O3 are corresponding to the lattice planes (hkl) < 210 >, < 211 >, and < 311 >, respectively. XRD data obtained in this study is well-matched with that reported by Ruíz-Baltazar and his co-workers27 and Guivar and his colleagues28 who confirmed the presence of the main diffraction peak in all patterns associated to γ-Fe2O3 phase is at 2θ = 35.5°. There are two additional peaks located at 23.77° (210) and 26.10° (211) in the XRD pattern associated with the γ-Fe2O3 phase. These intensities can be used to differentiate between the magnetite and maghemite phases29,30.
FTIR analysis of functionalized γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles
The FT-IR spectrum of biosynthesized γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles demonstrated a strong absorption band at 585.6145 cm−1 due to the stretching vibration of Fe–O bonds between 850 and 400 cm−1. The peaks around 3441.5520 and 3194.2283 cm−1 appeared in the spectrum correspond to the O–H group where bands between 3200 and ~ 3600 cm−1 assigned for the organic functional group of hydroxyl (O–H) or –NH groups of phenols, alcohols, or carboxylic acids. One peak appeared at 1659.2419 cm−1 for the carbonyl group (C=O); peaks between 1730 and 1625 cm−1 match C=O stretch due to the capping of carboxylic acid. Finally, one peak at 1136.2414 cm−1 assigned to C–O stretching of the primary alcoholic group while the presence of C–O Stretch in between 1300 and 1000 cm−1 may be due to the covalent linking of ester or ether groups to the nanoparticle. Taking that into consideration, these functional groups on the surface functioned as surface coating and stabilizing agents. The net results of the FT-IR analysis (Fig. 5) in this study matches well the previously mentioned by Sundaram and his colleagues24 there were certain organic compounds that contain O–H, C=O, C–O, N–H groups act as a capping agent in the biosynthesized γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles.
Morphology and size determination of functionalized γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles using TEM
Further analysis of the produced γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles was carried out by Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM). The image described the morphology of the nano-sized γ-Fe2O3 particles that showed a spherical shape nature with an average size of 7.68 nm determined from the size distribution histogram (Fig. 6).
The difference in the crystallite size calculated from X-ray diffraction about 17 nm and the size obtained from TEM of 7.68 nm is because of the several crystallization domains of particles detected by X-rays while the whole particle with TEM. In good agreement with the results obtained, Bharde and his co-workers previously succeeded in synthesizing two types of iron-based magnetic nanoparticles using the bacterium Actinobacter sp.: maghemite (γ-Fe2O3) and greigite (Fe3S4) under ambient conditions, depending on the nature of the precursor's used26. The bacterium synthesized γ-Fe2O3 when it reacted with ferric chloride and iron sulfide when exposed to the aqueous solution of ferric chloride-ferrous sulfate, and the average particle size was found to be 19 nm26.
Magnetic studies of functionalized γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles using VSM
The γ-Fe2O3 particles can exhibit unusual magnetic behaviors at the nanometer size scale that are reasonably different from those of bulk ones. These magnetic properties were dependent on the morphology and crystal structure of the sample31. The magnetic properties of the synthesized γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles were studied using VSM (Fig. 7). The magnetic hysteresis loops of γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles in the applied magnetic field sweeping from − 20,000 to 20,000 KOe showed much-closed loops with 51.989 emu/g saturation magnetization (Ms). These closed hysteresis loops resulted in small coercivity (Hci) (74.628 Oe) and retentivity (Mr) (5.8005 emu/g) providing good quality of the superparamagnetic property. Moreover, γ-Fe2O3 NPs showed superparamagnetic characteristics as expected and previously mentioned by Wu and his colleagues25.
The small hysteresis loop and low coercivity observed from the analysis of the γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles confirming the small particle size as mentioned previously by Rafi and his co-workers31.
Purity study on functionalized γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles using EDX analysis
The purity of the synthesized γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles was examined by Energy Dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis. EDX spectral analysis appeared in Fig. 8 reveals the presence of sodium, silicon, sulfur, oxygen, and iron in the synthesized γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles with mass % 5.37 ± 0.28, 0.71 ± 0.08, 1.93 ± 0.10, 36.63 ± 0.40, and 55.36 ± 0.74, respectively. The purity of the metal oxide (FeO) produced was 91.99%. The appearance of these peaks in EDX spectra is due to the functional groups of the capping agents through the biological synthesis.
Zero and in-field Mössbauer spectroscopy of functionalized γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles
Maghemite and magnetite nanoparticles cannot be distinguished from one another by X-ray powder diffraction; hence, Mössbauer spectroscopy was used to do so. Both experimental and analytical spectra are shown in Fig. 9 and Table 1.
It can be seen from Fig. 9 that a six-line spectrum and sub-spectra appear in the Mössbauer field, demonstrating that the sample is magnetic. In good accordance with the results obtained and the previously published Mössbauer Spectroscopic Analysis32 that found the isomer shift (δ = 0.40 mm/s), quadrupole splitting (QS = 0.72 mm/s), line width (0.49), and hyperfine field (497.2 KOe) of the standard Mössbauer spectrum of γ-Fe2O3 samples for octahedral coordination, B site, and 0.2 mm/s, 0.59 mm/s, 0.44, and 497.3 KOe for tetrahedral coordination, A site, respectively. To the best of our knowledge, the isomer shift (δ) movement of Fe3+ is commonly around 0.40 mm/s; therefore, according to the Mössbauer parameters in Table 1, we can define that the valence of iron in all samples is + 3. The γ-Fe2O3 sample presented in Fig. 9 has four sets of Mössbauer parameters at 300 K and typically comprises two types of iron atoms in tetrahedral and octahedral configurations. Subspectrum 4 with a regular energy shift (δ) of 0.367 mm/s may result from iron atoms located in an octahedron inside the crystal lattice. Subspectrum 3 with a regular energy shift (δ) of 0.319 mm/s may originate from iron atoms occupying tetrahedral positions in the crystal lattice. Subspectrum 2 with a regular energy shift (δ) of 0.466 mm/s may be derived from iron atoms on the surface of the lattice. These parameters are close to those of the bulk γ-Fe2O3 sample. While the double-line peaks in the spectrum 1 (δ = 0.359) may be attributed to the sample containing a limited number of extremely small-sized nanoparticles with superparamagnetic properties.
Functionalized γ-Fe2O3-amylase enzyme hybrid system preparation
γ-Fe2O3-amylase enzyme hybrid system prepared using the characterized synthesized γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles and amylase enzyme. The fabrication of the hybrid system was confirmed using TEM and FTIR analyses (Fig. 10).
The FTIR pattern of the immobilized amylase enzyme onto a γ-Fe2O3 surface was examined and compared to the FTIR pattern of the γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles only (Table 2). The hybrid pattern consolidated the existence of new functional groups not appeared in FTIR of the nanoparticles at a wavenumber of 2913.63, 1315.77, 1061.86, and finally 705.21 cm−1 those corresponding to the C–H or N–H, S=O, S=O, and Fe–O functional groups not found in the FTIR pattern of nanoparticles only. Taking into consideration that the biological synthesis of magnetic nanoparticles allows many functional groups on the surface that functioned as a surface coating, shape controllers, and stabilizing agents which confirmed by the FTIR analysis performed during the study for magnetic nanoparticles (O–H, N–H, C=O, C–O, Fe–O) only (Fig. 5) and synthesized γ-Fe2O3 -amylase enzyme hybrid system (O–H, N–H or C-H, C=C or N–H, S=O, C=C, Fe–O) (Fig. 10).
These function groups facilitate the bonding with the nanoparticles. This concept was confirmed by Guivar and his co-workers who stated that capping agents such as fatty acids form a protective monolayer, where carboxylate (R–COO −) groups are strongly bonded to the γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles surface28.
Reaction mixture yield course time
Optimum incubation period for maximum amylase activity produced by Bacillus subtilis SE05 and administered as γ-Fe2O3-amylase enzyme hybrid achieved after 90 min incubation, the maximum amylase activity was 592.92 U/mg (Fig. 11).
Cycling of functionalized γ-Fe2O3-amylase enzyme hybrid
As demonstrated in Fig. 12, the nano-amylase was recycled for 9 cycles. Maximum specific activity was approximately 169.63 U/mg, followed by gradual decline pattern retaining about 50% of activity (76.73 U/mg) with cycle no. 5.
Likely, Baskar and his colleagues have found that α -amylase MNPs has kept about 65% of its initial activity till cycle no. 6th of potato starch hydrolysis at optimum condition33. However, Dhavale and his co-workers have reported the stability of amylase magnetic nanoparticles (AMNPs) activity till 5th cycle and potential recycling for 20 times keeping 79% of its initial activity4.
Bioethanol production
Purified amylase isozymes of Bacillus subtilis SE05 in a shape of γ-Fe2O3-amylase enzyme hybrid directly administered to degrade glucose backbone presenting in starch in order to produce soluble sugar that could be used in bioethanol fermentation media. As indicated in Table 3, weighing starch (1.8 g/l) was enzymatically hydrolyzed by γ-Fe2O3-amylase hybrid giving 3.04 U/μg amylase in 90 min giving 10.4 g of soluble sugar. About 54% of such byproduct was converted by baker yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) to bioethanol, representing about 2.89 (g/g/L), nevertheless, although the same weight of starch was hydrolyzed by free amylase giving 2.74 (U/μg amylase) and producing (9.4 g) soluble sugar, only 22% of those soluble sugars were converted by baker yeast to bioethanol (1.06 g/g/L).
Such results implied that the conversion efficiency of the γ-Fe2O3 -amylase hybrid was twice that of the free ones in the case of sequential fermentation, where amylase byproducts were added to yeast cultures for fermentation in a separate step. Notably, non-significant results were obtained from direct incubation of starch with yeast (Saccharomyces cerviceae) only for 48 h as well as incubation of starch with nano-immobilized amylase and yeast as a batch for 48 h in terms of simultaneous fermentation.
The most likely explanation of such a case is that free-adding soluble sugar to yeast culture without any nano-material could exert an osmotic pressure on yeast cells, providing a stress condition that creates what is called feedback inhibition for glucoamylase34,35. On the other hand, adding nanomagnetic amylase combined with soluble sugars to yeast cultures might help reduce the pressure on yeast cells by aiding the yeast cells metabolize and convert the sugars to bioethanol more efficiently in a sense of a quick fermentation process, in other words, nourishing the yeast cells growth34.
The current study indicated that sequential fermentation (Seq. F) gave the highest conversion rate (52%), compared to simultaneous fermentation (SF). Such a finding contradicts the finding of Larrea and his team, who reported that SF is much better than Seq. F for high bioethanol yield18. Shanavas and his co-workers have found that the maximum ethanol yield was 0.11 g/g36, which is lower than the maximum ethanol yield in the current study (2.89 g/g/L), yet is a lower value than other reported ones35,36. Bearing in mind that 3.04 U per μg of immobilized amylase-specific activity has provided such value, adding more immobilized amylase isozymes to starch would raise the yield of bioethanol. Vesna and his colleagues have supported that, who mentioned that adding more amylases to high starch content would result in a higher ethanol yield37.
Qualitative measurement of bio-ethanol by GC –Mass analysis
The bioethanol product was confirmed qualitatively using GC-Mass by matching the ethanol peak resulted from fermented sugar solution using nano-amylase hybrid plus commercial yeast (Saccharomyces cerviceae) at RT 1.728 min as shown in Fig. 13a and the given control one at RT 1.731 min (Fig. 13b).
Conclusion
Discovering novel magnetic nanoparticles in terms of their unique characteristics and features is a matter of interest. Furthermore, the high potential for producing bio-ethanol as a biofuel from starch using immobilized amylase as a γ-Fe2O3—amylase hybrid with highly specific activity and a recyclable option provides a cost-effective and environmentally friendly way to manage starch-rich wastes.
Materials and methods
Isolation sites
Mesophilic iron-reducing bacteria were isolated from different growth niches such as sediment and water collected from El-Hamra Lake, Wadi El-Natrun; Zafarana offshore, Red Sea; Gabal El-Zeit offshore, Red Sea; Ras Gemsha reef, Red Sea; North Geisum island reef, Red Sea, Hurghada sediments and Gabal El-Zeit offshore, Red Sea; Zafarana offshore, Red Sea formation waters.
Bacteriological media
Medium composition is given in gL−1 unless otherwise stated. The medium was prepared with seawater and sterilized by autoclaving at 121 °C for 20 min. Isolation was performed on YSG agar medium, which contained yeast extract (2), glucose (1), soluble starch (2), and agar (20); the pH was adjusted to 3 with 1 M H2SO438. Nutrient agar medium (Oxoid) was used for screening and seed culture preparation and was composed of peptone (5); beef extract (3); and NaCl, 5. Before solidifying with 20 g agar the pH was adjusted to 7 with NaOH39. Bioethanol production medium consisting of (g/l): peptone, 20; yeast extract, 10; and pH 5.5.
Bacterial isolation
Each sample (1 mL) was dispensed in flasks containing 100 mL of YSG agar medium broth and incubated at 30ºC. The isolation from sediment samples was performed using the serial dilution technique40. One milliliter from each flask was used to inoculate agar plates. Plates were incubated at 30 degrees Celsius. Colonies were picked up and purified using the classical purification techniques.
Iron substrate
Salt solutions (1 mM) of ferrous sulphate heptahydrate (FeSO4.7H2O) (Nice Chemicals, Egypt) and ferric chloride anhydrous, 98% extra pure (FeCl3) (LOBA Chemie, India) were purchased of analytical grade and prepared using deionized water.
Screening for MIONPs producers
The ability of pure culture isolates to synthesize iron oxide nanoparticles was investigated by a grown-up in a 250-mL Erlenmeyer flask containing 100 mL of nutrient broth medium with continuous shaking on a rotary shaker (150 rpm) at 30 °C for 24 h. Salt solutions of FeCl3 and FeSO4.7H2O were prepared (10−3 M) and mixed with the whole culture. The entire mixture was kept on a rotary shaker at 30 °C and150 rpm. The reaction was permitted to continue for a period of 24 h. The biotransformed solution was observed by the colour transformation to black.
Bacterial identification
A partial 16S rDNA fragment of the proposed strain was amplified using universal primers. The forward primer (F27) was AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG, and the reverse primer (R1429) was CGGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT, while the standard PCR protocol was used in the following conditions: denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of 3 segments, including denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing at 65 °C for 30 s and elongation at 72 °C for 1 min, the end of the program was the final extension at 72 °C for 7 min. The resultant PCR product was sent to LGC Company in Germany for sequencing41. The bacterial strain used in this study was maintained in glycerol culture at −80 °C. For experimentation purposes, an aliquot of glycerol culture was cultivated on Nutrient Broth (NB) medium (LAB M, United Kingdom) and maintained at 37 °C.
MIONPs biosynthesis
Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (MIONPs) were prepared based on biological synthesis. In a typical synthesis, 50 mM of ferrous sulphate (FeSO4·7H2O) substrate was inoculated with 1 g of cells of the identified isolate. The mixture was incubated and kept at 37 °C under shaken conditions at 150 rpm. Incubation time continued for 24 h to allow the growth of the NPs. The biotransformed solution was observed visually by the colour change to brown or black. An external magnet was used to separate the MIONPs produced. The MPs were washed three times with distilled water for further experiments.
MIONPs characterization
The phase purity of the prepared samples was characterized by X-ray diffraction using a Bruker XRD-D2 Phaser (Bruker, Germany) X-ray diffractometer with Cu Kα radiations operated at a voltage of 30 kV and a current of 10 mA. The average particle size was estimated by using the Scherer formula: D = 0.9λ β cos θ Where λ is the X-ray wavelength (0.1541 nm), β is the FWHM (full width at half), θ is the diffraction angle, and D is the diameter size of the crystallite. The Mössbauer spectrum of CaFeO3-δ sample at room temperature was obtained using a conventional 57Fe constant acceleration spectrometer with 57Co (embedded in rhodium matrix) radioactive source. The Fourier transmission infrared (FTIR) spectra of the nanoparticles were recorded using a Fourier transmission infrared spectrometer (Bruker Tensor 37) in the range of 3500 to 500 cm−1. The morphology and size of the nanoparticles were studied using a transmission electron microscope (TEM). A Lakeshore 7410 vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) was used to get the magnetic properties of the MIONPs. The purity of the synthesized nanoparticles was determined by energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis using a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Jeol JSM-IT 200).
MIONPs-amylase enzyme hybrid system preparation
The MIONPs -amylase enzyme hybrid system was prepared by mixing 100 mg of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (MIONPs) with 100 mL of amylase enzyme solution for 15 min at room temperature, then allowing it to settle overnight in the refrigerator. The hybrid system was extracted using an external magnet, washed, and dried. TEM and FTIR were used to characterize the newly formed hybrid system42,43.
MIONPs application in biofuel production
Bioethanol production
Starch with ratio of 1.8% (w/v) was used for hydrolysis by amylase isozymes produced by Bacillus subtilis SE05 and semi-purified to their homogeneity by ammonium sulfate precipitation (data not shown) in both status (free and immobilized). The resulted byproduct in terms of soluble sugar was measured by DNS methods as described before, where those sugars were provided to bioethanol production medium44, in addition to inoculum size of 3 ml Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture. Then, the mixed culture was fermented at 30 °C for 48 h. Rotary evaporator was run at 50 °C seeking for evaporated ethanol from fermented medium. Dichromate assay as described by Yoswathana45 was applied for ethanol yield determination. Standard curve in range from 2 to 20% was plotted for slope deduction.
GC-mass analysis
The qualitative analysis of bioethanol was conducted by a GC-mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific TSQ 9000–1 triple quadrupole GC–MS,) with the Chromeleon 7, Version 7.2.10, Thermo Fisher Scientific mass spectrometry software was worked according to procedure of Suleiman46. The standard curve was plotted with standard of different ethanol concentration from 10 to 30%. The concentration of ethanol was estimated with internal standard value of ethanol analysis by GC-Mass. The ethanol was identified with retention times (RT) and peak range.
Statistical analysis
All experiments were performed in triplicates. Statistical evaluation of data as the mean ± SE was performed, plotted, and calculated using Origin Pro 8.1. The significant values were determined at P-value < 0.05.
Data availability
The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. The Bacillus subtilis SE05 sequence was deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) GeneBank under the Accession Number MT422787 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MT422787).
References
Meridor, D. & Gedanken, A. Preparation of enzyme nanoparticles and studying the catalytic activity of the immobilized nanoparticles on polyethylene films. Ultrason Sonochem. 20(1), 425–431 (2013).
Talebi, M., Vaezifar, S., Jafary, F., Fazilati, M. & Motamedi, S. Stability improvement of immobilized a-amylase using nano pore zeolite. Iran. J. Biotechnol. 14, 33–38 (2016).
Robinson, P. K. Enzymes: Principles and biotechnological applications. Essays Biochem. 59, 1–41 (2015).
Dhavale, R. P. et al. α-amylase immobilized on magnetic nanoparticles: reusable robust nano-biocatalyst for starch hydrolysis. Mater. Res. Express. 5, 075403 (2018).
Seino, S. et al. Enzyme immobilization on gold/Fe-oxide composite nanoparticles using a methionine tag. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 459, 298–301 (2014).
Li, Z. et al. An enzyme–copper nanoparticle hybrid catalyst prepared from disassembly of an enzyme–inorganic nanocrystal three dimensional nanostructure. RSC Adv. 6, 20772–20776 (2016).
Sohrabi, N., Rasouli, N. & Torkzadeh, M. Enhanced stability and catalytic activity of immobilized α-amylase on modified Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Chem. Eng. J. 240, 426–433 (2014).
Hosseinipour, S. L., Khiabani, M. S., Hamishehkar, H. & Salehi, R. Enhanced stability and catalytic activity of immobilized α-amylase on modified Fe3O4 nanoparticles for potential application in food industries. J. Nanoparticle Res. 17, 382 (2015).
Waifalkar, P. P. et al. Immobilization of invertase on chitosan coated γ-Fe2O3 magnetic nanoparticles to facilitate magnetic separation. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 482, 159–164 (2016).
Galli, M. et al. Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles functionalized by peptide nucleic acids. RSC Adv. 7, 15500–15512 (2017).
Thangaraj, B., Jia, Z., Dai, L., Liu, D. & Du, W. Effect of silica coating on Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles for lipase immobilization and their application for biodiesel production. Arab. J. Chem. 12(8), 4694–4706 (2019).
Souza, P. M. & Magalhães, P. Application of microbial α-amylase in industry: A review. Braz. J. Microbiol. 41, 850–861 (2010).
Adejumo, A. L., Aderibigbe, F. & Owolabi, R. U. Relationship between α-amylase degradation and amylose/amylopectin content of maize starches. Adv. Appl. Sci. Res. 4, 315–319 (2013).
Mehta, D. & Satyanarayana, T. Bacterial and archaeal α-amylases: diversity and amelioration of the desirable characteristics for industrial applications. Front. Microbiol. 7, 1–21 (2016).
Prajapati, V., Trivedi, U. & Patel, K. C. Bioethanol production from the raw corn starch and food waste employing simultaneous saccharification and fermentation approach. Waste Biomass Valor. 6, 191–200 (2015).
Mojovic ́, L., Nikolic ́, S., Rakin, M., & Vukasinovic ́, M. Production of bioethanol from corn meal hydrolyzates. Fuel. 85, 1750–1755 (2006).
Asada, C. & Nakamura, Y. Chemical characteristics and ethanol fermentation of the cellulose component in autohydrolyzed bagasse. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 10, 346–352 (2005).
Larrea, F. A. et al. Comparison of bioethanol production of starches from different andean tubers. Chem. Eng. Trans. 80, 259–264 (2020).
Ajinkya, N. et al. Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticle (IONP) synthesis to applications: present and future. Materials. 13, 4644 (2020).
Fang, S., Bresser, D. & Passerini, S. Transition metal oxide anodes for electrochemical energy storage in lithium- and sodium-ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 10(1), 1902485 (2020).
Magro, M., Baratella, D., de Bonaiuto, E. A., Roger, J. & Vianello, F. New perspectives on biomedical applications of iron oxide nanoparticles. Curr. Med. Chem. 25, 540–555 (2018).
Kostyantyn, T., Turek, Z., Zanáška, M., Kudrna, P. & Tichý, M. Iron oxide and iron sulfide films prepared for dye-sensitized solar cells. Materials. 13, 1797 (2020).
Wang, Q. et al. Plasma enabled Fe2O3/Fe3O4 nano-aggregates anchored on nitrogen-doped graphene as anode for sodium-ion batteries. Nanomaterials 10, 782 (2020).
Sundaram, P. A., Augustine, R. & Kannan, M. Extracellular biosynthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles by Bacillus subtilis strains isolated from rhizosphere soil. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 17, 835 (2012).
Wu, W., Wu, Z., Yu, T., Jiang, C. & Kim, W. S. Recent progress on magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: synthesis, surface functional strategies and biomedical applications. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 16(2), 023501 (2015).
Bharde, A. A. et al. Bacteria-mediated precursor-dependent biosynthesis of superparamagnetic iron oxide and iron sulfide nanoparticles. Langmuir 24, 5787 (2008).
Ruíz-Baltazar, A., Esparza, R., Rosas, G. & Pérez, R. Effect of the surfactant on the growth and oxidation of iron nanoparticles. J. Nanomaterials. 8, 240948 (2015).
Guivar, J. A. R. et al. Magnetic, structural and surface properties of functionalized maghemite nanoparticles for copper and lead adsorption. RSC Adv. 7, 28763–28779 (2017).
Darezereshki, E., Ranjbar, M. & Bakhtiari, F. One-step synthesis of maghemite (γ-Fe2O3) nano-particles by wet chemical method. J. Alloys Compd. 502(1), 257–260 (2010).
Girod, M., Vogel, S., Szczerba, W., & Thünemann, A. F. How temperature determines formation of maghemite nanoparticles. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 380, 163–167 (2015).
Rafi, M. M. et al. Synthesis, characterization and magnetic properties of hematite (α-Fe2O3) nanoparticles on polysaccharide templates and their antibacterial activity. Appl. Nano sci. 5, 515–520 (2015).
Guan, Y. et al. Study on the magnetic and in vitro simulation targeting properties of Co2+ and Dy3+ doped square γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. 30, 3396–3409 (2020).
Baskar, G., Afrin, B. N., Helan, L. G., Gayathri, V. & Jeyashree, N. Magnetic immobilization and characterization of α-amylase as nano-biocatalyst for hydrolysis of sweet potato starch. Biochem. Eng. J. 102, 18–23 (2015).
Lareo, C. et al. Evaluation of sweet potato for fuel bioethanol production: Hydrolysis and fermentation. Springer Plus. 2, 493 (2013).
Zhang, L. et al. Energy-saving direct ethanol production from viscosity reduction mash of sweet potato at very high gravity (VHG). Fuel Process. Technol. 91, 1845–1850 (2010).
Shanavas, S., Padmaja, G., Moorthy, S. N., Sajeev, M. S. & Sheriff, J. T. Process optimization for bioethanol production from cassava starch using novel eco-friendly enzymes. Biomass Bioenergy. 35, 901–909 (2011).
Vesna, M. et al. Thermo-acid pretreatment of starch based kitchen waste for ethanol production. Analecta1. 8(1), 85–90 (2014).
Södeström, L., Pilcher, L., Galbe, M. & Zacchi, G. Combined use of H2SO4 and SO2 impregnation for steam pretreatment of spruce in ethanol production. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 161, 423–431 (2009).
Jorgensen, J. H., et al. Manual of Clinical Microbiology. 11th Edition. Vol. 1, (2015).
Environment Agency’ The Microbiology of Drinking Water - Part 7 - Methods for the enumeration of heterotrophic bacteria (2012).
Abouelkheir, S. S. et al. Novel research on nanocellulose production by a marine Bacillus velezensis strain SMR: A comparative study. Sci. Rep. 10, 14202 (2020).
El-Borai, A.M., Beltagy, E.A., Gadallah, E.E., & El-Assar, S.A. Optimization of lead bioremediation by marine halomonas sp. ES015 using statistical experimental methods. Int. J. Biotech. Bioeng. 11(8), 636–643 (2017).
Abouelkheir, S. S., El-Sersy, N. A. & Sabry, S. A. Biofabrication of gold/activated carbon/polyvinyl alcohol (Au/Ac/PVA) polymer sheet and its application in seawater desalination. Desalin. Water Treat. 135, 94–100 (2018).
Yu, Z. & Zhang, H. Ethanol fermentation of acid-hydrolyzed cellulosic pyrolysate with Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Bioresour. Technol. 93, 199–204 (2004).
Yoswathana, N., Phuriphipat, P., Treyawutthiwat, P. & Eshtiaghi, M. N. Bioethanol production from rice straw. Energy Res. J. 1, 26–31 (2010).
Suleiman, W. B. In vitro estimation of superfluid critical extracts of some plants for their antimicrobial potential, phytochemistry, and GC-MS analyses. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 19, 29 (2020).
Acknowledgements
This paper is an output of Project No. 25584 funded by Science and Technology Development (STDF), Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research, Egypt, and supported by Marine Environment Division, National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries (NIOF), Egypt. As well, the authors are deeply appreciated Dr. Ahmed Gad for his valuable technical assistance and his efforts in the laboratory work during the investigation.
Funding
Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Regarding nanoparticles matter, S.S.A. was in charge for this part starting from strain isolation. She reviewed the previous studies, performed all experiments deal with synthesis, characterization, and enzyme immobilization, designed the required analyses, collected the data, analyzed, and interpreted them, and finally, wrote the manuscript draft, revised, and edited the manuscript final version. E.B. has conceived a project idea as PI and supervised all performed tasks, provided environmental samples for microbial isolation, and performed the molecular identification for both isolates producing nanoparticles and amylase enzyme. As well, outlined, modified, and adjusted the experiments providing bioethanol production, analyzed the obtained data, reviewed the previous studies, and finally wrote and revised this part in the manuscript. H.I. has provided the guidance and the experimental outline of bioethanol production and shared the manuscript writing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Abouelkheir, S.S., Ibrahim, H.A.H. & Beltagy, E.A. Functionalized maghemite superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (γ-Fe2O3-SPIONs)-amylase enzyme hybrid in biofuel production. Sci Rep 13, 11117 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37826-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37826-2
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Challenges and prospects of microbial α-amylases for industrial application: a review
World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology (2024)
-
Exploring magnetic nanomaterials with a focus on magnetic biochar in anaerobic digestion: from synthesis to application
Biochar (2024)